EW4 (West Virginia)
Posts: 95
Posts: 95
Posted:
Our board consists of President, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer, 3 at large directors. Our committees include Communication, Social, Maintenance, Finance, Nominating, Architectural Review (A/R), Compliance. Each Committee has a board member to oversee it but committee members do the work of the committee. Fairly standard. The Social and Communication committees are not required by our governing documents.
The Social, Communication are essentially defunct. The board President is the Liaison. Nominating only staffed for elections. AR, Finance â Treasurer , one non board member to review the books. Compliance only has one person which is the VP. Very problematic. The maintenance committee only has one person, a former board member no liaison and I have requested that we put a liaison there. The liaisons are required by our governing documents.
One of the 3 at large directors (me) handles the website, all electronic communications including an online/ email newsletter as material permits. One of the at large members is MIA (see my topic âChronic absences and member "friendships" hindering boardâ ). One at large director has nothing and will not take on anything.
We have approx. 115 homes. We donât have a pool, playground, sidewalks, club house, sports courts, or other amenities. Our overhead is lawn care, snow removal, lighting (electric costs only), legal fees, usual mailings, insurance, and not much more. We do have some key projects that need to be addressed including getting our roads evaluated so that we can build that maintenance plan. (4 year struggle on that), Review & update our C&R, By-laws, contract renewals and bids, escalating compliance issues, delinquent dues & collections.
We have operated with as few as 5 board members and now we have 7 elected but one is MIA. The recent tone of the majority of the board is that, âhaving a volunteer who does nothing is better than no one at all.â I was in the minority on that. We just re-elected board officers. Prior to that two of us laid out our shortages on the committees, lack of board member liaisons and the fact that there is only 1 person on Compliance. We asked that before officers were elected that we address the shortages to figure out how to handle the work load. Essentially, we were all going to have to pick up a little more. No luck. The elections occurred and 2 of us voted no on all nominations.
Basically we proposed a sharing of the work load & prioritization. Retire the non-required committees. Put any non-essential plans/ projects on hold. Remove any committee members that are not participating. Actively recruit to build up the Compliance & Maintenance Committees. Have committee representatives (not a liaison) attend Board meetings. Basically, the majority said no dice keep things the way they are.
What am I asking for? Given our community make up how would some of you recommend handling our situation. I know there are many different answers. The other board member that is looking at this has been on boards for 20+ years. He is at a loss as well. He and I want to try to propose something at the next meeting.
Your assistance on this is greatly appreciated. The two of us who proposed this see the writing on the wall and we donât believe things are going in the best interest of the Community.
The Social, Communication are essentially defunct. The board President is the Liaison. Nominating only staffed for elections. AR, Finance â Treasurer , one non board member to review the books. Compliance only has one person which is the VP. Very problematic. The maintenance committee only has one person, a former board member no liaison and I have requested that we put a liaison there. The liaisons are required by our governing documents.
One of the 3 at large directors (me) handles the website, all electronic communications including an online/ email newsletter as material permits. One of the at large members is MIA (see my topic âChronic absences and member "friendships" hindering boardâ ). One at large director has nothing and will not take on anything.
We have approx. 115 homes. We donât have a pool, playground, sidewalks, club house, sports courts, or other amenities. Our overhead is lawn care, snow removal, lighting (electric costs only), legal fees, usual mailings, insurance, and not much more. We do have some key projects that need to be addressed including getting our roads evaluated so that we can build that maintenance plan. (4 year struggle on that), Review & update our C&R, By-laws, contract renewals and bids, escalating compliance issues, delinquent dues & collections.
We have operated with as few as 5 board members and now we have 7 elected but one is MIA. The recent tone of the majority of the board is that, âhaving a volunteer who does nothing is better than no one at all.â I was in the minority on that. We just re-elected board officers. Prior to that two of us laid out our shortages on the committees, lack of board member liaisons and the fact that there is only 1 person on Compliance. We asked that before officers were elected that we address the shortages to figure out how to handle the work load. Essentially, we were all going to have to pick up a little more. No luck. The elections occurred and 2 of us voted no on all nominations.
Basically we proposed a sharing of the work load & prioritization. Retire the non-required committees. Put any non-essential plans/ projects on hold. Remove any committee members that are not participating. Actively recruit to build up the Compliance & Maintenance Committees. Have committee representatives (not a liaison) attend Board meetings. Basically, the majority said no dice keep things the way they are.
What am I asking for? Given our community make up how would some of you recommend handling our situation. I know there are many different answers. The other board member that is looking at this has been on boards for 20+ years. He is at a loss as well. He and I want to try to propose something at the next meeting.
Your assistance on this is greatly appreciated. The two of us who proposed this see the writing on the wall and we donât believe things are going in the best interest of the Community.