Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 10/05/2011 8:16 PM
We set a 6 months behind lien policy. Over a year and special circumstances, we would explore the foreclosure option. However, the foreclosure process should be used as a stop bleeding measure as that is all it does.
A lien is a judgement. So is a small claims court decision. However, a lien prevents the owner from selling their property until they pay it off. A small claims - court judgement doesn't prevent them from selling and leaving without ever paying. A judgement does NOT equal money. It just means the court recognized money is owed.
I wouldn't pursue the small claims judgement as it doesn't do much for the HOA accept pay for the lawyer to do something. A lien is the better option and doesn't always require a lawyer. However, the legal costs are part of the lien.
Establishing a good payment plan for those in the rears may be a good idea prior to going with a lien. I set up a plan which owners could pay half that month's assessments and try to catch up the next month. As long as they were paying something we wouldn't lien. If they wouldn't pay anything then at 6 months it was a lien. That was also the break even point it made sense to lien.
Depending on your state you don't need a lawyer to go to small claims, in Kansas lawyers in small claims are frowned upon. A small claims judgement allows you to do a couple of different things, you can lien their property with it or you can try to garnish wages. A court judgement isn't a bad thing, it is just different and has different options associated with it.