πŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
I am currently investigating low flush toilets for a townhome association we manage. The City's water and sewer department will provide a $75/low flush ((1.28 gal max) toilet when replacing a toilet with greater than 3.5 gal/flush. The water savings is important in this area. I calculate the annual cost reduction per townhome replacing 2 toilets to be about $75.

The HOA pays for the water and sewer with the current annual cost being $70,000; or about $4,000/month except when irrigating in the summer. To encourage changing out all of the older toilets I am suggesting the HOA consider paying $75/toilet to encourage changing out all of the older toilets. This would result in a net cost to the homeowner of about $50/toilet. All owners would benefit by a correspondingly lower monthly assessments after the second year.

Have you had any experience with low flush toilets; the water savings; and/or the cost savings?

That leaves the cost of irrigation water to be addressed. This is being done by xeriscaping where applicable and as the budget allows.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
I've noticed many people had to flush the toilets twice to achieve their desired task. So your savings may be less that you estimate.

I think your estimate of $75 to change a toilet is too low. May be more like $400 to hire a licensed plumber and costs associated with disposal of the old toilet. May cost even more if there is rot under the toilet. Just bringing up a few things you may not have considered.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
It depends on the manufacturer and design. Some of them do not work very well and some are not so bad. Check out the reviews for the type Model/Manufacturer.
We replaced all ours with Vortens Dual Flush. They work great and they were not expensive at all. (about the same price of those single flush junk toilets that that big box stores sell). There are lots of manufacturers jumping on the dual flush bandwagon. I know, the City probably only has one option.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
This could require a special assessment by all the members to participate. The logic being that if they pay a special $100 assessment that the dues would be reduced after the work is done by a certain percentage. Otherwise there would be no encouragement to invest in this option. Plus as the other poster pointed out, who would be responsible for the cost of the replacement? Toilets may be cheap but the installation falls on who's hands?

There are other options instead of new toilets. You can modify existing toilets to meet the low flush standard with kits. They can be about $10 to $20 a piece. Even putting a brick or bottle of water can lower the use of water in a toilet. I would put the word out on this program and encourage people to take advantage of this option. Don't think I would put the burden on the HOA to pay for it unless it's cheaper for everyone to divide up the costs as a group.

Former HOA President
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Having seen dual flush toilets in Europe for several years, we recently bought one for our guest bathroom as part of updating the whole 11-y.-o. bathroom. The dual flush works great!

But ours was pretty expensive as we wanted a sleek one-piece appearance.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
We also tried the kits (converion) on regular, but it just not work very well. "Vortens" is manufacturer who we choose to go with and they are definately flush demons. They work great. Used Elongated regular height and comfort height. You'll have to find a dealer on their website and they should be less than $200.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Roger:

Your annual water savings will be close to zero. You be can certain that the city-supplied toilets will be bottom-of-the-line (no pun intended). I have never seen a low-flow toilet that worked with a single flush. If I had a home with a low-flush toilet I would replace it with an Old Faithful 3.5 gallon model.

Before committing to replacement, why not take a "test-drive" on one first?

If the association wants to save money on water, quit irrigating and plant native species. If I have read between the lines correctly, the association is spending about $22,000 annually to water the grounds and plants. There's a lot of money to be saved just by turning the faucet off.
EdmundS1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 45
Posted:
Lots of information to consider. How old is you resident population? Someone, in one of the posts, mentions "comfort height" vs "regular height". If you have an older population then the "comfort height" is something that should be included. The extra 2 inches (17" vs 15") is a big help for older residents and even younger people appreciate it. (The only problem I know of is my 5 year old gradaughter who can't get up there without some help but that will change soon enough.)

Another low cost item to consider is a grab bar. A selling point for the HOA. "We will not only save $ on H2O but add to your comfort and safety as you/we grow older" It is also a selling/renting plus (bathrooms have 17" height toilets and grab bars).
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Roger

One way to save water is to place bricks inside the toilet cistern (the back where the water is) and change flapper valve mechanisms. You would be quite surprised how much water this saves.

Personally I would not give up my high volume flush toilets.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Melissa, With regard to special assessments I do not believe in them. To me they usually indicate poor financial management. The HOAs we manage never has had one. Also, the townhome owner is responsible for toilets, not the HOA.

Sorry I left out the critical word "REBATE" in my first post. The City will provide a REBATE of $75/toilet. The installed toilet total cost is $200. This cost is for an American Standard round 2" extended lip low flush; with options of $10 less for a round bowl and $17 more for a handicapped (ADA) elongated 2”&2”higher bowl. These toilets do not have the problems encountered by low flush toilets in past years of a plugged sewer line or requiring a second flush. The total installed cost would be paid by: $75 city rebate + $75 HOA rebate + $50 owner payment. The incentive for the owners to spend $50/toilet would be that all owners assessments could be reduced $75/year beginning in year three.

This seems like a big WIN-WIN for the city and the homeowners. The City conserves water and owner has less expenses after the 2+ year payout. Since my initial post I have talked to an HOA where 96% installed low flush toilets. They estimated their cost savings at about 20%. I followed up by calculating their savings was 16% in July 2012 compared to July 2011 based on info provided by the City Water Conservation Department. In addition, this summer was dryer than last year so it could be off due to irrigation water which was included in the calculation. My calculation of a savings of $75/unit/year is based on a 14% savings in 2012.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
These toilets do not have the problems encountered by low flush toilets in past years of a plugged sewer line or requiring a second flush.


This really depends on the user, not the toilet.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • βœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • βœ“ Share your experience
  • βœ“ Get expert advice
  • βœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here