💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AmandaH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 9
Posted:
I need some help and advice on the following situations. Any advice would be appreciated.

To start - I am a renter in my community, not a home owner. This is not from lack of trying - the homeowner we rent from did not want to sell, so we are awaiting the end of our lease to make another purchase offer, or find another house in our community to purchase (as we overall enjoy the community and most of the people in it). We HAVE been homeowners before, and I understand the manner in which (some) homeowners and board members can view renters, however I assure you we do our best to volunteer in the community and help out our neighbors or board whenever possible. So in short, we are not dead beat renters.

Couple of things I'm looking for:

- A state (SC) HOA Act that is in effect or a federal law that directly or indirectly effects HOAs.
- More information and understanding of how the Non-Profit Acts work with Homeowners' Associations.

Here's the situations:

Pool, Communication, and a Gate:

Our current HOA board is not very transparent, it is literally like pulling teeth to get any answers from them. First example, the HOA Board President is married to the CPO. In this last season alone, the CPO has closed the pool several times (at least 6 for fecal incidents and more than that due to imbalance of chemicals) and rarely has there been ANY notice given to the residents and sometimes not even a sign posted. Just the door entering the pool area chained and locked. Three weeks prior to the opening of our season, the CPO told his wife to tell the Board he did not want to be their contractor for the 2012 season. When the board rightfully objected, due to lack of time to find a new CPO in time for the pool to open on schedule, the wife (HOA President) states that a $400 increase in pay will probably convince her husband (CPO) to remain on board for one more season.

Per the SC Non-Profit Act (which from my understanding directly impacts HOAs as they are incorporated as non-profit corporations) - this is a HUGE Conflict of Interest. Anyone know if this is correct?

Secondly, the HOA will not release the 2012 season contract with the CPO for residents viewing, nor are they explaining or sharing any information regarding TWO DHEC fines from last season, nor do they seem willing to allow the past two years of financials to be reviewed either. Several questions have been asked regarding the CPO contract, and the President continues to ignore them.

The Board has kept their meetings very private, again when asked when the meetings were - ignoring the questions (they have been asked over and over) and not giving any information. When a meeting is known about, they refuse to allow anyone into their meetings until after they have been closed.

A low priority: the HOA installed a gate, that must be manually closed and locked, and unlocked and open everyday. The Board is failing to meet operating hours by opening the gate sometimes three and four hours AFTER the common areas were supposed to be opened. They are closing and locking the gates sometimes several hours AFTER closing hours due to the fact they are using facilities after close.

Forgive me, while I appreciate the hard work and time that volunteers give when they are a part of an HOA board, I just feel that this board is behaving really unprofessionally, borderline illegally, and in some instances - illegally. I need some help and advice on how to move forward.

Thank you in advance for your suggestions.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Hi Amanda and welcome to the forum.

As a renter you have zero rights to view any document within the HOA. Those rights are provided to the owner of the property (who would be a member of the Association).

You raise great concerns about the conflict of interest, lack of transparency (by providing documents) and the apparent lack of common courtesy of placing a sign at the pool as to why it's closed. However, none of those concerns are yours. They would be concerns of the membership (of which you do not belong).

You should direct your concerns to your landlord. The landlord should bring the issue up with the board (but may or may not follow through) as only the landlord has standing with the Association to (rightfully) complain about these issues.

I know that it's not what you wanted to hear and I applaud you for taking an interest in the community you live in. Unfortunately, it's not your fight - it's your landlords (if they choose to fight).

Hope this helps,

Tim

NancyG3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 342
Posted:
Amanda: You will hear this alot. You have no rights as a renter to participate in the Assn business. The complaints you have listed here should go to the owner of the property. If you see all this going on, why would you want to purchase a house in this community and get envolved. You are lucky to see what the Board is doing. My suggestion is don't buy a house in this community. Rent as long as you can. Keep abiding by the Rules & Regulations. You have the best situation. Don't get involved. Enjoy your house until your contact renewal comes up and find another home out of this community. Run as fast as you can. With what you have written there are going to be many problems. Sorry to write this to you. In the end it is your decision to stay or go. Good luck! Nancy
AmandaH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Nancy and Tim,

Thank you so much for your replies. DH and I owned our home prior to moving to SC and participated in the HOA there, so I understand why renters are excluded from HOA business. However, this HOA had initially been very welcoming to renters - including them in the Community Facebook (to which they posted community updates) and the private community forum that includes some HOA documents including meeting minutes and the Bylaws. So I felt that I had a voice - just not a vote.

I want to stay in the community because of the pool (ironically), lower HOA fees, lots of families and kids around the same age as my children, and overall I enjoy the people. I do agree it's probably not a good idea to buy in the community, but I keep thinking that if a better board gets in elected or if this board just takes care of the concerns I listed (and I'm in no way the only one who has expressed these concerns) I would dare say it would then be a near perfect community for our family.

And having been a homeowner and involved in my prior HOA, it's difficult for me to just step back and be quiet. However, I agree with both of you that I really do not have any rights and therefor need to communicate them to my owner and hope he takes them to the board. Thank you again for the feedback.

Regards,
Amanda
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Amanda

SC has no HOA rules/regulations. There is the SC Horizontal Property Act but it is for condo buildings, not standalone homes/townhomes. A HOA is pretty free to operate as it wishes to as long as it abides with SC Corporation Law and its own Covenants/Bylaws.

You say CPO. What does CPO mean?

Also is your HOA under owner control or is it still under declarant control?

As a renter you have no direct say to the association. Your communication has to be to the owner.

Your main issues seem to be around irregular pool hours and notification of such. Raise this with your landlord.

Hope this helps.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
There is a difference in reality and what you think is expected in a HOA. The reality is that your neighbors run the place out of volunteering. That doesn't mean someone is paid to keep an eye on the gate or have the ability to warn people in time about the pool closing. I often had to close our pool at the last second due to maintenance issues or fecal removal. Which if you have to reshock a pool takes 24 hours before one can enter it again. That is usually right after someone has found a turd floating. So I can't see a complaint there. Our pump blew up on 4th of July Weekend...Do you think the pool should have stayed open considering the pump no longer worked and found out at 8 AM? Spent 2 hours driving around town finding parts to have the pool open that day...

This the reality of a HOA. It's not perfect and not able to keep to everyone's schedule. Maybe lower your expectations to what you would be able to do if you voluteered to do something. As for records, your a renter and have no rights to those of yet. So yes, you will be denied access to them until you are an owner.

Former HOA President
NancyG3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 342
Posted:
Amanda: The first thing I need to say is I apologize for my spelling in the message I sent you. It was real late and I didn't reread for errors. Now that you have decided to remain in the community at this time as a renter all your concerns should be sent to the landlord. When you purchase a home then you can work on becoming a Board member and work on improving the community and helping the Board. Until then check with the Board and ask if you can attend their meetings. This will keep you updated on what is going on with the Board and the community. They may not allow this, but you could ask. Good luck.
AmandaH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Hi John,

Thank you for your reply. I found a HOA Act that SC introduced in 2009, and looks like passed in 2011. I even called the Legislature Board yesterday and they discussed it with me, yet a member of the HOA Board told me this mentioned yesterday they don't think it passed. Still trying to find out and had been hoping someone on the board would know.

CPO - Certified Pool Operator. Our state DHEC requires a CPO who tests the chemicals at least once a day (or more if needed), maintains an operator's log of visits, checks, etc., and maintains the pool with DHEC standards. The CPO is the Board President's husband and even though under his care the community received two DHEC fines last year, his wife negotiated a $400 a month raise (putting him at $1200 a month). (See my explanation in OP)

HOA is under owner control.

My main issues are the obvious Conflict of Interest, lack of communication, and inability to maintain a gate schedule (please note the pool closings, while irritating, are NOT the concern here). The Board created a FB group, and they claim hardship on posting pool openings and closures. Yet, after the pool has been closed - yet no announcement has been made it's closed or any announcement following that it's open (typically someone on the community who has found it either closed or re-opened posts to the FB group), friends and Board members are seen swimming at the pool - so obviously they know it's open, but feel taking 30 seconds to post on FB or having a designated volunteer post, is a hardship. When several other home owners had requested the specifics of the CPO contract - including who the CPO was and what he was even being paid because no one on the board had released that information, it took almost 3 months to get an answer from anyone. This seems so incredibly suspect. And again, when the gate fails to be opened - it's by several hours, with no communication, and when home owners get upset the Board President (who is the one responsible for opening and closing the gate those days) snaps at the community for complaining and that she felt like sleeping in.

To me there seem to be simple fixes:

1. Put up a sign when the pool is closed.

2. If Board members and friends were contacted when the pool is open, there should be some sort of communication on FB or any other communication such as the private community forums - "Pool is re-opened" that would take max 1 minute.

3. Answer home owner questions, if they don't want to answer them on FB, then post, "next meeting is this time with open forum beginning at this time, please bring questions to meeting" so the home owners with questions can have them answered. Home owners have even requested when the next meeting was so they could bring these questions to the board - and the board has ignored them.

4. Since the only times the gate has been opened late is when it's the President's turn to open it, simply take her out of rotation.

I personally think these are simple and easy solutions.
AmandaH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Hi Melissa,

See my reply to John, my concerns have nothing to do with the pool closures. My concerns go deeper than that. Also, while the people on our board are volunteers, they are compensated by the community - Board members do not have to pay any HOA dues during their service terms.

And again, to reiterate - obviously things happen, such as fecal matter in the pool or someone bleeding, and those obviously are not planned. What other home owners (and myself) have been asking is simply communication that either the pool is closed and communication that it is open. None of what the home owners or I expect are unrealistic - they are reasonable expectations (again see my post above this) and should not be considered hardships.

Regards,
Amanda
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
you are not a member of the HOA

take up any concerns / complaints with your landlord

if you feel the HOA's class 'b' public pool (NOT a typo) is a health hazard you may contact DHEC directly as a member of the public

do NOT expect to be popular after said contact .... expect attempts at your eviction

low dues and a properly operated / maintained pool is an oxymoron

[CAVEAT EMPTOR]
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Along with prompting your landlord to take the issues to the board, Amanda, you also can try to persuade other homeowners to get involved with their HOA & board. Encourage them to attend board meetings and bring up your shared concerns. Sounds as if you've met many via your children.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Amanda

General Bill
Sponsors: Senator Jackson

Introduced in the Senate on January 11, 2011
Currently residing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary

Summary: S.C. Homeowners Association Act

HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS

Date Body Action Description with journal page number
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/8/2010 Senate Prefiled
12/8/2010 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary
1/11/2011 Senate Introduced and read first time (Senate Journal-page 101)
1/11/2011 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary
(Senate Journal-page 101)
3/14/2011 Senate Referred to Subcommittee: Malloy (ch), Ford, Massey,
S.Martin

The bill is still in committee and is not expected to ever see the light of day and I hope is stays as such.

Hope this helps.
JeanI (Louisiana)
Posts: 112
Posted:
How can renters abide by the legal documents and rules and regulations if they are not given the legal documents. We put all of our on line for all to see. I disagree that renters do not have any rights. They may not vote at the annual meeting but they can certainly attend all other open board meetings and voice their opinions as to matters affecting the HOA. You may wasnt to consult an attorney about your rights and responsibilities. JeanI
AmandaH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Carol,

That's my next step, since I do not have a voice in my own community. I have already spent the last two evenings on front porches chatting with some homeowners and plan to spend the next month (our next election and Annual Meeting is sometime in September) talking with homeowners, discussing their concerns and ideas for solutions. Since the Board President is very reluctant to give any information regarding terms (who has completed their term, who is resigning, who is staying) I want to work with my neighbors to find home owners willing to run for the Board, and if needed - put in the required 3/4 vote to remove some current board members. I know this won't make me popular among the board and their friends, but I feel that enough people are concerned right now and personally affected by some members of this board (there are 1 or 2 really great, open, and respectful BMs) that they may just take action. I guess it's time to get to baking and head door to door! ;-)
AmandaH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 9
Posted:
John,

I would be interested to know what specifically you disagree with in this bill. Do you believe HOAs should not have any state regulations to help keep them in mind? I spoke with my owner today, and was sharing all the information I've shared here - understandably, he was upset by the news. He shared with me, that just a few years ago that there had been a BM who was taking money from dues or something along those lines. He didn't have specifics - because the Board never shared this information officially with the community, just with their friends. If this is true, this is a clear abuse of power, and it makes me wonder if anything was done other than maybe remove this board member (we don't know for sure since it was never officially revealed who this person was and my owner stated the board has overall remained the same over the years, just people rotating positions).

HOAs deal with large reserves of cash ($10k or more) and are trusted by the community they serve to do what is best with those funds. But how can we insure that that's what is actually being done with those funds if there is no transparency? Something I really enjoyed about the SC HOA Act is that all meetings involving board of directors must be open - there should never be a meeting of directors that homeowners cannot attend, because otherwise it begs the question - why? What is being kept secret? I'm not stating that the meetings become a debate or a Q&A forum, but with the exception of a meeting with the Board Attorney or a meeting with an individual HO regarding any citations, I cannot think of a reason why other HOs could not sit in on meetings and observe as decisions were being discussed and made.

Regards,
Amanda
KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AmandaH1 on 07/31/2012 1:12 PM
Carol,

That's my next step, since I do not have a voice in my own community. I have already spent the last two evenings on front porches chatting with some homeowners and plan to spend the next month (our next election and Annual Meeting is sometime in September) talking with homeowners, discussing their concerns and ideas for solutions. Since the Board President is very reluctant to give any information regarding terms (who has completed their term, who is resigning, who is staying) I want to work with my neighbors to find home owners willing to run for the Board, and if needed - put in the required 3/4 vote to remove some current board members. I know this won't make me popular among the board and their friends, but I feel that enough people are concerned right now and personally affected by some members of this board (there are 1 or 2 really great, open, and respectful BMs) that they may just take action. I guess it's time to get to baking and head door to door! ;-)

There is a possibility that you can run for the board without being a homeowner. Check your documents (articles of incorporation, etc.)

If they are not clear you may be able to run.

An association I dealt with changed the rules to allow non-residents serve on the board. The president didn't own a home but lived in one and the VP lived outside the neighborhood and owned zero property in the neighborhood they wished to run.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Kevin

Non-residents can quite often be elected to the BOD, but I never never heard of non-owners being elected. There is a difference.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
How is it that your BOD skips paying dues for their service? That is EXTREMELY BAAAAAD idea and concept. That should NOT be done. Many reasons. I still say people are human just like board members are. You can't please everybody nor put your expectation on anybody either. Yes posting on fB would be good but it depends on those taking the initiative to do it. It is an option after all NOT a requirement.

Think your putting too much expectations on reality here. My lawncare people came to work at 8 AM. My work schedule I was off at 2 or 3 AM. The bathrooms were behind the gate at the pool area. That is where they could go if needed. Somedays I would sleep till 10 AM if not woken earlier to handle Another HOA emergency. I had the key to the locked gate. So as President I was "expected" to keep the gate locked to prevent crime. I also had to unlock it for the lawncare people once a week. Plus I had a second job part time and went to college 2 days a week. Occassional I'd forget about the gate and leave it locked. One day a lawncare guy decided to pee in a backyard of a member who didn't know they were home. The gate was locked that day late.

Now are you going to complain about that and say my responsibilty should have given the key to someone else? Should I resign my position? Was I a bad President? NO. I am human and can only do so much. Just like any other volunteer or BOD member. Could I do better? Probably. Should that be a reflection of my entire HOA? Don't think so. Just shows that it takes work and not all work is up to everybody's standards.

Former HOA President
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Amanda

HOA's in SC are governed by:

1. SC Articles Of Incorporation For Non Profit Organizations part of which covers meetings and members attending such. Which I would say as a non-owner you are not a member thus probably not allowed to attend, never mind speak. Like an Annual Stockholders Meeting, one must be a stockholder.

2. Covenants filed with the deed and changeable by Owners.

3. Bylaws (sometimes filed with the deed) and changeable by the Owners.

4. Rules and Regulations established by the BOD and changeable by the BOD.

Bottom line is we do not need another layer of anything especially one done by politicians and bureaucrats, especially in SC. They were still passing laws to get around segregation in the 60's. SC school systems are still operated under Federal Mandates due to segregation. Operation Lost Trust, 1990. There is a long serving, leading SC Senator that recently called the Governor a Rag Head.

Tough love, but you are a renter thus have little skin in the game. If you came to chat me up about my HOA, I would say to you get back to me when we are on equal footing and I will welcome and treat you as an equal then.

JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Amanda:

In life sometimes we run into batles we MUST fight. Other battles we need not engage in. Just what are you geting out of this? Just what is your motivation? In your perfect world how will this all end? And is this really worth the time and effort you have put in, the effort going forward, and as you put it "this will not make you the most popular person on the property". Is this a battle you have to fight or is this a fight you went out of your way to find. Pretty clear to me.

Now IMO as a person who does not own the property as others have said you have no real rights or interest, financial or otherwise in the property. When others suggest you read your documents in fact they are not YOUR doucments as you have no ownership role.

Now just wondering why anyone who does in fact own would consider putting someone in a Board position who has no skin or financial interest in the property? Even if under the documents of the property non-OWNERS can in fact serve on the Board.

And your comments as to what you think should be the case just where do you assume your opinion carries weight?

As I am not familiar with the state laws in each and every state I can only speak for where I reside. We do NOT have open meeting laws and I thank God, or whomever else you might hold sacred, that we are NOT subjected to having meetings where we need to include unit owners.

I can think of numerous reasons why such a requirement would difficult. And of course I have heard about all the claims as to "transparency" and the suggestion unless the meetings are public than something must be wrong. California and Florida seem to have the most restrictive requirements and we see on this forum they have the most issues. IMO the more people you bring in the more Indians you have and in the end nothing will get done or progress will be impossible.

That's why they set up a system where a elected Board directs the management of the property. This is NOT a one man one woman democracy where each item needs to be brought up to the unit owners, and every conversation, word, decision or thought needs to be made public. Unless of course you live in Florida or California where I believe Board members using e-mail violates the public trust. IMO utter nonsense.
And if a quorum of Board members should suddenly find themsleves running into each other at the mall one or two must run for their lives as not to violate some stupidity passed by the state politicians in the name political correctness.

Sort of makes sense to me why public corporations are not required to hold open meetings and hear input from every shareholder. Can you imagine Microsoft operating under the Davis/Sterling set of rules?
And Bill Gates would need to provide every shareholder the information, agenda, and some input when ever they were making a decision. And of course no communication among Board members outside the monthly public meeting. And some folks think that's good policy. My guess they have never served on any Board. Sounds good, should work, but put into practice a complete and utter disaster.

Sounds to me like you might be looking for a fight to prove you are right. Looking to make what you think should be reality. IMO life is to short to fight battles that do not involve you. Life is to short to fight to prove you are right. You can be right and miserable or you can be happy and find something more important to do with your limited time.

Good luck.

AmandaH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Kevin -

I do not think there is any wiggle room for me to run for board, although a member is defined as someone with "interest" in the property (via our Bylaws).

Melissa,

Your examples have nothing to do with what's going on in my community. Can I say that you were a bad HOA president, could have done better, or excelled at the position? No. You can give me examples all day and all night, but at the end of the day - I'm not in your neighborhood, I did not live there during your term, and therefor cannot form an informed opinion on your matters.

I will agree to disagree with you regarding whether my expectations are realistic, my understanding is the gate duties are rotated - and as I mentioned, the gate only opens late during the HOA President's turn, so therefor - she should be taken out of the rotation. Obviously, she is unable to fulfill her turn in gate rotation and it should left to those who have already demonstrated they can open the gate on time.

I do agree that it's a BAAADDD idea that the BOD do not have to pay dues during their terms - especially since several of them are career BODs - having stayed in one office or another for several years. Further, apparently, the residents were never asked to vote on this - the BOD voted on this independently of the residents, and people only found out at a much later date.

John,

Your opinions do not bother me, I'm just curious about your logic. I do understand that you feel there are more pressing priorities in the Senate that need to be passed, and I can certainly respect that.

Regards,
Amanda
AmandaH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Jon,

The reason I'm "fighting this battle" is because my family and I really want to purchase a home in this neighborhood - as mentioned, we enjoy the common areas (when open and maintained), the people, and the fact that there are so many kids in the neighborhood for our kids with which to play.

I agree that allowing everyone to voice an opinion at every meeting would be insane and be so much extra work for the public. I'm not sure why board members (or ANY board not just HOAs) generally seem to go there when they consider open meetings. By there I mean that everyone would have a chance to ask questions or make statements, etc. Personally, I think all meetings should be open for observation, not that they should be open for anyone to take the floor.

I do not think my opinion carries any extra weight (or any weight at all being a non-owner), but the thoughts and ideas I've shared on this board are the ones I've discussed with home owners in this neighborhood and this is what THEY think as well. This is the general consensus among the owners I've spoken with thus far. That's why I was thinking of going around the neighborhood, meeting the residents, and encouraging them to get involved, run for offices, and attend meetings. If the board cannot come to some resolution among the home owners, then it will certainly effect my decision to purchase in this community, however if there can be some compromises made, some solutions found, some common ground, then of course we will continue to move forward in perusing a house to purchase in this community.

Regards,
Amanda
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Amanda

I did not say there are more pressing issues confronting the state politicos.

I did say I believe there are already enough controls in place for an HOA and more state regulation will bring HOA operations to a grinding halt plus bring frivolous lawsuits and the I am right no matter what freaks out of the woodwork.

One person on here said they saw 3 members of their BOD chatting at the pool and asked if this constituted an "illegal" BOD meeting. Some replied yes, where they lived it did. How frackin stupid can we get?

Curious, but where (generally) is the HOA you live in?

Come to Columbia and I will take you for drink at places where you can see politicians, lobbyist, special interest groups, etc. eating, drinking, dancing, and groping together within two blocks of the state house. One place does a great perfect Rob Roy on the rocks with a twist...my drink of preference....LOL

AmandaH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 9
Posted:
John,

Sorry, I didn't mean to misspeak there - when I read about the other stuff, I thought you were discussing the priorities of bills. I do agree that what you describe with the lobbyists, politicians, etc. having drinks together is not good. I guess (and is probably naive) I have always believed in common sense. Three BOD at the pool talking mixed drinks or recipes does not a Board Meeting make. Three BODs at the pool discussing the most recent association business is a risky line that should be avoided.

I'm about an hour or so (depending where in Columbia) from Columbia, closer to the border. I usually drive into Augusta for my Costco and other shopping. Coming to this town (from Vegas) - I compare it a lot to Disneyland.

Regards,
Amanda
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Amanda:

Let me share a few observations about life in general,if not HOA/condo living. Most owners really don't wish to have a direct role in the operation of their property. They would rather someone else do it. And if as you suggest somehow this Board decided to offset their dues by serving on the Board ( which I too can agree is BS) well just where were the owners then? Same place they are today moaning and whining but just not ready to do anything about it. But if you are willing to take the point position on this they are sure ready to let you lead them. Now point man gets the heat and runs the greatest risk hopefully you understand the position you are putting yourself in. Many folks will let you pay the price while they sit on their hands. Just how many are really willing to step up?

The gate open or closed when and how is IMO much to do about nothing. But if you (as a non-owner resident) wishes to suggest the Board Presdient is clearly incapable of doing their job well that is NOT a road I would be willing to go down as you have no idea just what the President does besides volunteering their time to open gates. And like I have said many times on this site when the consequences start to fall down don't wonder why. Most people don't like being labeled in negative ways and some people will even go so far as to push back. Lets hope you have considered that possibility.

I understand your logic about someday buying but as that is not the case right now IMO you have put the cart before the horse.

And after having served 25 years on our Board two final thoughts. I would not appreciate having a tenant who rents property here suggesting how things should be done, what is right and wrong and what I am doing does not satisfy them. That would be a real tough line to sell with me or anyone else I would guess. I also own several rental properties/condos
and IF one of my tenants were to take on the role you have decided to pursue there would be just two options. Cease or move out. IMO until such time as you are an equal owner to the rest you have no place talking it up with neighbors which in the end might come down on me.

Please let us know how things go for you. I hope in the end you are happy because being right really doesn't mater all that much.

Good luck.

JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 07/31/2012 3:50 PM
Amanda

I did not say there are more pressing issues confronting the state politicos.

I did say I believe there are already enough controls in place for an HOA and more state regulation will bring HOA operations to a grinding halt plus bring frivolous lawsuits and the I am right no matter what freaks out of the woodwork.

One person on here said they saw 3 members of their BOD chatting at the pool and asked if this constituted an "illegal" BOD meeting. Some replied yes, where they lived it did. How frackin stupid can we get?

Curious, but where (generally) is the HOA you live in?

Come to Columbia and I will take you for drink at places where you can see politicians, lobbyist, special interest groups, etc. eating, drinking, dancing, and groping together within two blocks of the state house. One place does a great perfect Rob Roy on the rocks with a twist...my drink of preference....LOL


Evidently, VERY frackin stupid. Davis/Sterling was drawn up by lawyers and signed by politicians and we read every day how that works.

Yes you can't e-mail. You can't discuss. There is no action unless at the MONTHLY Board meetings. 12 nights each year! Now that's a plan that can never really work.

Every wooden-nickel wanna be lawyer who reads something now makes a federal case out of whatever they view as a violation of the law. Lets waste time on perception rather than getting things done.

And when open meeting laws are in place just what percentage and the transparency demanding owners attend?

Now Amanda seems to have included non-owners into the already muddled debate.

You either want to get something done or we can sit around and read the rules each month and comply. Sounds like an east decision to me.

I wonder just how the people like those who impose such simpleminded nonsense on others would operate if they had to abide by their own rules?
Not that Washington or any state capital is proof positive our system works, but just what is less than nothing?
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Amanda, I fully support your right to freedom of speech.

If your h'owner neighbors wish to listen to you and consult with you and make plans for changes in your HOA, more power to them! You might be just the catalyst they've needed to improve your community instead of them just whining.

If your neighbors don't want to hear from you, I'm sure that they're mature enough to let you know.

If the election is "sometime" in Sept., I'd hope that your neighbors have persuaded some owners to seek election. In CA, we must send out ballots 30 days ahead of elections (such a burden!!), but it sounds like SC has no such requirement.

We have some excellent tenants in our HOA and a few have come up with good ideas that they've sent to our Board (I'm on it) via their owners.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I just wonder how many times the gate wouldn't be open if you were on rotation? You also have never had to take care of a pool on a public venue. A pool is a nightmare of continued maintenance, expense, time, and endless demands it stays open all the time. You have no idea even if you have a regular Pool person, the additional work it takes. Part of my duties after I worked a 10 hours shift, got home at almost 3 AM, was to go check on the pool. I had to clean the area up, monitor any issues, kick people out, and lock the place up. Heaven forbid the pump went out or poop was found. All of this just to make sure members like you were "Happy" the pool was open for use. ALL of this and more for FREE and no "thank you's"!

My advice is if you are not willing to put in the extra time and effort out of your schedule, then don't critcize those who do. So what the gate is open late? The pool closes for valid reasons and you don't get notified? It is just an annoyance to you but a RESPONSIBILIY of someone else who is doing this on their own time. Have a bit more respect for those who volunteer to make the HOA run. It's easy to pick out what you don't like but what about doing something you do like? That would be to participate and be willing to help those out by posting the pool closing or offering to do gate duty?

Former HOA President
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JeanI on 07/31/2012 1:05 PM
How can renters abide by the legal documents and rules and regulations if they are not given the legal documents.

It's the responsibility of the member to make sure that their guests/tenants comply with the rules.
Therefore, it's also the responsibility of the member/landlord to provide the guests/tenants with those rules.

That said, we also have our governing documents online for anyone to see.
We also provide additional printed copies (for a fee) to the membership if they request one.
We have one member who provides a printed copy with the lease. If not returned, the landlord takes the replacement cost from the security deposit.

Quote:
Posted By JeanI on 07/31/2012 1:05 PM
I disagree that renters do not have any rights. They may not vote at the annual meeting but they can certainly attend all other open board meetings and voice their opinions as to matters affecting the HOA.

The contract (CC&Rs) was entered into by the owner when they purchased the property. The Association only administers the contract and provides specified services and maintenance as required by the contract.

All the HOA laws and the governing documents I've seen convey certain rights and privileges to the member not their guests or tenants. Per the contract (CC&Rs) certain privileges (use of pool, services, etc.) are extended to the guests of the member and the member is responsible for the actions/behavior of those guests.

Every Association has the option to allow guests/tenants to attend meetings and voice their opinions. However, they don't have to. One of the issues that can arise by allowing tenants/guests to attend meetings is that not everyone is aware of their status. Depending on the governing documents, there might not be any qualification requirements for who may be elected to the Board. Additionally, many Associations allow nominations from the floor.

Therefore, depending on the governing documents, by allowing guests/tenants to attend the annual meeting, it's possible for the membership to elect a tenant or boyfriend/girlfriend to the Board. This may or may not become an issue for the community (especially if the boyfriend/girlfriend break up).

Like you, I appreciate anyone volunteering to serve.
A Board needs to weigh all the risks and benefits then make a decision based on what is best for the Association.

Tim

NancyG3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 342
Posted:
Why do we keep going over and over this with Amanda. She is a renter and needs to talk with her landlord who owns the property. She has all the necessary information to get the information she was looking for. All of a sudden the information being provided seems to address if she was an owner. When she purchases a home in the community she can start another forum.
KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 07/31/2012 2:42 PM
Kevin

Non-residents can quite often be elected to the BOD, but I never never heard of non-owners being elected. There is a difference.


I understand that. The president lived with the Secretary. The secretary was the legal owner of the home. The vice president lived in another neighboring neighborhood altogether. The BoD in my neighborhood changed the articles of incorporation and by-laws to only require a certain number of owners thus allowing the non-owner (president) and non-resident (vice president) to serve. The only thing that made me scratch my head was that those two were technically violating by-laws and the articles to begin with but they seemingly ignored them to change them.

That is why I suggested checking the by-laws, c&rs, and articles.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
I have seen Bylaws that read:

Executive Board, Number and Qualification: The affairs of the Association shall be governed by the Executive Board composed of not fewer than three but not more than five persons, all of whom, except one, shall be an Owner, and none of whom shall be related by marriage or civil union, blood or adoption or by partnership.

The “except one” allows a tenant or any other person, if elected, to be a Director.

I have also seen it written as: The affairs of the Association shall be governed by the Executive Board composed of not fewer than three but not more than five persons, at least one of whom shall be an Owner, . . .

Written that way only one of the Directors has to be an owner.

Some renters are long term tenants, 10, 15, 20 years, or more. If a renter is willing to be a Director, is capable, understands fiduciary duty, the degree of care required, etc., and is elected by the Owners, then why not?

Also, if a tenant, renter, is not allowed as a Director then perhaps they can serve as an “assistant” if there is a clause such as: The Executive Board may appoint a Vice President, assistant treasurer, an assistant secretary and such other offices as in its judgment may be necessary. OR: The principal officers may be Directors. The President shall be a Director.

Note the use of the word “may”. If a Document reads that way then the Secretary and Treasurer may be Directors, but it is not a requirement. Any person who is qualified to perform the function of Secretary or Treasurer may be delegated to that office by the Executive Board.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Ellie

By all means, let us turn our associations over to non-owners.

KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
I would personally prefer having two classes of membership. Sometimes I think that lack of engagement from renters is in part because they have no say in community affairs.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KevinK7 on 08/01/2012 1:17 PM
I would personally prefer having two classes of membership. Sometimes I think that lack of engagement from renters is in part because they have no say in community affairs.

I think the fact that a majority of issues on our property and many others stem from tenants rather than property owners suggests to me they have little in the way of consideration because they have no real financial interest in the property. They stay for only as long as they pay rent. Are there exceptions? Certainly, but they are not the rule IMO.
DoloresM2 (California)
Posts: 60
Posted:

Melissa

You mentioned that as a renter Amanda has no rights regarding records, that is true. She has no say in HOA matters. But as a renter, she is entitled to all the amenities listed in her lease, including the use of the pool and the common ares during set times. She understands that there will be times when closing the pool is unavoidable and would simply like reasonable notice of that. These amenities must surely be a factor in the amount of rent she pays each month, so, of course, she wants her money's worth.

In that her her agreement is with her landlord, she has no recourse when these problems occur, except through him. That would explain her frustration when she she sees board members using the pool that she thought was closed. She should let him know that the amenities she is paying for are not always available and he/she should contact the HOA as soon as possible to deal with the problem.

Renters who live in HOA communities are expected to adhere to all the rules. The are also expected to pay their rent on time and generally live up to the terms of their lease. They, in turn, have every right to expect that the place is run properly. Renting is a business arrangement and while a homeowner living in a HOA would certainly understand that, yes, sometimes problems come up and that things are not always up to everyone's standards, a renter may have a different perspective. They may, realistically, want what they are paying for. A well run community.

I think a more helpful approach would be to let the renter know that the board is aware of her concerns, apologize for any inconvenience and tell her that that they will work on fixing the problems.
DoloresM2 (California)
Posts: 60
Posted:
I do not quite understand what you mean when you say she can start another forum when she buys a house. Why would she not want to post in a forum that deals with all aspects of life in a HOA community. She rents a place in such a community and I believe she also volunteers there. This is the best place for her to get answers to her questions.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Dolores you are a bit naive. I used to rent out my HOA home so I know about that. Here is what your overlooking. A renter is NOT bound by the HOa's rules. The owner is. The owner has to have it in their lease agreement for the tenant to follow the HOa rules. This then could allow the owner to evict their tenant if they violate the HOa rules as the owner is being held responsible. However, most on the shelf rental agreements do NOT include HOA inclusions. An astute owner has to put that in there. Plus factor in Renters rights and neither owner or HOA can interefere with the lease agreement.

A HOA is only made up of owners. Renters are NOT owners nor paying the dues to the HOA. That means a renter is not paying for any of the amenities in a HOA. The owner is. That is why the owner has a vote and take part of the decisions of the HOA.

It is nice to live by theory but reality bites back every time...

Former HOA President
KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 08/01/2012 6:29 PM

A HOA is only made up of owners. Renters are NOT owners nor paying the dues to the HOA. That means a renter is not paying for any of the amenities in a HOA. The owner is. That is why the owner has a vote and take part of the decisions of the HOA.

While a HOA is a Homeowners Association, renters indirectly pay dues. Like it or not, part of the rent is to go towards the HOA. Renters are paying for the amenities - through the homeowner. I'm sure many C&Rs are created with the idea in mind that the homeowner would reside in the home, but that is not the case when people purchase homes as investment properties.
LoriL1 (Florida)
Posts: 78
Posted:
718.303 Obligations of owners and occupants; remedies.—(1) Each unit owner, each tenant and other invitee, and each association is governed by, and must comply with the provisions of, this chapter, the declaration, the documents creating the association, and the association bylaws which shall be deemed expressly incorporated into any lease of a unit. Actions for damages or for injunctive relief, or both, for failure to comply with these provisions may be brought by the association or by a unit owner against:
(a) The association.
(b) A unit owner.
(c) Directors designated by the developer, for actions taken by them before control of the association is assumed by unit owners other than the developer.
(d) Any director who willfully and knowingly fails to comply with these provisions.
(e) Any tenant leasing a unit, and any other invitee occupying a unit.

720.305 Obligations of members; remedies at law or in equity; levy of fines and suspension of use rights.—(1) Each member and the member’s tenants, guests, and invitees, and each association, are governed by, and must comply with, this chapter, the governing documents of the community, and the rules of the association. Actions at law or in equity, or both, to redress alleged failure or refusal to comply with these provisions may be brought by the association or by any member against:
(a) The association;
(b) A member;
(c) Any director or officer of an association who willfully and knowingly fails to comply with these provisions; and
(d) Any tenants, guests, or invitees occupying a parcel or using the common areas.

For those interested, the above citations are from Florida Statutes relative to Condo & Homewner Associations. In Florida, tenants ARE required to abide by governing documents of the community and the Associaton DOES have recourse against the tenant. Just sayin'...not all states are the same!
DoloresM2 (California)
Posts: 60
Posted:
Melissa,

One of us may be a little naive here but I do not think it is me. We own three rental houses in the HOA community we live in and plan to buy a couple more in the near future so I am quite familiar with the obligations of tenants in this type of community.

The renters are bound by the rules of the HOA, in that it is written into to the terms of their lease with the homeowner. I cannot imagine a owner renting a home out without this clause in the lease, it could be very problematic if it were left out.

Regarding the dues, I can assure you that the dues for the houses we rent out are being paid by our tenants, it is not specifically itemized as such but is covered by the check they send us and is commonly referred to as rent.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Dol

Pride of ownership, living in the association and renting out units you own in the association, and being an absentee landlord are 3 different subjects.

I congratulate you on caring about your association and probably keeping your renters in line, but let us be realistic here. In many associations, renters often do more harm then good.

If for some reason your renters stopped paying you, would you continue to pay the dues for those units while you worked your way through the issues?

When push comes to shove, many people are not as magnanimous as they were when they could afford to be.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
The reality is that many owners do not put in their leases that renters must obey HOA rules. Off the shelve agreements do NOT have this in them. Plus a HOA can NOT directly enforce the rules onto a renter. It has to be against the owner. That owner then has to then decide what to do.

In my state, a renter can stop paying rent for about a year without being evicted. There is nothing a landlord or HOA can do about it. It takes 2 10 working day notices alone to just evict. Plus up to another 2 weeks before the Sheriff department can forceably evict. That is IF the tenant does NOT protest. IF they protest and respond to notices sent they can essentially stay on the property legally for about a year. All of which in this time could break HOA rules. The HOa can't force the owner to evict. There are Tenant's rights to deal with even an owner can't overcome.

No tenants do NOT pay the dues. (Although Florida has a law). They are paying the owner enough rent to cover the dues payment. They do NOT pay the HOA directly. If they are your not very smart. Dues for rental property are tax deductions. They aren't when you own and live in the home. An owner can charge rent for any amount they want. Does not mean they pay their assessments. I had to foreclose on an owner who did this. Tried to make their tenant pay their backdues. That does not work here in Alabama just maybe Florida. However, what renter is truly going to pay their owner's debt?

Renters do not bring the HOA's property value down. They just can make it harder for new potential owners to get loans or pay a higher rate. A HOA does NOT maintain property value. It maintains the ATTRACTIVENESS to potential buyers to buy in their HOA.

Former HOA President
DoloresM2 (California)
Posts: 60
Posted:
Again, Melissa,you have misunderstood me. I said that our renters to do pay their dues The send us a check each month This amount was arrived at by us when calculating all the expenses of renting the house and yes we remembered to make sure it included the dues. We also remembered to include a clause that would obligate them to abide by the HOA rules.

Of course it may happen that we get some people in who will not pay the rent and we will have to start the process of evicting them. We always get references and other checks before we rent and have been very lucky with all the homes we have rented here and in the Bay Area. But it may happen one day and we will just have to deal with it. We would probably let our lawyers handle it.

However, I must say that if a tenant that came with good reference and usually paid on time fell behind in rent, If they were good tenants, I would see if there was a way for them to make smaller payments for a while and then catch up later. It is a lot cheaper than eviction and I would certainly try it first.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
That is all and good...However, I would dare to say 90% of people who rent out their HOa homes fail to include the HOA clause. Surprising many of those could be professional companies or out of town investors. You have to consider most HOA's lack a fining schedule to even enforce their rules. Can not use fines as a basis of foreclosure or lien in most states. So how does a HOA really have the power to hold over on a renter or landlord? Even rental quotas can be unenforceable. Only California has recently passed a law on that and it began just this year.

I had an owner refusing to pay a special assessment and dues for over two years. She was renting the property out and having the tenant basically paying off her second mortgage. When we started foreclosure proceedings (After years of liens), she demanded her renter pay the backdues. The renter found out not responsible for them and had paid extra each month to purchase the home. The renter moved out and later sued the owner. Which I was a witness to.

So owners/HOA members can be more of a factor of ruining a HOA than a renter. This was an excellent renter. Just bad owner. It can work both ways and the HOA really needs stronger enforcement against owners in that aspect.

Former HOA President
DoloresM2 (California)
Posts: 60
Posted:
Yes, as the owner of the house, I would always pay dues for that house even if we received no rent. That seems like a a no brainer. We consider our income property an investment and we certainly not to anything to jeopardize it including having a lien put on it.

We would of course cancel their id card that allows them to use the facilities. Our property manager screens very carefully and we have been lucky. But if that time ever comes when we have to evict someone, we always make sure we have enough in our property fund to cover expenses for the time it will take for the process to work. Also. I do not considered that I am "keeping mu tenants in line". However, we do like in a retirement community and maybe people are less trouble when as they get older. I know I am.
NancyG3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 342
Posted:
I think Amanda has gotten all the information she needs for this forum.
DoloresM2 (California)
Posts: 60
Posted:
I think you may have already mentioned that in an earlier post. It is good that you care enough to make sure she is fully informed.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here