💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DawnB (West Virginia)
Posts: 12
Posted:
I am new here to this forum, so please bear with me. We belong to an HOA. The Board does not follow C & R and By-laws. Last year they spent almost $8,000 in attorney fees because the HOA president was mowing our common grounds and getting paid by te tresure for this. A special meeting was brought forth, but no before the rest of the board quick (3 members) The president then appointed 3 new members to the board. Which is fine IF the "old board members" were voted in at the last annual meeting. wHich they were not. you must have quorum and proxies. This HOA has never done so. The President was paid almost 5,000 for mowing the common grounds. Not to mention he mowed grounds at a foreclosed home in our community and also got paid 45.00 each time he mowed that ground. This is all without vote and knowledge to the homeowners who pay thier dues!
This is a big mess. At the special meeting in Octiber they hired their attorney to be there to answer questions as well as a mediator who gave each person 3 minutes to speak and to only speak once! This group of petitioners were needless to say "railroaded" No-one has ever been able to see the HOA records. Even after requested. Cars have been towed in the community, and the homeowners pays to get their car out. Nowhere in the By-laws or C& r's does it state that our HOA has a right to do such a thing and to fine people for any reason at all. So long story short. The "annual" meeting is coming in Feb 2006 and I just got a proxy asking to vote on the currrent budget for 2006. If our proxy is not turned into the board they are taking this as a YES vote. They cannot do this. Right? We are in WV and the laws here state that a proxy is to be signed to anyone, not just the board. HELP!
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
Always helps to know where you are located... Some advice is very state specific.

Some general advice: Minutes and actions of HOA should be available to all members, per the open meetings laws of most states. Follow up on that, and force them to open their notes.

Proxies are not allowed in all states. Arizona, for instance, outlawed them last year.

Presidents can be paid for some duties: they can't be paid to be president, but they could be paid to do landscaping, for example, if the money would otherwise be paid to other groups. The amount must be reasonable, and should be open to bidding, for example.
JimR (Colorado)
Posts: 21
Posted:
Dawn, Yes you have a mess.
1. a non-returned proxy can not be considered a yes vote!
The Board must have on file for future review the proxy and who was the designated assisgnee and they must be turned in to the Secretary of the Board and the assignee receives an offical ballot for your vote to be recoreded upon.

2. A Board member doing work for the association for pay is the biggest no no that I know of. Setting them selves up for a conflict of interest law suite big time. I would get a concerned citizens group together, get legal advice and go after that turkey for several thousands of dollars in illigally gained funds from your association.

Ethics in the HOA world is so totally lacking that I feel that the states should interfer and set guide lines. Colorado did do some work on that this year and we hope to adopt that this 2006 session of our Board.
DawnB (West Virginia)
Posts: 12
Posted:
Do you know where I can find a West Virginia Law on proxy voting inan HOA. After reading this proxy time after time. Not only does it state we can hand carry the proxy to a board memeber. It also said that a proxy not turned in will be a YES vote. Help me please!

RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
JimR, it is my understanding that a Board member can legally bid for a contract for work with the association. It does have an appearance of conflict of interest but it is legal. To reduce the appearance of conflict of interest the Board should get competative bids. The Board member bidding should not be involved in any aspects, e.g., the design of the RFP, review and discussion of bids, and the vote on awarding the bid.
DawnB (West Virginia)
Posts: 12
Posted:
Roger,
It is my understanding that if a board member does do work for the HOA and gets paid (grass cutting) he or she needs to be insured or the HOA can be brought up on charges if someone gets hurt?
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
DawnB, the HOA needs to make sure any contractor doing work for them is adequately insured. We require a copy of their insurance, liability and workers comp, be submitted with their bid. I don't know what charges you are referring to but both the Board member and the HOA would be liable.

RogerB
HankL
Posts: 47
Posted:
When my HOA was poor, I did a lot oof volunteer labor to fix the poor infrastructure. I was only reimbursed for materials as verified by receipt. That was not a big "no-no." And it helpd the community save a significant amount of money when it was struggling, and only on Common Areas. Board firings in my Association can be with or without reason, presumably by a majority of the Board.

Bring a LOT of owners to the next regular Board meeting once you have told them the same story. Have all or a majority of owners sign a petition to have the Pres resign or they will fund court action. The Pres should have avoided the appearance of conflict of interest, but is not necessarily bound by it. What your Pres has done is more than a conflict of interest. Your docs probably forbid compensation of Board members. But it could be argues that he is not the "Pres" while mowing lawns, just a laborer. But no-notice cutting on lots is troubling, although if written warning has been done right, it may be OK, with just a bad appearance.
CaryL (Arizona)
Posts: 19
Posted:
In supporting Roger's premise:

ALL contractors working for an Association should be licensed, bonded and insured. This waives Association liability should an injuries or defect occur.

Also, the IRS requires that ANY contractor you hire submits a 1099 (statement of wages). Most licensed and insured contractors do this. In your case, the Association would probably have to do it after the member filled out the appropriate W2's. These forms can be found on-line at the IRS website, or you can hire a CPA to do it for you.

Roger, please correct any/some/all portions of this if I'm off point.

Cary
HankL
Posts: 47
Posted:
Continuation of my reply

If the three who quit felt the same way, you could have successfully made a motion and passed it within the Board that the Pres was to cease and desist if not outright voted him off the Board.

Still, the whole membership needs to know the story with a letter signed by the three who quit.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
CaryL, in response to your post I don't think the Association's liability is waived. When sued most attorneys would sue any and all possible parties. Regarding the IRS, you can contract with independent contractors to eliminate having employees. This eliminates social security taxes, withholding taxes, and other admin requirements for the HOA.

Regarding licensing and bonding, I often send bids to contractors who are not licensed when not required by law. And many are not bonded. Why? Because many small independent contractors will do a better job and for less than half the price of big companies. It all depends on the project. Sometimes a Board will decide to hire a contractor who is not licensed. It is normally a "safe" situation where we would not recommend a different decision. Notwithstanding, our management Agreement protects us in these cases.

I would be interested in hearing others comments, particularly on bonding.

Roger
JimR (Colorado)
Posts: 21
Posted:
When our association took over from the declarant control it was in mid year. We had to live with the budget that they had prepared for our association and many needed line items were missing. Such as postage expense, the developer ran his communication through his office expense, and we litterly had to had deliver our local mail. Yes we too had a very poor HOA to start, and all board members went out and picked up tumble weed and wind blown trash after the common area maintenace contract ended in Oct. But as we have had to deal with more and more legal issues it became very apparent that we need to only hire licensed and fully insured contractors, and we insist on that from even the cleaning company that comes into our clubhouse.

Any Board member that works and gets paid for his activity should have a contract, license and liability insurance.

Bonding is not a big issue except for in our case where we contract an accounting firm to do our financial dealings. Only if a big construction project, would bonding be wise.

I have found that the MC that we dealt with always insisted on licensed and insured contractors, and they also tried to sneek in one that wasn't at times and still charge the higher rate and it is well known that MC's sometimes get kick-backs from the contractors.

Rule your own Association, do your own contracting with legal advice and you will save more money than contracting non-licensed contractors.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
JimR, I agree with you about ruling your own Association. Never turn over control to a manager or to an attorney. The Board should act as good stewarts of the Association's funds - get the most bang for the buck. It appears you have had experience with lousy management companies. They are one of my pet peeves.

Nevertheless, we have never found a Board which could find a good contractor at less cost than we can. For example, recently a Board had decided to hire a contractor after they obtained competative bids. Upon our entry, we got a small company - insured and no licensed required - to do the work. One project resulted in a cost reduction of over 400% and another over 100%. And no costs were incurred for an attorney. This savings during 2005 equalled more than four years payment for our management fee.

RogerB
KathleenF (Illinois)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Posted By RogerB on 01/31/2006 7:25 AM

CaryL, in response to your post I don't think the Association's liability is waived. When sued most attorneys would sue any and all possible parties. Regarding the IRS, you can contract with independent contractors to eliminate having employees. This eliminates social security taxes, withholding taxes, and other admin requirements for the HOA.

Regarding licensing and bonding, I often send bids to contractors who are not licensed when not required by law. And many are not bonded. Why? Because many small independent contractors will do a better job and for less than half the price of big companies. It all depends on the project. Sometimes a Board will decide to hire a contractor who is not licensed. It is normally a "safe" situation where we would not recommend a different decision. Notwithstanding, our management Agreement protects us in these cases.

I would be interested in hearing others comments, particularly on bonding.

Roger


BarbaraS (New Mexico)
Posts: 49
Posted:
1120H and 1099M's. We are a small (22 unit) HOA.) Our contractor signs that he/she is an "independent agent, provides all necessary insurance, workmens compensation and taxes". Do we have to submit 1099M's for them? We have an EIN (Employees ID No).
Past presidents had used their personal SSN and evidently had no dealings with the IRS regarding contractors. None of the incoming board wanted to use their personal SSN at the bank, so we applied and got an EIN. In talking with the IRS I was told that you don't have to have "employees" to have an EIN.
I had thought independent contractors would do all their own declaring and filing with the IRS. Does the HOA have to file 1099M's for these contractors? Of course I will talk again with the IRS (just a little weary of listening to "The Waltz of the Flowers") but wanted to get some opinions from all of you. You all have been such a great help in pointing me in the right direction.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
Barbara, no, you don't have to submit their forms for them. It is smart to retain a copy of the declarations from your subs, in case THEY get audited (more likely) or the HOA gets audited (fairly unlikely). Those signed items are decent proof that you did "normal, business-like" diligence in collecting documents, etc.. If your board has a history of working with rather shaky contractors, they may not be enough to sway an auditor, but if the rest of your dealings are fairly normal, those will suffice.

Another route for IRS purposes would be a Taxpayer ID, rather than an EIN. Basically the same, just different forms.
JohnM3 (Florida)
Posts: 288
Posted:
Dear Barbara: We are a rather large association located in Florida. We have our MC submit 1099s to the IRS its the employers responsibility period.The manual so states that employers shall submit.Sometimes the MC does it and sometimes they dont! But you can bet you bottom dollar if its to a vendor and they do a bad job or they have to be chased by me then I demand that a 1099 be sent and submitted to the IRS.

Next item: I thought this was a web site for BODs Volunteers and MCs but it appears what we have become is a source for people to complain about everything under the sun. Its bad enough that each state has its own laws that we should help each other is important but every time I get notice of a posting its from somebody complainning about a HOA or a condo. The name of the site is HOA Talk. Read the heading where does it say squat about being the source for people to vent about the fact they dont read what they have joined or signed into at closing!!!!!!!!
JohnM3 (Florida)
Posts: 288
Posted:
Brian B Sir with all do respect you do not understand you are not doing there work by submitting the 1099m You sir are the employer period understand that fact. The form is made out by the employer to the IRS notifing them that wages,salaries or tips were paid to a entity that possess a Social Security Number. It is your responsibility.

Reference Dawns original posting Yes its possible that they paid lawyers a lot of money. It may have been on issues that you are not even aware of . When lawyers are used to do anything includeing answering a Telephone they charge $250 dollars per hour prorated accordingly. Understand that is normal for a HOA. We have succeeded inhiring a atty to do our collections but he insurers that the member pays the freight not the HOA. That is calld being a good stuart of funds put in your trust.

Now onto the President doing work for the HOA and being paid for his/her time so what do you know of anyone doing it cheaper or are you mad that you cant do it or is it sour grapes? Did you ever stop to realize what things cost, have you ever asked?

Personally in my assoc we try hard not to do things like that cause we do our homework and realized a long time ago that that is bad news to do that as it gives the opinion of people doing things wrong.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
Sorry, i was slightly off, John is correct... we never file 1099's, as we deal with contractors that are themselves, corporations, LLC's, or incorporated legally. Wouldn't have it any other way.. it limits liability, keeps folks from being "employees", and we don't have messy IRS forms to fill out.

Thus, if you deal with independent contractors who are not incorporated, and you are a trade or business or nonprofit organization required to file a 1099, then you should if you pay more than $600 for services (but not merchandise).

Just to check, do HOA's who hire management companies file 1099's for them? Or are all MC's set up as corporations themselves?

RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Brian, MC's are normally not hired as employees; they are Agents for the association.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
just checking roger, is that because the MC is not a "person" to whom $600 is paid in a year, but a company? THe 1099 form is for paying individuals who perform work (but are not employees), but not contractors, companies, corporations, etc., correct?

JohnM3 (Florida)
Posts: 288
Posted:
Roger: You are wrong and I will send you a message with the exact irs law. MCs are employees of the BOD period. If you think not show me where it says I cant fire my MC for cause. A contract is signed and they are an employee. If I do work for a Church and it exceeds $600 dollars a year they ssue me a 1099 and send a copy to the IRS. That sir is the law period.
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Posted By JohnM3 on 12/25/2006 9:19 AM

Roger: You are wrong and I will send you a message with the exact irs law. MCs are employees of the BOD period. If you think not show me where it says I cant fire my MC for cause. A contract is signed and they are an employee. If I do work for a Church and it exceeds $600 dollars a year they ssue me a 1099 and send a copy to the IRS. That sir is the law period.


John, I believe you are wrong. I hired a contractor to do some work on my house for about $6,000. I paid the contractor (a company). I do not expect to send them a 1099. Neither do I expect to send a 1099 form to the company that repaved my driveway.

As for "firing" a MC, I don't think "firing" is the correct term. Depending on the wording of the contract you can terminate their services. You may consider this to be "firing" and it may have the same effect, but it's not "firing" them. If I decide to discontinue my agreement with Comcast for cable TV, I am not "firing" them.

Ron
SC
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
John, please provide your citation/IRS information here (and not just privately to roger), because this is an interesting topic, and we can all learn the rights from wrongs. I know that every bit of info helps me, and i am learning about this topic already, and hope to learn more...

hoatalk (California)
Posts: 603
Posted:
Posted By JohnM3 on 12/24/2006 2:42 PM

Next item: I thought this was a web site for BODs Volunteers and MCs but it appears what we have become is a source for people to complain about everything under the sun. Its bad enough that each state has its own laws that we should help each other is important but every time I get notice of a posting its from somebody complainning about a HOA or a condo. The name of the site is HOA Talk. Read the heading where does it say squat about being the source for people to vent about the fact they dont read what they have joined or signed into at closing!!!!!!!!


JohnM3: Many posts are deleted soon after posting, if they are against our rules. We are trying to be proactive in removing posts that go against our posting rules (e.g. posts from individual homeowners that are not volunteers). We don't catch them all and even do allow some through if we feel other members could learn from the answers.

Also, we support board and volunteer talk about all community associations (HOAs, COAs, POAs, etc), even though the name is HOATalk. We just had to choose a short name and HOA-COA-POA-Talk.com would be a bit long (Just kidding :-)

I guess we should clarify the rules so people know it's for all types of community associations.

Happy Holidays,
HOATalk.com


HOATalk.com, A free service of Community123.com
Provider of Upscale Community Websites
CLICK HERE to get a FREE trial community website
*See legal notice below (end of page)
JohnM3 (Florida)
Posts: 288
Posted:


John, I believe you are wrong. I hired a contractor to do some work on my house for about $6,000. I paid the contractor (a company). I do not expect to send them a 1099. Neither do I expect to send a 1099 form to the company that repaved my driveway.

As for "firing" a MC, I don't think "firing" is the correct term. Depending on the wording of the contract you can terminate their services. You may consider this to be "firing" and it may have the same effect, but it's not "firing" them. If I decide to discontinue my agreement with Comcast for cable TV, I am not "firing" them.

I will try to answer you questions 1 at a time.

1. When you hire a contractor you are the employer. If you think not lets say he is a roofer and he falls and gets hurt, you have no contract his lawyer sues you. Kiss your home good bye cause he is gonna get it in court unless you have a contract that states he has workmens comp insurance . That is a Florida and New York Law. As far as the 1099 is concerned you are absolved of the requirement for a 1099 by virtue of the fact you are not a corporation or a registered business when work is accomplished on your home. But if you claim your home as a business you can show expenses but you must be registered and have a tax ID code number
.But A HOA or A Condo Assoc, or A Co-op is a corporation period. Each state is different but all Not For Profits are required to file data to the IRS. On a yearly basis The reason for that is you are required to file a Yearly Tax Form as a HOA. You will be charged a flat tax of 30Percent for all income not achieved as Assessments. If the IRS goes for a full scale audit you have been showing pay outs to different vendors. So it only makes sense for them to ask where are the copies of the 1099s to verify monies changed hands. without a paper trail the IRS can disallow almost anything they feel is above or beyond norms. Remember Tax Law in America is not English Law but is setup as French Law. Thats why there is a seperate Tax Courts.
English Law is innocent unless proven otherwise. French Law is Guilty unless otherwise proven.

Reference terminology firing, termination of a agreement is all the same it also known as restructureing or downsizing but it is still the same NO MO DOUGH. Most MC contracts use the term cessation of duties which also means firing its samantics. Never ever forget with all Vendors the BOD does based on there docs have the right of termination or firing. They dont like it buts that is what it boils down to

Have a nice day

Meaning in English if you get a check for $5000 from a tv station for the use of community property the first 30 percent is property of The United States Federal Government. Then you get into state, city,county taxing authority. But never ever forget a HOA is a
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
I wonder if the difference here is that John is speaking of hiring an individual, and Roger and I are speaking of hiring companies, but we both use the term "contractor" because in both cases, that is commonly used terminology. A "roofer" could be a single person, or a "roofer" could be a company with 56 employees, foremen, and crews.

Here's a question to help clarify: John and Roger: If I hire Truly Nolen (or Terminex or...) to come out and spray for termites along our fencelines, our clubhouse, and our poolhouse, I do not believe I need to file a 1099, because they are a company. They hire their own employees, they have work comp for them, pay their wages, etc.. However, if I hire Terri Spindley to do the same thing, I may well need to file a 1099, because Terri is a single person, and I am acting as Terri's employer for the duration of the job.

Is that a valid synopsis?
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Brian, I do not concur with many of John's statements. Most HOA's do not hire employees. They hire independent contractors. The association contracts with a MC to be their Managing Agent and in the Agreement there is wording allowing either party to terminate the Agreement. When there is no employee I do not think an IRS form 1099 is required. A contract and insurance, mechanics lien, indemnification, etc. should always be considered when work is done for either an association or an individual homeowner.

I suggest hiring both Terminex (Truly Nolen) and Terri Spindley as an independent contractors - neither as an employee. For additional information on advantages of not having employees one can go to google.com and search "independent contractor".

John may wish to further clarify his comments and post his references. Perhaps his experience has been with employee/employer relationships.
hoatalk (California)
Posts: 603
Posted:
It appears Roger is correct. First, this note is opinion and we are not CPAs. This is not professional advice....

See the attached IRS publication and the following web links:
http://www.irs.gov/charities/article/0,,id=128602,00.html
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p15a.pdf

The IRS document above states:
"People such as lawyers, contractors, subcontractors, and auctioneers who follow an independent trade, business, or profession in which they offer their services to the public, are generally not employees."

In addition, you can see at this link
http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=98114,00.html

that for 'employees' you must file a W-2, not a 1099.

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_1099
You find "A notable use of Form 1099 is to report amounts paid to independent contractors (in IRS terminology, such payments are nonemployee compensation). The ubiquity of the form has also led to use of the phrase "1099" to refer to contractors themselves. U.S. tax law requires businesses to submit a Form 1099 for every contractor paid more than $600 for services during a year. This requirement usually does not apply to corporations receiving payments."


HOATalk.com, A free service of Community123.com
Provider of Upscale Community Websites
CLICK HERE to get a FREE trial community website
*See legal notice below (end of page)
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
First, an "employee" must be a single person, not a group of people. These would be "employees".

Second, when one hires an "employee", wouldn't one be required to pay unemployment insurance and withold social security and federal, state, and local income taxes? Be subject to minimum wage laws? Fair hiring laws? Fair labor laws?

When we hire a contractor, he/she is responsible for all of the above. We pay the money and see the results.

Ron
SC
hoatalk (California)
Posts: 603
Posted:
One more bit of info..An example fromt the IRS on when to file a 1099-MISC for hiring of an independent contractor. It seems the distinction is whether or not the contractor is a corporation ir not.

From: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1099msc.pdf

"Illustrated example. The completed Form 1099-MISC illustrates the following example. Z Builders is a contractor that
subcontracts drywall work to Ronald Green, a sole proprietor who does business as Y Drywall. During the year, Z Builders pays
Mr. Green $5,500. Z Builders must file Form 1099-MISC because they paid Mr. Green $600 or more in the course of their trade
or business, and Mr. Green is not a corporation."

HOATalk.com, A free service of Community123.com
Provider of Upscale Community Websites
CLICK HERE to get a FREE trial community website
*See legal notice below (end of page)
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
to help confuse and clarify..

Ron, not necessarily would you have to pay minimum wage, work comp, etc. for hiring a single employee. In general, US laws about wages, fair labor, EEOC, etc. apply to businesses with minimum amounts of employees. The minimum amount varies by statute, but it may take 2, 4, 8, 12, or 25 before said laws kick in.

An interesting thing about the 1099 "rules" is the ruling of primacy: If you read the IRS instructions about the 1099 form in general, it states that BUSINESSES must comply with the filing of the forms, and specifically defines a Business in the documents to exclude HOA's. It then states you can look at the rules for the various 1099 forms (1099 A, 1099 B, 1099 INT, 1099 MISC) for further instructions. Only in the instructions for the 1099 MISC does the IRS specifically state that non-profits are to be included in filing the forms.

Thus, one could argue that an HOA intended to comply, read the PRIMARY rules for filing of 1099's, and determined that they didn't, by definition, apply. Therefore, there was no reason to read the minutae under each (assumed) non-applicable form, to see if the rules changed.

I liken it to a set of laws that state "All US citizens Born or Raised in Texas must file one of the following forms: FOrm A, FOrm B, Form C, or Form D. See the applicable forms for instructions on who should file each.".

Then, in the directions for Form C, it tells you "All US Citizens born or raised in Texas, or Arkansas, must file this form.".

How many people from Arkansas, seeing the primary rule, would read all the rest to see if they had to fill out the form or not? I bet ZERO would.
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Posted By BrianB on 12/26/2006 12:34 PM

to help confuse and clarify..

Ron, not necessarily would you have to pay minimum wage, work comp, etc. for hiring a single employee. In general, US laws about wages, fair labor, EEOC, etc. apply to businesses with minimum amounts of employees. The minimum amount varies by statute, but it may take 2, 4, 8, 12, or 25 before said laws kick in.

.................


Yes, some of the rules apply to businesses with "X" number of employees. I could be wrong, but I believe witholding taxes and SS applies to any employer.

I remember stories of people getting into trouble by not witholding taxes and SS for "maids" that they hire.


Ron
SC
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
which leads us back to the filing of a 1099 for a single person/employee.. doing the 1099 puts the burden on the "hiree" person to file their withholding, SS, etc., rather than each of the hundreds of people/companies who hire them in a year. The 1099 makes the "employer" tell the IRS how much money they gave the employee, so they can check to make sure the employee paid taxes, SS, withholding, etc. on it.

You are right, the IRS liked to nail BOTH halves of the equation, the homeowner for not treating the maid as an employee, or even as an independent contractor (and thus, filing 1099's) and the maid, for not doing withholding, etc. on the money earned. eventually, the IRS wants to know where all the cash went...
JohnM3 (Florida)
Posts: 288
Posted:
First, an "employee" must be a single person, not a group of people. These would be "employees".

Second, when one hires an "employee", wouldn't one be required to pay unemployment insurance and withold social security and federal, state, and local income taxes? Be subject to minimum wage laws? Fair hiring laws? Fair labor laws?

When we hire a contractor, he/she is responsible for all of the above. We pay the money and see the results.

The form 1099 misc is designed for use of Sole-Propriortoship business. IE moms the office mgr pops the plumber, or electrican, or what ever. It is also used very simply. So that Employers do not want the headaches of soc sec etc.
Now follow the logic.
The HOA is the employer thats 1 of the reasons you have EINs. At the end of the year you file x amount of money paid to abc electric, xyz landscape company and so on. The IRS on a General Audit wants a paper trail on every single cent charged off as a expense to an entity company,corporation, etc.Otherwise you could put down anything under the sun.Hence the rules are very specific and my tax man told me catagoricly yes anytime monies are given to any person performing functions for a HOA and more than $600 is going to be dispensed to them. You are supposed to hand them a W9 form and at the end of the year send in a 1099 form to the US Govt .

HOAs are Catagoryized as a "Type C Corporation Not For Profit", and thats what we genarilly are classified as. The 1099 absolves the employer from withholding, social security and many other headaches. It is a good thing. It also stops all the other nonsense that the Federal Govt tries to do to small businesses. It is common practice in Building Trades to hire people as 1099 Sole-Propriotors.The same holds true for many small businesses.
JohnM3 (Florida)
Posts: 288
Posted:
Brian: Do you have a job? Who do you think pays the soc sec and all the other expenses of a large corpoation. When Worker Second Grade farms are sent out(W-2) a copy goes to the IRS.
Whenn you become part of a BOD you become fiscally responsible for what ever takes place. You also have a fiduciary responsibility to your association to do what is right and proper. You become the defacto employer.
That makes you responsible for anything to do with the financial aspects of your association.I have many times hired 1099 type of businessess and make it part of the contract that they furnish us a copy of there workers comp in Florida. NY is a different situation cause in New York the state runs the workers comp it is run totally by them. Each employee or 1099 pays 1.50 per week per person to the state.Thats where they get the money to fund it.

BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
John, i will try to answer your questions as best i can:

"Do you have a job? Who do you think pays the soc sec and all the other expenses of a large corpoation."

Yes, i do. any my corporation and I both pay Social security. My corporation pays most of the other expenses of itself, which is fair, since it spends most of the other expenses itself, not me.

" Second, when one hires an "employee", wouldn't one be required to pay unemployment insurance and withold social security and federal, state, and local income taxes? Be subject to minimum wage laws? Fair hiring laws? Fair labor laws?

It all depends John: If i hire someone as an individual, certain rules apply. If i hire them as a company, other rules apply. depending on who they are, or how much they make, or the job industry they work in, other rules apply. It also depends on the state i am in. For instance, I can hire the boy next door to mow my lawn, direct his work, and pay him. And yet, I don't have to file a 1099, pay his unemployment, Social Security, etc. I can also hire workers, as a huge corporation, and not be subject to minimum wage laws... For instance, Applebee's or Red Lobster, or SBM or ARC/Recycling Centers of America. They hire thousands of employees, and don't pay minimum wage. I can also run a small company, hire two people to work for me, and not be subject to OSHA, Fair labor laws, EEOC, etc., because i am below their scope/legal limits, or out of their jurisdiction.

There are very few rules that apply to everyone, and every situation, which is why Roger and I are trying to understand what you mean when you speak of hiring contractors: are you speaking of the single person, Mr. Bob the plumber? or are you talking Rotor Rooter, or Paul's Plumbing, with 75 plumbers on call?

I believe Roger and I are hiring contractors that are companies in themselves, and thus, our advice that filing 1099's is not necessary is correct. Your advice seems good for HOA's hiring individual people... you must file a 1099 for them, yes. But until we can all agree that a contractor can be used to signify both individuals and companies, we will go round and round this bush, without resolution.

Barbara's original comment was about a contractor they hired. I saw that as a contractor/company, not requiring 1099's. I assume you see that as a contractor/individual, requiring 1099's, but have not clarified that yet (unless i missed it). If that is correct, i think we all agree, but i can't be sure until i know the definitions you are using in your thoughts.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here