JoanneB2 (Florida)
Posts: 25
Posts: 25
Posted:
Our deed restrictions, while serving the community for over 35 years, are really a mess in what they don't say rather than what they do say. Part of the problem is that no one saved any documentation to "follow" things that were changed (i.e. payments going to annual, fiscal year changing from January/December to October/September). The paragraph concerning fees says a fee up to $25.00 a month may be charged as may be set from time to time. Previous boards have allowed owners to make payments (on a $250 annual assessment).
What I proposed was a payment policy that allows for payments of $50.00 per month but to start in June (prior to the due date of the assessment) and be finished by October 31st. Presently payments are allowed from October to March. The covenants state fees remaining unpaid for 30 days following the date payable shall be charged a late fee of $25.00. An additional late fee of $25.00 shall be applied for each consecutive month on the 30th of that month that the account remains in arrears. By collecting payments from June to October, those accounts would not need special treatment (not accessing late fees).
The President is reluctant to make this change because he feels the governing documents are not specific enough. I say this is an area where the board can write the policy that really only affects less than 6 members per year.
Any forseeable problems with making this change?
JoAnne
What I proposed was a payment policy that allows for payments of $50.00 per month but to start in June (prior to the due date of the assessment) and be finished by October 31st. Presently payments are allowed from October to March. The covenants state fees remaining unpaid for 30 days following the date payable shall be charged a late fee of $25.00. An additional late fee of $25.00 shall be applied for each consecutive month on the 30th of that month that the account remains in arrears. By collecting payments from June to October, those accounts would not need special treatment (not accessing late fees).
The President is reluctant to make this change because he feels the governing documents are not specific enough. I say this is an area where the board can write the policy that really only affects less than 6 members per year.
Any forseeable problems with making this change?
JoAnne