💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AustinS (Tennessee)
Posts: 3
Posted:
So I have a tiny (16 unit) HOA for which I am the treasurer. Our By Law's were last updated in the 80's and don't give very much guidance on what the HOA is responsible for. We recently had a unit owner whose drain pipe from their kitchen sink is clogged underneath the concrete floor. She is claiming that it is the HOA's responsibility. Do you think this should be something that a HOA pays for or should it be the unit owners responsibility? I feel like the pipe is not common until it reaches outside of the unit and joins with the main drain line. Once it reaches that pipe it would be our responsibility, but she disagrees.

How do you handle this situation and what do your by law's say about what should be covered? I'm trying to find examples so I can add it to our own bylaw's but have not found much.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
the by-laws would be silent on this issue ..... the by-laws dictate the operation of the corporation

the 'covenants and restrictions' would define the 'architecture' of the structure

if you don't have the 'CCRs' ... get them from the registrar of deeds

for what its worth (probably naught) in a NY co-op or condo the unit owner is resposible from the paint (inclusive) inwards ... the association for all else ... however, the unit owner is responsible to NOT DAMAGE any common element
AustinS (Tennessee)
Posts: 3
Posted:
I know this isn't all that relevant, but your NY Co-op or condo the unit owner would NOT be responsible for a pipe inside the wall (or in the floor)?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Austin

I believe the homeowner is responsible for the sewage discharge pipe until it reaches the main pipe (like the city sewage pipe) and or a "shared" sewage pipe such as several units sewage discharges come together then onto the city sewage line.

An arguement could be made that once the discharge pipe reached common ground, the association became responsible.

Hope this helps.

SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
If there is no guidance, its likely the HOA's bill. If the has a garbage disposal unit on the sink, bill her back for causing it. Vote for all garbage disposals to be removed.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
If the HOA is responsible make sure everyone understands this may require a special assessment to pay for it. Just because it may be on the HOA doesn't mean it is "free". Once you establish that then you may get more views from the members on the direction to go. A HOA is ONLY funded by it's members for it's members. So expect to pay up if this is decided for the future to be HOA responsibility by the members.

Former HOA President
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Austin:

Seems like we have a few loose ends that need to be clarified.

Is this the ONLY unit served by this drain? We have two story units where the second floor runs down and connects with the drain through the first floor. Or in your case is this single unit served by that drain?

Not sure how the NY information applies as you don't reside there and in fact some elements outside the paint are in fact the unit owners responsibility here in NY but lets set that aside as perhaps misunderstanding or misinformation. I have served on the Board here in NY for 25 years now and what was stated is simply not the case.

My questions would be who determined where the blockage was located? Their plumber or yours?
IF this drain serves just that unit depending on the documents governing your property this might be the owner's bill to pay as it would be more than likely THEY caused the drain to clog in the first place.

IF your documents are silent on the particular point does NOT mean then the HOA is responsible. IMO this would require the HOA make a determination for this issue and similar issues going forward. Do you plan to cover the cost of ever clogged drain going forward?

Under OUR documents and by an explanation from our attorney, IF this element serves just one single unit that element is maintained at the expense of the unit owner not the property. Unless or until is joins a common drain used by other units OR as you suggest the amin drain serving the entire building.

Case in point, some years ago a party purchased a unit that had been empty for an extended period of time. When the new owner arranged for the utilities to be turned on leaks were discovered in the gas lines SERVING THAT UNIT ALONE because the pipe joints had dried out due to non-use. This required a new gas line be run from the outside meters through the entire building to the oppositie end of the structure. The new owner "believed" the property was required to cover this cost. He was told otherwise. ERnd of story.

If any property allows the uninformed unit owners to decide what costs should be covered
while avoiding any cost to them most would be broke in a short time.

Many times we have been approached by unit owners who wish to impose their opinions as to what and why certain costs should be absorbed by the HOA. IMO this is not a debate, the Board's role is to determine what costs are theirs to cover and which belong to thew unit owners. IF you allow input from the unit owners as to what they FEEL is the way things should be handled you open up the property to covering all future costs and expenses for similar expenses.

JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
many/most co-ops / condos in nyc have 'back-to-back' plumbing arrangements

a 'plurality' of stoppages involve more than 1 'unit'

........................

be that as it may, most people buy in to AVOID personal maintenaince, but ARE willing to fund the general costs of overall maintenance

'proving' that the resident created the stoppage would cost more than simply clearing it

most buildings in nyc have a superintendant because IT IS CHEAPER to have a full time employee than to constantly 'farm out' maintenance issues

this was the original principle behind the tenant owned as opposed to rented building .... known as a co-op or condo .... in house maintenance

'down south' maintenance worker = $30,000/year would perform about $60,000 of 'farmed out work'

what part of 'cost efficient' can we not understand?
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
to repeat:

"the by-laws would be silent on this issue ..... the by-laws dictate the operation of the corporation

the 'covenants and restrictions' would define the 'architecture' of the structure

if you don't have the 'CCRs' ... get them from the registrar of deeds"


JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
John in your first posting you state NY then you change that to NYC.
Which area are you comments supposed to apply to? Or are you one of those folks that thinks NYC IS NY?

There is a lot of state north of the Bronx and I would never assume to speak in general terms about most or many of the condos and co- ops in either NYC or the entire state of NY. Unless of course you have personal knowledge in regards to every one.

While your "down south" rate information is interesting how does that apply to the OP's question?

JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
originally from nyc .... yeah yeah yeah, we tend to think like its the whole world and simply say ny

my main answer to the OP was:

"the by-laws would be silent on this issue ..... the by-laws dictate the operation of the corporation

the 'covenants and restrictions' would define the 'architecture' of the structure

if you don't have the 'CCRs' ... get them from the registrar of deeds"


since nyc had among the first co-ops and condos (dating as far back as 1955) many early condos were modeled upon its successes

the OP's CCRs will decide the issue
AustinS (Tennessee)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Thanks for all the replies. I'm working on finding the CCR's. I will say that the pipe is not just clogged.. it has actually collapsed underneath the concrete slab in two places.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Make sure to also review the HOA's insurance policy and get the homeowner to review their policy. This may also give some guidance. This is a hard situation to figure out. Half of me is on the side the HOA is responsible for this if it's on a shared slab with multiple units on it like a condo/apartment. If it were an individual house, the the answer would be clearer. That would be a no for the pipe repair if it were a single house. The fact that the slab is the foundation of the rest of the building is where the issue truly lies. This setup may indeed make it the HOA responsibility as it is part of the entity of the building so to say.

Again it is really up to your membership to decide the dividing line when all is said and done. If they believe it's the HOA's slab then from now on it will be the HOA's responsibility and thus the HOA pays for it. If the HOA membership agree it's NOT their slab and the individual's who purchases that unit, then the owner may pay. Either way, you may want to ask a lawyer a few questions in case the owner decides to pursue legal actions.

Former HOA President
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AustinS on 03/28/2012 9:58 AM
Thanks for all the replies. I'm working on finding the CCR's. I will say that the pipe is not just clogged.. it has actually collapsed underneath the concrete slab in two places.

Uggg... this may only be the start of the problem. If the pipe is old and rotten, just wait till the plumber gets down there and notices the rot continues on and on. This could get very expensive, very fast.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
Again it is really up to your membership to decide the dividing line when all is said and done. If they believe it's the HOA's slab then from now on it will be the HOA's responsibility and thus the HOA pays for it. If the HOA membership agree it's NOT their slab and the individual's who purchases that unit, then the owner may pay. Either way, you may want to ask a lawyer a few questions in case the owner decides to pursue legal actions.


nope, not really ..... the EXISTING CCRs will determine responsibility

while the membership may decide to change said CCRs it would take a properly noticed meeting, a vote (usually 67% or more), refiling with the registrar of deeds, etc etc

however

the change(s) would NOT be retroactive, so the responsibility for the existing plumbing issue would still remain as determined by the existing CCRs

property maintenance costs money .... surely there is an adequate reserve fund ?

yep, i crack myself up
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
I'm working on finding the CCR's.

The answer lies in the CCR's. Typically, if you get insurance for your personal unit, the insurance you buy is based on the CCR's So if the CCRs say, unit owner is responsible for "from the paint in" then the sheetrock and out is the condo responsibility. If the CCS's say "from the studs in" then the studs (excluding sheetrock) and out is the condo responsibility.

The CCR's should talk about the plumbing and electrical as well. Typically, plumbing and electrical is owned, maintained by the condo, but not always.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Austin

One deciding factor will be the type construction. What type construction are your units?

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here