💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DavidJ13 (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Florida. We have an obnoxious controlling nuisance president and husband patrolling the area screaming at residents for anything that doesn't agree with their view of how things should be, always irrelevant and of no importance to any resident except them, e.g. a chair out of place, or someone placing an ashtray by an open window.
Our condo's have a 24% lower value than the hundreds of similar ones locally that have less facilities with inferior locations. This can only be due to the nuisance president making it a less desirable place to live. We cant vote her out due to her holding too many proxies of out of town owners.

Im considering suing holding them responsible for loss of value. Has anyone any experience please ?

David
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Misconception about HOA's or COA's holding ones property values. A HOA does NOT keep any home values up or down. The price your condo or house sales for is whatever homes with similar amenities/size/location sale for in a few mile block. Foreclosures or short sales have more of a bearing on your house resale values than a HOA.

What a HOA/COA/POA does do...It keeps your property ATTRACTIVE to potential buyers. Someone is more likely to buy into a neighborhood that has a nice well kept appearance with some shared amenities/rules than a property without that. A HOA is a sales tool in the end.

You can go on and sue. However, you sue your HOA your suing yourself and your neighbors. Plus what damages can you prove? You haven't sold your home to know that you took a loss because of this person's behavior. You have to prove monetary damages NOT just "theory".

I think you need to take a breath and read your rules again. Maybe they are just enforcing what is already written. Some people have different standards than others.

Former HOA President
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
David

I doubt your declining real estate values have anything directly to do with a few members of the BOD (be they fools or not) as no one knows anything about them until much later in the sales cycle and usually not until after the sale.

I think you have to look elsewhere for your declining real estate values.

DavidJ13 (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Thanks MellissaP1. I have no misconception, the HOA keeps the property in excellent condition and appearance and is attractive. However as "beauty is only skin deep" so is this community. The president and spouse interfere to the extent the community is referred to as a 'Mad' area by estate agents. They actively try to make potential buyers unwelcome and threatened. This counteracts any cosmetic attraction it may have.
My study did not include any foreclosures or short sales, there a 24% difference in sales over the past 3 years, probably more. A stigma is attached to the place and that can only be related to the presidents unwelcome activities.
I have no inention to sue the HOA, but the presi and spouse holding them personally responsible.
DavidJ13 (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
John
Pls see my previous post. they make themselves known wherever possible to prospective buyers and even tenants.
the value is not declining, but in all cases lower than comparative properties locally.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
David,

The problem with a lawsuit for damages in this situation is proving it. Until you sell you have sustained no economic damage. Even if you sell at a loss or below market value, you would have to prove that this husband and wife were solely responsible for your loss. That's a huge hurdle.

May I suggest an alternate course of action? Whenever you see them out and about follow them at respectable distance, fifty feet or so, and videotape their antics. They cannot lawfully prevent you from doing so. Be sure that each tape you shoot can be identified by time, date, and place. You can do that by pointing the camera at yourself and stating that you shot this footage at what time on what date at what place.

After you have sufficient footage, start by making a complaint with your police department for breach of peace, disorderly conduct, or whatever other charges might apply.

Then seek a protective order from the court to keep them away from your home and to prevent them from harassing you.
FredO (California)
Posts: 198
Posted:
MelissaP1,

While I agree with most of what you wrote in that the HOA/COA helps keep a property attractive, there is also a lot to be said for when a BoD (or BoD member) interprets the rules in such a way as to force the community into their own particular view of what they think the property should be. When these types of folks deviate from the original "intent" of what the developer wanted for the property is when people have issues.

In another post (the one talking about going straight to fines for example) you can have a situation where the the way the BoD enforces the rules to the point of deviating from the intent, then you can have a drop in property values because this type of behavior on the part of the BoD makes the whole neighborhood un-attractive to any potential buyer. This results in homes being listed for too long then the owner has to lower the price (thereby resulting in an overall lowering of everyone's values).

Let's be realistic, who would want to buy into an HOA where there are control freaks to the point of doing daily inspections, pulling out a ruler to measure the length of the grass or checking on whether a deck chair is positioned the way they deem correct on a deck or porch. That's a little too onerous without us having all the facts.

Yes, I agree, this is very hard to document until one actually sells and can't get a reasonable price for their property. Very hard to prove but it follows the same logic as someone who has a commercial vehicle, RV or trailer in the neighborhood. None of these (except a large commercial truck) is found in any real estate appraiser book as a factor in determining the value of the property.

So, if an HOA has an overzealous member who is trying to enforce their personal aesthetic on the property based on an incorrect interpretation of the rules, it can have a very real impact on property values.

If the rules this particular HOA has, are so onerous as to make the "peaceful use and enjoyment" of a property nearly impossible to achieve then the argument can be made that people are avoiding buying into the property because of a bad reputation regarding this BoD's level of action.

Yes, I think the OP has a valid concern. Does he have legal recourse? No! I agree with you that taking the HOA to court in this instance is not a wise course of action. And, as usual, it all boils down to what is in the documents. I agree 100% on that.

Here in Calif, the listing has to disclose if there are deed restrictions on a property and the prospective buyer has the right to request the governing documents for review (before close of escrow). The law also states that the seller has to provide the most recent 12 months worth of HOA newsletters. What's written in the newsletters can scare a prospective buyer away since things like violations and crime info are often listed in the newsletters. You can also get a feel for the HOA Board in the newsletters and minutes from the open meetings.

I certainly empathize with the OP as far as his concerns go. How peaceful is the HOA when you have to be constantly looking over your back for this person? I have lived in 3 HOA's here in Calif and certainly have learned lessons from each one regarding the good deeds done by many boards and the abuses I have witnessed by other boards. One really needs to do a due diligence in regards to HOA's. Some have good reps some have questionable (or even bad) reps. In my last purchase, I had learned to ask for the documents and the newsletters and make this a contingency on the offer.

I would advise any potential buyer to do the same due diligence. I don't mind the rules and happily follow them. What I do mind, is some pesky control freak on the Board trying to shove his/her personal aesthetic on me above and beyond what is written in the rules. I have personally chased the spouse of our past board president out of my backyard at 6:00AM one morning. The person was trespassing onto my parcel and inspecting for things that could not be seen from common areas. Sorry, that is against the law here and the "walkabout inspections" are to be done from common areas. If you can't see it then there is no violation. (I had no violations in any case but the point of the intrusion is what matters).

We have one home that is currently a rental and is vacant. Our board took it upon themselves to enter the dwelling (B & E) to look for violations. Yet there is nothing on the inside that even remotely pertains to the board's purview. They wrote the owner up for dry rot on the back of the house under the eves. Can't be seen from the street as this is in the backyard. These are single detached homes. The house backs up to a creek with no common areas behind the parcel. No reason for the Board to be there...

The board rightfully wrote them up for not mowing the front yard. I agree with that one. The legal owner lives out of state and has not set in place a plan for the maintenance of the home. The immediate neighbors volunteered to the owner to take turns mowing their lawn until a renter moves in. That is neighbors helping neighbors (the way it ought to be IMHO). I think the board was wrong to enter the home, which they admitted to in a monthly board meeting.

As you say an HOA is a sales tool in the end. Well, like most tools, they can be mis-used based on the user. In this case, the OP feels that the spouse of the Board President is mis-using their power to the detriment of all owners investment. In this situation, this issue is probably one very minor straw on the camels back compared to foreclosure sales, location, comps and the rest of items that determine the price for a property. However, if the community is suffering from depressed prices, I would think that all factors need to be examined as this would be in the best interest of all owners.

sorry for the lengthy response,

happy new year

DavidJ13 (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Thank you for having sufficient concern for my problem and taking the time to write a lengthy detailed reply. I can see you have experienced serious problems. There's many excellent ideas in your message i will certainly bear in mind when next buying property. Referring to newsletters and documents and minutes of meetings are a simple way to gain insight into the internal machinations of an HOA.

I'm not considering suing the HOA for its not the Ass that's problematic, nor its rules, but the individuals themselves. I believe I may have just cause for action for harassment, which if proven will open the way for loss and damages. These particular freaks don't measure grass, but insist on spacing between sunbeds and chairs, and she was/is a 'Peeping Tom' regularly peering into windows.

Dedicating much of their time into caring, which is appreciated, contorts itself into a feeling of ownership. It's not there's, they're only caretakers. Conveniently SHE appointed the husband as handy -man . Unlicensed and uninsured of course. The money he earns is in excess of their condo contribution, which is another matter to be taken up with the Town Corporation, and perhaps the IRS.

Finally the depressed prices are historical and not recent. Obviously careful planning is essential, part of which will the taking of testimonials from local real estate agents. An agreement that the reputation of the Condo Commandos are a deterrent to buyers, will help my cause tremendously.

Your comments assist me tremendously in case planning. I'm very surprised no one on the board yet has sued for what appears to be a common problem.
Happy New Year and wishing you much distance from these 'freaks'
David
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
If she is seen peeping into windows, call the cops it's against the law whether it is a sweet old woman or the neighborhood pervert.

I would assume she is elected not anointed so if a majority of the homeowners feel as you do, work to either recall her or remove her at the next election. Unless the HOA directly elects to a specific position (unlikely but I have heard of it) the rest of the Board could remove her as president and make her member at large with no powers.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
FredO (California)
Posts: 198
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DavidJ13 on 12/30/2012 4:36 PM
The president and spouse interfere to the extent the community is referred to as a 'Mad' area by estate agents. They actively try to make potential buyers unwelcome and threatened. This counteracts any cosmetic attraction it may have.


Do their actions rise to a civil tort claim of the intentional interference with business transaction/contract? You might want to explore this aspect of the law with a qualified lawyer as well as talking to any real estate agents trying to sell properties or any owners where the President and spouse have directly interfered by their threatening behavior towards potential buyers.

Anyone selling or trying to sell a home in your HOA may be able to get a restraining order against them.

If they have scared or chased off potential buyers who were ready to issue a contract or offer on a property, then the seller and real estate agent(s) may have grounds to sue them personally. This is something that I am sure the HOA D&O insurance will not cover and the insurance company would be wise to walk away from them. They will have hung themselves out to dry as it were. There is no way on this earth that these people could twist the facts saying that preventing a sale was in the best interests of the HOA or its members.

I would definitely follow the advice others have given as well by videotaping their actions. They could very well be considered as stalking the whole neighborhood through their actions. Peeping in windows will go over really well in court (caught on tape). It would be not go well for them when the time comes.

I don't like bullies and you have a set of them there. They have obviously crossed the line.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
contact all the out of towners, and ask for their proxies. all you have to do is more work than the nuisance guy, and you can vote him out easily.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
You fail to realize that as President of the HOA they represent the HOA members. You can't sue them "individually" when they are acting in accordance to the HOA's duties. The HOA has liability insurance to protect board members personal accounts and they would most likely hire a lawyer with the HOA money to defend themselves. All very much legal to do.

What others are advising is that you take this to the criminal side of things OUTSIDE of the HOA. If you feel they are peering into your windows you call the police. If they tell you to remove a "Pink Flamingo" from the common area, they are acting as HOA. The peering into your windows is criminal. Removing a violation is HOA.

An example that people fail to realize when they take their HOA problems to the "media", it truly ruins the reputation of their HOA. No one wants to buy property in the HOA that was just on "CNN" about forcing a veteran of removing their flag pole in the front yard. The fact that the rules state clearly that NO flagpoles are allowed in the restrictions and the veteran is possibly in the wrong. (Although respectable and deserving to fly a flag). How would any of the owners prove damages and who would they sue? The person who contacted the media? or the HOA they are a member of and responsible for enforcing the rules?

My suggestion is stop paying so much attention to this person and talking about it. The more talk about it, the more rumors spread. If it's not your direct problem, then don't worry about everyone elses problem. A good realtor would know how to "spin" a sale despite this activity.

Former HOA President
HeleneN (Connecticut)
Posts: 84
Posted:
David

check your documents as to restrictions on the number of unrestricted proxies any one person can cast votes for.

Here in Ct. it's capped at fifteen per cent of the votes in the Assoc. It works well here and curtails the activity of the overly zealous person trying to perpetuate themselves!
JeanneK3 (Maryland)
Posts: 562
Posted:
David:
Why spend money suing them when your community can just remove them and elect two more people to the board. Your governing documents and state law tell you how to do this.
Get others behind you and get rid of them.
Jeanne

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here