Quote:
Posted By DennisS7 on 08/23/2012 7:46 AM
Appreciate your inputs. First we have employees not independents contractors. The only person with a contract is the HOA Manager.
As for checking the local area for other businesses and companies to see what they do, I see this as a different matter. I believe this would be like mixing apples and oranges in getting an answer. Unlike business, we are not for profit, so other than increasing monthly maintenance fees, the goal is to keep the budget in check and reduce the burden as much as possible on the residents, many who in today's economy are also struggling. This is way I was seeking input from other HOAs who have paid employees to give me an idea as to what benefits they provide. Dennis
Comparing your employees' compensation to the compensation of employees of associations in other areas across the country is comparing apples to oranges and a variety of other fruits. Comparing your employee compensation to the compensation of employees PERFORMING THE SAME OR SIMILAR TASKS by other businesses in your area is comparing apples to apples, although the varieties of apples may be different. Why? Because you draw your employees from the labor pool in your area, not from across the country. A carpenter is a carpenter, a plumber is a plumber, a gardener is a gardener, a painter is a painter, and so on. It doesn't matter whether they work for your association or for some other employer in the area. If an individual can get a better deal performing the same work for another employer in your area rather than your association, then that's where they will go to work. Whether you are a profit-making or a non-profit organization is irrelevant. That's not how the employee looks at it.
I know first-hand of an employer in my area that requires mechanics for a fleet of vehicles he needs to maintain. He pays the poorest wages and has the worst benefit package in the area. The result? Quality mechanics won't work for him. They go elsewhere. At least half of this guy's mechanics are unemployable, meaning they've gotten fired from other employers in the area who offer higher wages. The productivity is low, and the quality of the workmanship is poor. Some of his mechanics are unreliable and often don't even show up for work. But he keeps them on because they are cheap and he knows they won't quit (because they can't get work elsewhere). His vehicles are constantly in disrepair to the point where he sometimes doesn't have enough that are roadworthy to do the jobs he's been hired to do. His vehicles often fail to pass state inspections and have to be redone. Is he saving money? An emphatic no! Of course, this is a worst-case scenario, but I describe it to demonstrate what happens when you become uncompetitive.
If you feel the need to cut, better to reduce your staff size, either by lay-off or by attrition (you just don't fill a position when someone leaves) rather than have an uncompetitive compensation package. Poor productivity and poor workmanship cost money. Eight good quality employees can often do the work of ten poor quality employees at less cost. If you have to hire additional employees or pay overtime to get the work done or to re-work jobs that were not properly done, you are not saving any money. People often have a hard time understanding this unless they've had some background or education in economics because it is hard to quantify.
Even if you are non-profit, you still need to compete with other businesses (including businesses that make a profit) for workers in your area. That's the point you need to remember.