💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

EM2 (California)
Posts: 28
Posted:
We are bidding out our master policy for the first time in donkey's years. We have narrowed down to State Farm (who was our former provider) and Traveler's, who is significantly cheaper.

Does anyone have any experiences (positive or negative) with either company? I've only ever worked with State Farm and I think that makes me biased in feeling like they are the more "trustworthy" company, but I don't have any real reason to think that...

Any experience would be appreciated!
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
EM,

This thread is bordering on violating the Rules for Posting Messages.

I will say that our Association has had no problem with either of them.
EM2 (California)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Whooops, sorry about that.

If anyone wants to email me privately through the site with any experiences, that would be great. Thanks!
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Got an e-mail address?

I don't believe this site provides access to your e-mail.
EM2 (California)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Sorry, when I go to "my profile" it gives me the option so I assumed it was there for all emails, but apparently it JUST gives me the option to email myself and no one else. you can reach me at [email protected].

Thanks!
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Too bad this thread died so quickly.

I was hoping that after the original question was answered we could take up some other important issues. Ford versus Chevy, for example. Red States versus Blue. Republican versus Democrat. My religion versus yours. Whether the toilet paper should roll off from the front or the back. Important stuff.

EM2 (California)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Clearly we don't have a "people who have nothing to do with their time and make people coming to this board looking for help try to feel stupid" vs "people who come to this board to offer up genuine advice to those asking" debate.

Its pretty clear where you'd fall on that one. Does it make you feel good about yourself to come on this board and ridicule everyone who posts? Or everyone whose posts don't meet some fantasy standard in your head of what you personally deem worthy should be on a public posting board? Perhaps you should apply for a job approval all posts before they go public to see if you deem them worth of discussing OR, you could simply ignore the ones that don't meet your standard -- but clearly you have nothing else to do but post even when you aren't interested in the subject.

Can you really find nothing better to do with your time?

How very sad a life you must lead.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Sorry, but you came here expecting a factual answer to an opinion-based question. What you asked is precisely the same as Ford v. Chevy. Whatever answers you might have received would be anecdotal, at best, and rely heavily on personal experiences and personal prejudices instead of objective analysis.

I am sorry that you took offense at my response as no offense was intended. Rather, it was a commentary on the futility of asking questions that one cannot expect to be answered objectively.

EM2 (California)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Asking people if they've had good or bad experiences with a company is not opinion, if they did, its a fact. If they didn't, that's also a fact. If someone tells me they had a terrible experience making claims with one versus another, that is useful information to me, and its my problem to decide how much or little weight I put toward that answer.

The point of these boards is to tap the masses of experience here. Obviously if one person has a bad experience that doesn't mean everyone will, but certainly some input from a large group is better than none. I never asked anyone to make a decision for me, I asked for peoples experiences so I can use that as a contributing factor in my decision-making. If I do a poor job in making a decision because I didn't gather information well, that's MY problem, and your attempt to point out that you thought I was seeking useless information doesn't change that one bit.

If you don't like questions people ask, simply don't respond. Your post contributed NOTHING to the thread (except a failed attempt to make me feel stupid, whether that was your intended goal or not, certainly any person reading it would take it that way), which you have also done in other posts that I've initiated as well as I've seen others I've seen. It completely devalues the point of these boards if people feel like when they post they are going to get useless responses that serve no purpose but to let them know you think they, or their question, was stupid.

Simply ignore it if its not something you care to deal with, but don't belittle people who come here seeking advice and input just b/c you don't like what they asked.

I'm sure you have MASSIVE amounts of useful information to help people with. I and others would love to get that from you. But this is just a waste of everyone's time and devalues the board.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
EM2, I can relate to deciding between two insurance companies. But what got my attention was that you wrote that one policy was significantly cheaper.

This got me to wondering, if you have had the various Insurance Agents make presentations, and explain the differences, and/or similarities, between the policies offered.

When we were reviewing our Master Policy, it was during the presentations that we asked, or the agent trying to “sell us” their policy, would tell us “how easy” it might be if we needed to file a claim with the Insurance Company they represented.

Using some made up figures. If the policy had been costing, let’s say $15,000, and the Quotes come in maybe $300-$400 either side, I would consider those bids competitive – and that is where, for me the “the intangibles” might come into play.

However, if one of the Quotes came in at $12,000 ($3,000 under) - that would be great, and a significant savings - but I would want to know why, and seek answers, before even considering any intangibles.
EM2 (California)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Hi Ellie, yes once we got down to those two, we had both agents make pitches. We actually sent each other the others policies so they could point out where they were better. At this point we can't find enough good reason to go with the more expensive one...
NancyG3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 342
Posted:
EM2 - There are two types of insurance companies one is a captive agency who only works for one company. The 2nd is an independent agency and they have multifply companies they represent. The difference between a captive and an independent is the commission. The most important thing to consider is if the coverage is the same, or better, when your Board decides to go with the cheaper premium. Hope I'm not out of line by posting this.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
We have used state farm and peerless (liberty mutual). Nothing special about either. Its good to switch every 3 years, just to keep rates low. The insurance companies just keep creeping up, you have to switch to get a lower rate, then creep up again.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
This thread is bordering on violating the Rules for Posting Messages


There are only a few companies that insure HOAs. It's beneficial to everyone to discuss them.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here