💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

ZacheryK (Florida)
Posts: 34
Posted:

Our FL HOA needs to revise and update our governing documents from the late ‘60’s. To enact amendments:

1. The Declaration of Restrictions requires Mortgagees consent. All banks, insurance companies and Federal S&L that hold a first mortgage.

2. The Articles of Incorporation do not require consent by Mortgagees.

3. The By-Laws requires Mortgagees consent. All banks, insurance companies and Federal S&L that hold a first mortgage

We estimate there are at least 20-30 financial institutions that hold first mortgages, perhaps more. Though cumbersome at best these are the procedures we must adhere to.

Is the consent of Mortgagees for amendment a common provision or unusual?

Is there a recommended strategy to accomplish consensus from the financial institutions?

Is it better to submit amendments to institutions, pre-approved by the membership, in small pieces that are easy to digest or the whole document at once?

One concern is an institution would like to see a change in some wording, another institution would like to see a change in a different section. This process could go on for years without results. Suggestions?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Funny to see Federal Savings and Loans in your statement. Those have been gone for almost 30 years. I would consult an attornery familiar with corporate law or contracts law. Not real estate law. It's best to have an expert to help guide you all through this.

Former HOA President
ZacheryK (Florida)
Posts: 34
Posted:
My error for not being specific. The exact wording is “these restrictions may not be amended without the consent of each bank, insurance company or federal savings and loan association holding a purchase money first mortgage upon a Lot.”

Today, the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Thrift Institutions issues federal charters for savings and loan associations and savings banks.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Our CC&Rs have that requirement too, Zachery (but not our bylaws.) Our CC&Rs, however, also provide for something like the following: We'd send proposed amendments, to the lenders and if we didn't hear back from them within a certain period of time, their silence would constitute agreement. So make sure your CC&Rs don't have similar provision.'d

I may be wrong, but my guess is that most of them wouldn't be interested in your CC&Rs.

I'd do the CC&R revisions first and send them out for a vote. It'll be expensive for the attorney, mailings, etc. What % of lots must vote yes to amend your CC&Rs? Your bylaws?
ZacheryK (Florida)
Posts: 34
Posted:
Carol, our CC&R’s are clear and precise on consent, it's mandatory, there’s no wiggle room. Many years ago the HOA had to file a rescind letter for Amendments that were filed and recorded because they were later found not to be approved by all lenders. We don’t want to repeat that mistake.

I agree that changes to the CC&R’s that do not affect the residence proper would not be of concern to the lenders, i.e., parking, landscaping, pets, etc. hence it should be straightforward to gain approval on those. That’s the course I’ve suggested – do the “no brainer” issues first. There are others who feel it’s the difficult issues that really need to addressed, i.e., the HOA is responsible for maintaining roofs, but for financial reasons would like to shift the costs to the Owners. I may be incorrect but I don’t see that lenders would be receptive to that change.

To amend the Declaration of Restrictions requires 2/3rds of members, the Articles require 75% of Board and 60% of members or 80% of members, and the By-Laws require 75% of Board and 75% of members or 80% of members.
KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
Have your covenants and restrictions been properly preserved in regards to the Marketable Record Title Act? If not then your covenants may be expired thus non existent and you may have a few more steps in revitalizing your documents.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Kevin I believe MRTA is specific to Florida.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Zachery our CC&R's also require approval by the first mortgage holder but also includes this: No amendment shall have any effect, however, upon a bona fide first mortgagee until the written consent to such amendment of such mortgagee has been secured. Such consents shall be retained by the Secretary of the Association and his certification in the instrument of amendment as to the names of the
consenting and non-consenting mortgagees of the various Units shall be sufficient for reliance by the general public. If less than all mortgagees consent to an amendment to this Declaration and / or the By-Laws attached hereto as Exhibit C said amendment or modification shall nevertheless be valid among the Unit Owners, inter sese, provided that the rights of a non-consenting mortgagee shall not be derogated thereby.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GlenL on 02/18/2013 1:52 PM
Zachery our CC&R's also require approval by the first mortgage holder but also includes this: No amendment shall have any effect, however, upon a bona fide first mortgagee until the written consent to such amendment of such mortgagee has been secured. Such consents shall be retained by the Secretary of the Association and his certification in the instrument of amendment as to the names of the
consenting and non-consenting mortgagees of the various Units shall be sufficient for reliance by the general public. If less than all mortgagees consent to an amendment to this Declaration and / or the By-Laws attached hereto as Exhibit C said amendment or modification shall nevertheless be valid among the Unit Owners, inter sese, provided that the rights of a non-consenting mortgagee shall not be derogated thereby.

Which says/means what??????????
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Which means that even if the mortgage holder doesn't agree - remember the HOA contract is between three parties, the HOA, the Homeowner and the mortgage holder - that the homeowner is still bound by the agreement unless it would negatively impact the mortgage holder.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Damn..no edit

Our Covenants (filed in 2006) have one whole page (Article) titled Mortgagee Provisions many docs have such. I am not going to quote them but I will tell a real life story.

In one HOA I was a member of (3-4 side by side townhouses per building) the BOD/ACC came out with several "allowed" modifications that some had been requesting like awnings, deck extensions, window modifications, etc. One resident/owner who was a building Property Manager for a high rise condo management company objected to some of the changes and said that a Mortgage Holder would have to approve such changes.

Well she did send the BOD scurrying to our lawyer. The lawyer sent a letter to the BOD explaining to/showing them how and where that she was incorrect. If memory serves me correctly (I am not nor do I play a lawyer) the main difference was we were townhouses, not condos and it had something to do with with shared common areas.

One part of our docs on this do say:

Failure of Mortgagee to Respond.
Any Mortgagee whe receives a written request from the BOD to repond to or consent to any action shall be deemed to have approved such action if the Association does not receive a written response from the Mortgagee within 3o days of the date of the Associations request.

He!!..any request would most certainly get lost in any good size mortage holding company for well over 30 days.......LOL

CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Yes, John, ours says the same thing as yours, as I note above, but apparently Zachery's do not have that provision.

And, Zachery, given that you want to make that major, major roof revision, I think I like your idea of sending out all of the "easy" revisions first, and after that's all settled, send out the tougher one(s). You need a lot of owners to approve the amendments and some (many?) of them may not want the roof revision either.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Zach

Mortgage holders or not, I doubt the owners would approve any major financial burden change such as responsibility of the roofs from the association to them.

Especially true if man owners are part time residents and/or older residents concerned about their "limited" income.

Candidly I do not see the banks as your main problem. I see the main problem as you all trying shift the financial burden...but I could be wrong...and it will not be the first time.

Depending on your type of construction, shifting the responsibility for the roofs could also be opening up a real Pandora's box.

ZacheryK (Florida)
Posts: 34
Posted:
Wow! I had to step away for a few hours and thank you so much for your input. I'm new on the site and am not sure how to box quotes and respond so.....

Regarding MRTA....Our HOA went through a Recordation of Revitalized Documents in late 2004 in compliance with Chapter 720.407 of Florida Statutes. I was not a member at the time but that would have been the ideal time clean up some of the old language. But they did not. They revived the original documents exactly.

Our Amendment Article is short and not so sweet. "AMENDMENT REQUIRES MORTGAGEES CONSENT: These restrictions may not be amended without the consent of each bank, insurance company or federal savings and loan association holding a purchase money first mortgage upon a LOT in the SUBDIVISION and the approval of at least two-thirds of the lot owners, either voting at a meeting or expressing consent in writing or any combination of the above."

I used the roof issue as an example and agree that the membership not would support that measure...but...over the years certain rules have been adopted that are contrary to the CC&R's and have become ingrained as gospel. Currently the general understanding is that each owner is responsible for their own. It's a delicate situation.

I think my questions may have answered. It's not uncommon for HOA's to have mortgagees consent for amendment. Ours is strict, perhaps too strict. Perhaps we should consider amending the amendment process to incorporate some of the T's and C's mentioned above.

Go with the easy items first. It will start the process of acquiring member approval and finding out who has a first mortgage, who the lender is, and who the contact person is in their legal department.

Another question that comes to mind is "do the members have an obligation to disclose their lenders to the HOA for the purpose of the amendment process? There's nothing in the governing docs that requires that.

This was my first post and am sure it won't be my last. Hopefully, one day I will be able to make a contribution as well...thank you all so much!

ZacheryK (Florida)
Posts: 34
Posted:
As an afterthought to a member disclosing their lender.....in the By-Laws Article on Mortgage: No Lot Owner may mortgage his Lot or any interest therein without the approval of the Association, except to a bank, insurance company, or federal savings and loan association."

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Zachery,

Courts have universally held that covenants are a contract between property owners. Yours makes it a contract between owners and anyone the property owner has contracted with for a mortgage.

You need good solid legal advice. As others have pointed out, your covenants may be expired under MRTA. The inclusion of non-owners in the covenants and the impossibility of compliance may be grounds for reformation by the court.

KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
Sorry. Thought I read the poster was from Florida. My mistake.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Keven you got that idea from the title of the topic:

"FL HOA - Mortgagees Consent for Amendments"

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here