💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

PenyW (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 43
Posted:
Late last year the Board of Directors for our association all resigned after an uproar over an illegal "special assessment" (it didn't fall into any of the categories listed for assessments specified by our Declaration). A new board was elected and is the process of sorting out the huge mess left by the previous board. I was wondering if any of you have ever had a situation whereby you felt the need to repeal any Rules and Regulations or amendments to Bylaws that were either confusing and poorly worded, or consisting of a tone better suited for a fascist manifesto than a document to govern a community of families. I'd be interested in any information you could provide. Thanks.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Posted By PenyW on 02/15/2007 5:15 AM
I was wondering if any of you have ever had a situation whereby you felt the need to repeal any Rules and Regulations or amendments to Bylaws that were either confusing and poorly worded, or consisting of a tone better suited for a fascist manifesto than a document to govern a community of families. I'd be interested in any information you could provide. Thanks.

There can always be a need to amend due to poorly written controlling documents, new laws, and desires of the members. Ee have helped associations amend all their controlling documents including the Declaration, the Articles of Incorportation, the By-laws, the Rules and Regulations, and Architectural modification request form.

JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
PenyW - what was the special assessment for, what categories does your Declaration describe?
PenyW (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 43
Posted:
JoeW,
The assessment was for the expense of a mamagement company that they decided to hire half-way through the year. Our fiscal year runs from January 1 to December 31. They hired the company in June. This expense wasn't in the budget for 2006.

Our documents list 3 forms of acceptable assessments:
1. General - these are are annual fees due on March 1.
2. Special - Identified as only being applicable to emergency repairs or captial improvements to the common areas.
3. Deliquency - For penalizing individuals who chronically disregard rules and regs, fail to pay dues, etc.

Hiring of a management company doesn't fall into any of those categories.
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
PenyW - the expense for a management company would come out of the annual fees, therefore under the General category. what was the amount of the special assessment, what is your yearly budget?
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Posted By PenyW on 02/15/2007 9:38 AM
The assessment was for the expense of a mamagement company that they decided to hire half-way through the year. Our fiscal year runs from January 1 to December 31. They hired the company in June. This expense wasn't in the budget for 2006.

Our documents list 3 forms of acceptable assessments:
1. General - these are are annual fees due on March 1.
2. Special - Identified as only being applicable to emergency repairs or captial improvements to the common areas.
3. Deliquency - For penalizing individuals who chronically disregard rules and regs, fail to pay dues, etc.

Hiring of a management company doesn't fall into any of those categories.

Are you sure the special assessment is identified as you presented? Following is part of our CC&Rs which would allow the Board to hire a management company.

6. Special Assessments.
In addition to the annual Common Expense assessments authorized in this Article, the Association, with the approval of two-thirds (2/3) of a quorum of Association votes cast by Members voting in person or by proxy at a meeting duly called for this purpose, may levy, in any fiscal year, a special assessment applicable to that year only, for the purpose of defraying in whole or in part the cost of any construction, reconstruction, repair or replacement of a capital improvement upon any portion of real property for which the Association has repair and/or reconstruction obligations, including fixtures and personal property related thereto, or for repair or reconstruction of any damaged or destroyed Improvements located on said real property, or for the funding of any operating deficit incurred by the Association.

PenyW (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 43
Posted:
Roger,
There was no vote taken for the additional expense. As a matter of fact, the board hid the fact that they were even considering hiring a management company until it had already been done.

The billing that came in July had a letter that described the amount owed by each homeowner as a "special assessment."

The association dues that were billed in January 2006 were for the amount of $200. These were due on March 1. In the annual budget sent to members in December of 2005 there was no mention of any plans to hire a management company.

In July the "special assessment" of $62.50 was sent to each member. It wasn't voted on or even discussed at any meeting prior to the hiring of the managemnt company. In reviewing past minutes, it was found that the decision had been made in an executive session.

Our community has no pools, tennis courts, or other extras. Spending $15K a year on a management company didn't sit well with any of the homeowners, since we know that work is going to need to be done on our common area in the next couple of years.

But my question isn't about the special assessment, it's about repealing resolutions and amendments made by the previous board. Roger, in your response you mentioned "Ee". I'm not sure what that refers to. Could you clarify for me.

Thanks.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Posted By PenyW on 02/15/2007 12:57 PM
But my question isn't about the special assessment, it's about repealing resolutions and amendments made by the previous board. Roger, in your response you mentioned "Ee". I'm not sure what that refers to. Could you clarify for me. Thanks.

Ee was a typo error, should have been We. Sorry but often I do not edit my posts due to limited time and many responses.
You can amend (change) any of the controlling documents. It just requires the approval level following the amendment procedures specified for that document. Last year we amended the By-laws of three associations with a total rewrite of them.

JM2 (Oregon)
Posts: 439
Posted:
Hi Peny:

In general I always recommend that any re-write of the governing documents be done by a lawyer who specializes in HOA issues; often they will also monitor and/or run the election process for you.

That being said, I was a manager for a small HOA (40 duplex units) that ammended their own docs. It was a long process, from sending out the initial notice to getting the election completed (we needed 30 yes votes) took about 3 months, several notices from the management company and then follow-up with footwork from the Board to get people to vote and send in their ballots.

What I'm wondering: why didn't they just pass an amended budget and send it out along with a new assessment billing? It seems like they worked hard to make it difficult for themselves. Or, (if your state law allows) they could have borrowed from reserves and paid it back the following year.

My guess is that the previous board wanted to hire a management company because they either felt they weren't doing a good job managing things on their own, that it was taking an inordinate amount of time for a volunteer board, or that they felt that they couldn't meet their fiduciary duty to the community without outside advice and work-time from a manager.

J. Patrick Moore, CMCA
JosephW (Michigan)
Posts: 882
Posted:
Penny,

I've worked with a number of asociations that wanted to amend or update their documents. This seems to be the process that has worked the best:

1. Make a list of the sections you want to add, change or remove
2. Write out, in simple english, what you think the changes should say
3. After each one, add an explanation and the reasoning behind it.
4. Sit down with an attorney who knows association law and go over them with him or her. At this point,the attorney may suggest more changes or additions, relative to state laws that the documents should conform to
5. When you think you have the chanes pretty well set, send a copy to the owners, and invite them to attend a meeting to discuss them, or to write you with their thoughts. Do not call a vote at this time. You wnat to find out where the objections might be, or to see if the changes might cause some problems you weren't aware of. Better to find out aout them before a vote comes up. Keep the meeting low-key and focused on proposed changes. Do more listening than talking
6. When you have all of the comments, sit down with the attorney again, and make final changes. Turn all this over to the attorney at this point so they can be put into final form. Ask the attorney for a checklist of things you must do from that point on, i.e. how many days notice, handling proxies or absentee ballots, voting percentage required, etc.
7. Get the vote
8. If approved, have the attorney record the changes and then send copies to every owner.

You want the owners to be a part of the process so that they "buy in" to the changes, and not feel as if they have just been forced on them.

Joe

Joseph West
Official HOATalk.com Sponsor
Community Associations Network, LLC
www.CommunityAssociations.net

*See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
Roger and PenyW:
PenyW's question is interesting because it brings us back to the authority of a Board in a situation of incurring an expense which was not covered in the budget and not brought up for community vote.
Peny's Board acted apart from the community to incur an ONGOING EXPENSE which all residents will have to be part of.

This has less to do with whether a mgmt. company is warranted or not, contracts, etc.--and more to do with authority/power of the Board to make this type of decision on their own. We do realize if residents don't like the way the Board is managing they can remove them....etc., etc. and on and on.

But we are talking about the effects of a Board's decision--putting an added financial burden on residents without their input.
Would someone please speak to this for all of us to benefit. Thanks as always for great input.

P.S. As an afterthought, could a resident take the position of choosing not to pay the special assessment of $62.50 since they did not agree to it and its not in the covenant docs. What's the worse that could happen other than a lien being put on the property.

PaulM
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
Roger,
In your quote of #6 Special Assessments to Peny's question --pardon my confusion--where does this address expense of hiring a mgmt. company. I only note repair, replacement of capital improvements, etc....and funding of operating deficit.
I'm not thinking that hiring a mgmt. company falls into either of these. Pls. define this for me. Sorry I'm not following you.
PaulM
PenyW (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 43
Posted:
Paul,

Residents didn't have the option to not pay the $62.50. The management company stated that they have a binding contract that they entered into in good faith. Therefore the dues must be paid or the accounts will be considered delinquent and late fees assessed. The ultimate outcome would be legal fees and eventually foreclosure (iwould imagine).
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Posted By PaulM on 02/16/2007 6:02 AM
Roger,
In your quote of #6 Special Assessments to Peny's question --pardon my confusion--where does this address expense of hiring a mgmt. company. I only note repair, replacement of capital improvements, etc....and funding of operating deficit.
I'm not thinking that hiring a mgmt. company falls into either of these. Pls. define this for me. Sorry I'm not following you.
PaulM

Read again the words "FUNDING OF OPERATING DEFICIT". The Board has the authority to hire a management company and since you said this was not in the annual operating budget there will be a deficit. Your post did not include this. Did you fail to include it? If not, your Board probably could made an adjustment to the annual budget and increased the annual assessment.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Sorry Paul, that was Penny not you who did not respond to my question as to whether funding the operating deficit by special assessment was allowed the Board. All assessments need the authorized level of approval prior to making the assessment. Any property which does not pay valid assessments can be fined, liened, and when the CC&Rs authorize, can be foreclosed and sold.

What can be done if the Board exceeded their authority by making a special assessment without proper approvals? Obviously they shouldn't and this can not legally be enforced. I prefer to win the battle of principle without legal action. I would send a letter to the Board advising them of the proper procedures they should have followed. But from a practical matter, I would not dispute paying the minor amount involved. No sense trying to win a battle for a few dollars when it would ultimately cost me 100 times more
PenyW (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 43
Posted:
Roger,

There are no provisions in our documents for funding an operating deficit. I suppose the developer (who put the Declaration in place)decided that those who would be approving the budget would try to keep routine expenditures within the amount approved. There was no "emergency" that would require a management company to be hired.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here