💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JeffL7 (Washington)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Small community of 10 homes. Asked a lot owner to remove his recreational trailer from the driveway. It has been there for about 2 weeks. He stated, well everyone else parks in their driveway and that is a violation of the Restriction. Checked the Restriction and it does say automobiles too, to my amazement! Myself and a couple others park in our garages and then there are some that park in their driveway. Kind of don't want to ask everyone to park their automobiles in their garages as I know they can't. The lot owner with the trailer can't park in his garage either. The automobiles is really not a big deal to anyone in the community, but getting everyone to park in their garage is going to be difficult. The big issue we have in the community is boats, trailers and work trucks in driveways. Can one say to an individual to abide to the specific part(trailer)of the Restriction or must I say to the neighbor put the trailer in the garage with your automobiles and that goes for all of you/me in the community?

Don't even suggest to amend the Restriction. We can't even get anyone to help in the community or show up for a meeting!

Here is the Restriction.

4 The streets shall not be used for storage of automobiles, boats, trucks, trailers or
recreational vehicles. No owner of any residential lot shall permit any automobiles, boats, trucks,
trailers or recreational vehicles owned by such lot owner, any member of the lot owner's family
or any guest, acquaintance, or invitee to be parked upon any lot within the property for a period
in excess of forty-eight (48) hours in any consecutive 30 day period unless such vehicle is on a
lot and enclosed in a garage or outbuilding or screened in such a manner that it is not visible
from any street or any other lot. The streets also shall not be used for off road/atv vehicle traffic.
Additionally, no lots of less than five (5) acres in size shall be used for off road/atv vehicle
traffic.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Jeff,

If your going to enforce the covenant on one you need to enforce it on all.

In reading your covenant, I also see a few gray areas. For example:

"The streets shall not be used for storage of automobiles, boats, trucks, trailers or recreational vehicles."

Define storage. That is, what length of time constitutes storage vs. normal parking?

" . . .to be parked upon any lot within the property for a period
in excess of forty-eight (48) hours in any consecutive 30 day period"


Is that 48 straight hours?
If it is, then as long as the vehicle is moved every two days, then the covenant is in compliance (and the work trucks, at least, could stay).

OR

Is that 48 cumulative hours?
If it is, who is keeping track of the hours? What documentation is kept to keep track of the hours?

I hate to say it, but unless the gray area is defined by a board who is willing to go after it's neighbors, or there is enough interest to change the covenants, you will likely have to live with the issue.

Are you on the Board or just a concerned member of the Association?

Tim
LawrenceC1 (Georgia)
Posts: 480
Posted:
Jeff,

Do your covenants have a mandate that the Association must enforce all the covenants? or is the language less strict?

Some governing documents allow for the board to waive certain aspects of the CC&Rs, as long as the waiver applies to everyone. Then when you get around to updating your documents, you can update the requirement to match the prevailing practice.
JeffL7 (Washington)
Posts: 14
Posted:
I'm neither Tim. Just a concerned neighbor that wants the CC&R's abided by to protect MY/the home values. We have half million dollar homes here. When I moved in there were only 4 homes and 2 occupied. I have brought this community back from the dead. Used my money and time to make it look respectable. Have not asked anyone for money nor will I. Might sound weird to some, but my wife and I moved to this community because it has protected CC&R's. Had one neighbor say to me that he doesn't care about the stinking CC&R's!

There is no association, nor does it say that we must form one. I brought up the suggestion to the current 7 owners and 2 are dead set against it, no reply from 1, 2 don't care and 1 doesn't want to get involved in any issues as they don't want any hostility.

All lot owners are hereby encouraged to participate, at least once each year, in a community function at which the owners then present shall use their best efforts to forecast the necessary amount of money needed to maintain the roads, gate and stormwater facilities. (These meetings may be separate between the owners using each specific road.) Any such function shall have a minimum of thirty (30) day prior written notice to all applicable lot owners, by way of mail or personal delivery to the physical address of each lot, stating the tune and place of the function. Once an estimate is agreed upon by more than fifty (50%) percent the men present and applicable owners, each lot shall be assessed its equal share by way of written notice mailed or personally delivered to the physical address of each lot. Payment of assessments shall be due thirty (30) days after notice is mailed or delivered, and if not paid shall become a lien on title to the lot nonjudicially foreclosable as provided by Washington law regarding deed of trust foreclosures. If the yearly assessment estimate is insufficient to cover the costs of maintaining the roads, gate and stormwater facilities hi the absolute and sole discretion of the Declarant or its nominee, similar notice should be mailed or delivered and each lot shall timely pay its share of the additional needed assessment. All lot owners are further encouraged to take their turn in organizing, hosting and chairing the at least yearly function, preferably as a community picnic or similar type get together.

Here is the Provisions as to getting an offender to abide to the CC&R's....

1 The Declarant and/or owner of any lots or lots subject to this declaration, shall
have the right to enforce, by any proceeding at law or in equity, all restrictions, conditions,
covenants, reservations, liens and charges now or hereafter imposed by the provision of this
declaration; provided however, that the Declarant' right to enforce the provision of this
declaration shall terminate at such time as the Declarant shall cease to be an owner of a lot or lots
subject to this declaration; and provided further, however, the termination of the Declarant'
power to enforce this declaration shall in no way affect the power of any other lot owner to
enforce the terms and conditions of this declaration. In any action to enforce the terms and
conditions of this declaration, the party prevailing shall be entitled to an award of such party's
costs, including attorney's fees, against the non-prevailing party for all costs incurred with
respect to the enforcement of this declaration. Failure of the Declarant or any such owner or
contract purchaser to enforce any covenant, condition or restriction herein contained shall in no
event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter

The Declarent no longer owns a lot and he never did appoint a nominee/Architectual Committee.

JeffL7 (Washington)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Thanks for your response Lawrence. No association here!
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Jeff:

You have some strange CC&R’s. You have common areas (roads, gates, and storm water drains), annual meetings, assessments, liens, and foreclosures but no formal association.

You quoted a passage that allows filing liens and foreclosing for unpaid assessments. Since you have no association, who is it that would file a lien or foreclose?

I also noted the passage about foreclosing non-judicially “as provided by Washington law regarding deed of trust foreclosures.” Is this legal in Washington? The law in Arizona, where we also have deeds of trust, requires an association to go to court to pursue an HOA foreclosure.

From what you wrote it sounds like your sole remedy to enforce the CC&R’s is to start taking your neighbors to court. The risk in doing so in a very small community is that the other owners could just amend the CC&R’s to remove all the nit-picking restrictions. From your own description, it sounds like you have very little support among your neighbors for strict enforcement.

JeffL7 (Washington)
Posts: 14
Posted:
I'm not looking to foreclose someone's property. Just want a couple restrictions abided by. Mainly, no boats, trailers or work trucks parked in driveway and fencing issues. If I must take them to court to get them to abide by it, so be it. The Restriction is their for a reason. To make the neighborhood asthetically pleasing and be of a high quality community.

One of the neighbors doesn't mow their lawn or pick the weeds out of the bark mulch landscaping in front of their property. It is a two foot tall jungle of grass, brush and weeds. But, there is nothing written in the CC&R's stating to take care of the issue. So, that is the way it goes.

The support from the neighborhood is pathetic. Some in the neighborhood believe that it is easier to ask for forgiveness than it is permission. Completely ignorant. But, if I'm the only one willing to speak up, as some others don't like what is going on also, but choose not to get involved.

What is the point of CC&R's, if some say screw the CC&R's and doesn't help when the CC&R's are clearly lacking clarity.

LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Jeff:

My question about foreclosures and liens was not clearly stated. My concern in what I saw posted was whether some of the provisions in the CC&R's are legal. In my state, they would not be. Have you ever asked an attorney to review your CC&R's?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Jeff,

As I understand it, you effectively have a private road agreement between all owners along the road to maintain the road.

These owners also have additional restrictions (like the trailers) attached to their deeds.

There is no formalized group to be in charge of making sure that the road is maintained. Therefore, the owners make decisions on their own or with others as to what will be done and who will pay what share.

The answer to your question is simple - if you wish to enforce the covenants, you need to file legal action against your neighbor with each of you responsible for your own legal expenses unless a judge says otherwise.

BTW - since there is no formalized Association or legal entity responsible for the condition of the road, each owner may be individually or collectively held responsible for any accident caused by negligence for failure to properly maintain the road.

Hope this helps,

Tim

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here