JamesB15 (Florida)
Posts: 87
Posts: 87
Posted:
Our new president stated that he does not recognize Fl. 720. This was in connection with a board member that was voted on the board at the last meeting. The member had not paid his dues for 8 months. When I asked that he be replaced we were told that the covenants do not provide his removal. The new president nominated him in the past meeting and appealed to us to get along. Members advised he us not eligible. He then asked that we appoint a committee to see if we recognize Fl. 710.Go figure. When asked if convicted felons can serve the president refused to address it. A motion then was allowed by him and it asked to remove him as president. It was seconded. The president would not allow the vote to be counted as he knew it was 4 to 2(One ineligible)to remove him. He then left with the other legal member and the vote was not counted as we no longer had a quorum.
The president's actions were singular and not in our best interest. If he continues to hold out or uses dues to consult an attorney without permission of the board could he be held personally responsible? Is the motion still on the floor when we convene the next meeting? Thanks Jim
The president's actions were singular and not in our best interest. If he continues to hold out or uses dues to consult an attorney without permission of the board could he be held personally responsible? Is the motion still on the floor when we convene the next meeting? Thanks Jim