💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RandalR (Tennessee)
Posts: 98
Posted:
It appears that my Board is not going to back down from their position of soliciting proxies from the residents that will give them unrestricted authority to "vote on other matters that may come before the annual meeting". Even if only a couple of dozen of them are returned, this would allow them to outvote the membership present at the annual meeting (which is usually less than 30 households). Because of this I'm electing to wage a proxy war to hopefully contain some of their new enthusiasm about being able to manipulate the voting and elections at our annual meeting.

I was thinking that there was some congressional bill that was passed that gave legitimacy to emails as legally binding documents. As such, the question is whether I can legally use a proxy that was emailed to me? The legitimacy of the email could easily be confirmed based on the return email address (which both the Board and I have on file) as well as the routing information.

I'm hoping to collect enough actual proxy signatures on file cards to where this would not be an issue but it would certainly be good to be able to use the extra email proxies to ensure that the "other matters" doesn't become a free for all for making unnecessary changes to suit a few Board members.

Proxy Wars - neighborhood politics at it's best (or worst).
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
i would say no... email headers can be easily faked, (i can fake an email in twenty seconds, with cut and paste technology only). To do a more legitimate version, you could use IPS addresses, but i doubt you will have good luck in that, especially if someone uses a wireless router or cable server.

Typically, you need a signed form to act as a proxy. The only way i can think to make an email work as a proxy would be for the board to set up an unknown to anyone code word, unique to each member. Then, only if that code were present in the email, could it be considered valid. The code on the email print out would be verified to the master code list at the time you register the proxies with the secratary, before the meeting. Only one person should have a list of the codes and members assigned, and that person must voluntarily agree before given the list that they will not vote any proxies.
DonN (Michigan)
Posts: 357
Posted:
RandalR

The board's solicitation is one of the abuses of governance based on corporation law. The board solicits proxies at POA expense and then uses the proxies against the members who attend the meetings. There is something wrong with this picture.

The abuse can be fixed by appropriately amending the bylaws which would involve a number of changes and is beyond the scope of this reply. A better fix is to ask your legislator to amend the appropriate law in your state to prevent such abuses.

You can counter the board's solicitation of proxies by soliciting the proxies for yourself. You should expect that the board will use the POA's attorney to try to invalidate any proxies you get. So do it right.

You can certainly solicit by email, but provide the correct form and require that the original signed copy be mailed to you. Just use the proxy form used by the board in prior years, if that is available. List the proxy holder as yourself. Provide for the appropriate signature blocks for the proxy giver. This is important because the proxy holder should present the proxy for verification of standing, etc. of the proxy giver.

The proxy form should allow the proxy giver to designate the proxy as either a general proxy to "vote on other matters that may come before the annual meeting" (your language), or a directed proxy to "vote only as instructed". On specific issues in the notice of the annual meeting, the proxy giver may wish to use a directed proxy, but be sure to include the general proxy for other matters. A general proxy could be provided for all matters. You will have to make sure the proxy form you provide has all the alternatives.

RandalR (Tennessee)
Posts: 98
Posted:
The Boards proxy has two sections. The first asks them to grant their proxy "to approve the proposed annual budget and association fees as presented in the meeting materials. The only money issue listed is to "vote on the Board's recommendation for the 2007 annual budget and member fees of $215.00 per member." The second section is wanting proxy to "vote on any other matters."

This gets complicated because the neighborhood is voting on whether to implement mandatory dues. These have not passed and the voting is still going on but they're mixing the ways things have been done in the past and how they supposedly will be done if they do pass.

In the past the Board just announced we're setting dues at $130/yr (or whatever). People could either join that year or not so that was the check and balance in what to set them at. (Our fees are ridiculously low for this area) That in itself was a violation of our Bylaws (which do contradict themselves) as one section says the annual dues will be approved by the membership at the annual meeting. The only thing they mailed out to the membership in the past was a ballot listing those running for the Board, and now they're not doing that because they think it would be unfair to a person that suddenly decided to run. John Doe jumps up at the meeting and says, "Hey, I want to run for the Board too!" He suddenly becomes a candidate and the entire Board election is then decided by those present (<30 households) and the proxies held by the Board. So much for being fair to the other 230 households!

The proposed covenants say that if the budget isn't approved then the rate remains the same. But if the $215 fails then the Board will most probably then fall back and try to set a new higher rate using the "other matters" proxy. Even if the membership is allowed to vote on it, the Board may still manage to pass an increase thanks to the proxies. That may anger some residents but probably not enough to hurt the overall budget picture. Why would someone need to give their proxy to the Board to approve a proposed budget anyway? Wouldn't the simplest thing be to just ask the resident whether they want to vote for or against setting dues at $215?

This practice of picking and choosing which rules they want to follow, and making up new ones as you go along is becoming a joke. Isn't there some rule that proxies have to follow the majority vote of those present in a situation like that?
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Randall, proxies should be issued to whomever the Owner choses. Peferrably they should be assigned to another person and not to "the Board". The second section of your proxy example excludes voting on a higher rate since it states "vote on any other matters."

If you don't like the Board's approach either get the support to pass a motion to allow voting of members by ballot on the assessment and on electing Directors(if the By-laws allow it); or solicit proxies from other members who can not attend.

I like proxies for two reasons:
1) Proxies allow members to be represented when they can not attend; and
2) Proxies can be used to achieve a quorum. Without proxies many association meetings don't have sufficient attendance to meet the quorum requirement. This wastes the time of those members who came to the meeting since rescheduling the meeting is required.
RandalR (Tennessee)
Posts: 98
Posted:
They make up the rules as they go along so if the $215 rate fails I can see them falling back to the "old ways" where the Board just sets the annual rate without asking the membership. And even if they do call for a vote then they'll use the proxies to make sure they outvote whoever opposes them. They should operate by the old rules until the covenants pass, which I don't think they will. Picking and choosing between the two ways of handling this is just asking for trouble. Time is short but I'm going after my own proxies from the residents.
HaroldS (Arizona)
Posts: 906
Posted:
Randal - Here is Arizona's law forbidding proxy voting. You don't say what state you are in, but send this to your state legislator and ask him/her to sponsor a bill in your state to stop proxy voting. You will note this law also requires all agenda items to be voted on must be on the absentee ballot, which means the board cannot bring up "other matters that may come before the board." Eliminating proxies will eliminate your problem. Harold

33-1812. Proxies; absentee ballots; definition

A. Notwithstanding any provision in the community documents, after termination of the period of declarant control, votes allocated to a unit may not be cast pursuant to a proxy. The association shall provide for votes to be cast in person and by absentee ballot and may provide for voting by some other form of delivery. Notwithstanding section 10-3708 or the provisions of the community documents, any action taken at an annual, regular or special meeting of the members shall comply with all of the following if absentee ballots are used:

1. The absentee ballot shall set forth each proposed action.

2. The absentee ballot shall provide an opportunity to vote for or against each proposed action.

3. The absentee ballot is valid for only one specified election or meeting of the members and expires automatically after the completion of the election or meeting.

4. The absentee ballot specifies the time and date by which the ballot must be delivered to the board of directors in order to be counted, which shall be at least seven days after the date that the board delivers the unvoted absentee ballot to the member.

5. The absentee ballot does not authorize another person to cast votes on behalf of the member.

B. Votes cast by absentee ballot or other form of delivery are valid for the purpose of establishing a quorum.

C. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section, an association for a timeshare plan as defined in section 32-2197 may permit votes by a proxy that is duly executed by a unit owner.

D. For the purposes of this section, "period of declarant control" means the time during which the declarant or persons designated by the declarant may elect or appoint the members of the board of directors pursuant to the community documents or by virtue of superior voting power.

RandalR (Tennessee)
Posts: 98
Posted:
Harold - Thanks for that info on AZ proxies. I've been trying to do some research on using email for proxy voting. It's done in some associations but whether they're doing it legally is another question. I was always under the impression that a proxy had to be for a vote on a specific item. Of course our Board has not defined any of the parameters for how they will use them so I'm expecting some abuse before it's over with. My proxy is going to address eight specific items. The ninth will also be "other matters" (if they can get by with it, why can't I?).

My plan is to use the "other matters" to keep the Board from blocking the proposal from getting to the floor for a vote. After that I call for a vote of the membership and then report the Yes/No votes as I received them for each item. Hopefully I can get them all passed but it I don't.... hey, that the way my proxy votes fell so I'll just have to live with. On the things that the Board brings up that I'm not prepared for I've asked some friends to run cover for me and also reel me in to keep me from doing something where I can be accused of abusing my proxies. They're not shy about telling people when it's time to shut up.

I modeled my proxy after some Pennsylvania examples. Seems to be a good example to follow.

i.e. - State the name, date, time, and location of meeting then

I (their name), a homeowner at (their full address), do hereby appoint RandalR to be my proxy, to vote in my place and on my behalf as though I were voting, at the 2007 XXX Homeowners Association Annual Meeting to be held on January 13, 2007 at 10:00AM or at any adjournment thereof, hereby revoking all previous proxies.

Signature of Homeowner__________________________

Date_______________________________________
WilliamT (Arizona)
Posts: 489
Posted:
The AZ absentee ballot system works well. It prevents the abuses that can occur with proxies, and the absentee ballots are counted toward the quorum.

We still have to work hard to get the people to send in the ballots. But all that is required for an annual meeting quorum is 10% so we do always have a quorum.

We're working on ways during the year to increase attendance at the regular board meetings, and as we increase that, it should also increase the physical attendance at the annual meeting.

I believe the problem with using email for the proxies is not having the original signature on the proxie. So anyone in states using proxies should go to each home and solicit the proxy with a signature.

While it's easier to email a form and ask people to mail it to you with a signature, the success rate will be much lower than going door to door. When going door to door and requesting face to face, the people are more likely to sign your proxy, even if just to get rid of you.
RandalR (Tennessee)
Posts: 98
Posted:
Our Bylaws state, "In the absence of a quorum, a simple majority of the members present and duly submitted proxies shall be sufficient to fund the corporation." That's been interpreted to mean that as long as someone shows up, you have a quorum and can vote on anything and everything. We have 263 households but usually less than 30 are ever represented at the meetings.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Randall, an original signature and date are needed for a proxy to be accepted. Therefore an email proxy should not accepted. I recommend allowing members to vote via ballot but never via an email proxy assignment. Attached is a sample of the Notice of annual meeting, agenda, and proxy we use.
📎 Attachments (1):

⏸ Downloads temporarily unavailable

📝11853079971.doc(24 KB)
RandalR (Tennessee)
Posts: 98
Posted:
Thanks, that will help me in drafing my own proxy request. The question has come up as to whether proxies can be all encompassing (as it appears yours and my Boards are) or should they only address specific issues? Is there a legal ruling on something like that or is it just another one of those large gray areas that vary from state to state? Should the proper use of proxies be specifically spelled out in the Bylaws or would that even help, especially when the Bylaws are considered suggestions instead of rules?
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Randal, our examples are general proxies. Some HOA's prefer to use directed proxies. Either is acceptable when allowed by the By-laws if not overruled by your state's statute. By-laws are not suggestions; they are the rules (laws) for the conduct of an organization. You can provide specific restrictions about proxies in the By-laws if your HOA choses to amend the By-laws to do so. For example you can restrict the assignment to only another member, limit the number of proxies allowed to a member to whom the proxy is assigned, and prohibit proxies from being assigned to "the chair" and "the Board".
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
Randall, just a note of caution: refer to your covenant documents on 'proxies' to ensure to whom the proxies are to be given and if it is PRIOR to the meeting. Usually, they are to go to the Secretary.
So, if you yourself want to retain the proxies and bring them to the meeting, this may be looked on as a little suspicious.
Just check your documents on where the proxies are to be collected and counted and you should be OK.
PaulM
MikeS1
Posts: 668
Posted:
Has anyone had any experience with SECURE WEB BASE VOTING SOLUTIONS? Just curious, since I don't believe in proxies. I can tell you that we've seen some serious abuses of proxy fraud. Residents may just sign the proxy without filling out the entire form, in order to get the proxy solicitor out of their doorway. Here's where there's a chain of custody issue with the proxy. Once the solictor has the proxy, they can fill it out however they wish. Technically no resident may hold more than 5 total proxies, but that doesn't prevent the proxy solicitor from just filling out the form in the manner in which they choose and then they can mail it in as if the resident was mailing it in. Any ideas?

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here