💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
This situation has come up... The CC&Rs do not state anything about (I am talking about condos)_ a condo upper story(second story) balcony has to be free of flower pots, etc (sitting on the ledges of the balconies) even though it is a definite liability. Can the HOA Board, in itself, decide that from now on..... there will be nothing placed on the ledges of patios
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
The short answer is yes. The board usually has the power to enact rules and regulations.

The longer answer is that it will depend on what your various governing documents state. CC&R's usually give the board or association the authority to make and enforce rules. Even though some restrictions are set forth in the CC&R's, the board and/or members may elect to add other restrictions.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hi Alex:

They potentially can as a Rule, but anything in State statutes or CCR can trump and supersede any rules so make sure nothing is stated otherwise in the Declaration. CCR will hold up possibly as absolute in a court as agreed to by all owners to amend. Rules are implemented usually by a few (a.k.a. board) and may or may not hold up depending on how reasonable and equally applied.

This is potentially a safety issue and high probability of withstanding a battle; however, if imposed it needs to include all patio balconies not just upper floors so it can be equal and equally applied to all homeowners.

Check your governing documents and here is a link for your State statutes: http://www.azleg.gov/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp?Title=33. Chapter 9 contains regulations for Condominiums.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I agree with Janet, I think....LOL

There well could be a local law concerning such (I know there are some about grills on balconys) that might well cover it so it does not become an HOA issue.

I also believe it could be clarified as a safety issue thus not requiring CC&R changes but simply a BOD Ruling.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I hate no edit.

One issue I do not agree with Janet on.

I do not think it would be necessary to apply to all like those on the ground level. I think the grill restrictions do not apply to ground level but then maybe ground level is not a balcony, but a patio.

JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 02/29/2012 1:36 PM
I do not think it would be necessary to apply to all like those on the ground level. I think the grill restrictions do not apply to ground level but then maybe ground level is not a balcony, but a patio.

John I would be willing to bet that the areas are not separated in the governing documents by those on ground floors vs. those on upper floors. Generally it will be noted in the definitions as “limited outdoor space” consisting of all balconies or patios, and then referred as the “limited outdoor space common elements” in the balance of the governing documents. Now many (but not always all) condos will also have walls for ground level outdoor space to prevent encroaching on common area. An HOA has to be careful because it is a common interest community and this means in essence to be “all for one and one for all”.

If something is implemented and not equally applied then the OP can sit back and watch the fur fly and possible battle begin. The question then will be was the Board allowed under the governing documents or state statutes to pick and choose to implement a Rule which did not apply to everyone equally. Any inequality tends to loose in court battles, so why pick and choose when you can make it equal.

In AZ 33-1212. Unit boundaries

4. Any shutters, awnings, window boxes, doorsteps, stoops, porches, balconies, entryways or patios, and all exterior doors and windows or other fixtures designed to serve a single unit, but located outside the unit's boundaries, are limited common elements allocated exclusively to that unit.
AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
Well, if that be the case, the board (in office at the time) can state whey want all sorts of things and just put it into force as long as the Board agrees... I would have thought that any changes to the CC&Rs woulod require some sort of approval of the owners.
AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
There MOST certainly IS a safety issue as it pertains to things placed on the balcony of an upstairs patio wall but not that I can think of for a balcony below... the problem that I see is that the people on the below balcony would be or might tend to be angry if the same law(enforcement) was placed on them.... i.e. NOthing is to be placed on the upstairs balcony walls as things might fall off and go down.... the individuals on the lower balcony would argue that yes, for the above but it should not apply to individuals on the lower balcony.
AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
Actually, where I am from, we call them all patios whether the upper or the lower.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AlexM1 on 02/29/2012 4:29 PM
I would have thought that any changes to the CC&Rs woulod require some sort of approval of the owners.

A separate document titled Rules is not changing the CCR. If Board CHANGES the CCR then must get homeowner approval, so make sure you do not change the CCR without following proper guidelines.

Do the lower patios have railing also?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Janet

Allow me to represent.

In some cases rather then change CC&R's, local law(s) could prevail thus easier and cheaper to go with local law(s) then change CC&R' thus no pitting neighbor against neighbor.

Like an HOA meeting when someone crawls up your whatever about whatever and you smile and say well, I am not going to disagree/argue with you but it is the law and as such we are simply observing the law.....LOL

The buck stops here...unless I can pass the "unpleasant" buck off..LOL

JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 02/29/2012 5:12 PM
Janet

Allow me to represent.

In some cases rather then change CC&R's, local law(s) could prevail thus easier and cheaper to go with local law(s) then change CC&R' thus no pitting neighbor against neighbor.

Like an HOA meeting when someone crawls up your whatever about whatever and you smile and say well, I am not going to disagree/argue with you but it is the law and as such we are simply observing the law.....LOL

The buck stops here...unless I can pass the "unpleasant" buck off..LOL

Those are my favorite!!! LOL ... can also remind them to whip out that cell phone camera and collect evidence to provide to the proper authorities.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Alex ... what John is suggesting is to check your local government ordinances to see if they have regulations regarding upper story patios. If so and they cover the issue, then the HOA does not need to implement any rule.
AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
Neither the upper or lower has railings... would be greatif they did.

JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AlexM1 on 02/29/2012 7:49 PM
Neither the upper or lower has railings... would be greatif they did.

Surely at least the upper level patios have a wall or rail to keep individuals from falling. If not this would violate building codes.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,569
Posted:
1) any raised 'occupiable' area 30" or more above grade MUST have railings

2) portable grills are NEVER allowed on 'balconies' period, or within 10' of a structure .... built-in grills would require a building permit

3) an unrestrained object capable of falling off a 'balcony' would more than likely be covered by your county/local codes

.....if your above grade balconies/patios really don't have railings, then they are unfit for human occupancy and should be 'locked off' until 'brought to code'
AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
Has a wall....of course but no rail on top of the wall.
AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
Oh.... the occupiable area wall around the balcony is probably 40" tall
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Alex, doesn't your Association have a document called Rules & Regulations or something similar? We do and it is indeed a governing document as defined in our CC&Rs.

In Calif., if we want to change, add or delete a rule, the board first agrees, then our PM sends out the proposed change for the state-required owner 30 day review & comment period. ( No rule change can conflict with CC&Rs or Bylaws. ) Then it comes back to the the board agenda for its final decision.

Even if your state doesn't have this 30-day comment period, proposed rules should be discussed at an open meeting of the board, at which time owners can state their opinions.

We do have a rule prohibiting plants or other objects on our standard height balcony walls. there is a railing with glass surround attached to all of these walls. Between the railing glass & outer space is a four inch ledge. An owner was just sent a courtesy letter for having little potted plants on this ledge, which clearly are a potential hazard to the units below.

Our HOA doesn't care if ground floor units with patios have objects on their low walls.

AlexM1 (Oklahoma)
Posts: 287
Posted:
Carol:

Could that be consideed discrimination if one allows the bottom to havs plants on the ledges and NOT on the above... EVEN though we know why it is NOT adviseabl to have anything on the above?
CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Janet makes a good point that only prohibiting items on upper stories' balcony walls would be discrimination against those owners. Groups of owners are being treated unequally based upon whether they own on the 2nd or 1st story (their status or class). And technically, I think she'd be right, Alex.

But, at least in my 200+ unit high rise HOA, I promise you that upper floor residents do not at all mind that their 13 ground floor neighbors are able to have items on their patio walls. They clearly understand that a decorative iron object perched on their own 22nd floor balcony ledge could be very dangerous.

Meantime, the ground floor folks must wash their own windows, but units on the 2nd floor & up do not except the ones off of their balconies.

JeffR7 (California)
Posts: 251
Posted:
There would not be any discrimination if you include all owners living above a certain floor. Discrimination only applies to protected classes (age, sex, national origin, religion, familiar status, race, disability) Ownership of a particular unit on a particular floor is definitely not included.

There are many condo association that prohibit hardwood floors on all floors except first, or those that allow BBQ on the first floor patio, but not other floors. None of these issues are discrimination.

CarolR11 (Colorado)
Posts: 2,563
Posted:
Good point, Jeff! And your examples are much better than my window-washing one.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AlexM1 on 03/01/2012 12:03 PM
Carol:

Could that be consideed discrimination if one allows the bottom to havs plants on the ledges and NOT on the above... EVEN though we know why it is NOT adviseabl to have anything on the above?

Yes, it is discrimination. But it is not illegal discrimination unless there is a law that requires upstairs and downstairs owners/occupants to be treated equally.

Many associations have rules requiring that upstairs units have carpeted floors. Discrimination? Yes. Illegal? No.

Objects on a the ledges of second floor balconies can fall and injure those below. The same objects placed the same way on a first floor patio pose no danger. Therefore, there is no reason to treat both floors equally in this matter.

Is there nothing else to bitch about other than gravity?

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:


Is there nothing else to bitch about other than gravity?

I love it.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here