💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

IleanaV (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
I have an inquiry re adjournment of HOA annual meetings. On 11/29 the 1st attempt to meet occurred and quorum was not met. The Secretary of the Board requested adjournment that night and 2 Board members agreed. The other 3 Board members declared a roll over and that is what the property manager honored. The Secretary has continued to request a 2nd attempt to meet with the purpose of attempting to involve members and achieve a quorum. He is meeting with opposition from the Property Manager, whose apparent behavior demonstrates support for the 3 Board members who declared rollover. Every one of his requests have been ignored by the property manager and the 3 board members (who conveniently declared a roll over).

Now the property manager responds via email that an annual meeting cannot be requested 2 months later! He has audio of his request made in Nov.2012. He has made numerous requests for an adjournment.
I have 2 questions:
1. Can he, as Secretary of the BOD, hold the annual meeting on his own with support of two other members?
2. Is the Property Manager breaking her duty to follow up on his request? Thank you, Dr. Ileana Vazque
LauraR5 (Tennessee)
Posts: 220
Posted:
We didn't have a quorum at our annual meeting. It was reflected in the meeting minutes. While we could not vote, we did not adjourn the meeting and continued through the agenda and discussion with those who did care enough to attend.

As for the elections, we had three people who did not want to continue on the board, so they asked for three volunteers from those in attendance. There were only three volunteers (out of about 30-some homeonwers). Because we couldn't hold elections, the old board appointed the new one.

I would think perhaps you could reschedule your meeting, but do you really expect better attendance? Apparently we never have a quorum at ours, which is why they just continued on the way they did.

I would say at this point it is already several months later to just continue until next year and do a better job trying to get folks to attend. If there is an issue with your board and that is why you wanted elections, then you could always attempt to recall those folks, but you may run into the same issues with apathy and finding replacements and getting them elected.

Perhaps your neighborhood has a different dynamic or someone else might give better advice, but based on what I've seen those are my suggestions.
LauraR5 (Tennessee)
Posts: 220
Posted:
We didn't have a quorum at our annual meeting. It was reflected in the meeting minutes. While we could not vote, we did not adjourn the meeting and continued through the agenda and discussion with those who did care enough to attend.

As for the elections, we had three people who did not want to continue on the board, so they asked for three volunteers from those in attendance. There were only three volunteers (out of about 30-some homeonwers). Because we couldn't hold elections, the old board appointed the new one.

I would think perhaps you could reschedule your meeting, but do you really expect better attendance? Apparently we never have a quorum at ours, which is why they just continued on the way they did.

I would say at this point it is already several months later to just continue until next year and do a better job trying to get folks to attend. If there is an issue with your board and that is why you wanted elections, then you could always attempt to recall those folks, but you may run into the same issues with apathy and finding replacements and getting them elected.

Perhaps your neighborhood has a different dynamic or someone else might give better advice, but based on what I've seen those are my suggestions.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Ileana,

I'm a little confused. Before I can offer an opinion, I need more information.

1. First, you need to follow your bylaws. What do your bylaws say with regard to an annual meeting when there is no quorum? Do your bylaws allow for a "roll-over"? Do your bylaws require a second meeting to be held within a specified period of time? Do your bylaws allow for a reduced quorum at a subsequent meeting? Do your bylaws allow for proxy votes? (Proxies normally contribute towards a quorum.)

2. Who is the secretary? Is the secretary a board member (director)?

3. Is the PM also a board member? If not, the PM has no say in the matter.

4. How many members (directors) make up your board? Are 3 members a majority of the board? Even if they are, they cannot vote to act differently from the bylaws. The bylaws cannot be overruled, even by a majority vote of the board. The bylaws must be followed.
PeterD3 (Florida)
Posts: 708
Posted:
As others say, refer to your docs.

Abscent any specific directives in your docs. your BoD has not violated FL law.

Our HOA has done similar for the last 5 years.

Does this equate to the 'right thing"? Maybe not.

Here's an article for your purusal:

http://blogs.sun-sentinel.com/condoblog/2012/08/rescheduling-hoa-annual-meetings-in-the-absence-of-a-quorum-a-fiduciary-duty.html
IleanaV (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Hi Bruce,

Thank you for responding. In answer to your questions,
1. First, you need to follow your bylaws.
--Response: Our by-laws do not address a rollover nor do they say a specified period stated for a second meeting. They do address the right to adjourn when a quorum is not reached. The state of Florida states quorum is 30% membership, which is 55 people in our case. FL Statutes 720 also indicate that motion to adjourn should occur at the annual meeting (there was a motion, but it was ignored). The problem is that it is a 6 person board: 3 Board Members voted in favor of adjournment; 3Board Members voted to roll-over.

2. Who is the secretary? Is the secretary a board member...Yes, the Secretary is a member and director of the Board.

3. Is the PM also a board member? Absolutely not--but the PM is manipulating the situation by saying that an adjournment is not possible. The PM is supporting the roll-over request by the 3 Board members who are basically controlling all decision making.
4. How many members (directors) make up your board? That's the problem!!! There are 6 members and they are totally divided 3 vs. 3. The 3 who are supported by the PM are in fact controlling ALL decisions.

The dilemna is that the Secretary who DID request adjournment during the annual meting wants to hold a second annual meeting towards the end of this month with the required days to notify the membership. The PM sais 'too-late'...Can he move on his own accord with the support of 2 Board members (now that is 3)....to conduct the annual meeting to include proxies of course?

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
"Can he move on his own accord with the support of 2 Board members (now that is 3)....to conduct the annual meeting to include proxies of course?"

IMO No, he doesn't have that power. He can as a homeowner call a special meeting for a specific purpose if he can get enough homeowners to sign a petition calling for one unless your bylaws allow 3 Board members to call a special meeting. The particulars for calling a SM should be in your CC&R's.

What didn't happen at the Annual Meeting that he wants to rectify? I'm guessing a vote for some of the slots that got rolled over. In that case a SM to recall that person or persons would be the way to go. Although if you didn't have enough to make quorum, this might be a tough row to hoe.

Why only six, is that what your CC&R's call for or someone has resigned and not been replaced due to the Board tie? If that is the case you could hold a SM for the purpose of filling the vacancy and end the tie, one way or the other.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Ilena,

My, my my. What a messy situation. An even number of board members is never a good idea, and a tie vote never resolves anything.

IMO, 3 votes for another meeting, 3 votes to roll over, neither wins. Not a majority. What a mess!

Actually, since it was an annual meeting, the members who were meeting should have decided what to do; not the board members. It wasn't a board meeting. The board has no say. If the majority of the members wanted to adjourn and hold a second meeting, then that's what should have been done. If the majority of members wanted to merely "roll-over", then that's what should have been done. The board has no authority in an annual meeting. Only the members have any authority. And, your PM has no authority in either a board meeting or an annual meeting. The PM should be regarded merely as a consultant. So, the mistake that was made was to let the board decide what to do. It wasn't their option to begin with. A vote of what to do should have been decided by the members who were present.

The bylaws may not specifically refer to the term "roll over", but might say something like the directors hold their office until their successors have been elected. Same thing.

In any event, since your board assumed authority they didn't have, my recommendation to correct the past mistakes would be to hold a second meeting to elect board members.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Let us be careful here. Ileana is talking about FL. A very heavy regulated association state She is using terms like "rollover" so who knows what that means.

I can say that some Bylaws do say:

1. That if a quorum is not reached then the meeting can be adjourned and readjourned, but proper meeting notice of the readjournment must be given. In one HOA I was a membr of this required 30 days of notice.

2. The amount needed for a Quorum is reduced by 50% per meeting. If say 100 were needed for a Quorum at the original meeting, then 50 are needed for a Quorum at the 2nd meeting and 25 are needed for a Quorum at the 3rd meeting. In one HOA I belonged to, several times we did go to a 3rd meeting before we had a Quorum and could proceed with elections.

My overall problem with the post is the fact that they are letting the Property Manager call the shots.

Hope this helps.

CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
I think that Bruce is right. Neither the rollover nor the scheduling of another meeting "won." Like, Glen, I wonder if your docs--probably bylaws-- call for a Board of 6. If so, very odd.
IleanaV (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
I am so very grateful for so many good folk offering good information and advice!

Our CC&R call anywhere from 3 to 9 board members. There is an even number because one member resigned. The Board is totally divided 3 to 3. The 3 board members who called 'rollover' did so because they control everything. The landscaping company owner confided to me that these 3 people called him aside and said, "Don't pay attention to the other 3 board members--only to us. The other 3 people are just there in paper, but have no decision making ability."

So with that being said, you can imagine the rationale behind the three Board members, one of whom is the Secretary of the Board, for wanting an election! He basically wants to have a fair election and do things according to our by-laws. We are a community of 181 homes, FL Statutes call for 30% quorum in an annual meeting, or approx. 55 members or proxies, which should not be difficult to obtain.

It is an extremely messy situation indeed! The even number is terrible and has a dead-lock. My alternative as a member of the community is to file an Intent to secure a Court Appointed Trustee to oversee matters, but this will entail a cost of about $2400 monthly for this person's salary.

I totally agree that a second meeting is in other, but the PM is blocking the petition of the Secretary of the Board, saying it is too late and she is quoting FL Statutes! Mind you there is an audio tape of that night's meeting whereby the Secretary of the Board said he wanted to adjourn and members in attendance also indicated their wish to adjourn. We have the option of filing for arbitration at a fee of $200.00 and this might be a solution.

The other option is a special meeting and having the 'majority of members'--in this case 91 members present or via proxies--so that the dilemna can be solved and these 3 controlling people be put to a stop.

I just thought that the fair thing to do would be an adjourned annual meeting. It would require 55 members present or by proxy vs. 91 with a special meeting. The Secretary of the Board is restrained by an even vote...so it appears that the wisest choice here is the Special meeting--even if it means more proxies and/or people!!! Seems that they better start knocking on doors.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Ileana

I think you should consider recalling one or two BOD Members. As you allow Proxies then one could work toward collecting enough to make it happen.

The last thing most here will tell you to look to is legal action.

IleanaV (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Absolutely--that's where we're heading..then filing with the Clerk of County Courts...who will of course ask for mediation...The bureaucracy to enforce a democratic way of leading is so difficult for HOA members!!! Something must be done about these types of scenarios and abuses of power. The biggest barrier:
It takes money to fight...and the economy is affecting many people!
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Ileana you don't have to hold a messy recall election IMO. A Special Meeting can be held for any valid purpose which. I would start a petition to hold a SM for the purpose of electing the missing 1 or 3 members of the Board. This of course could be a double-edged sword, the new members might side with the "rollover 3".

Your CC&R's say 3-9 somewhere should be a resolution setting the number at seven so you need to determine EXACTLY how many spots need to be filled 1 or 3.

720.306 Meetings of members; voting and election procedures; amendments.—
(3) SPECIAL MEETINGS.—Special meetings must be held when called by the board of directors or, unless a different percentage is stated in the governing documents, by at least 10 percent of the total voting interests of the association. Business conducted at a special meeting is limited to the purposes described in the notice of the meeting.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
PeterD3 (Florida)
Posts: 708
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By IleanaV on 01/11/2013 3:18 PM
Absolutely--that's where we're heading..then filing with the Clerk of County Courts...who will of course ask for mediation...The bureaucracy to enforce a democratic way of leading is so difficult for HOA members!!! Something must be done about these types of scenarios and abuses of power. The biggest barrier:
It takes money to fight...and the economy is affecting many people!

You need to further your research on Florida HOA BoD recalls.

The 'clerk of county courts' has nothing to do with recalls.

If you are sure that you have 50% +1 of the members/lots/parcels, etc. willing to support a recall it can be done without a meeting or vote.

You can begin your research here:
http://www.myfloridalicense.com/dbpr/lsc/LSCMHHOAForms.html
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Ileana

Why do you keep searching for a legal, outside the association solution versus handle it within the association with recalls, special meetings, etc?

PeterD3 (Florida)
Posts: 708
Posted:
I forgot to add above, if you are suggesting removing enough BoD members to prevent a quorum you will need to have (replacement) members willing to be placed on the recall ballot to restore a quorum.

I think you are in over your knowlege base here. Best step back, get other like minded folks to research the issue with you and determine if you are up to this.

A recall, with adequate support, is easy but all steps must be completed with precision.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here