Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 09/13/2012 12:44 PM
Posted By TimB4 on 09/13/2012 2:59 AM
Our policy is that funds are applied first to any charges, costs of collections, legal fees or court costs, if any, on their account then toward past due assessments then toward current assessment due.
This policy would be very wrong under current Arizona law. Maybe some other states, as well.
In AZ, if an HOA levies a fine and the owner refuses to pay the HOA is then required to either sue for a judgment in court or forget about it. If the HOA gets a judgment and the owner still refuses to pay, the HOA can record a lien on the property but cannot foreclose over unpaid fines.
If a homeowner pays his assessment and the HOA diverts that payment toward the fine, the HOA can then use this a a pretext to foreclose for nonpayment of the assessment. This would not hold up in a foreclosure proceeding.
Not sure but I think applying assessment funds to unpaid fines would not fly in California? When we lost the ability to lien for unpaid fines our unpaid fines went WAY up. We can only lien for unpaid assessments or if the Assn performs work for safety or health reasons and the member does not pay, we call it "Alternative Remedies". It is then classified as a special assessment which we can lien for, but to the best of my knowledge in the last sixteen years we haven't done that. Our fine situation is a joke.
The only thing we can do is withhold amenity privileges, and as almost all of our non-compliance violations involve short and long term rental properties, it is basically worthless. I would think a fine schedule would be required for consistency purposes?
Paul T