💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Question for the group...this has been on here a couple times. Long story short we had a former treasurer who used association money for his personal benefit. The new board has since obtained receipts of most of the transactions, consulted with an attorney and had the attorney send him a letter asking to be paid back in full. We still have the right to file a police report and may do that if needed but we felt this was the best way to get our money back.

My question, when do we bring this up to the membership? We will have a meeting soon before the deadline on the letter. Do we wait for resolution on this issue or do we bring it up at the next meeting?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
File the report. It will protect you more than a legal letter from a lawyer. Does the treasurer still live there? That could cause some sense of vigilantism. The HOA members have a right to know what is going on but do it in a way not to reveal personal information. Maybe keep it between the board with discussing the actual case but give the members general terms.

That letter from the attorney may have no power without a police report in the long run. This is a criminal case and should be prosecuted as such. It is NOT a small claims issue.

Former HOA President
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
If this gets brought up in a meeting the members will know exactly who it is without us saying anything. The lawyer letter is merely step 1 letting him know that we know what he did and asking for payment. If he declines then we will proceed with a police report. I would disagree that this isn't a small claims issue, the amount is question is about $2,800 so it is fileable in small claims court if we decided to go that route.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
I would file a police report anyway. Its a crime. If this person did steal, they cannot be trusted and should be charged with a crime. They may have a past record of doing this, or may do it to someone else in the future.

At least if they are charged with a crime, it will be on record for people who may deal with this person in the future.
PetunkaM (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
Once you know more and have filed a police report, etc., I would release the following:

The Board concluded that there was misappropriation of Association funds and we have turned the issue over to the police for action. No one currently serving on the Board is associated with the misappropriation [or those possibly involved with the misappropriation have been removed from the financial affairs of the Association]. As there is a police investigation and a potential legal matter - the Board will not comment further until the issue has been resolved. {Tim}
__

Tim,
this is a very good advice. I do not see any need to say any more. I would only say 'with possible misappropriations'.. because it has not been investigated and proven, officially that is.
The books should really be reviewed by an independent accountant, not by the board.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
This is a crime and not a reason to collect passed money owed. That is why I suggest going the criminal route. Most likely wouldn't be much actual jail time but required to pay the money back. If your HOA does go the small claims court way, then they have to hire an attorney to represent them. This is an additional cost. If your HOA goes the criminal court route, most likely won't need to hire a lawyer to handle it.

The choice is yours if you think it's a crime or a mishandling of funds...

Former HOA President
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Three years, about $2500, for phone bills and computer for a treasurer.

If the lawyer thought that there was a real crime there, he would have turned it over to the police. Cash was not taken, it was for hardgoods.

How about that the board was asleep at the wheel and should have seen these purchases on the monthly expenses sheet?

How about that this person will claim that those expenditures were neccessary as a part of his/her job?

Your burden of proof - that this is a crime - better be water tight.

BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 08/29/2011 10:27 PM
This is a crime and not a reason to collect passed money owed. That is why I suggest going the criminal route. Most likely wouldn't be much actual jail time but required to pay the money back. If your HOA does go the small claims court way, then they have to hire an attorney to represent them. This is an additional cost. If your HOA goes the criminal court route, most likely won't need to hire a lawyer to handle it.

The choice is yours if you think it's a crime or a mishandling of funds...

Our lawyer told us due that embezzlement crimes are very low priority in the DA's office and with the amount taken it is going to be even a lower priority to the point where it might not ever see a courtroom or could take a long time getting there. Our focus as an HOA is to take the route that offers us the best opportunity to get our money back. I know it is a crime that is easy to figure out.
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SusanW1 on 08/30/2011 5:00 AM
Three years, about $2500, for phone bills and computer for a treasurer.

If the lawyer thought that there was a real crime there, he would have turned it over to the police. Cash was not taken, it was for hardgoods.

How about that the board was asleep at the wheel and should have seen these purchases on the monthly expenses sheet?

How about that this person will claim that those expenditures were neccessary as a part of his/her job?

Your burden of proof - that this is a crime - better be water tight.


Susan...it was at the time a non active board which allowed these to go undetected. Once we got a new board on track it was a matter of days before this was discovered.

In the history of our HOA we have never provided cell phones, never provided computers, never provided office chairs. There are no minutes authorizing these expenses. There is no way he can claim it as a necessary part of his job. I haven't even gotten into his attempts to hide this stuff, where are all the receipts, etc?

His burden to prove it was for his job and was authorized by the board does not exist.
MoM1 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 56
Posted:
The Board needs to come clean with the owners about what it has discovered, what it is doing about collecting the funds, and what it plans to do to make sure things like this don't happen again. Are the books audited/reviewed annually? How many signatures are required on checks? How often are the association,s financials distributed to the owners. It may seem overkill but now there needs to be absolute transparency in all financial transactions to avoid the appearance of a cover-up.

You need to file a police report. Should you decide to file an insurance claim the ins. company will insist. It also shows the other owners that the Board is serious about association funds being diverted for personal use.
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PetunkaM on 08/29/2011 6:01 PM
The books should really be reviewed by an independent accountant, not by the board.


Based on our low operating budget (20k) and the amount taken (2,500) it really is throwing good money after bad to pay an accountant to go over our books. We are not that complex that a lay person could figure it out. Our focus all along has been going the route which gives us the best chance to recoup our money. If he wants to pay great, if he doesn't then there are other consequences.
CarolF (Florida)
Posts: 435
Posted:
Just a question our of curiosity.......was the computer passed on to the next treasurer to use? Or, did the person keep the computer?
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
nothing that was purchased was passed on...he received nothing when he was treasurer either. He kept the cell phone, the computer, the hard drive, the chair, the lamp and everything else.
CharlesB17
Posts: 112
Posted:
Brad,
You asked "My question, when do we bring this up to the membership? We will have a meeting soon before the deadline on the letter. Do we wait for resolution on this issue or do we bring it up at the next meeting?"

Transaprency builds trust and communications. That being said, I think advising the members that the board may have discovered some misappropriation of funds by previuos BODs and the discovery is under investigation would be suitable at the moment. Maybe include, Pending litigation, we are not at priveledge to discuss the issue further, would be enough to provide transparency and bulid trust. Then after the situation is over, you ask your attorney to release a statement to the members and that would close the door on the situation.
Now, obivously you know and have said the situation is a cime of Embezzlement. Upon legal advice, your attorney is giving you the adice you need to follow legally and criminally.
CynthiaF (Texas)
Posts: 5
Posted:
I disagree. You do not need an attorney to file in small claims court - that is what small claims if for.

In a criminal case the district attorney (or solicitor general) prosecutes the case - there is NO cost (your taxes pay for that). If the defendant if found guilty in criminal court he will be asked to pay restitution; and depending on his past criminal record or lack thereof his exposure is limited to a fine, adjournment in contemplation of dismissal, community service, probation, or jail depending on the jurisdiction.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
You is NOT a corporation...A HOA is a corporation and they must either be represented by an attorney in court (be it small claims etc...) or a competent board member that has been approved by the board to represent them. It's just that not many people are competent enough nor would many HOA agree to let an individual represent them in legal matters that isn't a lawyer. Sure an individual can file a claim in small claims. Your just NOT dealing with an individual when your dealing with an HOA...

Former HOA President
JenniferA2 (California)
Posts: 27
Posted:
If you have employee dishonesty insurance, you could try to file a claim. They will ask for a copy of the police report.

Jenn
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Brad:

I gotta share my reservations about this situation with you.

You indicated that three years ago the then-treasurer purchased a computer, office chair, desk lamp, and cell phone with HOA funds. These all sound like items that a treasurer would need to perform his job from his home. I assume that your HOA does not have an office of its own and owns no other office equipment.

You also indicated that during that time the board seldom met. Is it possible that the board at that time was aware of the expenses and approved of them without the formality of minutes or even a meeting? Have you interviewed the old board members and obtained affidavits from them affirming that they were not aware of the use of HOA funds for the equipment in question?

You stated that the “new board has since obtained receipts of most of the transactions.” Does this mean that the receipts were in the HOA financial records? I would think it unusual for a person to deliberately misuse funds and then turn in the receipts. How did you obtain the receipts if they were not in the HOA’s financial records? If the receipts were in the HOA financial records then one could argue that the previous board was aware of the expenditures and its failure to object is a constructive approval.

Are you in a position to state without a doubt that the equipment was never used for HOA business? That would be a tough fact to prove. If the equipment was used at all for HOA business, then the best case you have is that the treasurer has failed to return the equipment. But realistically, what is a 3-year-old computer and office furniture worth? (If it was a laptop computer, it would have a value of about zero.)

In reading what you posted I cannot find much evidence of theft or misuse of funds. Without proof that the previous board was unaware of the expenditures and without proof that the equipment was never used for HOA business, it looks to me as if you are trying to punish the previous board by hanging criminal charges on a scapegoat. No doubt about it, they failed to do their job well but that’s far short of looting the treasury for personal gain.

There is also the matter of the amount involved. I am usually an honest person but if there is enough money involved I might be tempted to throw my principles out the window. Your accusations imply that your former treasurer – a neighbor and fellow homeowner – was willing to sell his soul for less than $3,000 by picking the pockets of all the members. (I can understand selling my soul; I just cannot understand doing it for so little money.)

My advice would be that if you do not have the proof mentioned above to forget the whole episode and write it off as water under the bridge. Keep your suspicions to yourself until you have proof to back it up.
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Larry:

I would disagree with you, in the seven years prior to him taking over every treasurer and board member used his/her own equipment and we did not have "HOA" equipment that was passed on. Most of these transactaions or at least the largest dollar amounts happened after he was the only standing board member left. While it is hard to describe there is a trail of deceipt in how he did things. While you have a hard time understanding why he would do it for little money, perhaps his thought is no one will miss such a little amount of money. If things were on the up and up he would have turned over all of this equipment when he gave us everything else but he did not.

There were no receipts, we had to go to the businesses and get the receipts. I think we will stick with the advice our attorney gave us, he probably knows Kansas law better. While he may have used the equipment for HOA business he had no approval to purchase and went to lengths to hide the transacations...case in point:

1. Five cell phone bills paid over two years time were not entered into our Quickbooks accounting software, like they never happened.

2. Computer and external hard drive were described as a fix for an online website.

3. Computer chair, lamp, crayons, colored pencils, shredder, etc. were described as office supplies and purchased after he was the only one on the board.

4. three checkes were written to himself with no accompanying receipts.

As this progresses he has some tough facts to combat, where is the approval for all these items, why didn't he turn them over to the HOA after he was done, what happened to all the receipts that "disappeared"?

BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 09/01/2011 7:24 PM
You is NOT a corporation...A HOA is a corporation and they must either be represented by an attorney in court (be it small claims etc...) or a competent board member that has been approved by the board to represent them. It's just that not many people are competent enough nor would many HOA agree to let an individual represent them in legal matters that isn't a lawyer. Sure an individual can file a claim in small claims. Your just NOT dealing with an individual when your dealing with an HOA...

In Kansas you can not have an attorney represent you in court without permission of the court. In Kansas whether you are a company or not it is designed not to have lawyers.
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BradP on 09/05/2011 9:52 AM
Posted By MelissaP1 on 09/01/2011 7:24 PM
You is NOT a corporation...A HOA is a corporation and they must either be represented by an attorney in court (be it small claims etc...) or a competent board member that has been approved by the board to represent them. It's just that not many people are competent enough nor would many HOA agree to let an individual represent them in legal matters that isn't a lawyer. Sure an individual can file a claim in small claims. Your just NOT dealing with an individual when your dealing with an HOA...


In Kansas you can not have an attorney represent you in court without permission of the court. In Kansas whether you are a company or not it is designed not to have lawyers.

should clarify...this refers to small claims
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
sounds like our "hunch" or whatever you want to call it was correct...he met with our lawyer yesterday, didn't dispute and asked for time to get the money to pay us back.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Our lawyer told us due that embezzlement crimes are very low priority in the DA's office and with the amount taken it is going to be even a lower priority to the point where it might not ever see a courtroom or could take a long time getting there.


Your HOA isn't going anywhere. Who cares how long it takes. Step 1. File a police report.
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SteveM9 on 09/07/2011 4:46 PM
Our lawyer told us due that embezzlement crimes are very low priority in the DA's office and with the amount taken it is going to be even a lower priority to the point where it might not ever see a courtroom or could take a long time getting there.


Your HOA isn't going anywhere. Who cares how long it takes. Step 1. File a police report.

disagree...main focus is getting our money back...filing a police report was not the number #1 option to achieve that objective...as it turns out it sounds like we are achieving our objective.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here