💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MaryP5 (Arizona)
Posts: 2
Posted:
Our community has between 20-30% rentals. It may be true that all renters are not destructive and can be good neighbors, but it is not the case here. We are contemplating changing the CC&R's to restrict the number of rental properties. We would like some feedback on this idea and also some sample verbage to use in the CC&R's.
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
MaryP5 - read the post on this site regarding rental restrictions Subject: Court applies "reasonableness" standard for amendments. are you in Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, North Dakota, Ohio, and Wyoming.

Please clarify, who "We" is in "We are contemplating changing the CC&R's to restrict the number of rental properties". Is "we" the Board?
MaryP5 (Arizona)
Posts: 2
Posted:
We're in Arizona, but that is interesting information. Our management company first suggested rental restrictions and hopefully they are aware of the legality. Not that I have a great deal of confidence in them.

I am on the CC&R committee and have been nominated to fill a vacancy on the board (only nominee).
JM2 (Oregon)
Posts: 439
Posted:
Hi Mary:

I would recommend that you talk to your HOA's lawyer regarding anything on rental restrictions. They have to be carefully worded so that they do not violate Fair Housing laws. Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac have restrictions on loans if the total rentals exceed a certain percentage (they then treat the community as investment property vs. residential).

The important thing to do: act quickly before you reach a lower percentage of owner-occupied units than is required for approval of an amendment - otherwise you'll be fighting an uphill battle.

Another suggestion: require that rental owners provide the association with the following:
Owner name/address/phone/email
Copy of lease agreeement
Lesee name/phone/email (including all residents of the rental).

Also require that the rental owner provide a copy of the restrictions (it may be worthwhile to have the HOA provide a copy for owners to give) and send back a signed release from the renter that they have received a copy (you devise the form).

IMPORTANT: Be sure that you require that rental owners provide that any violation of the HOA rules voids the lease (have your lawyer provide that language) - I think it's a default on the lease agreement but I don't quite recall the exact language I used to use. That way, the owner can get out of the lease without excessive fines if the lesee violates rules and won't quit - it gives the owner the power to evict without getting stuck.

These measures should help with the issue of compliance and dealing with violations.

J. Patrick Moore, CMCA
LanceT (Alabama)
Posts: 121
Posted:
This is a frequently asked question and issue with HOA's. The simple answer is "No" you may not restrict rental property. (Unless all property is owned free and clear). Restricting Rental property lies with the MORTGAGE/BANK/LOAN companies. They are the ones that can put restrictions on the use of property.
If you have renter issues, your best bet is to hold the OWNER responsible. The HOA legal recourse is to hold the OWNER feet to the fire. Keep in mind, renters do have rights and the owner's may not be able to make the renters move in a timely manner. It can take 6 months to a year in some states to get renters out. So be careful to assume the owner isn't doing something.

Recovering Ex-President of a HOA
hoatalk (California)
Posts: 603
Posted:
Many HOAs and COAs have successfully put rental restrictions in place. It can be done. Use the search box on this forum (upper right of forum) and search for: rentals

This is a hot topic and you'll find good information on it here.

HOATalk.com, A free service of Community123.com
Provider of Upscale Community Websites
CLICK HERE to get a FREE trial community website
*See legal notice below (end of page)
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Our attorney told us that we can put an amendment in our documents limiting rentals, however, if it was ever challenged in court it wouldn't hold up. He suggested doing it as a scare tactic with the understand we would have to fold if it was challenged.
HaroldS (Arizona)
Posts: 906
Posted:
Wonderful legal advice there Brad. Thanks for sharing. Is this the prevailing reasoning behind making rules - knowing full well that most people don't have the funds to challenge them? Harold
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
BradP - fire your attorney.
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Harold:

That may be some association's take on them. Our motive is to protect our investment, as long as I am president I would never let this get challenged in court, I wouldn't waste our money that way. I don't know, it was an attorney and they know the laws better than me.

Joe...Why do you say fire my attorney. With all due respect unless you have seen our covenants and know our state law I don't know how you can make that observation? From what I have gathered on here every state is different and so is every association, just curious what you base the statement on?
JamesC (Maryland)
Posts: 282
Posted:
Mary:
JM2, has great advice as concerns Freddie Mac.
We are located in Maryland. The Maryland Homeowners Association informed us when we inquired about this issue that mortgage companies are no longer required to write mortgages in our community, once the rentals exceed 30%.
You can bet the home values will decline once the rentals reach this point.
We have "forced" a landlord to evict his renters by the end of this month. We were able to do so because, they have terrorized the community for the past ten years (as the boys have grown older, they have gotten worse)
We had called the owner before the board on several occasions, and finally told him we would fine him for EVERY violation committed by his tenants. Rather then pay the fines, he consented to having them evicted.
We do have some decent renters, but will not permit comming anywhere close to 15%.
Good luck
Jim
LanceT (Alabama)
Posts: 121
Posted:
It is more up to the mortgage/lenders in allowing houses to be used as rental property. They have the power to put loan restrictions such as rental caps or assign a timeline before the property can be used as rental. Someone stated before that there was a cap of 30% - 40% for some home lenders. Home lenders find out this information often times at closing. Unbeknownst to many homeowners, the HOA plays a small role in your house closing. Not on EVERY type loan, but some with ties with government mostly. (FHA, Fanny Mae, Freddy Mac etc..). A form has to be filled out by the President of the HOA or a board representative. It is a form with about 25 questions about the operations of the HOA. It mostly concerns itself with the number of residents, collection of dues, or the failure rate of non-collection. This form is how most loan companies KNOW the condition of your HOA. This form is turned over to HUD. (Housing and Urban Development Department). It's most likely used for statistical data. This form MUST be filled out prior to the homes closing or it won't close.
Rental restrictions by a HOA most likley won't stand up in court if challenged. However, I think HOA's should change their mindset in restricting rental property and instead concentrate on helping empower members in removing bad tenants. The HOA should instead look into "Renters rights" laws. You will be surprised at what you find out. In some states, it can take 6 months to over a year for an owner to remove a tenant legally. No matter how many notifications from the HOA the owner gets, the owner may be powerless to act in a timely fashion. I know it took me 5 months to kick out my tenant, and he raised a baby emu in the backyard!!!
The HOA still has the right to hold the OWNER's feet to the ground. It is ultimately the homeowner's responsibility to control their tenants/property. The HOA must also understand that Fining the owner isn't a tool at thier disposal. A HOA can't lien for fines or late fees. They can ONLY lien/foreclose for NON-payment of dues. (1 exception which is another story). Renter's aren't responsible for paying dues nor do they have the right to vote. Thus, why the owner is held responsible ultimately.
Truly, to control bad rental property, make rules that enable the owner to better act quickly in removing the tenant. Give more power to the owners and work with existing "Tenant" laws. This may go "against the grain" of thought of most members but it may be the best option. Anyone who has ever been in the position of dealing with bad tenants, understands they don't need additionaly pressure coming from the community. Instead, they need the community's help in supporting better rights to owners.

Recovering Ex-President of a HOA
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
My experience.
Currently we have about 60% rental in a 65 condo unit in SC. We are on the coast and considered a resort (what ever that means) I don't think a resort means anything pertaining to Condo laws.
Anyway, more than one has posted that Fannie Mae and Fredddie Mac will not approve loans if rentals get above 30%. Don't know if this is a state thing but I know for sure that numbers of buyers of condos in SC go to bank or someplace and use a Multi-state Femae and femac forms to mortage property. They get all kinds of high risk mortgages such as interest only, etc. Then they attach a Condo Rider and a Second Home Rider (which states they can not rent, imho, close the deal and put the property on the rental market. I called a Bank and asked if I was applying for a mortgage in a condo that had high rental numbers, could I get a Fanie Mae loan. They told me not to worry, if I am qualified, they will get me the loan no matter what the rental # were. I called a Real Estate Office and said I was just looking at condos where I live and asked the same thing of them that I did the bank. They replied, don't worry about it, we will get you the money.
I have been contacting Federal Agencies, State, and County government.
I can not get a definitive answer from any of them. I am still trying.
Has anyone else run into this? I get a real sense that this happens all the time and it is something no one wants to deal with.
Our Board sees it as a non-problem.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Can we get back to my original post.
I am sure there are state differences in rental laws as they pertain to condos. One of my reasons for the request was to get a response about new owners and old that refinance sign a condo rider, and sign a second home rider then imediately start renting their high risk property. Anyone like to comment on that with opinion of how these units effect the integrity of the Regime. Come a mild recession and lenders might be looking to dump some of these loans. Also, a comment about the legality of what happenss if Fanie Mae becomes aware of the situation. I have no idea if this practice is legal or not.
The practice of the Condo management replying to, say, Fannie Mae; is that a state thing? Does anyone have a form # or Fannie Mae reference? I called HUD and I called Fabbie Mae and to be frank, I could not get them to reply hypothetically about the problem, if there is one. Yet I read in the newspapers that Mortgage Application fraud is a big problem and some articles specifically mention falseifing Residence Status. I have also tried to get thru to State Level offices and currently have been promised a reply from my State Senator.
I am starting to believe I am the only one in the condo world that cares about this and maybe they are right and I am "Chicken Little."
Regards rentals, this is a world of difference between Long Term Rentals and short term (2nights to several months in off season).
I find renters here for several months during the off season are by far the best renters.
LanceT (Alabama)
Posts: 121
Posted:
Robert, there are already laws on this effecting condo's mostly. It started in florida. The history behind the law is that developers/flippers/professionals whatever you want to call them were buying run down condo's. They would quickly repair the condo's and resale them in a matter of months. Often times the materials used were shotty or caused damaged to other units. Lot's of stories on bad plumbing issues that flood the downstairs condo making the new owner responsible for the repairs for BOTH units etc...
In order to stop this, a law was created. Sorry I can't quote it directly. I am not an "internet lawyer wannabe". However, with enough research you may be able to find it or ask a mortgage company. This law limits the number of rental units a purchaser can own within a time period. From my own experience, I know that I could only purchase 1 rental property a YEAR and keep my own home. However, to do this I must have a 1 year lease signed on the rental property for that first year.
The new law has sent people to prison already. I read that one person in florida got almost 10 years for purchasing multiple condo's and selling them with serious problems. The new owner's were stuck with the problems and couldn't sell the property.
So if your so concerned about this issue of rental property, you should know the laws and regulations of owning rental property. Do the research from the point if you were to rent your home out and got bad renters. You will find another whole world out there. I know I found out the hardway about rental property. I don't assume owner's using their homes as rental property have any intentions of doing so at the risk of devaluing their property or the ones around them. Owners can get behind laws that aren't in their favor.

Recovering Ex-President of a HOA
LindaC3 (Florida)
Posts: 526
Posted:
lanceT--- I have lived in Florida for over 45 years- am in the construction business and have lots of friends who invest in properties here in florida ...They say they have NEVER heard of this LAW you are talking about and would like to know where in fact did you get this information from...Seems to me that they would be governing someones right to be in the spec house business...any further info would be appreciated ..... There are a great deal of investors in florida who purchased hurricane damaged homes and have in essence become landlords all the while owning their own homes....So this 'law" seems far fetched and that is why I am asking for additional info from you....Your personal experience may be because of your financial situation where a bank would not allow you to be over extended credit wise...My brother in law owns MULTIPLE HOMES that he rents out to people.One of my largest clients also has multiple homes he rents out-- many in HOA'S here in florida...... Appreciate any further info on this LindaC
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
For Linda and Lance,
To get back on point, let me ask both of you these questions?
1. Do you believe if you sign a second home mortgage and rent out the property are you doing anything wrong.
2. If you follow this practice and enough people do the same thing are you putting the Condo Regime on shaky ground.
3. Is it legal to get a Fanie Mae Mortgage in a Condominium without obtaining information from the regime.
4. Should the BOD care about any of this?
5. Is there a standard Fanie Mae form to be filled out by condo and who determinees what goes on that form.
6. Our CC&R's state all deeds have to be General Warraanty Deeds. What does this mean? What should it mean to our regime?

Anyone fell free to chip in or e-mail me direct. Click on RobertR1
LindaC3 (Florida)
Posts: 526
Posted:
Robert-- I can't honestly answer your questions as I do not live in a CONDO-- I live in a SFR HOA...I can state that my second home mortgage was for a "rental" home till we sold our primary residence and moved to the "rental ' home... I could pose your questions to my mortgage broker if you need answers to these questions...I knwo he will want to know which state you reside in so could you please be so kind as to supply that info for me ? thanks bunches LindaC
LanceT (Alabama)
Posts: 121
Posted:
1. Do you believe if you sign a second home mortgage and rent out the property are you doing anything wrong.

IMO Answer: It depends on the situation. Are you doing this because of personal financial reasons? Signing a second mortgage on a home and then renting it out could raise some financial alarms. Usually, second mortgages are taken out for items such as major remodeling or repairs. Nothing wrong with taking out a second mortgage but using the rental proceeds to pay it off seems like an attempt at some "financial wizardy". To me I wouldn't do it. However, there's really nothing wrong with it if you can get away with it. My rule of thumb is if I have to ask myself several times if it is questionable, then it usually is...

2. If you follow this practice and enough people do the same thing are you putting the Condo Regime on shaky ground.

IMO answer: Renters don't vote Owner's do. What your putting at risk is having to many "No show" owners running the place. This is the problem with rental property when you have a large group of "hands-off" owners. Things get neglected or broken and then the bill for repairs comes in. Guess who pays that bill? The owners. If you notice a raise or special assessments coming your way, then you know this is an issue. Renters aren't responsible for repairs or paying the dues. They are only obligated to the owner to follow the rules and pay their rent on time. The owner is obligated to the Condo "regime".

3. Is it legal to get a Fanie Mae Mortgage in a Condominium without obtaining information from the regime.

Answer: It isn't the responsibility except the BUYER's to get information on the HOA/Condo. The CC&R's are filed at the court house records department. Realtors should inform the buyer of the HOA/Condo board existance and dues rates but aren't required. Mortgage companies must know about the HOA's/Condo dues rates but NOT the rules. The former owner as a "courtesy" should provide the copies of the paperwork at closing but aren't required as well. The condo board may be contacted by the buyer to get a copy or the seller could be nice enough to get a copy for the buyer at closing. It's a BIG misconception that Realtors, mortgage companies, HOA/Condo's or seller are responsible for the buyer's being informed of the rules.
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or other type loans aren't guaranteed to be offered in your area or your condo. This may sound "crazy" but in some cases certain areas don't qualify for certain loans. It may depend on the growth, price, or type of housing in the area. A fannie mae/Freddy mac loans are more for high credit risk or low income families. You may want to consult a mortgage broker to see what loans qualify in your Condo.

4. Should the BOD care about any of this?

IMO answer: Yes and no. It depends on the situation. If your renters are good and provide no major issues then no problem. However, if there are groups of renters who don't obey the rules and the owner's have been notified several times, then the BOD should be concerned. Limiting rental isn't going to effect this situation. No one knows how good or how bad a renter is going to be. Plus add on that it can legally takeup to 6 months to a year to kick a tenant out. All the BOD can do is keep the owner's feet to the fire and notified.

5. Is there a standard Fanie Mae form to be filled out by condo and who determinees what goes on that form.

Answer: There is a form. However, it is not just for Fannie Mae loans. It is mostly any loans that funds are partially government subsidized. HUD does have a 25 question form that is filled out at closing by a HOA representative/Board officer. This form includes information about things such as dues collections, rate of non-payment, Fee-simple classification, how many units and possibly any units in debt collection by the HOA/Condo? Not every loan requires this form. It mostly used for statistical data by HUD.

6. Our CC&R's state all deeds have to be General Warraanty Deeds. What does this mean? What should it mean to our regime?

Answer: Ask a real estate agent on this one. I am not sure what it means for sure. It's probably part of your closing papers. There are several different "warranties" involved in the closing of one's home. I don't think it has anything to do with the condo association as much as it does with the owner's contract. It's in the rules so that homes meet certain standards as far as I know.

Recovering Ex-President of a HOA
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
For Linda and Lance.

Thank you so very much for your time and input.
Now, I have to admit that I made a signficant error in my post with the questions. Very sorry to have mislead you all.
Here goes: None of this has anything to do with a second home mortgage! I meant "a second home rider on a mortgage." Of course this makes a world of difference and just about makes all my questions invalid.
Linda, a personal appology from me, and I would be most happy to hear anything your friends may have to say about the subject.

Lance, again I am personally sorry for misleading you and find your advice helpful and interesting. I have no real problems with renters and agree with a lot of what you say. But as you can see the renters are not my concern, it is numbers and the financial stability of my regime. Please substitute "second home rider on a mortgage" and see if your opinions remain valid. Certainly, it is not my intent to disagree with anyone that is kind enough to take their time and interest to help me.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here