💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DH
Posts: 13
Posted:
Davis-Stirling Act (California Civil Code) Section 1365.2 part (i), sub-section (2), members are entitled to meeting minutes from committee meetings commencing January 1, 2007 and forward.

The way I understand this is as of Jan 1, 2007 homeowners are now entitled to copies of BOARD meeting minutes as well as COMMITTEE meetings minutes.

I have been told by our HOA (attorneys who represent) that because our committees are not technically "committees of the board" then I am not entilted to their content.

I don't see where it says what entity these committees represent, but they must have to report to somebody.

Can someone please tell me if this is some loophole our HOA is trying to get around?

This is in California and I would also like to know if this has been challenged yet.

Thanks so much for your time!

DH
DH
Posts: 13
Posted:
ALSO..............

Why would a HOA NOT want to release meeting minutes or committee meeting minutes to the communities they serve.

What is this reasoning???

Thank you very much,
DH
LuciusD
Posts: 139
Posted:
First suggestion: Read your association bylaws regarding committees.
Are the committeess appointed by the board? Do they report to the board? Are they supervised by the board? Are they given task to perform for the board? Perhaps they never record minutes and wish to hide the fact.

Of course, the real answer to your question is that committees, and even boards, do not want to be answerable to anyone for what they do. They want power without responsibility. They, by nature, do not want to conform to, or even be reminded of, civil code.

RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Posted By LuciusD on 02/04/2007 5:07 AM
......................
Of course, the real answer to your question is that committees, and even boards, do not want to be answerable to anyone for what they do. They want power without responsibility. They, by nature, do not want to conform to, or even be reminded of, civil code.


LuciusD, What board or committee are you on in your association? Do you not want to be answerable to anyone for what they do? Do you want power without responsibility?

Unless you're a board or committee member and personally feel this way, I think you're making an unfair statement about the volunteers who serve their communities in those capacities.

As for committees keeping minutes, Let's take the welcoming committee: They visit new residents, take them copies of the association documents and possibly a basket of fruit or coupons. They're going to keep minutes of that?

How about the landscaping committee: They meet Saturday morning and plant flowers at the entrance. Again, they're supposed to keep minutes?

Minutes should be kept for membership meetings and board meetings and any other meeting where money is spent. Not for planting flowers.


Ron
SC
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Posted By DH on 02/03/2007 7:51 PM

Davis-Stirling Act (California Civil Code) Section 1365.2 part (i), sub-section (2), members are entitled to meeting minutes from committee meetings commencing January 1, 2007 and forward.

The way I understand this is as of Jan 1, 2007 homeowners are now entitled to copies of BOARD meeting minutes as well as COMMITTEE meetings minutes.

I have been told by our HOA (attorneys who represent) that because our committees are not technically "committees of the board" then I am not entilted to their content.

I don't see where it says what entity these committees represent, but they must have to report to somebody.

Can someone please tell me if this is some loophole our HOA is trying to get around?

This is in California and I would also like to know if this has been challenged yet.

Thanks so much for your time!

DH


DH, Why do you want the minutes? If you really want to know what's going on, why not volunteer for some of those committees? You'll find out what is going on and help your community at the same time.


Ron
SC
LanceT (Alabama)
Posts: 121
Posted:
Yes it's ALL a "conspiracy". Committee members want to rule the world and your home! Sounds like someone finally made a law that will bring the demise and downfall of committees and put them in their place! Whew!
Sorry...couldn't help myself....
A HOA can have multiple different committees if the members want or need them. Typically, there is a Archectual Control Committee (ACC) that governs the "uniformity" or "Appearance" of the homes/property. A clubhouse committee that handles renting or maintenance of the clubhouse. There can be a committees that involve HOA security. Any time there are areas of the HOA that could use VOLUNTEERS to organize, you can have a committee. (Board may need to agree to it).
Having stated that. Committees can NOT be funded by themselves. The money the HOA has is by the owners FOR the owners. If a committee needs money, they will have to report to the board or general membership. Example: The clubhouse committee finds people smoking in the bathrooms during parties. It's a no smoking facility. The committee can decide "Let's put smoke detectors in the bathrooms". That committee then goes to the board meeting and gives their "report". Requests that the board buy the smoke detectors. The board agrees if the clubhouse committee installs them. Later, whoever purchases the smoke detectors will turn over their receipt to the board (AFTER approval) who will submit it to the bookkeeper to reimburse.
This is how it is supposed to work. That means that ANY decision the committees make have to get approval from the board. Hence, these decisions should be in the meeting minutes per the law. There will also be financial records as well. Nothing is being "hidden". There may NOT be any notes or requests from the committees to the board. NOT all things that need to be done by committees require money or discussion with the board. If the ACC has the power to deny a fence, then why would they submit that to the board? It's usually only when a conflict arises that such issues would even be discussed at board level between the committee and board.

Recovering Ex-President of a HOA
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
I am not sure why an HOA would do what the OP believes his HOA is doing. it seems counterproductive. A good team (ie, commitee) will take notes at their meeting (it's part of running an effective meeting of any kind), and i see nothing wrong with transparency in the system. Owners should be allowed to see what goes on in the meetings of the HOA, and any committees that meet.

Ron, i wouldn't agree that planting flowers on a saturday is a meeting. that's a project, to me, and a very different creature from a meeting. As is the welcoming committee greeting a new owner. a meeting is the the time spent by the members making a master plan of the flower bed designs, reviewing bids by landscapers for the materials, deciding if wood chips or stone will be the matrix of choice, arranging the details of payment for the materials, etc.. It is the time spent by the welcoming committee reviewing the packet, making edits and changes to the procedures, establishing a process and protocol for delivery, etc... Meetings are things that should have agendas, learnings, decisions, actions/deliverables due, etc..

DH
Posts: 13
Posted:
I am specifically referring to our Archetectural Committee where they have responsibilty to decided on view maintanence, tree removal, planning and approving community landscape renovations.

I feel I would like to be kept informed as to the decisions they make seeing as though we are finacially funding these projects. It seems as though this new Civil Code is designed for this purpose.

Why would you feel the community that supports these efforts through monthly dues should not have access to these minutes.

Understandably there would not be minutes to planting flowers.
Our HOA in fact requires that an Archetectural committee memeber enter the homes of the people who feel they need landscaping or tree trimming done in order to protect their view and then ususally finds that your request is not warranted. I feel it important to see how our money is being spent. Don't you agree?
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
DH, I think the HOA attorney may be referring only to the Architectural Committee and then only when it is autonomous from the Board. Often the Declaration is written in a manner so that the Developer can still control the Architectural Committee after giving the homeowners control of the Board. After the Developer moves out the homeowners Board controls the Architectural committee. Thus the autonomy no longer exists since the Board oversees and appoint the members of the Architectural committee. So technically the attorney could be correct but from a functional standpoint they are not.

The bottom line is all minutes of all member, Board, and committee meeting should be made available. However, the question remains as to whether a committee is required to maintain minutes. Some ARCs meet only to approve or disapprove modification requests and the only records maintained are their copies of requests.
DH
Posts: 13
Posted:
Thank you for this response. From what you state here it appears that the excuse for complying with the civil code is not valid.

In other words it does not matter what relationship the Archetectural Committee has with the board, it just matters that the minutes must be made avaiable. Period.
Next question......

How do I get this enforced?????
Thank you all very much!
DH
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Posted By DH on 02/04/2007 12:16 PM

How do I get this enforced?????


Simple - go back and tell them that you read on a website that they had to provide the minutes to you. ;)


Ron
SC
LanceT (Alabama)
Posts: 121
Posted:
How do you get anything enforced in a HOA? Simply by participating and doing the work. If you want to know what is going on in your HOA or other committees then JOIN those committees!
My simple advice is again PARTICIPATE! Your a member of the HOA, so act like one!

Recovering Ex-President of a HOA
DH
Posts: 13
Posted:
Thank you!

This is a terrific site and I feel most here are well informed and gave excellent feedback.
Thanks to everyone especially Ron.

I'll be back.
;o)
DH
DH
Posts: 13
Posted:
Especially thank you to Roger. I may ask for your opinion again. I think you speak straight up and make much sense.

Thank you very much,
DH
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
RonaldW - LusciusD unfortunately speaks the truth about many committees and boards, not all, but many. If you disagree with LusciusD's statement, it wouldn't matter whether LusciusD was on a board or committee or not. The statement is probably born out of the frustration of boards that believe they are superior/not accountable to anyone. Exactly opposite of what CA Civil code is designed to prevent.

The landscape committee should have minutes from the meeting where they decided to meet on a Saturday to plant flowers at the entrance. That is of course if funds were taken from the association. If it was a free enhancement, I don't see why anyone would need to know how the matter was discussed and decided upon.
LucyB (California)
Posts: 4
Posted:
This is really a simple matter. Send them, via Certified Return Receipt, your request for the meeting minutes you are interest in. Start your sentence off with: Pursuant to the Sterling Davis Act I hereby request the following........

If they do not comply, go online to the CA Attorney General's office, get your complaint form and send it in. Be sure to mark the box where it's ok for the AG to copy them w/your complaint.

You'll get your meeting minutes soon after that. In California, it's the law.
DH
Posts: 13
Posted:
This is excellent information. I was wondering who has jurisdiction as to the enforcement of rights of homeowners in HOA non compliace disputes. Somebody's got to monitor HOAs. Thanks
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JoeW1 on 02/05/2007 10:10 AM
RonaldW - LusciusD unfortunately speaks the truth about many committees and boards, not all, but many. If you disagree with LusciusD's statement, it wouldn't matter whether LusciusD was on a board or committee or not. The statement is probably born out of the frustration of boards that believe they are superior/not accountable to anyone. Exactly opposite of what CA Civil code is designed to prevent.

The landscape committee should have minutes from the meeting where they decided to meet on a Saturday to plant flowers at the entrance. That is of course if funds were taken from the association. If it was a free enhancement, I don't see why anyone would need to know how the matter was discussed and decided upon.

There is a level of detail below which it doesn't matter. Do the association members need to know if I purchased a $6.00 lock for the sprinkler controls from Lowes or Home Depot? I don't think so and we didn't have a meeting and keep minutes to decide, I just picked it up when I was doing personal shopping and installed it when it was convenient to me. Anyone see a problem with that?

The landscape committee doesn't have to hold a meeting to decide what day and what time they will plant flowers. Suppose it rains that day? Do they call another meeting? Once the decision is made to plant flowers they can call or e-mail each other to pick a good day and time to meet.

Let's try to clarify this - Suppose the landscape committee decided to hire a contractor to plant the flowers - Would the date and time the landscaper is to do this work have to be placed in the minutes?

In a way, our board is also functioning as the MC since we don't have one. An MC would not keep minutes of maintenance items, they would just do them.

Requiring detailed meetings and minutes of everyday decisions could push boards to just hire a MC to handle the details. The association dues would increase significantly. Would this make the members happy?

Ron
SC
DH
Posts: 13
Posted:

I don't think anyone I am asking for the type of details you describe here. I'm a pretty reasonable person as well as the rest of our HOA. However we as a progressive society makes for a better place to live when we can have open across the board level of communication.

I'm interested in knowing what we can do as an interactive community (which is why these civil codes are being enforced) to assist our boards in building a stronger bonds rather than drawing lines in the sand.
Our HOA needs to understand this by opening the doors and welcoming those of us who support a better community. After all isn't that why we live here?

Understand, it's not about supporting the board or the HOA in all their decisions, but to know that we are a community working together for the common good of the HOA we solely support. It's simply a sharing of information.

I want to know how our AC makes their decisions. It is not based on what time they are planting flowers. They also make other decisions like roof and tennis court modifications, major landscape overhauls, surface and pool installation recomendations, gate keeper modifications, fine assesments. The list goes on and on depending the type of power the board assigns to them. My request goes far beyond timely flower planting.

Thank you.
BradD2 (Florida)
Posts: 418
Posted:
DH, check what California says is a board meeting. In Florida, it is defined as a gathering of a majority of the board. It doesn't matter what we call it that is a board meeting in the legal definition. I would guess that California has the same legal definition and that every board meeting is open to the Owners; check your States Statutes.

For this reason, we never have more than a few board members on any committee to ensure that they can meet and discuss whatever they must in a timely manner. In Florida, all documents of the Association are available to any Owner that requests them. Check for that as well.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
DH:
Re: Arch.Comm. and responsibility for decisions. You state you are not informed of the decisions they are making, or have made.
Normally, the Arch. Comm. is required to state a reason why they have denied a request, not to just say no. Actually, you may want to check your docs; often it is the committee who gives their recommendation to the Board but the Board has the final say. To answer your question on wanting to be kept informed of their decisions, it is certainly a valid request.

Might you attack the situation like this...Make a request in writing that you would like the Arch.Committee to give a Committee report as part of the agenda at each resident meeting--a recap of Arch. requests & decisions made. This way, it will be part of the minutes which residents should be receiving.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here