💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

ClaudiaH2 (Florida)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Does our HOA need to have a lawyer on retainer "just in case".
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:


My Association doesn't have an attorney on retainer (which requires money to exchange hands) but uses our Registered Agent, who is an attorney, as needed and are charged for any legal services provided.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
It really depends on your HOA's level of understanding it's rules and limits. Some HOA's feel more comfortable and dependent on lawyers than others. If that is what the membership wants and is okay paying the amount of money to keep a lawyer on retainer then that may be an option.

However, a HOA does NOT need to keep a lawyer on retainer. If you understand your documentation and follow it, then there's no real need for an attorney except for filing paperwork that requires a lawyer to do. A lawyer is basically a TOOL for the HOA to use in areas that legal filings need to be conducted. Those areas are filing of liens, foreclosures,representing in court, and updating the CC&R's. Having a lawyer for advice is kind of an indication your HOA needs more HOA education. Making small claims court filings should always be avoided unless it's your state mandated to do so.

I wouldn't keep a lawyer on retainer as you most likely don't need one for the most part until you do. That is the general rule...

Former HOA President
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Would you pre-pay a plumber to deal with issues, just in case? I wouldn't. And I wouldn't do it with a lawyer either.

Different issues will require different lawyers, so there is no need to lock into one office.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ClaudiaH2 on 01/09/2013 5:40 AM
Does our HOA need to have a lawyer on retainer "just in case".

We have a law firm to take care of legal issues when they arise, but no, the firm is not on retainer. It's pay-as-you-go.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
We used to have our attorney on retainer, as most of his work involved delinquent homeowners, so it made sense, costwise, and as part of the deal, we also got a certain amount of time that could be used to answer some of the thornier questions that came up with CCR enforcement and other stuff. Over time, we became dissatisfied with the rate of return on the delinquencies (some of it really wasn't his fault) and so we decided to take him off retainer.

Since then, we have another attorney handling our delinquencies, but his firm (which specializes in HOAs) is also good at other HOA issues, so the old one is closing out the old cases and we'll be using the new guy from now on.

The main thing you want to do with an attorney is to watch the costs carefully. We usually designate the vice president or myself (I'm treasurer) to talk to the attorney and we try not to go to him with every single question (review the Bylaws and CCRs first). As far as delinquencies go, I meet with the attorney once a year (between now and March) to discuss all the delinquencies and come up with an overall approach for the year - it saves time and sometimes money.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Very very good point Sheilah. There should be limited contact with the attorney down to only one or maybe 2 officers like you have it. More than that it then becomes almost personal use.

Just wanted to add that even if you have a lawyer on retainer they charge for alot of other things. They have a hourly rate in addition. They may charge for the following items: Court appearances, filing paperwork, collecting signatures, sending out letters, court costs incurred for filing/work related, phone calls, emails, and any real contact with them. So if you do need to call them do NOT leave your name or HOA information. Just say you will call them back when they are in the office. I've seen them charge for this to.

So discuss the terms of what all the charges are you may incur. That includes their rules on contact, appearance, and drafting documents beside retainer/hourly rate. Plus make sure they are in the best field you need. A HOA is a corporation and deals in CONTRACTUAL laws and NOT real estate. So if you hire a lawyer make sure they are familiar with contractual laws. Specialty lawyers in HOA law cost more.

Former HOA President
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
In the 5 HOA,s I have belonged to, we have never had an attorney under retainer. We just used them as need...same as they do to most people.....LOL

Hiring a law firm to do collections is one issue. They might be the best there is at collecting but know litte about HOA law. Especially as back dues become more and more of an issue you need a collection expert.

Opposite might be true. Great at HOA law but suck when it comes to collecting money.

My initial blush is keep them seperate as in hire the best for each job versus one do it all type. Use them as needed for what they are best at.

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
In my area there are several law firms specializing in HOA law who charge around $50 a month to be "on retainer." For that $50, the HOA can receive advice by phone on virtually any HOA-related topic.

Sounds good, right?

The reality is that most HOA board members have no experience with hiring attorneys and are sitting ducks for these weasels to pick off. The quality of their "free" advice is just what you paid for.

The game these lawyers play is that when the HOA wishes to file suit for non-payment, the lawyers soak the HOA with unbelievable fees. We had one of these law firms who charged us over $150,000 to file suit against 50 delinquent owners to collect about $25,000 in unpaid assessments.

Our development is made up of unimproved large parcels and not one of the delinquent owners lives on their parcel. In fact, the last known address we had for most of them is out-of-state. You cannot obtain a money judgment against a person you cannot find and serve, yet our attorney filed one lawsuit after another collecting his fees in advance for services that he knew he would never render. And of course the board paid and paid and paid.

There were a couple of lawsuits that did get served. One was upon a local woman who failed to pay a $15 late fee because no one ever told her she owed it. To settle the lawsuit against her she had to pay the attorney some $4,000. Had I known of this beforehand, I would have advised her to go to trial. The judge would be unlikely to find in favor of the association as she had paid every amount they had ever billed her for and even if she lost, the judge is required by law to limit the amount of the lawyers fees to a "reasonable" amount. No judge is going to find it reasonable to charge $4,000 to collect $15.00 that the plaintiff never sought before filing a lawsuit.

Another lawsuit that did get served went all the way to foreclosure and the sheriff issued a deed to the property to the association. Too bad there is a superior lien on the property, so the deed will eventually be invalidated. The attorney had already been reprimanded twice by the court of appeals for pursuing similar actions for other associations, so it was not like it should have been news to him that he cannot foreclose when there is a lender's lien on the property.

My advice is to stay away from budget attorneys. They are sharks waiting to prey on the next unsuspecting HOA board.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Kind of like free brake check. Surprise, you need brakes, rotors, tires, wipers, engine, transmission etc
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Once upon a time, I read somewhere that when hiring a law firm (retainer or not), the Association should get a list of charges (responding to phone calls, court appearances, etc.) – from there, you can determine under which circumstances to contact the attorney so you’ll know exactly how much it’ll cost.

For example (and I think I read this somewhere on this site), if you know you have to sue a homeowner for delinquent fees, you can set some sort of budget to address court filings appearances, correspondence and such. Measure that against the amount owed and it can help you decide when additional action, if warranted, should be done if other efforts don’t work, especially if it means foreclosure might be in the forecast. And when the legal costs begin approaching the amount owed, you can then debate what your stopping point.

I saw another attorney website that suggests you ask who’s actually doing the work and possibly negotiate fees from that. People often get charged attorney’s fees for something a paralegal actually did, so try to find out if an attorney is actually doing the work (if not, maybe you can negotiate a lower fee for that service).

Finally, ask around about alternative dispute resolution, which may be great for CCR violation disputes (both parties often agree in advance to comply with the arbitrator’s decision). You usually don’t need an attorney and the arbitrator may come up with a resolution both parties will be happy with – it can be faster and a lot cheaper than hiring an attorney and duking it out in court. In my opinion, there aren’t nearly enough of these programs that are affordable or even free – look for one where the parties split the costs of the arbitrator, with the loser reimbursing the winner.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
A HOA should NEVER sue to collect unpaid dues. A lien is a much stronger instrument and avoids the expense of court. However, some states do require if the HOA wants to collect FINES that may require filing in small claims to collect. Otherwise a HOA should avoid going to small claims court period. A lien may be more time consuming and seem a waste as nothing gets collected. However, the person can't sell their home without paying it off. A lawsuit judgement wouldn't. Allowing an owner to pack up and leave without ever paying. Although liens can fall into "la-la" land once a bank comes in to foreclose. It's still a better chance of collection than a lawsuit or doing nothing. Plus it's cheaper!

Former HOA President
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
A lawsuit judgement wouldn't. Allowing an owner to pack up and leave without ever paying.


You have obviously never collected on a judgement. Once you have a judgement you can have the sheriff take his harley davidson, boat, whatever and sell it at auction, garnish their wages, etc. Most people never take it to that point, but I have.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Although liens can fall into "la-la" land once a bank comes in to foreclose.


Well, its not la-la land. Its over. Once the bank forecloses, the money you paid to file the lien is lost. You will never see it again.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I have collected on a debt after my renter ran out. However, it's a HOA/corporation we are dealing with here and NOT as an individual. You have a group of people involved. That makes it a bit more difficult. Plus you have to factor in that if you do get something like a motorcycle, that if you sell that bike at $5K and they owe you only $3K, that $2K difference goes back to the owner NOT the HOA. Something I am not sure some HOA's would be competent to understand. Which could mean another lawsuit against them.

I'd rather go the lien route for a HOA. Mind you that lawsuit judgement could be made into a lien. However, that means it was a waste of time and money originally to file the lawsuit just to file a lien.

Former HOA President
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Its quite simple. You do both. File the lien. Add the lien costs into the lawsuit. He pays. Remove the lien.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
if you sell that bike at $5K and they owe you only $3K, that $2K difference goes back to the owner NOT the HOA. Something I am not sure some HOA's would be competent to understand.


What the heck are you talking about? The sheriff handles this stuff, not the HOA.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Not necessarily in all states. Not mine atleast. I could go to the sheriff's department to collect an item that is worth how much they owe. However, I would be the one that had to sell the item and then give back any profits. In my case the renter moved to a house without a mailbox. He only had a post office box. Which you can't collect against a post office box. The sherriff's department has to have a physical address which is a mailbox.

Not all states work the same when it comes to collecting money. My state and about 7 others has a thing called a "Super lien" (Superior lien). That means that the HOA lien is on the SAME level as the bank. Most liens it is the HOA is second in line to get paid from the leftovers from the bank sell along with other debtors. A Super lien is supposed to equal out that.

After reading a post from a guy in Florida, they supposedly can even make the new purchaser pay for the lien. Which is still gray area and highly debateable. You really have to be aware of your state laws when it comes to collections and what your best options are.

Former HOA President
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
The sherriff's department has to have a physical address which is a mailbox.


Why not pay the sheriff to deliver in person? I'm sure the town had the address, even if there was no mailbox.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
I had the sheriff serve a guy at work once. He left me a really angry voicemail about how embarrassing it was, he was in a meeting with his boss and other colleges, he had to excuse himself from the meeting and everyone saw him meeting with the sheriff, and asked him a million questions afterwards, blah, blah, blah.

Made my day anyway. Deadbeat.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
This persons business was his house...So could not serve him at work...LOL! this wasn't his first time in trouble so he knew the law. That is why the mailbox not there.

Former HOA President
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
A person who applies for a post office box must disclose his actual residence and the letter carrier is required to confirm it.

When I worked as a processs server years ago I was able to obtain the street address directly from the local post office where the box was located. The post office has a form to fill out and any person acting under authority may obtain that information. Sheriff Bubba and Deputy Buford would have known that if only they served donuts at the post office.

SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 01/11/2013 8:52 AM
A person who applies for a post office box must disclose his actual residence and the letter carrier is required to confirm it.


While this is true, you dont need to reconfirm if you move. You could move 4 times, keep renewing, and still have your original address on file and no one would know.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
That is very true. I recall once after getting the street address from the post office that I went to the house and found it vacant.

Still, if you are willing to poke around enough you can track a person down. Old neighbors often know a little about where he works or where he moved to. And you can always "sit" on the post office box itself.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here