💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JB7 (Georgia)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Hi all,

Developer lost neighborhood and empty lots are now in the possession of 3 different banks. Trying to get control of the management company contracted by bankrupt declarant, was wondering if banks have votes as our new declarant(s). Our covenants are vague on the description of declarant...

What can the board do to take control of the neighborhood management service, and the management company resists because they stands to lose their contract with our community once we have control?

Thanks in advance

J

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
The HOA, Inc. that the developer owned is not doing business, so who is running/paying the checking account, utilties, etc?

Did he file bankruptcy?

You may have to go to court to get control of the HOA BEFORE someone else comes in and buys the developer's assets - which would include your HOA!

(Treat the bank-owned parcels like any other owner and insist they upkeep the premises)
JB7 (Georgia)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Hi,

The management company the developer/declarant contracted to handle the neighborhood is, and has been paying the landscaping, utilities, etc.. through the use of our HOA dues.

Our neighborhood is about 20 percent occupied and we want to take over the management of our HOA, but we are not at that point in our Covenants to "technically" do so until the neighborhood is 75% occupied, or without the approval of the Declarant.

The management company we have is terrible, we need to fire them. but the Declarant has lost ALL of his lots to the bank, and other investors lost theirs too. So now we don't know who is the official declarant since there's 3 banks holding large amounts of property in our neighborhood.

JB7

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
The board usually has the power to hire and fire the MC. Is that true with your HOA?

What is preventing this board from making administrative/management decisions?

PetunkaM (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:

JB,

usually the mortgagee with the highest aggregate mortgage on the property would be in charge. Can you access the public records to get a feel which bank it could be and talk to their mortgage department?
JB7 (Georgia)
Posts: 10
Posted:
No it is not. As I wrote before, we need more votes in the form of residents. We are at most 20% and we need at least 75% to take over.

JB
JB7 (Georgia)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PetunkaM on 08/23/2011 1:00 PM

JB,

usually the mortgagee with the highest aggregate mortgage on the property would be in charge. Can you access the public records to get a feel which bank it could be and talk to their mortgage department?

That's a good point. I was reading on forum that the declarant title could be signed over to the bank with the most lots.. We're checking that Thursday.

JB
JB7 (Georgia)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SusanW1 on 08/23/2011 12:58 PM
The board usually has the power to hire and fire the MC. Is that true with your HOA?

What is preventing this board from making administrative/management decisions?


We need more votes in the form of residents. We are at most 20% and we need at least 75% to take over.

JB
JohnO6 (Georgia)
Posts: 424
Posted:
JB - I think you need to consult an attorney experienced in community association practice in Georgia. As I think this through it seems likely that:

1). The original declarant was probably a legal entity such as an LLC or corporation or other registered business in the state.
2). The fact that the declarant has gone bankrupt and lost its assets doesn't mean that the legal entity has ceased to exist (I don't think?)
3). I'm not sure that the transfer of the declarant's assets to its mortgage holders automatically conveys the role of declarant to those entities that assumed control of the assets.

Frankly, I'm just not sure how this would play out . . . . which is all the more reason to consult the attorney.
PetunkaM (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
The fact that the declarant has gone bankrupt and lost its assets doesn't mean that the legal entity has ceased to exist (I don't think?)

Dear John,
This statement alone is off the wall, You have no idea if the property is in distress, or foreclosure or ,of the developer is actually in bancrupcy.
JohnO6 (Georgia)
Posts: 424
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PetunkaM on 08/23/2011 3:56 PM
The fact that the declarant has gone bankrupt and lost its assets doesn't mean that the legal entity has ceased to exist (I don't think?)

Dear John,
This statement alone is off the wall, You have no idea if the property is in distress, or foreclosure or ,of the developer is actually in bancrupcy.

I based my statement on this from the original poster:

"Developer lost neighborhood and empty lots are now in the possession of 3 different banks."

A reasonable person can only assume from this that the banks foreclosed on the properties and while it's certainly true that this doesn't automatically translate into declarant bankruptcy, the OP then goes on to say, "Trying to get control of the management company contracted by bankrupt declarant" which suggests that he knows the declarant to be bankrupt.

So I'm at a loss as to why you called my statement "off the wall"?
PetunkaM (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
John,
Sorry. I admit JB said ‘bankrupt’ developer but he did not say the developer filed for bankruptcy. In fact it is not even clear if the property is in foreclosure. Banks may have placed liens on the property but have they foreclosed? It is fairly typical (in Florida anyway) for the banks to file a lien and not foreclose for years. Banks are dragging their feet, they do not want the responsibilities of ownership and instead are making deals all over the place. It is really very confusing what is going on.
In any event, if the property is in foreclosure, the first trust would usually owns the property unless there is a joint deal. And, I do not think JB knows, yet.
JohnO6 (Georgia)
Posts: 424
Posted:
Petunka -

I think you may be missing the point. Foreclosure on the properties should have absolutely nothing to do with the fundamental question - who is the declarant?

If, in fact, the declarant was the developer's company, my point was that unless the company was dissolved, then it arguably remains the declarant.

However, I'm not an attorney and am not sure that holds true - which is exactly the reason that I recommended the OP to consult a Georgia attorney experienced in community association practice.
PetunkaM (Florida)
Posts: 1,009
Posted:
John,
My apology. I did miss the point. I was thinking about the ownership and management of the property.
JB7 (Georgia)
Posts: 10
Posted:
To clarify, the lots the Declarant owned ARE lost to the bank. They are foreclosed upon. In regards to the "bankrupt" wordage I used, the developer/declarant is out of business so one would assume (and I know about "assume") that the guy ran out of money, hence "bankrupt".. Hope this helps.

PS. The services of lawyer is part of our plan, we're just doing some research ourselves. Once we figure out who the Declarant(s) are, we can then save the cost of having to do needless title searches on every lot.

Thanks for the replies!

JB

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here