Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 10/05/2011 6:58 AM
They want to file a lien on the house the tenant intends to purchase NOT the home the tenant is in. That contract has nothing to do with them. An exchange of money or contract hasn't even taken place. It's like me putting a lien on your home because the person buying the house owes me money. Does that make sense? No.
What has to happen is an eviction. That eviction paperwork will cover the amount owed. However, since it's more than the small claims court limitations, it will have to be taken to a higher court. The eviction will go through it's proper channels but another case may have to filed in another court level separately.
Proof of what is owed is needed. The original rent agreement will be required. 20K in rent for 6 months is kind of high. Where is all this 20K amount coming from? You can't prove damages yet until the tenant is removed. Then you have to get estimates of repairs, pictures of the damages, and other sources of proof. That amount may then be added to the lawsuit but the intial eviction should contain the amount in regards to actual back rent owed.
I've had to evict a tenant that caused damage to my home. The first steps are to serve them with the proper court notifications. After that happens, then the judgement portion is pursued. A lien is a judgement. It's different than the one from the court judgement. It would be more of a result of non-paying of the court judgement than a separate pursuit.
If you go back and reread the OP it states he just bought a home and we all understand it isn't the home he currently lives in. She wanted to know if she can lien the home for the monies owed, the answer is yes and no. No she just can't lien someone's property without a stake in it. But yes, if she goes to court and she gets a judgement against this person then she can lien their property wherever they own it or even pursue wage garnishment. Two issues, eviction and getting the money, both require court proceedings.