💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

ArtS (South Carolina)
Posts: 1
Posted:
Our Association consists of 218 units, all condos. We have in our Rules and Regulations that no renters are allowed to have pets, without first obtaining approval rom the owner of the unit and approval then from the Board of Directors. We have a new management company that seems to think we can not enforce that rule. He cites this section of the law, which to me is slighly ambigious:
SECTION 27-31-120. Designation of apartments on plans; conveyance or lease of apartment.

Each apartment must be designated, on the plans referred to in Section 27-31-110, by letter or number or other appropriate designation and any conveyance, lease, or other instrument affecting title to the apartment, which describes the apartment by using the letter or number followed by the words "in Horizontal Property Regime," is deemed to contain a good and sufficient description for all purposes. Any conveyance or lease of an individual apartment is deemed to also convey or lease the undivided interest of the owner in the common elements, both general and limited, appertaining to the apartment without specifically or particularly referring to same.

Does anyone know of specifics about restrictions on pets by HOA's in South Carolina?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Art

SC Horizontal Property Act

SECTION 27-31-170. Compliance with bylaws, rules, and regulations; remedy for noncompliance.

Each co-owner shall comply strictly with the bylaws and with the administrative rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, as either of the same may be lawfully amended from time to time, and with the covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth in the master deed or lease or in the deed or lease to his apartment. Failure to comply with any of the same shall be grounds for a civil action to recover sums due for damages or injunctive relief, or both, maintainable by the administrator or the board of administration, or other form of administration specified in the bylaws, on behalf of the council of co-owners, or in a proper case, by an aggrieved co-owner.

A co-owner is the owner of a unit in a building, be it one or more people.

I say the part about pets is enforceable especially if it was there from the get go thus each owner(s) agreed to it when they purchased.

Pet restrictions are quite common. Some associtions do not even allow pets. Others have restriction on size, types, amounts, etc.

The Horizontal Property Act deals with high rise condo buildings only. SC did try and pass regulations about HOA's (Townhouses, stand alone houses, etc.) but thankfully, it never made it out of committee.

MoM1 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 56
Posted:
I think the part the MC is saying would not be enforceable is the blanket rule that only renters can't have pets. That is discrinimation of the basis of your living status. We have a similar by-law here and have been told by a number of lawyers that if someone wanted to challenge it, we would lose. You can't have one set of rules for tenants and another for owners.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
A HOA can not interfere with a contract between the owner and their tenant. This pet rule would be overstepping these bounds, A HOA may be able to restrict the owner pet rights but not of their tenants, That isn't to say the HOA has no say. They just have to have that say against the homeowner who is responsible for the tenant adhering to the HOA rules.

Your HOA also needs to have a set fine schedule for violators to enforce the rules. Without a dedicated fining schedule, it could be nearly impossible to enforce anything. The other poster is correct that if one choose to challenge this rule they most likely would win.

Former HOA President
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
The only way to do this would be to ask the landlords to put "no pets' clause in their lease but the landlords could ignore you unless the entire HOA is "no pets"
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
In the HOAs we manage all have rules which owners must follow. If they have a lessee residing on the property and that lessee or any other resident of the unit breaks a rule restriction in the CC&Rs or the Rules and Regulations it is the owner who is subject to a fine. It is the owners responsibility to educate the lessee on the restrictions and under their lease agreement they need to have wording which allows them to evict if the lessee fails to comply with the restrictions. For quality of living of onsite owners all HOAs need the right to fine the owner until it is less costly for the lessor to get rid of bad renters.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
People

My view is that the BOD is not saying no pets for renters. Seems to me they are just trying to control it.

Am I missing something?
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
I see where the PM is coming from. It almost seems that your applying the no pets rule to only renters. It would seem like the renter would be treated the same as an owner here. Most condos have a pet rule that restricts the number and the weight of the animal and most of them now have pet registration in order to monitor this.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here