Quote:
Posted By ElizabethA2 on 10/10/2012 7:31 AM
Anyone encountering a resident who is a member of a homeowners association who is managing a personal blog which occasionlly posts items critical to the BOD? Our HOA is threatening legal action to require that resident to stop.....can the Board do that?
That sounds like something I would do.
First, you have to be able to separate opinion from libel. Being critical is part of freedom of speech. If the statements are false, which is not what you state, then the HOA could possibly sue for libel.
The HOA may be on unsteady ground here, but it depends upon what is being written and the reason behind the resident's action. For instance, if the BOD is supposed to allow equal access to newsletter and other media as provided in the State of California's Davis-Stirling Act for the purpose of elections and other matters that require a vote or the public voicing of opinion, a judge is likely to see that the resident had little or no recourse.
Second, the directors as elected officials are considered public figures. For this reason, the burden of proof is higher. The HOA would have to prove actual malice--so not only knowledge that the statements are false, but also that the statements are being published with a sense of recklessness.
A HOA should have an open forum where lively discussions can take place. In the case of the HOA that I was under, the board disregarded the law and attempted to squelch any dissenting voices. That's not democracy; that's like a fascist state. This was a winning argument in small claims court when we took our HOA to court for release of documents and a reversal of the judge's original decision.