DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posts: 664
Posted:
I recently overhauled our HOA website and added some features such as online forums, polls, calendars, etc. Stuff that I would hope would help improve communications within the community. While I was in the process of doing this overhaul, I looked around at some other HOA websites (including some from the people in this forum) and using them as an example, I included a "Terms of Use" page and a "Privacy Statement" page. Before taking the website "live", I asked the other Board members to review it. I am the President of the Board.
One of the other Board members has managed to hold up the release of the website because he objects to a couple of statements in the Terms and Privacy pages. In particular, he objected to the "automatic collection of information about your computer hardware and software, including IP address, browser software, domain names, ...". His claim is that we have no business asking for that type of information. I've tried to explain that that information is just part of how the Web works and doesn't really identify an individual, but he doesn't want to believe me.
He also objected to the disclaimer where it says that we are not responsible for the content on third party sites that may be linked to from our website. He states that if that is the case, then we shouldn't have any links to any third party sites. In my mind that would kind of defeat some of the usefulness of a web site. I would think that we would want to have links to other resources in the community.
And finally, he doesn't want the website to have community forums, even in a password-protected area. I've had homeowners ask for things like forums and bulletin boards to allow them to post things like "For Sale" notices or school events or similar. But as far as this board member is concerned, the website should only be used to communicate from the Board to the HOA members without giving the members the ability to communicate among themselves or back to the Board. He thinks that having something like a discussion forum or any other means for the homeowners to post content will cause the website to turn into another "MySpace" or similar. I'm not even sure why that would automatically be a "bad" thing.
For now, we have held up the release of the web site until an attorney has reviewed those pages (an expense I think we could have done without), but I have a feeling that he will have more objections once the attorney has given his input. Any thoughts on how to handle this?
One of the other Board members has managed to hold up the release of the website because he objects to a couple of statements in the Terms and Privacy pages. In particular, he objected to the "automatic collection of information about your computer hardware and software, including IP address, browser software, domain names, ...". His claim is that we have no business asking for that type of information. I've tried to explain that that information is just part of how the Web works and doesn't really identify an individual, but he doesn't want to believe me.
He also objected to the disclaimer where it says that we are not responsible for the content on third party sites that may be linked to from our website. He states that if that is the case, then we shouldn't have any links to any third party sites. In my mind that would kind of defeat some of the usefulness of a web site. I would think that we would want to have links to other resources in the community.
And finally, he doesn't want the website to have community forums, even in a password-protected area. I've had homeowners ask for things like forums and bulletin boards to allow them to post things like "For Sale" notices or school events or similar. But as far as this board member is concerned, the website should only be used to communicate from the Board to the HOA members without giving the members the ability to communicate among themselves or back to the Board. He thinks that having something like a discussion forum or any other means for the homeowners to post content will cause the website to turn into another "MySpace" or similar. I'm not even sure why that would automatically be a "bad" thing.
For now, we have held up the release of the web site until an attorney has reviewed those pages (an expense I think we could have done without), but I have a feeling that he will have more objections once the attorney has given his input. Any thoughts on how to handle this?