💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

NesreenM (Texas)
Posts: 1
Posted:
Does anyone have any experience with surveillance cameras around their neighborhood?
We're considering this for our neighborhood. We're looking for high quality cameras, that do not need to be monitored-we would only refer to the recordings if there is an incident.
Any company recommendations or advice would be appreciated!
KarenC15 (Florida)
Posts: 118
Posted:
We recently had our local police chief attend a meeting and recommend cameras as an alternative to personal confrontation. He had many suggestions and, as such, I think it might be a good place for someone to begin -- with asking the local police or at a security store. One of my concerns is who would be watching the videos, especially of young girls in the pool. I am still waiting to see how that will be managed, as we do not background check our board or residents (unfortunately).

Hatred is contagious, so one should work to avoid it.
PeterD3 (Florida)
Posts: 708
Posted:
Community wide no.

Personally yes. No I don't monitor but review as you describe. My system overwites every two weeks, more or less if I choose. Plenty of time to discover something unusual.

We had no problems for about a year after installation. Then friends of some neighbor's kids tried stealing two bikes from the garage. They could be seen walking from the neighbor's house, scoping the bikes, and then attempting to steal.

The bikes were locked so they tried carrying them for a bit then stashed in a bush. We discover the theft within a half an hour, reviewed the tapes, showed the police, and they were able to interrogate the neighbor's kids and obtain identities which led to locating the bikes.

As far as people at a pool etc. There is little to no expectation of privacy out side your home or property in public places with a few exceptions. You can easily obtain court decisions on this.

Especially after notice is posted of surveilence, if the girls, or anyone, wish to act or dress lewdly then they are doing so of their own volition.
AllisonD (Florida)
Posts: 449
Posted:
I have cameras at my front entrance only. We can see both exit and entry and license plates at entry. A month or so ago, a roofing company truck hit our keypad and we had to spend money to repair it (weld it back upright). On the video you can see the entire incident very well including the name and phone number of the roofing company on the back of the truck. I called and emailed them numerous times and they have not responded. Now we will fill out a police report and give them the video. In Florida its illegal to leave the scene of an accident with property damage. Although they may not have known they damaged the keypad (I will give them the benefit of the doubt), they know now from all my calls and emails.

The initial reason we got the camera system is because there had been a rash of car breakins and for those here that live in Florida, the pillowcase burglars were nearby as well. This is not a prevention method but its here to help the police solve crimes. The police in my town are fabulous but they can't be everywhere all the time.

We had to have internet hooked up at the front gate. That was our only other expense and continues monthly, besides the actual camera installation. I can view the entrance anytime I want from my computer or tablet, but its pretty boring unless I am looking for something specific.

If you are going to have the camera by the pool or some other place people normally congregate, it might be a good idea to have a policy about who is allowed to view the video and when and why. There is no need to watch people at the pool while they are there. That would creep me out. If you have security staff, they might only view the cameras during the time the pool is closed or if someone notifies them about an incident occurring. I would even go so far as to change the password occasionally for security staff. And I would definitely post signs that say the area is under camera surveillance.

I would look online for good security cameras and then let the website tell you who are installers in your area. Many of the warranties are only good if you use their approved installers. I would also get an extended warranty and also, please ask about static IP addresses because you do not want the IP address to change if their are power problems, then your viewing app wont work. Our installer did not tell us that, I had to get the internet company to do that after our installation was complete. Test the system in different conditions before you decide its been installed properly (rain, snow, night). Also, let your local police know you have the system installed and they can give you some advice specific for your area.
MatthewW4 (Arizona)
Posts: 500
Posted:
Just a couple of tips from my days in the self-storage business.

High-quality color is much better than grainy black-and-white but requires a much higher quality cable to connect with the recorder.

Do not waste your time and money with videotape; digital disc is the only way to fly.

Motion-sensing cameras/recorders will reduce the amount of "dead air" and increase the amount of video you can store on a disc. Do not mount a motion-sensing camera behind a bush or tree as it will record every time the leaves shake when the wind blows.

When mounting cameras, consider that in the winter the sun may be so low in the sky that it will blind the picture, maybe even damage the camera. You may need to invest in better housings for the camera just to keep them shielded. Face cameras north whenever possible.

The best recorder in the world is useless if no one has been trained to operate it. Make sure that the vendor will provide regular training sessions for those who will use the recorder.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
If you're localized to one area (like your community center), then try getting an NVR (network Video Recorder)with digital IP camersa... and NOT a DVR (Digital Video recorder)with analog cameras. The difference in quality is huge and everything is going digital now. The problem with getting a community wide system is related how do you connect everything? You would need a secure, stable internet connection at all the camera locations.
JeffreyB2 (Florida)
Posts: 2
Posted:
Our community has cameras at the 2 entrances and exits and 2 club houses. We currently have a collection of various cameras and the video is sent offsite to a monitoring company getting a lot of money a month. We are looking to redo them to a single system that we can control in house. This is to partially save money and also consistency in the cameras and reliability. We have one company pushing for 4 dvr's one per area as there is no simple connection between the 2 sets of gates and 2 clubhouses. They are pushing Analog cameras for quality. I would think digital is more current technology and future proof the system better. The main bidding company does not do digital. Another bidder, who does digital, we have had other issues with so I will not use them. I have instructed our management company to find other bidders with preference to digital. Has anyone found reasons to prefer Digital or Analog systems and why? All of my online research looks biased based on what a given vendor is used to rather then an unbiased opinion.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
You would need a secure, stable internet connection at all the camera locations.


Actually, you dont need internet access at all. They can all work on their own network without access to the outside internet world. But you would need to have access to the computer to view the cameras.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Digital or Analog systems and why? All of my online research looks biased based on what a given vendor is used to rather then an unbiased opinion.

Analog is more reliable. No networking or computer issues. Computers have many issues, it happens and people who know how to troubleshoot this stuff is expensive. Analog is easy. You really shouldn't need to access the camera unless there is a reported issue. So while remote access is nice, it's not really a necessity.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Not to mention IP based cameras are so easily hacked. All it takes is one flaw in the code and an attacker has control of the camera. And there is always flaws in code. And because it's hard programmed into the camera, it's not always fixable. And if it is fixable, companies don't always issue an update, people don't update or the new firmware has new issues. Unless you have a IT people on staff or can afford to hire someone to work on your camera network, stick with analog.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Sorry to agree to disagree on this one. We already went down the analog trail and had what they called "high end" CCTV analog cameras. The reason that they are pushing analog right now, is because the hardward is very cheap. It had it for a year and it was awful and yes it was sold and installed by one of the largest commercial security contractors in the country. We've had an NVR with 6 digital cams for a year now and it's been great. You can actually recognize faces from across to the other side of the pool and the quality of the nighttime video is great. Security software locks down access and we're never had any problems with security. There is tons of video comparisons on the web. You don't have to buy a high end Mobotix, but digital and NVR is where it's at if you'r looking for adequate resolution. Also easy to use with Smart Phones on all 6 cams.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Security software locks down access and we're never had any problems with security.


How would you know if you don't know what you're looking for? A virus could or already have easily compromised your internet connected machine, and now you need someone to fix it. Analog systems have no such issues.

And why would you need live access from a smart phone unless you're stalking someone. CCTV should only be for security problems, not spying.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
We already went down the analog trail and had what they called "high end" CCTV analog cameras.


The details are in the specs. If they were expensive cameras, but had low specifications, they are not going to look good. There are plenty of inexpensive cameras with good specs that provide a good quality image. Just because a national company sold it to you doesn't mean it's not crap.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
We agree to disagree - We did confirmed and verified the specs on the old analog cameras. After the new installation, we can all say that they results speak louder than words. We're very happy with the NVR and digital cams. Everything is going to digital now. It's just a sign of the times.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Wow - Only our property managers have access to video, and it's primarily to monitor the pool company lifeguards and patrons. If there is an accident, complaint or incident where we might have a liability concern, the video is pulled and archived so that we can document the incident for legal reasons. Spying? Come on... pls.
Cameras are everywhere these days and there are no expectations of privacy in our world.
AnnH5 (Florida)
Posts: 304
Posted:
I just caught this thread. I am in the minority- I have found cameras to be worthless in most if not all instances. We have cameras all over our common area so if someone damages something or causes a problem, it is recorded. However, the trouble then becomes identifying people. In a large community, it is usually impossible to identify someone who is recorded doing something. It is 100% impossible if the person doesn't even live here. We have also had people use these cameras to watch others in live feed, from afar, and without the knowledge of their "subjects". Let's just say that if you have Wi-Fi and some software, somebody can do this. All they need is the access code. From a legal standpoint, our HOA is still at risk for being sued for this (it was all due to the action of a rogue Board member). Save your money and your time. Cameras solve very few issues and it has become increasingly creepy to know that I am being filmed whether I am walking to the bathroom, swimming in the pool, playing on the playground, etc.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AnnH5 on 10/02/2013 6:08 PM

Cameras solve very few issues

A very true statement. They typically only document the incident which may or may not assist the police in identifying and bringing those involved to justice.

Quote:
Posted By AnnH5 on 10/02/2013 6:08 PM

it has become increasingly creepy to know that I am being filmed whether I am walking to the bathroom, swimming in the pool, playing on the playground, etc.

I agree. Unfortunately, cameras are now an integrated part of society. There are traffic cameras, security cameras (both home and business), cameras on cell phones and satellites. Many are made accessible to the general public via the internet. Depending on what the subject matter is, the recorded material may even be published by the media. The reality is, they are not going away. Therefore, we need to take the necessary steps to ensure privacy standards are upheld. The other choice is to get never leave the confines of your home.

AnnH5 (Florida)
Posts: 304
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 10/02/2013 7:19 PM
Posted By AnnH5 on 10/02/2013 6:08 PM

Cameras solve very few issues


A very true statement. They typically only document the incident which may or may not assist the police in identifying and bringing those involved to justice.

Quote:
Posted By AnnH5 on 10/02/2013 6:08 PM

it has become increasingly creepy to know that I am being filmed whether I am walking to the bathroom, swimming in the pool, playing on the playground, etc.


I agree. Unfortunately, cameras are now an integrated part of society. There are traffic cameras, security cameras (both home and business), cameras on cell phones and satellites. Many are made accessible to the general public via the internet. Depending on what the subject matter is, the recorded material may even be published by the media. The reality is, they are not going away. Therefore, we need to take the necessary steps to ensure privacy standards are upheld. The other choice is to get never leave the confines of your home.


I agree wholeheartedly. It is one thing for a homeowner to have cameras on their own property (although I think that it is bordering on paranoia to need cameras in front of one's home with live feed to monitors). It is also another thing for a business to have cameras to catch shoplifters or because it is necessary for their business (theme parks, storage/warehouses, pharmacies, military bases, etc). Does an HOA truly need cameras to monitor the neighborhood residents and their visitors, everyone's comings and goings, who is using the facilities (even the bathrooms)??? I will also say that for the repair expenses we had a few years ago for some petty vandalism pales in comparison to what our HOA has spent on cameras- thousands have been wasted all in the name of "trying to catch people in the act"--- the same people who pay their HOA fees and abide by the rules.
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
It's a sign of the times. In other countries, like U.K. and Europe, there are cameras everywhere and it's rapidly changing here in the U.S.
Previously, our pool house and the surrounding area was severally vandalized numerous times and we used to have folks partying in the pool during the night after it's closed. We have a lot of money invested in our community club house, pool, and tennis courts. We certainly want to mitigate the damages to our property which is somewhat secluded and also don't wish to be sued when someone is injured or drowns in our pool after hours. The pool parking lot was previously also an area where they parked after closing and dealt drugs. The Digital camera system has been an excellent deterrent and it's worked great. We have none of the problems that we used to have. Yes, we initially installed an analog system, we were promised good quality where we could recognize faces, and the security company did not deliver what they promised. The cameras were high end 640 TVL analog cameras which are on their way out. Everything is going digital and the prices for digital continue to drop. The first security company refunded the entire package and we went with another digital solution with an NVR (Network Video Recorder). The system is very secure and keeps good quality images (when triggered) for over a month. Our PM is the only one with credentials to log into the system remotely or locally. The cameras are all on the outside of the building and we are very pleased with the results. I also have a small digital video recorder installed by my rear view mirror which not only is a deterrent against vandals, but it might save me a deductible or other problems in an accident situation, when the other party decides to lie or develop discretionary memory. Video cameras in cars are more prevalent in other countries, but you're going to see them more and more as prices come down. In terms of facial recognition, we have had not problem with the new system. It's sharp and crisp. These two links will clearly demonstrate the difference in quality.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apuO4j5toOI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzcO4Z-Kp5k
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
It's a sign of the times. In other countries, like U.K. and Europe, there are cameras everywhere and it's rapidly changing here in the U.S.
Previously, our pool house and the surrounding area was severally vandalized numerous times and we used to have folks partying in the pool during the night after it's closed. We have a lot of money invested in our community club house, pool, and tennis courts. We certainly want to mitigate the damages to our property which is somewhat secluded and also don't wish to be sued when someone is injured or drowns in our pool after hours. The pool parking lot was previously also an area where they parked after closing and dealt drugs. The Digital camera system has been an excellent deterrent and it's worked great. We have none of the problems that we used to have. Yes, we initially installed an analog system, we were promised good quality where we could recognize faces, and the security company did not deliver what they promised. The cameras were high end 640 TVL analog cameras which are on their way out. Everything is going digital and the prices for digital continue to drop. The first security company refunded the entire package and we went with another digital solution with an NVR (Network Video Recorder). The system is very secure and keeps good quality images (when triggered) for over a month. Our PM is the only one with credentials to log into the system remotely or locally. The cameras are all on the outside of the building and we are very pleased with the results. I also have a small digital video recorder installed by my rear view mirror which not only is a deterrent against vandals, but it might save me a deductible or other problems in an accident situation, when the other party decides to lie or develop discretionary memory. Video cameras in cars are more prevalent in other countries, but you're going to see them more and more as prices come down. In terms of facial recognition, we have had not problem with the new system. It's sharp and crisp. These two links will clearly demonstrate the difference in quality.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apuO4j5toOI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzcO4Z-Kp5k
BenteJ1 (California)
Posts: 4
Posted:
If a camera will be placed where cars go by, make sure you get a smart camera with license plate capture. It will provide police with valuable information if needed.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Unless the thief steals a car in your HOA. And it's so easy to steal a license plate. Two screws, 30 seconds and its yours.
LauraR5 (Tennessee)
Posts: 220
Posted:
I read this thread because our community has been thinking about installing cameras. Our biggest issue is the folks from a neighboring subdivision using our Dumpsters, followed by some vandalism and petty theft.

I talked to a friend who is a security consultant, and he said these kinds of set ups can be very expensive, especially with a lot of you saying you don't feel like they work the way they are supposed to. He actually suggested installing fake cameras with signs saying there are cameras, but our management company says that opens you up to liability if something bad happens and you don't actually have tapes to turn over if you're subpoenaed.

Honestly, as much as I want my neighborhood to be safe, it sounds like you're darned if you do, darned if you don't.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here