SteveS8 (New York)
Posts: 128
Posts: 128
Posted:
We are a community that is still under the control of the developer. So, our board consists of 4 board members selected by the builder and 3 selected by the residents.
In the 4+ years our community has been around (with, perhaps, 3 or 4 more before the community is sold out), elections were held by asking who wants to run. At an open board meeting, those candidates read a prepared script, and the voting took place.
This year, for the first time, 2 voting resident seats (out of the 3) are opening up, and since this is an important event for the residents, we polled the community, and 93% of those voting said that they would like an opportunity to ask questions of the candidates in a forum and then have some time to decide upon their choice.... sort of like a real election.
I keep hearing about Fiduciary Responsibility, but if the board decides that they will, once again, rush the election without any opportunity for vetting the candidates, is there any way that this is not a total disservice to the residents?
Thanks,
Steve
In the 4+ years our community has been around (with, perhaps, 3 or 4 more before the community is sold out), elections were held by asking who wants to run. At an open board meeting, those candidates read a prepared script, and the voting took place.
This year, for the first time, 2 voting resident seats (out of the 3) are opening up, and since this is an important event for the residents, we polled the community, and 93% of those voting said that they would like an opportunity to ask questions of the candidates in a forum and then have some time to decide upon their choice.... sort of like a real election.
I keep hearing about Fiduciary Responsibility, but if the board decides that they will, once again, rush the election without any opportunity for vetting the candidates, is there any way that this is not a total disservice to the residents?
Thanks,
Steve