💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

SovE (Michigan)
Posts: 6
Posted:
I'm interested in buying a number of condos in small community consisting of 7 buildings in a inner city urban location. However, after further research it seems most of the other units are either - uninhabitable or abandoned probably 60% of the development. Of the occupied units nearly all are rentals with some non-payers subject to evictions. Overall there are only 2 owner-occupiers who seem to be the only ones paying the dues.

The seller suggested that if I buy I should take over the HOA?

The finances of the HOA is terrible and I believe they are on the verge of collapse. In fact 3 of the 7 buildings have had all utilities stopped for non-payment. There is no board as such. The owner of the units who is trying to sell me the property is the only board member but wants to quit from everything to do with the property, very burnt out and cash strapped.

After reviewing the HOA documents, the majority of the abandoned units have been foreclosed by the HOA and there are judgement on the remainder of the units. However, action as not taken place on 20% of the units.

I am ultimately looking to turn this property in rental buildings.

I presume if I choose to buy the units for sale and then assume the role of HOA that it would mean combined I control the bulk of the community. My questions are:

Can I rewrite the byelaws as the only active member of the 'board'?
Can I foreclose on the remaining non-paying owners and acquire their units for the HOA?
Can I sell off the foreclosed units or individual buildings which consist of a group of 8 units?
Can I dissolve the condo association and turn the building into a apartment community?

Any advise will be helpful.
PaulT6 (California)
Posts: 409
Posted:
Wow!!, suggest you run, not walk away. Seriously, I think some money spent on an Attorney that specializes in these matters would be a good investment, good luck.

Paul T
SovE (Michigan)
Posts: 6
Posted:
I'm used to buying distressed apartment buildings. As this on is a property with a HOA element it has made it more complicated. I thought i'd get some general advice to see if I get any answers to my questions, to determine even if it worth speaking to speaking to an attorney.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SovE on 08/30/2012 8:42 AM

Can I rewrite the byelaws as the only active member of the 'board'?

You need to read the governing documents to see what is required to amend.

Typically, the CC&Rs require 2/3 of the membership vote.
The Bylaws may or may not be able to be rewritten by the Board.

For the Board to take any action, meetings must be held and a quorum met. Quorums are typically a majority of the Board. If your governing documents require 3 board members than a quorum would be 2. (5 would be 3, 6&7 would be 4, etc.).

The Association must comply with applicable laws. The main laws many Associations forget to follow are the corporate laws (which are applicable if the Association is incorporated (most are)).

Quote:
Posted By SovE on 08/30/2012 8:42 AM

Can I foreclose on the remaining non-paying owners and acquire their units for the HOA?

Providing you follow the procedures outlined in your governing documents and applicable foreclosure laws, then yes.

Note: Just because the Association forecloses doesn't always mean that the Association owns the unit as the mortgage will need to be satisfied (typically by the bank taking possession of the unit). Until the Bank takes possession, the Association may be able to rent the unit out providing they first go through the process of evicting the previous owner, cleaning the unit, making necessary repairs, etc.

I would suggest consulting with an attorney.

Quote:
Posted By SovE on 08/30/2012 8:42 AM

Can I sell off the foreclosed units or individual buildings which consist of a group of 8 units?

Typically, NO. This is because the Bank holds the 1st lien.

Again, you need to check with an attorney.

Quote:
Posted By SovE on 08/30/2012 8:42 AM

Can I dissolve the condo association and turn the building into a apartment community?

Typically only if you (or a group) own 100% of the units.

Consult an attorney.

SovE (Michigan)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Tim,

Thank you for detailed reply.

With regards to the bank. None of the condos have mortgages. The property was created as affordable condos in the 1960's, but the area went into rapid decline in the 1990's and was most probably not mortgageable for the past 20 years.

How would the fact there is no bank involvement change your answers?
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Can I rewrite the byelaws as the only active member of the 'board'?
No

Can I foreclose on the remaining non-paying owners and acquire their units for the HOA?
Yes. But the bank will still have a lien, and someday it will foreclose on the HOA.

Can I sell off the foreclosed units or individual buildings which consist of a group of 8 units?
No, the properties will still have a 1st lien holder, the bank. Its likely more is owed to the bank than the value of the unit.

Can I dissolve the condo association and turn the building into a apartment community?
No, not unless you buy all of them

Unless you can buy all the units, dont do it.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
The only change would be that if the Association was the only lien on the home, the Association could then foreclose.

Depending on State foreclosure laws -

If there is no auction, the Association (not you) will own the property.

If there is an auction, then anyone (you, a relative of the owner, etc.) could purchase the property and the Association would receive the amount of the lien. The new owner would then be liable for assessments from that time forward.

I am not an attorney. I do not work within the legal profession. I have done zero research on MI laws. I would encourage you to seek a legal opinion from a qualified attorney who would be able to review your governing documents and have a knowledge of MI laws.

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Sov,

Taking control of a condo complex is much more difficult than rehabing an apartment because of the multitude of owners.

It is not clear what percentage of the units you would own if you purchased those that are being offered to you.

In addition to all other laws, you would need to comply with your state's non-profit laws (assuming that the association is incorporated as a non-profit) by holding elections and having open meetings. It sounds, however, that you might be the only owner casting ballots and so you can take control of the board. Depending upon state law and the existing bylaws, you may be able to amend the bylaws to facilitate some of what you wish to do.

Your biggest problem will be the declaration, which typically takes the approval of 2/3 or more of the owners to amend. All of those other units have owners somewhere and you would have to track down enough of them to amend the declaration.

Foreclosing for unpaid assessments is not always as simple as it may sound. Depending on state law, the courts may not allow you to foreclose if you cannot serve process on the legal owner because you cannot find him. If you do foreclose, you face the possibility of someone bidding at the foreclosure auction meaning that either you get into a bidding war or you have a new owner to deal with. But if you foreclose and there are no bidders then the association can take title to the property. If you control the association then you (personally) could purchase the units from the association.

You can sell off anything you own but it will still be subject to the declaration until you have the needed owner approval to amend.

Condo associations can be dissolved and turned into apartments. The person doing so needs to acquire enough of the units to amend the declaration or have the consent of the required percentage of owners. Those units that are still owned can be forced to sell to the majority owner.

As others have already stated, you need the advice of a really good real estate lawyer.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Why do you need a HOA? Why not self manage the place? A HOA is just a "sales tool" for developers to sell their homes. Plus HOA means "Homeowners Association". Meaning the OWNERS would be the ones in control eventually if you decided to leave.

I think your much better off in the long run to incorporate yourself and make this management controlled property. Drop the HOA concept for now until time to sell it off. Your much better off that way in many ways until you get this place in line and upgraded....

Former HOA President
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Sov,

Taking control of the HOA may not be easy. In any event, you would have to comply with the association documents (Declaration or CCRs, Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws) in addition to any applicable state laws.

If the bylaws require a 3-member, 5-member, etc. board size, you cannot be the sole board member. The board must have the number of members specified in the documents.

You will need to get enough votes from other owners in the association in addition to your own votes to get yourself elected to the board (typically, there is one vote per unit).

To control the board, you will need to get enough other members elected to the board who see things your way and will go along with what you want to do. Most board actions typically require a majority of the board in favor, but there may be some actions that require a 2/3 of the board members to approve.

Assume the board can re-write the bylaws. If the bylaws currently require a 5-member board, you cannot re-write the bylaws yourself. You would have to get four other people elected to the board and together you could re-write the bylaws. But then, your bylaws cannot conflict with state law. If state law requires there by at least three officers and prohibits the same individual from holding two positions, then you would still need a partner.

You need to do some homework and check your state laws and the association's documents.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Melissa with all due respect but do you read either the original post or your post before you hit send? If the HOA currently exists, which according to the OP it does, he can't just do away with it, it would have to be dissolved according to the covenants.

Contrary to your view that HOA's are "just a "sales tool" for developers to sell their homes", a great majority of communities will not let someone build a development without a HOA because they do not have the resources to maintain the things required of the HOA to maintain. Otherwise I would bet 80% or better of all standalone home HOA's would dissolve, but the rub is getting the city, county to take over the amenities and maintenance. Nor could I see a COA which is what the OP is talking about being run without someone either a Board or a CO-OP to run it.

I personally agree with Paul's post that he should run, not walk away from this deal. If he doesn't it must be done by the book, with all of the t's crossed and the i's dotted or he is in a position to loose a lot of money. At the very least Sov you should look into purchasing additional units to give you a clear majority to ram your improvements and changes through.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 08/30/2012 11:30 AM
But if you foreclose and there are no bidders then the association can take title to the property. If you control the association then you (personally) could purchase the units from the association.

However, it would have to be for fair market value and not just what the Association dues were. Otherwise, you could end up defending yourself in court for failure to perform your fiduciary duty to the Association.
SovE (Michigan)
Posts: 6
Posted:
I've gone through the bylaws and here is what is states:

'These bylaws may be amended by the association at any regular annual meeting or a special meeting called for such purpose, by an affirmative vote of more than sixty (60%) percent of all co-owners in number and in value.' Quorum mentions 35% for regular meeting and 60% for special meetings.

I've calculated my potential holdings at 67% - if I combine the units i'm thinking to buy it's 46% and the HOA foreclosed units at 21%.

Furthermore, there are 20% of the owners severely delinquent on average by about 2 yrs. So i have to consider going through the foreclosure process to acquire these units.

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Tim,

I was operating on the premise that at this point Sov would be in control of the association due to total apathy of the remaining owners. The foreclosure auction is a public sale and if no bids were recieved that is a pretty good indication that the market considers the property worth less than the amount owed. If Sov, acting as the board of directors, sold the property to himself in his personal capacity for $1 his defense against breach of fiduciary duty would be to ask his accusers where they were when the property went up for auction? The burden would be on his accusers to prove that the property was worth more than $1 when it failed to bring a single bid at a foreclosure auction.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 08/30/2012 1:36 PM
Tim,

I was operating on the premise that at this point Sov would be in control of the association due to total apathy of the remaining owners. The foreclosure auction is a public sale and if no bids were recieved that is a pretty good indication that the market considers the property worth less than the amount owed. If Sov, acting as the board of directors, sold the property to himself in his personal capacity for $1 his defense against breach of fiduciary duty would be to ask his accusers where they were when the property went up for auction? The burden would be on his accusers to prove that the property was worth more than $1 when it failed to bring a single bid at a foreclosure auction.

Good Point.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SovE on 08/30/2012 1:28 PM
I've gone through the bylaws and here is what is states:

'These bylaws may be amended by the association at any regular annual meeting or a special meeting called for such purpose, by an affirmative vote of more than sixty (60%) percent of all co-owners in number and in value.' Quorum mentions 35% for regular meeting and 60% for special meetings.

I've calculated my potential holdings at 67% - if I combine the units i'm thinking to buy it's 46% and the HOA foreclosed units at 21%.

Furthermore, there are 20% of the owners severely delinquent on average by about 2 yrs. So i have to consider going through the foreclosure process to acquire these units.


Forget the quorum, from what you posted, I think that's meaningless because you need 60% of the owners in number and in value. I think it's the "number" criteria that may stop you. Assume, as you say, that you manage to own 67% of the units. Assuming they all have the same value, you then hold 67% of value.
But, there is at least one owner who owns the other 33% of units. If there is only one other owner besides yourself, you represent only 50% of the owners in number. Chances are, though, that there are more, so you will likely own considerably less than the required 60% of owners "in number" needed to change the bylaws. My interpretation of what you posted is, you're out of luck as far as being able to change the bylaws yourself is concerned. Furthermore, changing the bylaws does not dissolve the association. You will need to read your Declaration (CCRs) to see how to do that. It's not the same as amending the bylaws.

My best advice to you is to consult an attorney before you waste your money. You're obviously expecting to invest thousands in this venture, so spending a few hundred dollars for a consultation with an attorney is certainly money well spent, even if you're advised not to go ahead with the deal.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
SOV

I believe the complexities and legal issues are beyond the ability of this forum. I know they are beyond mine.

You need sound, experienced legal advice ASAP.

SovE (Michigan)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Bruce thank you for your points.

I guess I was wrong, as I interpreted to be 60% to the refer to the number and value of the condos. However, if it is based on the number of owners and looking through the records I will need to buy properties using 7 different entities so the entire group then has over 60% of the number of owners and over 60% of the value of the condos.

It's unlikely any of the owners want anything to do with the units and there is little value to them and they are highly likely to go the tax sale auction, if the HOA doesn't foreclosure. But I the rules must be strictly followed in any event.

John, Bruce, Larry, Tim - I fully intend to go to an attorney before I commit to any such deal. I'm merely here to seek opinions and knowledge from folks who are in the field and may have direct experience for dealing the severe HOA issues.

SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
SovE,
My prediction is you will spend more on legal fees over the years with these issues VS what you will spend renovating. But hey, good luck.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
SovE,

Don't forget that you will need to pay assessments on each unit you own.
Therefore, if you own 65% of the development, you will be paying 65% of the Assessments.
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:

Using the HOA board to foreclose on non-payers is legitimate. When the board president's strategy is to use HOA-induced foreclosure to purchase the property, that does not pass the smell test. Besides, a property that doesn't bring a bid at the foreclosure auction doesn't mean the property is worth $1 or less. What it means that any underlying liens on that property make the property too expensive for investment. Most states preserve superior liens when an HOA forecloses its lien for non=payment.

You're buying bank mortgage debt plus a property, many times, when you buy at an HOA foreclosure auction.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Kelly brings up a good point. A $1 foreclosure sale is NOT a $1 house. You still have to secure a loan for the amount still owed on the home if there is any. Plus it could be the dollar added onto the amount they are foreclosing for. There is the right to redemption issue. In Alabama that is 1 year. It differs in each state.

My earlier statement about making this managed property and not an HOA still stands. If you owned a majority of the property, you could then dissolve the HOA. Our documents actually allow for us to dissolve as long as we are turned over to a management company. I'd read the documents to find out what it takes to dissolve.

The concept of a HOA does go beyond just a sales tool now. However, it is still just a club of home/property owners who pay dues to be said members. It is mandatory to be a member. (Unless volunteer HOA setup). The setup of this specific 7 unit setup doesn't sound it fits into HOA scenerio. Something sounds fishy to me for it to fit into the HOA setup. I am not sure what is off but I am not sure I would trust the person who has this all set up. Sounds like they got in over their heads by trying to be so "smart"...

I'd read the existing HOA documents to see what the setup is. Is it non-profit? What does it take to dissolve it? Who is referenced as being in control? Is it the owners or the developer? There are details here missing that a little more research is needed...A HOA foreclosing does the work of the bank. So I'd even check out with the bank the situation of the tenant/owner. ALOT of details that need to be worked out first before trying to buy up this place....

Former HOA President
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
I find it highly unlikely that someone will be able to purchase a foreclosed house at auction for as little as $1. Anyone ever hear of a minimum starting bid?

My reasoning is thus: The party that has foreclosed on the house has a minimum amount that is needs to recover from the sale of the house. If it's a bank, they want the balance due on the loan. If it's the local taxing authority, they want to recover the back taxes. If it's an HOA, they want the back assessments. In all cases, they also need to recover any fees and costs incurred along the way before getting to the foreclosure sale.

Certainly, one might be able to purchase a house for considerably less than its fair market value, but for a $1? I sincerely doubt it.
SovE (Michigan)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Actually i'm buying some of these units for $1. Obviously, i'm taking over the outstanding water bills and tax bills and responsiblity for the repairs
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Actually i'm buying some of these units for $1.


Any bank liens?
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BruceF1 on 08/31/2012 8:41 AM
I find it highly unlikely that someone will be able to purchase a foreclosed house at auction for as little as $1. Anyone ever hear of a minimum starting bid?

My reasoning is thus: The party that has foreclosed on the house has a minimum amount that is needs to recover from the sale of the house. If it's a bank, they want the balance due on the loan. If it's the local taxing authority, they want to recover the back taxes. If it's an HOA, they want the back assessments. In all cases, they also need to recover any fees and costs incurred along the way before getting to the foreclosure sale.

Certainly, one might be able to purchase a house for considerably less than its fair market value, but for a $1? I sincerely doubt it.

Bruce,

I think you and several others misunderstood parts of this thread.

Sov described this condo complex as being in extremely poor condition, with many units abandoned. Three of seven buildings have no electricity (non-payment) and none of the units have a mortgage. Units have unpaid taxes and unpaid water bills. Sov is looking at buying 46% of the units outright and wishes to acquire the rest of the units to turn the place into apartments. From what I understand, nearly all of the remaining 54% of the units have paid no assessments in years. The current condo association is run by the owner of the units that Sov is about to purchase and no other owners seem to be involved with the association.

If he buys, Sov will be the largest single property owner and apparently the only one interested in the condo association. Given the apathy and/or absence of the other owners, he should be able to legally take control of the association. Please note that I do not advocate steamrollering other owners, but this place sounds like it is generally abandoned and that many of the units are occupied by squatters.

Once Sov has control of the association, the association can begin to foreclose on those units that have paid no assessments. Sov stated that there are no mortgages on any of the units so there are no liens superior to the association's, except tax liens.

Part of the foreclosure process is a public auction conducted by the sheriff under the supervision of the court. The minimum bid is normally the sum of the debt plus all the costs in bringing the case to court. This could easily top $15,000. If no one places a bid at the foreclosure auction, title goes to the association. The failure to obtain any bids at a public foreclosure auction is a pretty good indication that the market says the unit is worth less than the minimum bid.

Once the association has title, it may sell the unit for whatever it wishes to whomever will buy it. While there is a fiduciary duty for the association to get top dollar, the only persons who have standing to object to a sweetheart deal would be other members, of which there seem to be none. The association, under Sov's control, could sell the foreclosed units to him at $1 each. Do not overlook the fact that someone will have to bankroll the foreclosure actions and that someone, as the only member paying an assessment, will be Sov himself.

As far as market value goes, what I understood was that Sov is considering purchasing 26 units for $1 each. It's pretty hard to argue that the remaining units are worth tens of thousands of dollars when almost half the units just sold for $26 for the lot of them.

BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 08/31/2012 9:57 AM
If he buys, Sov will be the largest single property owner and apparently the only one interested in the condo association. Given the apathy and/or absence of the other owners, he should be able to legally take control of the association.

Thanks. I think I understand. But, even though he is able to purchase some of the units for $1 (and Sol says he can) he still is obligated to pay back taxes and water bills, so in effect, he is still paying more than $1 per unit.

I still think, however, that he will have to do some maneuvering to take full control of the association. According to what Sol has posted, it requires a vote of 60% or more of the owners, in value and in number to change the bylaws. Even if there is only one other owner, Sol cannot be more than 50% of the number of owners. Of course, the answer is simple. All he needs to do is to create enough entities (eg., LLCs) under his control to purchase the units he plans on. He will then have the required 60% or more of owners in value and in number.

The present owner may "control" the existing association by virtue of apathy among the other owners, but even then, the documents that bind the association must still be adhered to.

It's hard to imagine how a place could be this run down. A large number of people living there must certainly have fallen on hard financial times.

It sort of sounds like a hostile takeover by buying up enough stock to have majority control of the corporation.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Sov will definitely pay more than $1 per unit. He already acknowledged that he will have to pay water bills, taxes, and repairs on the units he is purchasing now. Anything he is able to obtain through foreclosures will also cost him a few thousand dollars to get through the court proceedings. And he will likely have taxes, water bills, and repairs on those units, also.

Sov's objective should not be to amend the bylaws but to dissolve the CC&R's that create the whole condo regime.

As far as the bylaws, though, the only persons with any real standing to challenge what the association does are other members. I suspect that somewhere in the bylaws voting is restricted to members in good standing, so Sov himself may very well be 100% of the members in good standing.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 08/31/2012 3:19 PM
Sov's objective should not be to amend the bylaws but to dissolve the CC&R's that create the whole condo regime.

As far as the bylaws, though, the only persons with any real standing to challenge what the association does are other members. I suspect that somewhere in the bylaws voting is restricted to members in good standing, so Sov himself may very well be 100% of the members in good standing.

I agree, I don't see what purpose amending the bylaws serves, unless Sol is referring to the Declaration as bylaws.

Your second point is well taken, but we don't know if such a "good standing" clause exists. Not all do. Our bylaws contain no such clause or requirement.

What Sol has not posted is what the Declaration (CCRs) has to say about terminating the association. That's what is important for Sol to know to achieve his goal.

By the way, I don't object to what Sol is trying to do. He's basically trying to turn a useless, wasted development into rental housing. It could be a good investment for him, and could provide clean rental housing for people who are unable to afford to purchase their own homes or obtain mortgages. There are also those who like the flexibility that goes with renting.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
When estimating rehab expenses remember the city is going to make you bring it up to code. The large scale units are a pain to deal with code enforcement. With large multi unit buildings, safety is very important. Especially fire related things like sprinklers, fire escapes, etc. This can get very, very expensive. Sometimes not even worth it.

BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SteveM9 on 09/01/2012 5:52 AM
When estimating rehab expenses remember the city is going to make you bring it up to code. The large scale units are a pain to deal with code enforcement. With large multi unit buildings, safety is very important. Especially fire related things like sprinklers, fire escapes, etc. This can get very, very expensive. Sometimes not even worth it.


Sol is going to have to do the math and determine that for himself.
AnthonyD11 (Colorado)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Talk to a business attorney or someone who is legally trained in real estate. This does not seem like a good investment.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Anthony,

You are violating the site's posting rules by recommending a specific attorney. This is not the first time you have done this and you have been reported to the moderators.
CarlH2 (Nevada)
Posts: 5
Posted:
I have also obtained a breach in Jan to remove fresh weeds. The conformity date was mid Feb and the yard was completly free of weeds. If anyone else has face same type of situation or any such defaulter information, please share your experience.

aged care gold coast
Fairways Supported Living
182-184 Hursley Road Toowoomba QLD 4350 Australia
Phone : +61 1300 765 051
http://www.fairwayssupportedliving.com.au/
Providing community aged care supported living housing in Toowoomba, the Glenvale Villas are the perfect option for your loved ones, if they need a little extra help with daily living.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
who can spell:

s l u m l o r d

Hamurabi's Code, anyone?

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here