๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AlbertM2 (Virginia)
Posts: 1
Posted:
My HOA is in Virginia and VA has what is called POA Act. All members can attend meeting but as a rule don't. We have one couple that attends and only disrupts and trys to re direct topics to thier own agendas.. Can we as a board, ask them to leave or bar thier attendance.??? The couple is the home owner in our subdivision that is violation of our CC&R.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I would change how you do your meetings. That may mean that people can not have feedback until the end of the meeting. Business first and blasting last...They have every right to be at that meeting. However, there are ways to control that by how your HOA conducts it's meetings. Read your CC&R's or Incorporation documents to see how your meetings are to be conducted. Some of them do have the meeting sequence in them.

Be calm and divert the conversation back to the matter at hand. Don't give them the attention they seek. Realize you are the board and were elected to represent ALL owners. Get feedback from owners but don't be bullied by them. You can't make everyone happy so why try. Get the business done.

Former HOA President
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Albert,

You should try to work with the couple if possible. The Board should always be polite but firm when needed.

Per VA ยง 55-510.1 not only are they allowed to attend but they are allowed to speak at the meetings at appropriate times.

I would suggest that, in accordance with VA ยง 55-510.1 (see earlier link), the Board adopts a policy resolution specifying when non-board member may be heard at board meetings (typically during new business or an open forum). Within this policy specify procedures on how to handle unruly or disrespectful members (polite warning, 2nd warning, removal).

If the members are being abusive and the board meeting is being held in someone's home, I would recommend the following procedure:

1) President politely warns the members to be polite and courteous.
2) If repeated, final warning with the additional remark that if it continues they will be asked to leave.
3) If repeated, President calls for recess of the meeting due to disruptive and abusive behavior and to reconvene once the Mr/Mrs x leaves. Motion is seconded and voted on.
4) Once the meeting is recessed, Owner of the property politely asks the individuals to leave.
5) If members do not leave, the owner contacts the police charging the individual/s with trespassing (as they have been asked to leave but refused).
6) Police show up and, if needed, escorts the individuals from the property.
7) Meeting reconvenes.

Note: Steps 1-3 should be recorded in the minutes with the name of the members identified.
Steps 4-6 is a personal matter between the owner of the property the meeting is held in and the individuals who were asked to leave (these steps are not an association issue).

Again, try and work with the individuals first.

When we have members attend, we always open the floor first allowing them to speak about any issues they may have first and then politely thank them and invite them to stay while the meeting continues but that they are welcome to leave at anytime if their schedule doesn't allow them to stay.

If the issue they bring up is one that needs further investigation, we actually ask them if they would like to be on a committee to investigate the issue (usually they back off, sometimes they step up and help).

If the issue is violations of others, we inform them of the procedure to use.

If the issue is something already on the agenda, we will skip to that item and discuss it then OR inform them that the item is already on the agenda and will be discussed later in the evening.

Hope this helps,

Tim
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
In my last HOA (750 homes) the first 1/2 hour of every BOD Meeting was an open Q&A session. At the end of this time the BOD informed the attendees that they were invited to stay and observe the rest of the BOD meeting but that they would only be allowed to speak if asked to speak by the BOD.

Other then reminding the occasional interrupter that they were not allowed to speak unless requested to do so, we never had a truly unruly person but others out here have had such.

If someone tries to stifle a fellow owner from speaking, asking questions, they are asking for trouble. You must allow a time and place for all to be heard or they will turn against you.

Hope this helps.

JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
You might try adopting the same protocol as your local school board or city council.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 12/01/2012 8:17 AM
In my last HOA (750 homes) the first 1/2 hour of every BOD Meeting was an open Q&A session. At the end of this time the BOD informed the attendees that they were invited to stay and observe the rest of the BOD meeting but that they would only be allowed to speak if asked to speak by the BOD.

This would not be legal in Arizona as state law requires allowing members to speak for or against a proposal immediately before a vote is taken. Other states may have similar laws.
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
California generally is considered very lenient when it comes to Owners' rights. But even here, Owners at Board meetings may only speak during open forums--which must be provided--but they may not speak during the business portion of meetings unless invited by the Board.

A meeting of the Members (Owners) is a different matter
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AlbertM2 on 12/01/2012 7:23 AM
My HOA is in Virginia and VA has what is called POA Act. All members can attend meeting but as a rule don't. We have one couple that attends and only disrupts and trys to re direct topics to thier own agendas.. Can we as a board, ask them to leave or bar thier attendance.??? The couple is the home owner in our subdivision that is violation of our CC&R.

Albert...you need to check Virgina law on the ability to speak. In Kansas we have to give members a reasonable opportunity to speak on the topic that is up before the board. I think the chair of your meeting needs to be a stronger leader and when this redirection happens they need to take control of the reigns.

Yes you can boot them out of a meeting if they are being disruptive but you need to give them an opportunity to jump back in line before that happens. Barring their attendance in my opinion should only be done if they pose a safety threat
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Albert, this may not suit your Board, but perhaps they can invite this couple to submit agenda topics. The couple might be advised to name the topic an provide written justifications for each one. There may be 2-3 basic issues that they want discussed and putting them in wiriting may help them organize their thoughts.

Though we only get 3-4 agenda items a year from Owners we always seriously discuss them. Well, one wanted us (the Board) to remove access to a deeded parking space in our underground garage to its delinquent Owner. That, we may not legally do, so that was handled very quickly.
JM10 (California)
Posts: 503
Posted:
The Stirling-Davis Act says "A reasonable time limit for all members of the association to speak to the board of directors or before a meeting of the association shall be established by the board of directors." There are certain times when the members must be allowed to speak before a vote.

So this is something that each HOA must look at and refer to the state and CC&R.

So it is not only during an open forum when member can speak in California.

I suggested that one check out the local boards and city councils. I spoke at a city council sub-committee meeting (public health and safety). I contacted the person in charge and they even postponed the agenda item until a day that I could attend. I signed in and noted what topic on the agenda I wished to address. I was given time to address my concerns and answered questions.

This way, the president/head of the committee can see what are the items that someone wants to address. Because I was the only person there speaking, my time was not limited. The committee understood this was of considerable community concern because another person had come to support me.

The committee also asked questions of other people in attendance from other agencies and I was allowed to ask questions.

I've also attended a school board meeting. The chair would ask if there was anyone interested in addressing certain issues before the discussion. This was above and beyond the open forum which was for things not on the agenda.

I agree with Carol that asking to have someone submit the topic and write the justifications is a good one. I had already written out an essay that was published.

When making up the agenda, you can note the agenda item and refuse those that aren't under the jurisdiction of the HOA.

CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Albert, remember when JM or I speak of the Davis-Stirling Open Meeting Act, it applies only to CA. The davis-stirling.com site, though, sponsored by an HOA attorneys firm, discusses a huge array of HOA topics, and often is useful to folks in other states.

Brad points out that Kansas permits Owners to speak about listed agenda items during the biz portion of open meetings of the board. Maybe VA does too.

JM--I'm pretty familiar with Cali's Open Meeting Act and, without researching it, please give me the article and section number that says that Owners must be permitted to speak before a vote during an open regular or special meeting of the Board. I don't think that's correct. Do you mean meeting of the Members (h'owners) ??

Relying on school board meetings or city council meetings as models might be helpful, but they are meetings that are open to the public and must comply with different laws (e.g., the Brown Act) than HOAs, which in our case, and probably most, is a non-profit mutual benefit corporation.

CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Albert, remember when JM or I speak of the Davis-Stirling Open Meeting Act, it applies only to CA. The davis-stirling.com site, though, sponsored by an HOA attorneys firm, discusses a huge array of HOA topics, and often is useful to folks in other states.

Brad points out that Kansas permits Owners to speak about listed agenda items during the biz portion of open meetings of the board. Maybe VA does too.

JM--I'm pretty familiar with Cali's Open Meeting Act and, without researching it, please give me the article and section number that says that Owners must be permitted to speak before a vote during an open regular or special meeting of the Board. I don't think that's correct. Do you mean meeting of the Members (h'owners) ??

Relying on school board meetings or city council meetings as models might be helpful, but they are meetings that are open to the public and must comply with different laws (e.g., the Brown Act) than HOAs, which in our case, and probably most, is a non-profit mutual benefit corporation.

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here