💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RandyB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 29
Posted:
We had been a very informal HOA but now that we want to get things right we are getting flack.

One homeowner decided to put a fence in that crosses over a utility right of way and when they spoke to the then HOA and ARC made no mention of it nor did the old group ask for documents required.

This same person (a) then filed a complaint about their neighbor (b) not maintaining the land behind B's fence.

B's fence is on their property line and the land behind it is a local utility companies property. We called the utility and they tell us no problem we can get it (they also DID cleaned it up) and I asked if they knew about A's fence and was told yes and we sent them a letter that it would be OK.

I asked A if we could get a copy of the letter for our records and get told:
"Regarding our agreement about our fence with CWA, that is an agreement between CWA and us and does not affect the HOA at all. If you would like a letter of permission, please contact CWA, who I am sure will tell you it is confidential account information."

I explained to them that as far as we know your fence is a violation since it crosses your property line and your shed is a violation since it is with in 10 feet of your property line BUT if we can see your agreement maybe this can be fixed - btw the old group OKed the shed and fence without getting any plans for them!

Our rules state:
"nor shall any work be commenced or performed which may result in a change or exterior appearance of any Structure, until the plans and specifications showing the nature, kid, shape, dimension, material, floor plans, color scheme, location, exterior plans and details, paving plans and location, landscaping details, proposed topographical changes, and proposed tree removal, together with the estimated cost of said work and the Owner’s proposed construction schedule, and together with a designation of the party or parties to perform the work, have been submitted to and the Committee indicates approval in writing on said plans. Said approval must be obtained prior to seeking a building permit from the Township."

A is now looking to do a pool and sent us an e-mail to that effect. When I asked for plans for this project I get

"Our measurements and plans are well within the guidelines of the HOA and the township, as is our notification to the HOA. I do not have official drawings yet, but I will provide them to the HOA as soon as I get them from the builder. "

My reply:
Homeowners do not determine if something is within the guidelines or not, the ARC does. The ARC should be in contact with you about what they need for their review and verify it complies. So a compliance letter can be submitted to the township for your permit. This is done to protect all parties involved now and in the future. SEE BELOW

The bottom line is we have a person getting township permits for work without ARC review and per our Declarations, Covenants and Restrictions.

Township tells me they have no authority to enforce HOA rules (no issue with that) and could get in trouble for withholding a permit on HOA basis. Now I have an issue - they will issue a permit for stuff NOT ALLOWED in the Declarations, Covenants and Restrictions.

RandyB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 29
Posted:
I am done!

"As a homeowner, we can decide we are within the guidelines of the bylaws simply by reading them. They are not open for interpretation on an individual basis, otherwise they would not have been voted in."

Is that is true why have an HOA and ARC?
KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
When did this fence and shed go up?
RandyB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 29
Posted:
Fence 2011
Shed 2012

BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RandyB6 on 07/11/2012 12:14 PM
I am done!

"As a homeowner, we can decide we are within the guidelines of the bylaws simply by reading them. They are not open for interpretation on an individual basis, otherwise they would not have been voted in."

Is that is true why have an HOA and ARC?

Oh, cute!

Hmmmmm, didn't you say

"nor shall any work be commenced or performed which may result in a change or exterior appearance of any Structure, until the plans and specifications showing the nature, kid, shape, dimension, material, floor plans, color scheme, location, exterior plans and details, paving plans and location, landscaping details, proposed topographical changes, and proposed tree removal, together with the estimated cost of said work and the Owner’s proposed construction schedule, and together with a designation of the party or parties to perform the work, have been submitted to and the Committee indicates approval in writing on said plans. Said approval must be obtained prior to seeking a building permit from the Township."

Well, there it is. The rule says the homeowner must submit the plans for approval prior to seeking a building permit from the Township. That's not subject to interpretation either. There it is, in black-and-white. The homeowner didn't follow the rule.
KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BruceF1 on 07/11/2012 1:04 PM
Posted By RandyB6 on 07/11/2012 12:14 PM
I am done!

"As a homeowner, we can decide we are within the guidelines of the bylaws simply by reading them. They are not open for interpretation on an individual basis, otherwise they would not have been voted in."

Is that is true why have an HOA and ARC?

Oh, cute!

Hmmmmm, didn't you say

"nor shall any work be commenced or performed which may result in a change or exterior appearance of any Structure, "

A homeowner could argue that a fence and shed are not a change in the exterior appearance of an existing structure but an entirely separate entity.
RandyB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 29
Posted:
I could see that thinking except

Article 1
Definitions

1.1.16 “Structure”. Any thing or device the placement of which upon the Property (or any part thereof) may affect the appearance of the Property (or any part thereof) including, by way of illustration and not limitation, any building, trailer, garage, porch, shed, springhouse, greenhouse, bath house, covered or uncovered patio, swimming pool, barbecue installation, fence, clothesline, radio, television or other antenna, satellite dish, statuary, fence, curbing, paving, wall, roadway, walkway, exterior light, sign or any temporary or permanent living quarters or any other temporary or permanent improvement made to the Property or any part thereof. “Structure” shall also mean (i) any excavation, fill ditch, diversion, dam or other thing or device which affects or alters the natural flow of surface water from, upon or across the Property, or which affects or alters the flow of any waters in any natural or artificial stream, wash or drainage channel from, upon or across the Property, and (ii) any change in the grade of the Property (or any part thereof) of more than six (6) inches from that existing as of the date hereof.

I moved in here 4 years ago and read this like crazy to make sure WE know what we could get into with an HOA and I was able to the HOA rules to actually reduce the price since I was giving up certain property rights.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Randy

Is this the guy with the pool?
RandyB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 29
Posted:
No different lot and homeowner just a bad week!
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Oops..it is him. He is back. Might well be time to lawyer up.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RandyB6 on 07/11/2012 11:52 AM

btw the old group OKed the shed and fence without getting any plans for them!

Lets see, Homeowner is required to get prior approval. Per your post, prior approval was provided. Homeowner installed shed/fence per approval.

New Board knows about approval but wants to overturn it because per the rules the previous board should not have approved the request.

Sounds like the issue is with the Association and not with the member. At this point if this board wants to force compliance, they will likely have to make some sort of deal because it appears procedures were followed.
DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Doesn't sound like there's anything you can do about the existing structures, but you may have issues if they're non-complying and other people want to do similar things.

As for knowingly defying the association for new work, document every bit of communication you have with them so that it is clear that they're aware of the rules. Should they continue without approval, it's time to seek a legal cease & desist.
RandyB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 29
Posted:
We currently are not looking to over turn their old work BUT get from them the proper documents they had a responsibility and the ARC and HOA can request so records are complete and accurate.

I also found out today the fence they did install violates township rules as it does not meet this TOWNSHIP requirement:

C. All fence posts and structural members shall face inward and not be exposed to
neighboring properties.

I also wonder if our current board could raise an issue with the shed and fence:
1. The approvals were from an HOA member not an ARC member

2. They homeowner never provided full and complete plans which would mean our 60 day review has not started yet:
"In the event the Committee fails to approve or disapprove such design and location in writing within sixty (60) days after full and complete plans and specifications have been submitted to it, approval will be satisfied under this Article 9.3."

My biggest advice is if an HOA has been ran ad hoc DO NOT TRY to get it right as you will only be called:
A bully and Unfair

"I fail to see why such a problem is being made by the HOA. If we are being unfairly and discriminately, that is an entirely different conversation we will be having.

We look forward to a continued relationship with the HOA and will await our letters for our existing structures and the pool."
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RandyB6 on 07/12/2012 5:13 AM
We currently are not looking to over turn their old work BUT get from them the proper documents they had a responsibility and the ARC and HOA can request so records are complete and accurate.

The Association is responsible for maintaining their records. If the records were not kept or lost, it's not the members responsibility to recreate them for the Association. The Association can certainly ask that the member provides a copy, but likely has no other authority than making the request.

Our Association's architectural files were also incomplete. When I was on the ACC we took the following steps to correct this:

1) Organized the files (if interested, I can provide a copy of the regulation we wrote, but you will need to provide an e-mail as it's too large to post)
2) Identified any and all changes on the Lot.
3) Cross checked the existing changes with any approvals in the files.
4) Searched all Association records/minutes to see if there were any approvals identified in those records but not in the Architectural files.
5) For changes where approval was discovered elsewhere, we copied that file and created a memo documenting the change. A copy of this was sent to the member.
6) For changes that had no approval but would likely to have been approved, we created a memo documenting the approval.
7) For changes that had no approval and would likely have been disapproved, we wrote a letter to the member indicating that Association records have no approvals for the change on file. If the member has a copy of the approval they should provide a copy or eliminate the change.

We then started following the rules/regulations which required written documentation. This way we identified what was wrong. Fixed what we could. Educated the membership and then moved forward.

Perhaps a similar process can work for you.

Quote:
Posted By RandyB6 on 07/12/2012 5:13 AM

I also found out today the fence they did install violates township rules as it does not meet this TOWNSHIP requirement

That's an issue for the township, not the Association. The Association should not take on responsibility that are not within their authority to administer.

The Board, or any member, may forward this concern to the appropriate agency within the township for action.

Quote:
Posted By RandyB6 on 07/12/2012 5:13 AM

I also wonder if our current board could raise an issue with the shed and fence:
1. The approvals were from an HOA member not an ARC member

If the individual had the authority or perceived authority (i.e. a Director or committee member) to speak for the Association, this is an internal issue of the Board. The member would have done nothing wrong.

Quote:
Posted By RandyB6 on 07/12/2012 5:13 AM

2. They homeowner never provided full and complete plans which would mean our 60 day review has not started yet:
"In the event the Committee fails to approve or disapprove such design and location in writing within sixty (60) days after full and complete plans and specifications have been submitted to it, approval will be satisfied under this Article 9.3."

You stated earlier that the Association approved the request. If the approval was based on incomplete data, that's not the members fault.

Since you admit that the Association records are incomplete, it may be up to you to prove that the plans were not submitted (if you want to go that route). By the way, does the Association documents define what full and complete plans consist of? What if the change is to paint the house a different color - do I need to provide plans for that? Does a installation manual constitute "complete plans"?

I hope you see the issue I'm trying to illustrate.

We fixed this by requiring our ACC to approve or deny any request received within the timeline (ours is 30 days). The denial can be for incomplete application (no copy of plans, etc.) but the committee must act one way or the other.

Quote:
Posted By RandyB6 on 07/12/2012 5:13 AM

My biggest advice is if an HOA has been ran ad hoc DO NOT TRY to get it right as you will only be called: A bully and Unfair

This happens even if you run an Association by the book.
It's human nature to feel it's unfair if you can't do what you want (especially in America). That's just part of the process.

RandyB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 29
Posted:
Thanks and that is some excellent input!

This forum is great!

At a BOD and ARC meeting this past week I brought up the idea of doing yearly inspections so members know all are treated equal and in the hope it would cut down on petty neighbor vs. neighbor stuff - Got these ideas from another forum here - and it was not received too well - my impression from them was it will be more work and but "us" at odds with more people

I guess I need to do more sales pitches!

Thanks for all the input
DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RandyB6 on 07/12/2012 5:13 AM
We currently are not looking to over turn their old work BUT get from them the proper documents they had a responsibility and the ARC and HOA can request so records are complete and accurate.

I also found out today the fence they did install violates township rules as it does not meet this TOWNSHIP requirement:

C. All fence posts and structural members shall face inward and not be exposed to
neighboring properties.

I also wonder if our current board could raise an issue with the shed and fence:
1. The approvals were from an HOA member not an ARC member

2. They homeowner never provided full and complete plans which would mean our 60 day review has not started yet:
"In the event the Committee fails to approve or disapprove such design and location in writing within sixty (60) days after full and complete plans and specifications have been submitted to it, approval will be satisfied under this Article 9.3."

My biggest advice is if an HOA has been ran ad hoc DO NOT TRY to get it right as you will only be called:
A bully and Unfair

"I fail to see why such a problem is being made by the HOA. If we are being unfairly and discriminately, that is an entirely different conversation we will be having.

We look forward to a continued relationship with the HOA and will await our letters for our existing structures and the pool."

Did your HOA have an ARC defined? We have declared that the Board and the ARC are one and the same.

The 60 day review doesn't seem to apply. That's like a bill being made into law if the president fails to sign or veto it. If they submit plans, the association has 60 days to approve or deny. Approval was granted without plans, so the point there is moot.

The issue I see is that while a fence was approved, is there any record of WHAT was approved? How does the current or future board know if what was constructed matches what was approved?

Since their fence was supposedly approved but does not meet Township requirements, I would ask the township about how THEY plan to enforce their own rules. You don't need to be the bad guy if it's out of your jurisdiction.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
I can understand those concerns.

Our documents require: The Architectural Control Committee is to assure that the property shall always be maintained in a manner: (i) providing for visual harmony and soundness of repair.

Per the documents definitions, "the property" includes all lots. Therefore, the committee uses the annual inspection to comply with this requirement of the CC&Rs.

As for a selling point, I've attached an article one of our committee members wrote for our newsletter. Feel free to modify and/or use it. Their is another article that I think is better. If I can find it, I'll attach it later.

Hope this helps,

Tim
📎 Attachments (1):

⏸ Downloads temporarily unavailable

📝1712524851371.doc(24 KB)
RandyB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 29
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 07/12/2012 6:52 AM
I can understand those concerns.

Our documents require: The Architectural Control Committee is to assure that the property shall always be maintained in a manner: (i) providing for visual harmony and soundness of repair.

Per the documents definitions, "the property" includes all lots. Therefore, the committee uses the annual inspection to comply with this requirement of the CC&Rs.

As for a selling point, I've attached an article one of our committee members wrote for our newsletter. Feel free to modify and/or use it. Their is another article that I think is better. If I can find it, I'll attach it later.

Hope this helps,

Tim

Tim,
Thank you
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Randy

I guess I am a little confused. On one hand you say you do not want to go after the guy with the shed and fence then on the other hand you sound like you want to.

Exactly what do you want to do about him and the association in general?

It appears your docs only reference home/structure modifications as in part of/attached to the house, nothing about out structures (sheds) and/or fences. It might well be time for the BOD and/or the ARC to tighten these procedures up.

Hope this helps.

RandyB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 29
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 07/12/2012 6:59 AM
Randy

I guess I am a little confused. On one hand you say you do not want to go after the guy with the shed and fence then on the other hand you sound like you want to.

Exactly what do you want to do about him and the association in general?

It appears your docs only reference home/structure modifications as in part of/attached to the house, nothing about out structures (sheds) and/or fences. It might well be time for the BOD and/or the ARC to tighten these procedures up.

Hope this helps.


Please see prior post above on how a structure is defined.
I personally do not care about their fence and shed - they do not live next to me.

What I care about is the processes and impact of them:
1. The old process for these were not done correctly

2. Now that we want to follow a more formal process they want to say we are being unfair since we are asking for more now than was asked for prior (I disagree with them on this point)

3. They tell us the township is OK with what they did and want to do but what they did is actually a township violation (minor) but they brought it up and went to the township about the HOA rules we did not go to the township

4. My neighbor or someone else seeing what A does and think they can do it when in fact what A did was not done correctly and we all know how the grape vine works

I try to talk to my neighbors as much as possible and always ask "got any future home or yard improvements planned?"

One thing I do miss from our old town was they had a 200 feet requirement for a permit (deck, fence, pool, additions, garages etc) so in order to get a permit you had to send certified mail to all property owners within 200 feet of your property lines that explained what you are asking a permit for and when the permit hearing will be held before the board - basically say your piece now or hold your tongue - I hated it BUT not see why it worked!

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Randy,

Our Association does something similar. The application for sheds,decks or major landscape changes requires signatures from neighbors on each side and (if the change is in the back yard) directly behind you. Same type of thing, not an approval but notification that you submitted the request. Then if the neighbor wants, they can raise concerns to the ACC.

RandyB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 29
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 07/12/2012 7:22 AM
Randy,

Our Association does something similar. The application for sheds,decks or major landscape changes requires signatures from neighbors on each side and (if the change is in the back yard) directly behind you. Same type of thing, not an approval but notification that you submitted the request. Then if the neighbor wants, they can raise concerns to the ACC.


Seems your development has what I think now are proactive requirements. Great Stuff!

The 200 feet thing was the city's process you had to follow prior to them OKing the permit - we did not live in an HOA development at that time

RandyB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 29
Posted:
Sorry to kick this back up but I am trying to get a good understanding of what COULD cause "closed" issues to re-open.

The CCR require person get approval for fence

They asked via e-mail to install a white vile picket fence were sent an OK on this

Fence goes up

Township requires fence posts and members face in so not viable via a neighbor

CCR state "Any improvement, construction, or other development by an Owner shall be subject to any applicable Township regulations and ordinances in additional to any other provisions of this Article."

Would this be cause for the ARC or HOA to come back as the fence is non-compliant with the township

This homeowner has made a few enemies and we really do not want to get involved but if someone brings a legit claim we may be stuck and this looks like a potential way for it to happen

Thanks

DaveD3 (Michigan)
Posts: 796
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RandyB6 on 07/12/2012 5:33 PM
Sorry to kick this back up but I am trying to get a good understanding of what COULD cause "closed" issues to re-open.

The CCR require person get approval for fence

They asked via e-mail to install a white vile picket fence were sent an OK on this

Fence goes up

Township requires fence posts and members face in so not viable via a neighbor

CCR state "Any improvement, construction, or other development by an Owner shall be subject to any applicable Township regulations and ordinances in additional to any other provisions of this Article."

Would this be cause for the ARC or HOA to come back as the fence is non-compliant with the township

This homeowner has made a few enemies and we really do not want to get involved but if someone brings a legit claim we may be stuck and this looks like a potential way for it to happen

Thanks


Imho, that's not an HOA issue. That's a township issue and a complaint should be filed with the township.
If the Township chooses to not address the issue I would think it COULD be dealt with at the HOA level given the regulation you cited.

The question then remains "what was actually approved?" If they said "we want to install a 6' fence" with no other detail, then you have a place to act. I doubt that they declared the orientation of the fence posts though, considering your posts thus far.

So yes, there is a violation of the township regs, and you could possibly address it within the HOA, but I see the township as having the obligation first.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RandyB6 on 07/12/2012 5:33 PM

Would this be cause for the ARC or HOA to come back as the fence is non-compliant with the township

No.

It's not the Associations responsibility to enforce Federal, State, County or City laws/codes/ordinances.

The Association has a very specific purpose - to oversee the contract between the members (the CC&Rs) and to maintain the common area and amenities. That's it.

They are not a mediator between neighbors.
They are not the local police department.
They are not the local zoning board.
They are not the fire Marshall
They are not something more than what is outlined within the Articles of incorporation and only have the authority given by the CC&Rs and State laws.

Just as an Association must comply with Federal, State, etc. laws, a member of an Association must comply with all of them as well. It's the members responsibility to know those laws, get city/county permits as required, etc.

If your application doesn't have the following phrase, you should change the application so it does:

The homeowners acknowledge that he/she is aware and understands the following:

• Approval of any project by the Association does not waive the necessity of obtaining the required governmental permits.

• Obtaining a governmental permit does not waive the need for Association approval.

• Nothing contained herein shall be construed to represent that alteration to lots or buildings, in accordance with these plans, shall not violate any of the provisions of local building and Zoning Codes to which the above property is subject. Further, nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver or modification of any said restrictions.

• Where required, building permits shall be obtained prior to the start of any construction. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver of said requirement.

RandyB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 29
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 07/13/2012 2:59 AM
Posted By RandyB6 on 07/12/2012 5:33 PM

Would this be cause for the ARC or HOA to come back as the fence is non-compliant with the township


No.

It's not the Associations responsibility to enforce Federal, State, County or City laws/codes/ordinances.

The Association has a very specific purpose - to oversee the contract between the members (the CC&Rs) and to maintain the common area and amenities. That's it.

They are not a mediator between neighbors.
They are not the local police department.
They are not the local zoning board.
They are not the fire Marshall
They are not something more than what is outlined within the Articles of incorporation and only have the authority given by the CC&Rs and State laws.

Just as an Association must comply with Federal, State, etc. laws, a member of an Association must comply with all of them as well. It's the members responsibility to know those laws, get city/county permits as required, etc.

If your application doesn't have the following phrase, you should change the application so it does:

The homeowners acknowledge that he/she is aware and understands the following:

• Approval of any project by the Association does not waive the necessity of obtaining the required governmental permits.

• Obtaining a governmental permit does not waive the need for Association approval.

• Nothing contained herein shall be construed to represent that alteration to lots or buildings, in accordance with these plans, shall not violate any of the provisions of local building and Zoning Codes to which the above property is subject. Further, nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver or modification of any said restrictions.

• Where required, building permits shall be obtained prior to the start of any construction. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver of said requirement.


Again I guess this is why we have lawyers in the world - it is my understanding and reading ALL of those are in our CCR in some fashion. Homeowner feels since township told them the township does not enforce HOA rules THAT as long as the township said OK they can do it - which is why in this or a different thread I posted the part of the CCR that says owner needs ARC approval PRIOR to getting a township permit.

I am starting to think I since we as an HOA and community do not have a lawyer on file/retainer it may be time to get one. I am close to getting one on my own just to help me do a newsletter or something to the development that explains this stuff and has been shown to be accurate by xyz attorney.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here