💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RobynH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 39
Posted:
We for the first time have mean dogs in the neighborhood. Only in one house.
Our community is made up of retired (90%) and semi retired homeowners.
Our community is mostly patio homes. Total 64.

We have written a petition which includes the SC law for vicious dogs.
The petition was approved by owners and the BODs.
Also included is a limit of 2 dogs per owner, a weight limit of 25 lbs.

We have never filed an amendment to the covenants and are not sure of the next steps. Does this require an attorney's legal docs. to file this with the county?

I have been told we would be better off to call animal control and leave it at that. This doesn't help with insurance liability.

The problem I have with this is from an insurance stand point.

Say said mean dog(s) gets loose (they have) because they are tied outside (against current HOA restrictions) and attacks someone on common ground.

At that moment HOA has a lawsuit on its hands. We have issued a letter to owner notifying him he is 100% liable for any damage or injury his dogs
may do to others. He has his home for sale but that doesn't resolve the immediate risk.

Because the HOA has knowledge of this dog risk this could put our standard rating for our master insurance policy at risk. HOA restrictions states nothing that would risk the standard rate of insurance is acceptable.

Anything that happens on common ground we are liable for is my understanding.

Anyone been through this situation?

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
The homeowner's insurance covers the dog and dog owner. The HOA's insurance wouldn't be effected. Unless the HOA owned the dog and it was left on common property. Your HOA may be taking this situation to another level out of fear more than reality. Do a bit more research. It's up to the animal control and the city's ordinances more than the HOA's who have to also live within those guidelines.

Insurance companies don't uninsure people for having certain breeds of dogs. They charge them EXTRA for having those type of breeds. If they lose insurance it's because AFTER the fact the dog attacks they may drop them....

These rules have to be accepted and adopted by the majority of owners according to your CC&R's. Read those on how to adapt/ammend those rules. You may find this a major undertaking...

Former HOA President
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
if they are tied outside against your documents requirements .....
take appropriate action against the member of the property

else ... contact animal control and/or the assoc. atty.

how will you CONSISTENTLY enforce a weight limit?
weigh every dog annually
eg. (assume a 25# limit) a 22# dog is purchased ... as it ages it becomes sedentary and gains weight ... now it weighs 28# ... a neighbor with a grudge complains ... you weigh THIS dog and not EVERY dog ... SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT SUIT ... etc.

you do not need NEW rules ... you need to enforce EXISTING rules (ie. 'nuisance', leash, tied up rules, etc.) and seek help from the county or local agency(s)

do you really want to 'knee jerk' react by changing CCRs for a 'percieved' problem?

what about the NEXT 'problem'?

if y'all were busy earning a living would this be an issue?

probably not, so forget about it
RobynH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 39
Posted:
If the homeowner doesn't carry a policy and the attack is on common ground what then? Condo policies usually have very little liability coverage.

I'm hard pressed to think an attorney would not go after the master policy because the homeowner after all does own the master policy and liability is a part of that policy with much more liability coverage. You bet on that policy premium going to one and half times current rate or cancelled.

When insurance companies do not want certain dogs they cost them out (our term)
because most people go for price and they know they will go down the street for a lessor price. Most Best A+ companies don't surcharge dogs. Substandard markets might. But we don't want to end up with a substandard market.

This isn't so much out of fear as it is trying to eliminate being unwilling sued by either a victim or 64 owners who wanted to know why they were not
protected from such a suit.

RobynH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 39
Posted:
John, I'm sorry I obviously annoyed you with this post.

I prefer you keep your comments on subject rather than nastyness.

Your earning a living comment was not appreciated.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Robyn, even if you amend the covenant, that doesn't necessarily mean the owner would have to remove their dogs until they croaked. It would prevent new problems, theoretically but there is always someone who will test the rules. The best thing IMHO is to go after the H/O for the rules they are violating and document everything. If a worst case scenario occurs the HOA needs to prove they were on top of the problem and attempting to rectify it.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
RobynH1

Would you be willing to provide a bit more information?

You posted “HOA restrictions state nothing that would risk the standard rate of insurance is acceptable.” In what Document is this restriction, and what are the actual words?

What do you mean by “Condo policies usually have very little liability coverage”. What do you consider “very little liability coverage’?

You also posted about dogs being tied outside (against current HOA restrictions). Where is that restriction – in what document? And what else does that document have to say about pets, dogs, etc?

I am sure someone will answer your question re the steps necessary to amend your CC&R’s (if that is the correct name of your top document).

Also I have read many arguments against using a dog weight limit restriction, along with the suggestion is that what is probably desired, is to prohibit any pets that become a nuisance, or a source of unreasonable annoyance to other residents, or any pets that are perceived as a possible danger to others or to the property.

Also if documents are amended to include “pet restrictions” existing pets are usually “grandfarthered in” – so would do little “to help” your current situation.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Robyn

One thing we discuss out here is how might some things can be dealt with under state/local laws without the HOA being involved at all.

Might this "dangerous" dog be dealt with as such?

PS

Where is your HOA located in SC?

Thanks
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Robyn

If your HOA has an existing rule against such animals or this animal is in violation of your documents then the association woudl be liable no matter where it happened if it did nothing to enforce its documents. If the association has no such documents then it is not liable. If SC has a law then proper procedure would be to call the appropriate agency.

The homeowner's insuarnce may not cover him if he is breaking the law by having the dog.
RobynH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Glen, thank you for your comments. We have sent two letters already for existing pet violations.
They are documented and filed.
Go Bucks

RobynH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Brad, Anderson, sc Anderson County
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
robyn:

if you have pet/dog restrictions then your HOA should take steps to enforce, if you are and the owner still refuses you have shifted the burden of liability. If your county has pet restriction, again report it to the appropriate agency more than once and you have shifted the HOA's responsibility. Maybe not 100% but certainly better than doing nothign.
RobynH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 39
Posted:
EllieD,
Sorry, this is lengthy. What I should have said was personal HO6 insurance policies that individuals carry are less in amount than commercial lines policies where liability coverage is concerned.

Keep in mind while reading Exhibit A that all decks,porches, patios are on common ground in this community.

The document I am reading from is our CC&Rs. Written: 12/1985
Use and Occupancy Restrictions
Exhibit A

Pets:
No animals other than a reasonable number of generally recognized house pets, shall be kept or maintained on any portion of the property and then only if they are kept or maintained solely as domestic pets and not for commercial purposes. No pet shall be allowed to make and unreasonable amount of noise or to become a nuisance. No structure for the care, housing,or confinement of any pet shall be constructed or maintained on any part of the COMMON AREA, and no such structure shall be constructed or maintained within any balcony, deck, patio or terrance area unless the same shall be approved in advance in writing by the Board of Directors. Pets shall be under leash when walked or exercised in any portion of the Common Area. No pet shall be permitted to leave its droppings on any portion of the common area, and the owner of such pet shall immediately remove the same. Upon the written request of any owner, the BOD shall conclusively determine, in its sole and absolute discretion, whether, for the purposes of this Section, a particular pet is permitted or such pet is a nuisance, and shall have the right to request the owner of a particular pet remove such pet from the property if such pet is found to be a nuisance or to be in violation of these restrictions.

End of Pet restrictions
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
the BOD needs to perform its Fiduciary Duty and actually enforce the existing restrictions

assuming proper letters have been sent (with proof thereof) and no acceptable respnse was forthcoming:

involve the corporate attorney ... or ... forget about it (oops ... the BOD has already acknowledged the issue, now it MUST act)

ps. i, also, am retired .... with nothing better to do than be a Director
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
if the BOD is making every effort to enforce the CCRs and the member's non-compliant dog does any damage or creates any actual injury ,,,, IMO there would be no corporate liability

again...the BOD must be actively enforcing the CCRs

Anything that happens on common ground we are liable for is my understanding.


any NEGLIGENCE of the BOD/Membership at large on common ground - YES

any individual action of a HO or an act-of-god - NO

if you have 'ticketed' and/or fined and/or brought a court action against the dog owner in question - NO

i know that attorneys are expensive ... but you choose to be a member of a corp., so pay up (via your dues) - the alternative to being Inc. is assumption of PERSONAL liability

if/when the inc. HOA is sued for 10,000,000 and loses YOU will NOT lose your home, only the ammenities

the corp. BOD has exactly the same fiduciary responsibility as any other corp. BOD

JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
We have written a petition which includes the SC law for vicious dogs


so ..... why not just call animal control and/or police and have the actual law enforced?

problem is now "off your hands" and is a matter of public record
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
You should be making every effort to NOT get your hoa involved. Getting your HOA involved seems to be your first move. In many cities, its illegal to tie out your dog. This would be an animal control or police issue. I've never heard of animal control talking to your insurance company. Why the worry?
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
the HOA's sole involvement should be enforcement of the CCRs

criminal and code/regulation law is the function of the POLICE

i have tried very very hard not to say:

as per the posted documents the HO in question is NOT in violation of any CCR and probably not in violation of any state law .... the fact that some people do not like (pit) bull dogs is unfortuneate, but remember that any new CCRs will be EXPENSIVE to implement and subject to court challenge as the MUST be reasonable and not arbitrary and ENFORCEABLE ... just remember that SMALL dogs yip and yap and 'cry and moan' INCESSANTLY, but at a volume level and pitch which is virtually impossible to document with dB meters .... be very very careful what you ask for, you may get it

CAVEAT EMPTOR
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hi Robyn:

I’m with Brad and Steve. Cities love HOA’s like yours where they are willing to take on the responsibility to enforce. Just remember it then becomes a legal responsibility and failure to enforce gives a homeowner the right to sue.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Robyn

There are two different posters out here:

JohnB26 from South Carolina, not me.

JohnC46 from South Caroline, me.

We are not the same...in several ways...LOL

JohnC
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
Your earning a living comment was not appreciated.


sorry if i offended

i do tend to be 'gruff'

i meant it in the sense of 'too much time on one's hands'
(myself included)

JohnB26
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hi Robyn:

Let me further explain so you understand where I am coming from regarding your concern where you state:
Quote:

Say said mean dog(s) gets loose (they have) because they are tied outside (against current HOA restrictions) and attacks someone on common ground.

At that moment HOA has a lawsuit on its hands. We have issued a letter to owner notifying him he is 100% liable for any damage or injury his dogs may do to others. He has his home for sale but that doesn't resolve the immediate risk.

If you do not have HOA restrictions and rely on the local government ordinance … If a dog gets loose and just happens to be running around and bites someone who threatens to sue the HOA … my responses would be:

1. The HOA Corporation does not own a damn dog; therefore, we are not liable for any dog.

2. The HOA does not regulate dogs because that is the function of the local government; therefore, may I suggest you are barking up the wrong tree.

It then would be the responsibility of the local animal control to determine who owns the dog and the individual can take legal action against the dog owner and potentially not the HOA.

RobynH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 39
Posted:
John C,

I figured this out on my second post.

Me thinks I walked this dog around the barn long enough.

Forgive me if I bored you to tears with this.
My intentions were in earnest.

I'm turning on March Madness or going over an play 9
not sure which but the dog is in it's house!

I'll login every now and then just to give you a scare!

Thank you for you kindness.

"Go Bucks"
Robyn
RobynH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Janet,
Thanks for your comments.

I putting the dog in barn. Never to heard from again.

You have all convinced me let sleeping dog be.

Thanks again,

Robyn
RobynH1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 39
Posted:
JohnB,

Ok. As I told John B, I have walked this dog around the barn long enough.

I take you comments under advisement.

Parting comment its not the dogs it the people who really do injustice to the dogs.

I'm turning on March Madness or playing 9 holes.

Thank you and good day.

I told John C I would login in every now and then just to scare ya'll.

Robyn..............with small dog that yips and yaps.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here