💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
We read articles about people embezzling money from HOA's, well no organization is immune. In a town I lived in (upscale, wealthy) an employee of the Police Department was embezzling money from the Police Department. She did it for sevreal years before being caught.

No one in immune.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Yep, its because no one watches the books. People just trust others to do it and are too lazy to pay attention to the finances. It happens everywhere and as the economy gets worse, it will happen more often.

Many times people will think the person writing the checks just does sloppy work, but what is really happening is they are embezzling. The sloppy bookkeeping ensures no one will ever makes heads or tails of the finances and thus never catch them. And they probably wont.
DavidW5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 565
Posted:
John,

In nearly all of the articles about HOA embezzlement that give any details there is evidence that prudent internal control mechanisms were not in place. Such practices as having banks provide duplicate statements to a board member, requiring board signature on checks, etc. were ignored.

There is a very good CAI document - Best Practices for Financial Operations. An HOA that follows these would almost surely detect any "fishy" transactions shortly after they took place and be able to put a stop to them.

What it requires is that some folks in the HOA be willing to put in the time and effort to safeguard their assets.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
If you read the charges and how they did it, most times it's writing checks to themselves, many times as reimbursement for bogus purchases.

In the non-profit that I am treasueer for, (museum) I started a procedure that if someone submits a receipt for reimbursement, another person must sign off on the form indicting the items WERE purchased for the organization.

One woman I know went around and picked up recipts thrown away outside of a big box store and submitteed them for reimbursement from her church group. No one checked to see the items were indeed even voted on or received by the group.

A finance committee can go thru all transactions on a quartly basis and do do a mini audit of all accounts. Comparing bank statements to the treasurer's report is a good idea.

One HOA in this area had a treasurer that set up a PayPal account and made purchases with that. Since those are only seen on the checking account statment, it is important for someone to go over all those once in a while. Bank statments are on line now and at least two people should be looking over those.

JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Two signature lines for checks and anyone who balances and handles the financials does not sign checks. This helps keep somebody from having fingers dipping into both sides of the pie and trying to hide the evidence.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
More difficult to detect are schemes where a vendor submits an inflated bill for work and splits the excess with someone on the inside. I am currently investigating such a situation in our POA.

Our board hired an attorney to recover delinquent accounts. One board member worked with the attorney. The attorney's fees were far outside the envelope of reasonable for the work performed. Most of the board members wanted to end the attorney's contract but that one board member insisted that we continue on. We did and lost even more money. When the board finally terminated the attorney's contract, the vote was 8-to-1. Guess who voted "no?" The board member who had been working with the attorney quit in mid-meeting right after the vote. Given the circumstances, I have a strong suspicion that the board member was receiving kickbacks from the attorney.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
LarryB's example of kickbacks illustrates the most difficult embezzlement scheme to find. This requires a REAL audit rather than the financial review often done and referred to as an audit. I have previously posted on factors involved in a real audit.

We have developed internal controls to remove the opportunities for theft. While some advocate two signatures as effective against theft, I believe that two signatures is not an effective internal control. Two signatures may make certain Board signers of checks feel more comfortable just remember that the bank only requires one signature. Bottom line - do not rely of two signatures to prevent theft.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 02/23/2012 10:15 AM
More difficult to detect are schemes where a vendor submits an inflated bill for work and splits the excess with someone on the inside. I am currently investigating such a situation in our POA.


I agree, very hard, to impossible. This is where multiple bids are helpful to see if one vendor is waay too expensive and is the vendor picked. Another good practice is to include a photocopy of the detailed bill from the vendor as part of the minutes. This way the members can review the bill and someone who knows prices for similar vendors can question an expense as too large based on his or her personal knowledge of similar bills. IE: If you had a landscaping bill that shows $1,000 per mowing when the price should be in the $500 range, its time to get more bids from other vendors.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Nothing is 100% guarantee. However, when checks are printed with two signature lines I have had the bank call me a couple of times when a check was accidentally sent out with only one signature to verify if the check is legit. Maybe they pay closer attention to checks with two signature lines or potentially their system kicks out said checks. This would be a question to ask a bank.

The important fact is with two signatures it can help because it would take two individuals collaborating and conspiring together to write a bogus check. While it is not a 100% guarantee it definitely can make individuals think twice.

Thanks Steve ... I like your idea regarding photo copies of invoices in minutes.
BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SteveM9 on 02/23/2012 5:54 AM
Yep, its because no one watches the books. People just trust others to do it and are too lazy to pay attention to the finances. It happens everywhere and as the economy gets worse, it will happen more often.

Many times people will think the person writing the checks just does sloppy work, but what is really happening is they are embezzling. The sloppy bookkeeping ensures no one will ever makes heads or tails of the finances and thus never catch them. And they probably wont.

Hmm interesting. A few years ago we had a sloppy bookkeeper. She had never been trained to be a bookkeeper so I thought it was lack of knowledge.
BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
Also we have one member who goes over every financial with a fine tooth comb. But she find problems where there are no problems. We paid some vendors twice in January because the February bills were paid early. Something I hopw doesn't happn again. The person responsible for writing the checks is aware of the problem.

About kickbacks -- We hired the son of our CCO to do some work. We then asked for a bid for some other work. His bid was the highest bid. I wonder if he was going to give his mother some of the money. Just got me to thinking. But I don't dare accuse as we did not use him.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
I wouldn't be so concerned about written checks. With so many financial transactions being done on line, I'd watch those kind of transactions, especially transfers and other electronic payments, like PayPal and electronic payments to other people's accounts.

That's why a Finance Committee needs to look at all transactions and have access to bank statments.

FredB4 (Ohio)
Posts: 375
Posted:
Our bank informed us that although many banks will say they do, in today's age of computers the two signature requirement is not likely going to be followed. As long as the check contains one of the approved signatures on the account it is most likely going to be processed.

we were also told that banks could not be held liable if they didn't follow the request for two signatures per check before processing. Don't know what others have found, but this is a major bank chain with a seperate department that exclusiovely handles homeowner associations.

Always check to be sure you MC and board members are insured for theft. Having the bank send a duplicate account statement is also a great idea to help prevent fraud.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
One thing I have noticed at my bank is that if I try to deposit a check made out to someone else at the teller's window, they will not accept it. If I deposit the same check in the ATM it sails right through without question. I do not know how widespread this practice is but it sure opens the door to a lot of opportunities to commit fraud.

SandraZ (Louisiana)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Banks in Louisiana do not make sure there are two signatures on checks before cashing. We could not believe they did not enforce this. It is only the Homeowners Association officers to that enforce this issue.

Another happening to our association. We petitioned to remove the ex vice president. He went to the bank and made a deposit into the checking account. Board (our treasurer) discovered the $120 extra in the bank statement. The bank stated any one can make deposits in the account.

We informed the association lawyer and the association board wrote a letter telling the ex vp to do his business in our office not the bank. We informed the homeowners at the board meeting as well.
SimoneT (Florida)
Posts: 116
Posted:
All I can say is....WOW! So many problems, and no checks and balances. Now I can understand better how something good can go so wrong, especially in a HOA. But, some suggestions posted here are very good, and making a "post it" of them. Thank you.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
He went to the bank and made a deposit into the checking account. Board (our treasurer) discovered the $120 extra in the bank statement.


I doubt many HOA's have issues with unauthorized "deposits" I wish we had that problem. (wink)

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here