KevinN (New York)
Posts: 4
Posts: 4
Posted:
hello
i am new to a HOA board that has had more than it's share of ethical questions in the past. one member has created a code of ethics--there has always been one. i am worried that it was written with too much legaleeze (monday morning lawyer type) to be fuzzy instead of clear. for example, "A member may not knowingly misrepresent facts in order to achieve any measure of personal gain for themselves, or any affiliated company from which he/she may benefit", i might have written that "a member may no misrepresent facts to the board or a homeowner, period!". additionally, there is a full 1/3 dedicated to gifts/gratuities--which i would have simply said "gifts from a contractor to the hoa are strictly forbitten, period!, while gifts from friends, reletives are no business of the HOA, relationships between the member and any potential or existing contractor must be explained to the HOA and any board actions for/against this contractor will result in relate member excusing himself from the vote".
am i too anal onthese issues or is there some logic?(either way)
thanks for your input
i am new to a HOA board that has had more than it's share of ethical questions in the past. one member has created a code of ethics--there has always been one. i am worried that it was written with too much legaleeze (monday morning lawyer type) to be fuzzy instead of clear. for example, "A member may not knowingly misrepresent facts in order to achieve any measure of personal gain for themselves, or any affiliated company from which he/she may benefit", i might have written that "a member may no misrepresent facts to the board or a homeowner, period!". additionally, there is a full 1/3 dedicated to gifts/gratuities--which i would have simply said "gifts from a contractor to the hoa are strictly forbitten, period!, while gifts from friends, reletives are no business of the HOA, relationships between the member and any potential or existing contractor must be explained to the HOA and any board actions for/against this contractor will result in relate member excusing himself from the vote".
am i too anal onthese issues or is there some logic?(either way)
thanks for your input