💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JohnS61 (Ohio)
Posts: 1
Posted:
My HOA restrictive covenant did not specifically mention or restrict dog runs anywhere in the Restrictive covenants, but did mention fences and its construction, so I went ahead and built a fneced in dog run, the HOA Board demands that I remove it immediately, I am refusing, stating a fence is a fence and a dog run is a dog run, they say they will not discuss dog runs and will only discuss fences...stating that if I do not remove the fence they will asses me $50 each month I refuse...I was under the impression Restrictive Covenants had to be specific and not ambiguous, what can or should I do?????

RichardW6 (Maine)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnS61 on 08/17/2012 5:39 AM
...so I went ahead and built a fenced in dog run...


A fence is a fence regardless of the purpose it serves. The fact that you used the fence to confine a small area for a dog is really no different than confining an entire yard for a dog.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Your very, very wrong.

Its not a "fenced in dog run" its a fence. And because its a fence, you must follow the rules of fences in your HOA.

Are fences not allowed in your HOA? Or did you not follow the proper procedures to get a fence approved, etc.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
John,

Typically prior approval is required before making exterior changes (including fences). Is this requirement within your documents?

Often, the CC&Rs will specify that any fence built must be of specific materials, height, etc. or will simply specify that fences are allowed. However, having that specification doesn't automatically allow the fence. Approval must still be obtained prior to the fence being built.

If your documents require prior approval and you did not request and receive prior approval, then you are in violation of your covenants. Depending on the enforcement options available to the Association, it's possible that the $50/month assessment could be legit.

BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
A rose by any other name is still a rose.

A fence by any other name is still a fence.

Your "dog run" is enclosed by a fence.

Your argument is childish. Take it down.
FredS7 (Arizona)
Posts: 927
Posted:
Reading between the lines, I am assuming that your HOA does not allow fences or requires prior approval.

In such a case- the board (or architectural review committee, if such exists) gets to define and/ or approve fences.

If you disagree with what they call a fence, your choices are to (1) gather support to vote in a more pliant board or (2) challenge in court.

Childish is the right word here.

DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Agree with the above, unless of course the dog run is somehow an unconfined area without a physical barrier preventing the dog from escaping (i.e. a fence)
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
John,

The law is mostly on your side. If a dog run is not prohibited in the deed restrictions the association has no lawful authority to prevent you from putting one in. You are correct that restrictive covenants must be specific and not ambiguous. Stick to your guns.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 08/17/2012 2:03 PM
John,

The law is mostly on your side. If a dog run is not prohibited in the deed restrictions the association has no lawful authority to prevent you from putting one in. You are correct that restrictive covenants must be specific and not ambiguous. Stick to your guns.

Bad advice.

If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, it is a duck.

The fence is NOT a dog run. The fence merely ENCLOSES a dog run. If it looks like a fence, and meets the definition of a fence, it still is a fence, no matter what you call it.

You're playing with words. It's a childish argument. The law is NOT on his side. Judges are not childish.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
John

Are any fences allowed in your association?
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
John,

Does your structure meet any of the following definitions (look in your dictionary for one, if you wish)?

A structure serving as an enclosure, a barrier, or a boundary,

A barrier, railing, or other upright structure, typically of wood or wire, enclosing an area of ground to prevent or control access or escape.

A fence is a freestanding structure designed to restrict or prevent movement across a boundary.

Those are all definitions of a fence which you can look up. If your structure meets those definitions, then it is a fence.

Guess what a judge would do to determine if your structure (what you refer to as a dog run) is or is not a fence. You guessed it. He would look up the definition!

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I refuse to remove it...what could that get you? The HOA could come in and remove it at their costs. They then can send you that bill...If you don't pay that then they can lien you for it. Which lien can include legal costs, interest, and the cost of removal. It stays on your property so you can't sell untill paid off.

That is one scenerio. The other is that you choose to sue. Most likely would lose in court. The bonus is that you also just sued yourself and your neighbors...

My suggestion: Remove the dog run. Develop a plan and submit it to the HOA board for approval. The very step you missed the first time that would have stopped this all...

Former HOA President
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
I know nothing about them, but have heard of "invisible fences." Are they any good?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
My neighbor has one up the road from me. It works with that dog. However, they do not have any signs displaying they have it. Which is a good idea but HOA's are picky about signage.

You have to keep in mind your dog may not run out but other dogs can run in...It really depends on the circumstances and the dog. It too may need the HOA's blessing before installing. Just because you can't see it doesn'r mean it's not there...One has to dig up dirt to install it and the HOA may have other concerns.

Former HOA President
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Invisible fences do not require the dirt or grass to be dug to be installed. It is simply a wire that is plowed underground by a special installing device. Only a tiny furrow a fraction of an inch (probably less than 1/8") is made in the ground which quickly closes over. The wire transmits a radio signal to a receiver around the dog's neck. When the dog gets too close to the imbedded wire an alarm is emitted (audible to only the dog) followed by an unpleasant sensation. As the dog is "trained" the dog learns to stop when the alarm is heard, but before the unpleasant sensation is felt.

Of courses, invisible fences do not work during a power outage. Also, if a dog does manage to get outside the perimeter of the fence, the dog will be reluctant to return to the inside for the same reason. The device causes the alarm and unpleasant sensation no matter which way the dog is traveling: from the inside out, or the outside in.

The issue of whether they are permitted by your HOA or not is an interesting one. Technically, they may not be allowed or they may require prior approval. HOA restrictions, just like our laws, sometimes have to play "catch up" to allow for technological advancements that were not forseen when the restrictions or laws were written.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Personally I do not think wireless fences are that secure but in some cases where no fencing is allowed, they are often the only acceptable solution.

I also asked the OP if fences were allowed in his association. If so, then a proper allowed fence is his answer. Problem solved.

KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
I am leaning towards saying a dog run is not allowed but I am also reminded of the other thread where a covenant stated something along the line that "fences or like structures" are not permitted. I guess one could make an argument saying a dog run is not a fence depending on the language of the covenant's phrasing. Someone could reasonably argue that the restriction implies that traditional fences are banned - not dog runs or even something like a small fence-style plant border.

I would consider consulting some attorneys for their opinions on the matter to see whether it is worth the fight. Maybe you could submit a request to the board to build a "dog tunnel."
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Kev

I could be wrong, but I read the OP as implying fences might be allowed but must first be approved.

Also the OP did not ask for permission for a dog run. He said as he could not find anything saying he could not do it, thus he assumed he could do it and did it.

Typical of the many posters here. They did something without asking, the association came down on them, they come out here looking for a way out.

At least some say they were wrong when asking for help.

EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
We try to impress on all our Owners and Residents that it is “never wrong” to ask – and/or never wrong to “ask first” – even it appears that someone else has done what you would like to so.

Many requirements, have at the end of the sentence, words such as: or similar, or the like, or some other phrase, that indicates that not every single thing that anyone could possibly think of is listed.

Even if JohnS61’s Documents do not have words to that effect, just the very fact that “dog runs” was not mentioned should have “clued” JohnS that he needed to ask first.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here