💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

FernF (New Jersey)
Posts: 3
Posted:
MY condo community exists of 45 cluster style units. Our deed restriction and rules and regs clearly state no alterations to the outside
of any unit w/o prior board approval. All outside fixtures need to be matched to original ones as close as possible.
None of the new replacements are matching due to the 30 yr old age of the originals. No big deal right?
Now the pres. of the board who has been a resident for only 6 mos. has gotten board approval to add a spiral staircase to adjoin
outside decks. This pres. has a personal agenda to make upgrades that change the exterior look of our complex obviously.
Shoulnt the 45 of us decide on such major exterior changes. last week several of us were told to remove our bird feeders due to the mess.
We can't put up flag poles, or walk our dogs off the leash when no ones around, but one new homeowner gets board approval for such a major
exterior change to our bldgs.?Is this fair? Is this legal legal?
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Our deed restriction and rules and regs clearly state no alterations to the outside
of any unit w/o prior board approval.


Ok.

Quote:
Now the pres. of the board who has been a resident for only 6 mos. has gotten board approval to add a spiral staircase to adjoin
outside decks.


Ok, so he got approval, just like your docs stated.

Quote:
Shoulnt the 45 of us decide on such major exterior changes?


I thought you said your docs only said you need board approval. So why would you think 45 of you should decide?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By FernF on 10/20/2012 6:43 AM

None of the new replacements are matching due to the 30 yr old age of the originals. No big deal right?

This could be a big deal or not. It will depend on who the membership elects and if they have common sense to allow the changes or not.

Quote:
Posted By FernF on 10/20/2012 6:43 AM

Shouldn't the 45 of us decide on such major exterior changes.

Depending on how your governing documents are worded, it's typical for the membership to elect Directors then have the Directors appoint individuals willing to serve to the approval committee (typically the architectural committee). If there is no approval committee the Board would typically become the approval authority.

Therefore, your vote for who serves on the Board is your decision on the other items.

If you disagree with a decision of the Association you typically have the following choices:

a) Live with it and complain to your neighbors
b) Volunteer and become part of the decision process by serving on the approval committee
c) Volunteer, gather support, and become elected to the board so you have a say in the decision
d) Gather support and recall the individual or entire board who made the decision
e) Gather support and don't reelect those same individuals when the time comes.
f) Gather support and follow the process to amend the governing documents so the entire membership is required to vote on specific issues.
g) Move

I know that this may have been difficult to read, but that is how the process works within Associations.

Quote:
Posted By FernF on 10/20/2012 6:43 AM

last week several of us were told to remove our bird feeders due to the mess.

Separate issues. You may want to link an approval of one item and the removal of different items together to make a point but they are in fact two different issues and should be treated as such on their own merits.

Quote:
Posted By FernF on 10/20/2012 6:43 AM

We can't put up flag poles, or walk our dogs off the leash when no ones around, but one new homeowner gets board approval for such a major exterior change to our bldgs.?Is this fair?

Fairness depends on the individuals perspective.
Is it fair that only those who are elected get to make the decisions? The answer is, it doesn't matter if it is fair or not. This is the process as outlined within your governing documents and State laws. Therefore, until the governing documents are amended requiring some other process, then this is the process the Board is required to follow.

Quote:
Posted By FernF on 10/20/2012 6:43 AM

Is this legal legal?

Typically, what you described is within the law. However, I am not an attorney and I do not work within the legal profession. I also have not read your governing documents to see what the requirements and/or procedures are that must be followed. Nor have I reviewed your applicable State Statutes to see if a State Law may supersede your governing documents.

Therefore, you should do the following in order to make that determination:

Read your Governing Documents:
CC&Rs (also known as deed restrictions or covenants)
Articles of Incorporation (if your Association is incorporated, most are)
Bylaws
Resolutions (rules, regulations and guidelines adopted by the board)
NJ Condominium Law
NJ Nonprofit Corporation Act (if your Association is incorporated as a nonprofit, most are)

If you still have concerns if the Associations actions were legal you should consult a local attorney.

Hope this helps,

Tim

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
In another post Fern does say she was on the BOD for two months but she resigned for reasons unrelated to the changes.

Seems she might have had her opportunity to participate on the highest level (BOD) but she chose not to by resigning.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here