💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AliceS3 (Colorado)
Posts: 5
Posted:
Where can I get information on establishing a 55 Plus community in CO. My HOA wants to change to this designation and says only the HOA Board can vote to change - not the homeowners. I don't know what the Colorado regs are on this.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
This would most likely require an amendment to your CC&Rs.
Your CC&Rs should specify what is required to amend that document.

JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
also see:

http://www.hud.gov/offices/fheo/library/hopa95.pdf
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AliceS3 on 02/08/2013 1:02 PM
Where can I get information on establishing a 55 Plus community in CO. My HOA wants to change to this designation and says only the HOA Board can vote to change - not the homeowners. I don't know what the Colorado regs are on this.

Your board needs to consult with a attorney. Trying to convert an existing association to a 55+ community is far more difficult than starting one from scratch.

The Arizona Court of Appeals ruled on a case in 2005 where an association attempted to impose a 55+ restriction with a change in the bylaws. In Wilson v. Playa de Serrano, the court held that restrictions on the use of property require a change to the covenants and not the bylaws. The case is available online at http://www.appeals2.az.gov/Decisions/CV20050072Opinion.pdf.

Ironically, in Wilson the bylaw change required and received approval of 75% of the members. In most associations, this would be a sufficient number to amend the covenants.

Based on the case cited here, unless your covenants specifically allow the board to impose a 55+ restriction, your board is wrong. The owners must approve such a change to the use of their property.
AliceS3 (Colorado)
Posts: 5
Posted:
Our CC&R's DO have a Section that states that the Board MAY make rules which limit maximum occupancy and restrict the ages of occupants. For 10 years this has never been acted on. The 28 townhome units in our gated community were never Sold to us as a 55 & Older Community. Now, the new HOA president is flexing his control muscles by instigating this (with the encouragement of our Management Company)to supposedly provide a solution for a problem that doesn't exist! We have never had any disruptive or other issue in our HOA that would precipitate this. A Booard meeting is on Tuesday the 12th - it should be pretty lively for a change!
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AliceS3 on 02/08/2013 1:02 PM
Where can I get information on establishing a 55 Plus community in CO. My HOA wants to change to this designation and says only the HOA Board can vote to change - not the homeowners. I don't know what the Colorado regs are on this.

Why would you want to do such?

Thanks
BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
I would stronly advise against this even if you could. I live in a 55+ community. We have having problems getting a young man to vacate his deceased grandmother's unit. (He did not inherit the unit.) He is quiet and has caused no other problems that can be proven. (Thefts started when he moved in, but new owners moved in about the same time)
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
Below is a link that provides “instructions” as to what must happen in order to convert to a “55 and over” community:

http://www.fairhousing.com/include/media/pdf/conversiontohousingforolderpersons.pdf

Here are some excerpts from this HUD Memo dated March 6, 2006:

“This memorandum provides clarification on how communities that did not convert to "housing for older persons" by May 3, 2000, can become housing for older persons. There are two ways to establish housing for older persons after the transition period: conversion and new construction”.

“First, an existing community or facility can convert to "housing for older persons" if 80 percent of its occupied units become occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older.

Unlike during the transition period, housing providers cannot discriminate against families with children in order to achieve 80 percent occupancy by persons 55 or older. In other words, a community or facility cannot reserve unoccupied units for persons 55 or older, advertise itself as housing for older persons, or evict families with children in order to reach the 80 percent threshold. If a family with children seeks to occupy a vacant unit in an existing facility before it has met all of the requirements necessary to become housing for older persons, the community or facility must permit the family to live there.

Additionally, the facility may not make existing families with children feel unwelcome or otherwise encourage those families to move. While the facility or community may not take any measures deliberately designed to discourage families with children from continuing to reside in the community, nothing prevents the offering of positive incentives that might lead some families to seek housing elsewhere.

If the community or facility achieves the 80 percent threshold, without discriminating against families with children, it may then publish and adhere to policies and procedures that demonstrate an intent to provide housing for persons 55 years or older and comply with verification of occupancy rules.

The facility or community cannot publish such policies or procedures in advance of meeting the 80 percent threshold (without discrimination) as such policies and procedures would have a chilling impact upon potential applicants or current occupants who are families with children.”
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
Also see: http://www.hud.gov/offices/fheo/library/hopa95.pdf

Here is an excerpt from the preface:

“The Housing for Older Persons Act (HOPA), signed into law by President Clinton on December 28, 1995, amended the housing for older persons exemption against familial status discrimination. The HOPA modified the statutory definition of housing for older persons as housing intended and operated for occupancy by at least one person 55 years of age or older per unit. It eliminated the requirement that housing for older persons have significant services and facilities specifically designed for its elderly residents. It required that facilities or communities claiming the exemption establish age verification procedures. It established a good faith reliance defense or exemption against monetary damages for persons who illegally act in good faith to exclude children based on a legitimate belief that the housing facility or community was entitled to the exemption.”
-------------------------

Then following are 44 Questions and Answers. Here are just a few excerpts

Question 3
What must a housing community or facility do to qualify for the 55 or older housing for older persons exemption?

Answer
In order to qualify for the exemption, the housing community/facility must satisfy each of the following requirements:

a) at least 80 percent of the occupied units must be occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older per unit;

b) the owner or management of the housing facility/community must publish and adhere to policies and procedures that demonstrate an intent to provide housing for persons 55 years or older; and

c) the facility/community must comply with rules issued by the Secretary for verification of occupancy through reliable surveys and affidavits.

Question 7
What information should a housing provider include in its survey of residents in order to calculate whether the community or facility meets the 80% requirement of HOPA?

Answer
The owner or manager should obtain the total number of units in the housing community or facility. From that number, the following units should be excluded from the calculation of the 80% requirement:

a) the number of units that have been continuously occupied by the same household since September 13, 1988, and the household did not contain and does not currently contain at least one person over the age of 55;

b) the number of unoccupied units (see question 22);

c) the number of units occupied by employees of the housing facility or community who are under 55 years of age, and who provide substantial management and maintenance services to the housing facility or community

d) the number of units occupied solely by persons who are necessary or essential to provide medical and/or health and nursing care services as a reasonable accommodation to residents.

The owner or management then should calculate the percentage of the remaining number of units that are occupied by at least one person age 55 or over as of the date of the survey or the alleged date of violation of the Act.

Question 16
May a housing facility/community impose an age limitation more restrictive than that required by HOPA and qualify for the 55 or older exemption?

Answer
Yes. For example, the housing facility/community may require that at least 80 percent of the units be occupied by at least one person 60 years of age or older. The housing facility/community may require that 100% of the units are occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older, or that 80% of the units be occupied exclusively by persons aged 55 or older. However, the facility/community should review other state and local laws, including fair housing laws that may prohibit discrimination based on age, before establishing policies and procedures restricting occupancy based on age, or affecting survivors' rights to property, that are not covered under HOPA.
EdmundS1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 45
Posted:
The key is your covenants, not the by-laws. They will have to amended by vote of the residents and that may require 75% agreeing to the change.

Good Luck, we have a group of residents who wanted to go 55+ (150 patio and town homes). It's easy to meet the requirements but pointless if the HOA does not have the power to restrict sales in the covenants....and in today's housing market getting 75% of the residents to agree is impossible....who wants their sale options restricted in todays housing market?

Ed
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EdmundS1 on 02/10/2013 10:33 AM
The key is your covenants, not the by-laws. They will have to amended by vote of the residents and that may require 75% agreeing to the change.

Good Luck, we have a group of residents who wanted to go 55+ (150 patio and town homes). It's easy to meet the requirements but pointless if the HOA does not have the power to restrict sales in the covenants....and in today's housing market getting 75% of the residents to agree is impossible....who wants their sale options restricted in todays housing market?

Ed

Good point. Any "new" restriction that would hurt real estate sales has little to no chance of passing.

RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AliceS3 on 02/08/2013 1:02 PM
Where can I get information on establishing a 55 Plus community in CO. My HOA wants to change to this designation and says only the HOA Board can vote to change - not the homeowners. I don't know what the Colorado regs are on this.

I think it would take approval of every homeowner to do this; check with a good HOA attorney. If so, forget about trying.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AliceS3 on 02/09/2013 11:00 AM
Our CC&R's DO have a Section that states that the Board MAY make rules which limit maximum occupancy and restrict the ages of occupants.

Sooo, a forty-year-old couple with ten-year-old kids buys a home. Then the board says, "We decided to implement the age restriction. Get out."

I think it would be hard to sell the courts on the idea that the young buyer had notice of the age restriction because the CC&R's said, in effect, maybe there is and maybe there isn't. The courts in general like definite restrictions and tend to void those that are vague or subject to multiple interpretations.

See Allen v. Reed, a Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion at http://caselaw.findlaw.com/co-court-of-appeals/1464443.html for an example of how the courts deal with a vague restriction.

You would be much safer and wiser to amend your CC&R's to state in definite terms who may and who may not occupy a home within your development. If you cannot get enough support to amend the CC&R's then it would be a good idea to forget about the whole idea.

BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
The only exception to the FHA of 1968 which was amended in the 80s to allow for senior living is to restrict the age to 55 or older. You can not legally restrict the age to 50 which years ago our Board at the time made a decision to do. But it was just a "Board decision" and invalid. We are a retirment community
AliceS3 (Colorado)
Posts: 5
Posted:
Thanks for all the replies and helpful information. I have already looked at the Federal HOPA regs and understand them. One thing I could not find in them is the number of present owners who must vote to approve this change to our CC&R's. Does it revert to the number votes specified in our Rules and Regs to make other decisions in the HOA? BTW - I am VERY much against this 55 plus Resolution that would change our CC&R's. As a real estate agent I am well aware of how it is going to affect our home values beside decreasing the pool of buyers! Our Board meeting has been changed to Feb 26th so I am trying to get my "ammunition" ready!
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AliceS3 on 02/12/2013 2:46 PM
One thing I could not find in them is the number of present owners who must vote to approve this change to our CC&R's. Does it revert to the number votes specified in our Rules and Regs to make other decisions in the HOA?

Alice,

Your CC&R's should have a section about how to amend them. Typically a certain percentage of owners must approve by signing a written amendment that is then recorded wherever the CC&R's were recorded. CC&R amendments are usually difficult because the number of owners who must approve is often 2/3 or even higher.

A big misunderstanding that comes up on this forum a lot is about "voting" for amendments. If your CC&R's have the usual language about executing an instrument and recording it, then voting is irrelevant and not necessary. The only thing that counts is getting enough owners to approve by signing the amendment.

EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
AliceS,

Re your question as to the number of Owners who must vote to approve an Amendment to the CC&Rs, to convert to a “55 plus community”:

I agree with Larry B that the owners would need to approve by “actually signing” the amendment.

As to how many, or what percentage of Owners would have sign, I think it could well be as RogerB posted – it “would take approval of every homeowner to do this” and “check with a good HOA attorney”.

The reason being (just my understanding, I am not an Attorney) is that any “age restrictions” must be included in the property deed, and so every deed would be affected.

You wrote you are a real estate agent, so I would assume you know an Attorney versed in property deeds and also in HOAs that you could ask to find out if all Deeds would be effected and so require the approval of all Owners.

When you get that answer, it would be informative, if you would post it.

Thanks.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here