Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 08/25/2011 2:12 PM
Someone is more than just a little bit anal. Seek professional help.
Larry,
There is no reason to make a comment like that. Fran is just trying to do what her governing documents specify her volunteer duties and responsibilities call for. If her committee is responsible for enforcement, then they should be enforcing the guidelines. If the community doesn't want to follow a covenant then the Board should propose an amendment to the documents to remove that covenant and have the membership vote on it.
Fran,
In my opinion, approvals for design changes should be considered on the following:
1) Does the request comply with the CC&Rs
2) Does the request comply with the guidelines
3) Have similar requests been approved or disapproved in the past (past precedence)
3) Will the change impact the neighbors and have the neighbors supported or opposed the request
4) How might the change impact the development (a hard one because it's a judgment call)
5) Ties should go to the homeowner
You will not be able to properly address any violations unless the rest of the committee and the Board of Directors are also willing to address the violations. However, you can still do some things to address the issues and gather support for what you are doing.
One of the best ways to start is to organize your Associations architectural files so you know what is and isn't documented. Then identify changes that are not documented and send letters requesting a copy of the documentation from the owner. For those changes that documentation is not available and it's logical that the item would have been approved, create a memo for the file indicating that it's likely the approval was lost. For those items that were not approved and probably would not have been approved, provide a reasonable time for the member to correct.
You might even want to walk the development and identify the common violations and make recommendations to change the guidelines. As an example, my Association did this and discovered that 90% of the lots kept a garden hose hidden in the shrubbery or in a hose caddy. Our guidelines at the time considered this a violation. However, since there were so many that were doing it, the Committee made the recommendation for a new guideline to allow a garden hose, properly stowed, in the front yard/shrubs. This was adopted and the committee only had to be concerned of those who were in violation of the new guideline.
Hope this helps,
Tim