πŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

LindaC3 (Florida)
Posts: 526
Posted:
Good evening group.....Another meeting with rv parking issues...hopefully this will be the last ?? My situation is as follows--- The BOD has passed a Rule stating RV'S must be enclosed in a building OR stored in the storage area provided by the HOA.....People who do not want to store their RV'S or build a building have been fined $5.00 per day for the violation..... Up to $1000.00 total for the violation.Now my question is ----- Should there be a defined time period for them to comply with the Rule or do you just keep letting them pay the $5.00 per day and still be in violation ? It makes no sense to me to allow someone to just pay a fine but not have to comply with the Rule..Why then even bother having a Rule ?? Thoughts and suggestions PLEASE as I know my next task when I chair the Appeals Commitee will be to have to deliver the bad news...... Thanks as always for your help LindaC
HaroldS (Arizona)
Posts: 906
Posted:
More to the point: What does your original documents say about RVs? Does your board have the authority to make these "rules" at all? They can't make them more stringent than your documents, without approval from the required consent of your owners. If your original documents did not require RVs be hidden inside a building, the board can't pass such a rule.
As far as notice, I don't know your state laws, but whatever happened to due process? Are your violators being notified, have a hearing, or do you just begin issuing fines? You can issue fines every day forever. Doesn't mean they will comply or pay them. Again, depends on your state laws whether you can foreclose on fines or must get a judgment. Arizona requires a judgment for fines before you can file a lien and collect at closing. Harold
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Posted By LindaC3 on 02/20/2007 4:48 PM
Should there be a defined time period for them to comply with the Rule or do you just keep letting them pay the $5.00 per day and still be in violation ? It makes no sense to me to allow someone to just pay a fine but not have to comply with the Rule..Why then even bother having a Rule ?? Thoughts and suggestions PLEASE as I know my next task when I chair the Appeals Commitee will be to have to deliver the bad news...... Thanks as always for your help LindaC

Linda, the following is from R&Rs we wrote which may help:
"When a violation is not corrected within the specified time limit, an initial fine of $50.00 is assessed. If a violation is not corrected, subsequent citations may be issued and the fine will be doubled compared to the previous Demand letter. If necessary the Association shall get a court order to correct the violation and effect corrections required. The owner’s property shall be assessed for all costs involved. This will include, but is not limited to, the costs to correct the violation, fines, fees, attorney fees and court costs."

PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
LindaC3:
I totally agree with Harold's statement regarding--what do your documents state about parking RVs. This is really the issue, not the
how to and when to fine. If RVs are not specifically mentioned and described as such (a Recreational Vehicle can mean different things to different people) then the BoD has no authority to impose such a strong rule without a vote by the community. Review your documents on parking.

I could see where difficulty could arise by many 'larger' vehicles
(RVs?) being parked causing congested streets and driveways. But the Bod needs to address the problem with a solution from the community--not resorting to fines hoping that fining will get rid of the problem.

This, again, may be action from a BoD exerting their power in something 'they' have decided 'they' don't want to tolerate. By the way, how many actually own an RV in your community of residents?

PaulM
LindaC3 (Florida)
Posts: 526
Posted:
Ah !! The age old question about RV'S and parking them on residential lots.... Our Deed Restrictions specifically state that RV'S ARE NOT PERMITTED on the lots--- You have to store them in a storage yard provided by the Association for that use...BUT.......For some strange reason- and we had many a post here at HOA Talk about this- Our Deed Rest. contains a section that states the BOD may adopt a Rule of General Application to deal with the RV Issue...The Rule itself may only be "TEMPORARY" .....We wrangled back and forth for over 15 months...YES FIFTEEN MONTHS on this isssue....Caused a major rift in the community......The BOD finally settled on a Rule that you had to have the RV Enclosed in a building...Well most folks here do not want buildings on the land- the cost etc......So we then went back and forth about maybe a landscape rule to "screen" the RV....Well you can only imagine how that went..

So this past Sunday at the BD they went to final vote--- No landscape--- Build a building- or move it...Now mind you - parking the RV in this 40 x 40 - 16 ft high building is only TEMPORARY...because the deed rest...does not allow the RV on the property....So they fined the people $5.00 per day for the violation......We had 15 violations when this all started--- 12 complied- moved the RV to storage- and 3 fought it....The 3 lost--- After Sunday meeting when word got out that the fine was $5.00 per day- more people moved their RV'S out of storage under the assumption that they could "basically" pay $5.00 per day to park the RV on their property...

Well ,you can imagine the ruckus this is now causing.....

The question you may ask is--- Is the Rule Fair ?? Probably not--- I think (personally)it is counterproductive to have Deed Restrictions to state one thing- but then have another Deed Restriction that allows for you to "temporarily" ignore the other Deed Restrictions....Why even bother having Deed Restrictions to begin with........And as always just my humble opinion..But this has caused MANY A NEIGHBOR to DISLIKE MANY A NEIGHBOR---- What a shame .....Linda C
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Linda, I see this as clear cut and not questionable. If your CC&Rs state no RV may be stored on a lot then none can be - PERIOD. The BOD has no authority to change this and needs to enforce the restriction - PERIOD. The CC&Rs should have been amended if a change was desired. A Rule which violates the CC&Rs is not valid. Rules and Regulations can be more restrictive than similar restrictions in controlling documents but may not be more liberal.
LindaC3 (Florida)
Posts: 526
Posted:
RogerB--- I am in total aggreeance with you on this one...However- our esteemed Attorney for the HOA has stated that the BOD may make a rule to deal with the parking of rv's....... I feel like you do--- How can you have a rule that in essence violates the Deed restrictions.....LINDAC
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
$5 a day might seem feasible for parking an RV on a lot. I have no idea how much RV storage costs, but $150 a month doesn't seem excessive, given that a 10 foot by 10 foot storage area runs over $100 a month here.

If I had an RV, and you fined me $5 a day for parking, with no other penalty, i might just pay it ad infinitum. It's cheaper than complying!
JM2 (Oregon)
Posts: 439
Posted:
Hello all:

Here is our rule:

4.10 Recreation and work vehicles and trailers. These vehicles are not to be parked in the street nor otherwise stored in sight per the CC&Rs.
- Three day notice to correct problem.
- $25 daily fine begins on Day 4, plus administrative charges.
- Daily fine increases to $50 on Day 10
- Day 16 the Association may have the item removed at lot owner's expense, minimum $100 charge, and/or refer the matter to the Association's attorney for legal action.
- Repeat violations will begin with the $25 daily fine and administratvie charges, wtihout notice, and follow the same steps outlined above, with the daily fine increasing to $50 on Day 7.

It has been very effective. Since we do have some "snowbirds" in our community, we ask them to notify the office when they will be loading/unloading and to minimize the time in the community.

We have an "upscale" neighborhood (minimum prices are around $350k for a townhome or condo, up to $1.5M for the highest priced single-family homes. You might need to adjust your scale according to your community. The lower daily fine, followed by a higher daily fine seems to help keep the violations to a minimum as well.

It may be worthwhile to price out the cost of RV storage in your areas and then adjust the fines so that it's worthwhile to store off-site.

J. Patrick Moore, CMCA
WilliamT (Arizona)
Posts: 489
Posted:
Posted By LindaC3 on 02/21/2007 7:41 AM

RogerB--- I am in total aggreeance with you on this one...However- our esteemed Attorney for the HOA has stated that the BOD may make a rule to deal with the parking of rv's....... I feel like you do--- How can you have a rule that in essence violates the Deed restrictions.....LINDAC


Linda, A rule may explain or clarify a CC&R section. It can not add to, or subtract from the covenant.

If your attorney said you can make a rule to deal with the parking of rv's, he is correct.

If he said the rule can conflict with the CC&R's, he is wrong, and should be fired. Get another attorney who specializes in HOA operations.

HaroldS (Arizona)
Posts: 906
Posted:
Was your attorney's opinion based on this rule, or given before they made the rule? Your board does nave the authority to assess reasonable fines, but not based on unallowed "rules".
Sounds like your board needs decisive leadership; instead they have created a devisive brouhaha in your HOA that will probably not heal for quite a while. Require they build a "temporary" building for storage? The $5 a day fine would be cheaper. At least while they are on the road with their RV they won't have to pay the fine and the neighbors won't have to always look at a 16 ft building.
They should have enforced the CC&Rs as written and told the members if they want them changed to go the proper route.
Maybe your board could require they dig 16 foot pits to hide their RVs? Oops! That would be exceeding their authority too. Harold
LindaC3 (Florida)
Posts: 526
Posted:
Okay let's see if I can explain this the short and sweet way.......... Our CR&R does not permit RV's to be parked,maintained,or stored on the Property...Period...
Then in the CC&R it states per Article Seven Section Six--- No temp residence is permitted to parked,stored or maintained on the property unless temporarily permitted by a rule of general application ,which shall be subject to laws and ordinances....PERIOD...

So the BOD made a RULE that the RV would have to be wholly enclosed in a building..Some people wanted landscaping....It turned into World War III......The Attorney said they could make a rule to allow landscaping....The BOD said NO.....People have been paying fines the whole time we have been wrangling with this rule.......So now the vote is FINAL and we all want to get on with life but..............you know how that goes.....

In my PERSONAL OPINION the rule itself violates the CC&R that gave the BOD authority to make the rule because it states that the rule shall be subject to local laws...Well local law allows for RV'S to be parked on the property WITHOUT being in a building...The CC&R did not state the BOD could make up a rule saying it had to be in a building----It says the rule SHALL BE SUBJECT to local laws..So I feel they overstepped their authority by mandating a BUILDING for a temporary situation..

I know this is confusing ,and if we DID NOT HAVE ANY RULE many owners would be in violation of the CC&R because they have RV'S in buildings on their property....LindaC
WilliamT (Arizona)
Posts: 489
Posted:
Posted By LindaC3 on 02/21/2007 10:08 AM

Okay let's see if I can explain this the short and sweet way.......... Our CR&R does not permit RV's to be parked,maintained,or stored on the Property...Period...

Then in the CC&R it states per Article Seven Section Six--- No temp residence is permitted to parked,stored or maintained on the property unless temporarily permitted by a rule of general application ,which shall be subject to laws and ordinances....PERIOD... LindaC


This means that no RV can be on the property, either on the street, or in a building built for that purpose.

The only rule that would work in this case is a rule that allows an RV to park in front of the residence for up to 24 hours for the purpose of loading and unloacking.

We have that rule. It is very reasonable and gives consideration to the fact that owners have to load supplies from their home into the RV and unload their dirty laundry when they return.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • βœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • βœ“ Share your experience
  • βœ“ Get expert advice
  • βœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here