SamE1 (California)
Posts: 32
Posts: 32
Posted:
Our Board has hired an "independent consultant/expert" to oversee/advise a large construction project on our building (in California). He was hired to ensure the general contractor is held to the strictest of standards, is performing all the responsibilities correctly, all the work is done right etc.
He is supposed to be a completely independent consultant/expert and represent the HOA's best interests.
Our Board is now telling us that this so called "independent advisor" is referring two (of the three) general contractors that will bid on the project. (The third bid is now coming from an attorney that was hired to review all contracts etc. and is also supposed to be completely neutral. A bit of the same problem here as well...).
I have been told by numerous people with a lot of experience in this area that it is VERY important that the "Independent Consultant/advisor" does not have any relationship w/ the general contractor as there is high probability of kick-backs, incentives, less strict oversight etc. (which makes perfect sense). (If they are friends, the independent consultant/advisor is less likely to point out flaws in their workmanship, force them to do work over, tell us when their quality is not good etc.)
Is there any rule/law or further justification I can site that mandates this so called "independent consultant/expert" have no prior connection/relationship with the general contractors he's overseeing? The Board just responds telling me that this relationship ensures we are getting a good general contractor as he is coming recommended etc. I've been searching Davis-Stirling and found 10 Bidding Mistakes etc., but nothing exactly specific to this...
Any advise? Thanks!
He is supposed to be a completely independent consultant/expert and represent the HOA's best interests.
Our Board is now telling us that this so called "independent advisor" is referring two (of the three) general contractors that will bid on the project. (The third bid is now coming from an attorney that was hired to review all contracts etc. and is also supposed to be completely neutral. A bit of the same problem here as well...).
I have been told by numerous people with a lot of experience in this area that it is VERY important that the "Independent Consultant/advisor" does not have any relationship w/ the general contractor as there is high probability of kick-backs, incentives, less strict oversight etc. (which makes perfect sense). (If they are friends, the independent consultant/advisor is less likely to point out flaws in their workmanship, force them to do work over, tell us when their quality is not good etc.)
Is there any rule/law or further justification I can site that mandates this so called "independent consultant/expert" have no prior connection/relationship with the general contractors he's overseeing? The Board just responds telling me that this relationship ensures we are getting a good general contractor as he is coming recommended etc. I've been searching Davis-Stirling and found 10 Bidding Mistakes etc., but nothing exactly specific to this...
Any advise? Thanks!