💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KeithQ (North Carolina)
Posts: 4
Posted:
We have several lots in our rural community that cannot get their septic permits renewed...the county won't budge on the issue. Some of the lot owners are refusing to pay annual assessments, and won't cut their grass because they essentially cannot build on their property. We have discussed the matter with the owners to no avail. The board is now considering using the lien process, but the sense is the owners will ignore the "threat". In this state (NC) liens are "extinguished" in three years if not settled, which means via foreclosure or lawsuit. I am not an attorney (nor have we hired one), but dollar value of these lots is close to zero since they can't be used for housing (restrictions on non-residential building), and I don't see how the HOA would be able to recover the delinquent assessments or costs of trying to do so. Any suggestions?

Thanks...
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
The value of the lots are irrelevant to the HOA. It doesn't matter. HOA dues are like paying your utilities. You have to do it no matter what your house is worth. The problem with the sewage needs to be taken up with the county and/or the seller of the lot. It is NOT a HOA issue except for making sure the owner follows the rules and pays their share. If they don't, then put a lien on it. The HOA doesn't want to own this property so you may just hold off on foreclosing. As for fines, you need to have a fining schedule set up and make sure your HOA can issue fines for lack of grass cutting.

My parents had a really old house that a neighbor wanted to buy. The sale didn't go through because the septic tank issue and the county not approving it. So I am somewhat familiar with county not approving sewage systems. However, there should be some kind of compromise or fix the owners can do. It just may be expensive. They also may be able to sue the builder/developer for selling them the land they can't build on.

Is the HOA owner controlled or still under the developer? That needs to be known in case the advice changes due to the circumstances.

Former HOA President
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
septic with a leaching field may not be approved

BUT

a straight 'cesspool' system holding tank w/o leaching field is a viable option

ALBEIT EITHER

expensive if a LARGE tank is installed

OR

inconvenient repeated pumping out

CAVEAT EMPTOR
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
i am referring to a SEALED cesspool, not a 'weeping' one
KeithQ (North Carolina)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Thanks for your input Melissa...

Our HOA is owner managed, and has been for quite some time -- and frankly we have most of our "business" under control with few difficulties. However, the issue with the lots that cannot renew their septic system permits is something we just can't get our arms around.

The lot owners have engaged the county (one even hired an attorney), but can't seem to find resolution. The developer sold the lots with valid septic permits, but when the owners tried to renew them 5 years later the county somehow determined the lots did not pass the requirements for new permits of any type. As you stated, the HOA is not responsible for dealing with the septic permit issue; however, the issue does have a negative impact on the HOA. It's a bad situation for the lot owners -- they can't build, can't sell (why would anyone buy these lots), but are required to continue paying taxes and HOA assessments. Several have had their property values decreased accordingly to reduce the tax burden.

We could proceed with the lien process, but I am reluctant since in North Carolina the lien must be acted on within 3 years...otherwise it is "extinguished". My concern is we could approach the 3 year lien anniversary and be forced to try foreclosure on worthless lots -- and that seemingly would defeat the purpose of the lien.

We haven't tried some other creative solutions like encouraging the lots be sold (very cheap) to adjacent lot owners as a means for the current lot owners to rid themselves of the burden...the two lots could then be combined into 1 lot so there isn't a double lot burden in terms of assessments for the new owner.

...continuing to seek resolution on this issue, and appreciate all comments...

KeithQ (North Carolina)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Thanks John...but as you said, a sealed septic tank would fill pretty quick -- especially with the conveniences of modern life like the washing machine. For whatever reasons, the county and lot owners are not able to resolve the septic system issue. From an HOA management perspective, we are assuming the lot owners and county are/have explored all possible options to no avail. We are now just trying to determine how best to deal with the situation...which up to now is just to maintain good records of the past due (and penalties) assessments so we may be able to collect in the future.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
The value of the lots is entirely relevant.

For whatever reasons, your county has reduced the value of the unbuilt lots by making them useless. If I owned such a lot I would just walk away from it as these owners apparently have done. The county has changed the nature of these lots from residential to pasture land.

Your first course of action should be to consult with an attorney.

As a practical matter, taking title to these lots through foreclosure would be suicidal. You will spend a small fortune to acquire each title and the property cannot be used as intended. You will end up with title to commercially worthless real estate, you will receive no future assessments, and you will be liable for property taxes. This is a lose-lose-lose situation.

If I were on your board, I would recommend writing these lots off completely for budgeting purposes. I would assume that you will never receive another assessment payment from them and I would waste no money pursuing collections.

If you were in Arizona, the lot owners would have recourse against the county under state law for "taking" the property without compensation. Taking, in this context, means to adversely change what may be done with the property. You may have some recourse against the county and this should be discussed with your attorney.

KeithQ (North Carolina)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Larry,

I agree with your assessment. For budgeting we have written off these lots in that we don't count on any contribution from them. Additionally, we have decided (up to now) not to expend funds on an attorney since we really don't see what could be done from a management point of view. Frankly if I were one of the lot owners, I would "push" harder on the county because obviously something is amiss. Since our community is not close to being "built out", having vacant lots is not an issue...and these few (3 of 40) lots do not stand out -- except the owners are beginning to balk at maintaining the grass cutting regimen. Actually, we can do nothing for a long time which may be the most responsible action for us to take.

One thought: If we did go through the lien and foreclosure process, could the HOA turn the property into common grounds to avoid taxes...and to maybe use the property for some type of community amenity?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Keith

I think it is time for you all to get a paid, professional leagl opinion.

I cannot see how it would hurt your association to file liens if for no other reason then to protect yourselves. You can always remove/discharge the lien if somehow they become an issue.

I think it is time to lawyer up.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I like the idea of turning the lots into common area somehow. The HOA really doesn't want to own these lots and foreclosing on them that would happen. Meaning the HOA would then have to pay the assessment to themselves. Now I wonder if there is an option for the owners to "donate" the land to the HOA and use it as a tax write off?

The HOA could then take care of the property and make it part of the common area. Which sounds like would have to be treated like pasture land. Some options would be a community garden, a dog play spot, a park, or maybe put some sheds on it for storage.

I would look into seeing if your HOA can reduce it's lots number. If these lots were donated and then converted to common area to stop the assessment requirements it may have to be reassessed by the tax department. I would check into this option as I am sure some of these owners would want to discard this property. I'd look into the idea of donation since it could help both parties.

Former HOA President
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KeithQ on 01/04/2013 6:40 AM

One thought: If we did go through the lien and foreclosure process, could the HOA turn the property into common grounds to avoid taxes...and to maybe use the property for some type of community amenity?

That would depend on state tax laws not only for now but in the future. When things get tough state legislatures start closing tax loopholes to raise revenue. Assuming that HOA common areas are currently exempt from property taxes there is no guarantee that will remain forever.

The one time I attended a legislative hearing was when the state proposed to tax real and personal property owned or leased by non-profit corporations. That property had previously been exempt from taxes.

Imagine the mess you would be in if your HOA acquired title to those lots and the state started imposing taxes. You could find your self caught in the middle of the county assessor declaring that they are residential lots while the health department refuses to grant septic permits.

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 01/04/2013 7:18 AM
I like the idea of turning the lots into common area somehow. The HOA really doesn't want to own these lots and foreclosing on them that would happen. Meaning the HOA would then have to pay the assessment to themselves. Now I wonder if there is an option for the owners to "donate" the land to the HOA and use it as a tax write off?
I'd look into the idea of donation since it could help both parties.

But you posted....
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 01/02/2013 2:23 PM
Who donates to their HOA anyways? That's against the rules. A HOA is a non-profit corporation that doesn't take donations.

I'm confused, I think I need a donut.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Understandably...I thought of that after I posted. One would not typically donate money to their HOA. However, in this case it may benefit both but still with the tax ramifications. There still is going to be a tax burden to pay but the end result LONG term would outweigh that.

The city in which I live is basically surrounded by a "bigger city". Years ago they tried to annex my city altogether and be absorbed into theirs. This didn't sit well and a rivarly developed. Our city grew stronger and now can NOT be overtaken by the larger city. I state this because a few years ago land on the border opened up. It was critical land on a popular divide. The owner of this land wanted to finally get rid of 20 acres of it. For some reason he was upset with the smaller town (I think over the liquor license difficulties) and DONATED the land to the BIGGER city. Even though the land really laid more in the smaller town. He decided to prevent it from being annexed in by the smaller town (Which they could do) he would donate it altogether. It is now a bunch of expensive apartments and houses who's tax revenue goes to the bigger city.

This basically where I got this strange idea. If these people who can't ever develop/use their land donates it to the HOA, they would be able to stop their bleeding. They may face some kind of tax ramifications but it's a ONE time deal. The HOA would benefit some because it appears some owners already had reduced their tax burden on the property. It will cost the HOA money by accepting this property as a donation but it too may be the one time deal.

A talk with a tax expert or the tax assessor's office would need to be conducted. Just to verify the tax burden the HOA may encounter. After the land donation, the property may change tax wise the next year. It's NOT going to be free land. However, it's a good deal for the HOA because they did not have to foreclose or purchase the property straight out which they could do.

It's just an option to consider and a little outside the box. Not saying it would work and haven't got all the details. However, it's an option for looking into even though it contradicts my previous advice on NOT EVER donating to a HOA. Since this really isn't monetary but land, it could be enough of a difference to make it worth it. Now I need to eat a donut...

Former HOA President

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here