💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

TroyH (Texas)
Posts: 55
Posted:
Hello All,
Well, I just started as President of the HOA as of last Tuesday and well, had my first "issue" yesterday. I was contacted by a resident who told me there as a neighbor that was having a dish antennae installed right at the very front of the house. Our deed restrictions mention that dish antennae can only be positioned on the side or rear of the house. The spirit of it I'm sure is to cut down on the unsightly look if it. I realize people have the right to gain access to signal, but we also have to maintain continuity with aesthetics of the community. Being at work at the time, I couldn't personally check it out, but didn't want this person to install a dish, then come to find out it's out front and have to reposition it, hence leaving holes/patches in the roof. So I called them and left courteous message that if they indeed were installing a dish, could they have the technicians put it as far back as possible while still being able to receive signal. I also posted a thread on our community's yahoo group in the hopes that this individual would see it and realize action needed to be taken towards the dish tech's (after all, they probably could care less where they put it, they just want signal and then go on to the next home). I worded the post on the community group in an informative manner in general terms so everyone would understand it. The average person doesn't know the deed restrictions inside or out nor have them bookmarked somewhere.

Well, apparently they either heard my message or read my post. When I went home, the dish was in the back-side of the house, not really visible from the street.

Did I do ok? I mean, I was trying to make sure they didn't do any unnecessary damage to their roof. I know I would personally HATE having to reposition a dish and then patch up some holes.......

Sorry for the rambling, but since there's no "HOA directors for Dummies", I have go off the seat of my pants and ask for experience...

Troy
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Welcome to the club...!!! It will take you awhile to get your footing but so far so good. You may want to take the situation a step farther and contact the companies people use for the satellite services in your area. Let them know that area is in a HOA and what your codes are in regards to where they place their sattelites. This is a good prevention step to stop this from happening again. Prevention is now a part of your job...

It's not easy but keep going with written notices to the person in violation. Make them pleasant and reference the rules. I posted mine to their doors if it was short notice. You can mail it but NEVER put a notice in a mailbox without a stamp on it. This is illegal. Make sure to keep copies of correspondence.

Here are a few fast and simple rules to go by as president: 1. This is now YOU. You live, breath, and ARE President 100% of the time. Accept this. Don't be like "I don't like being management etc..." People smell weakness and won't trust someone who doesn't show confidence that they own that position.

2. NEVER EVER ANSWER A QUESTION WITHOUT CONSULTING THE RULES FIRST!!! If you don't know the answer right away, defer to the person you will get back with them when you look it up yourself. ALWAYS BRING A COPY OF THE CC&R'S/BYLAWS TO ALL MEETINGS.

3. DON'T BE AFRAID TO BE SUED. This is most important aspect to learn. You will be threatened to be sued several times. The truth is that 99% of the time these are empty threats and can be resolved outside of court. If someone does threaten to sue, explain them this: SUING YOUR HOA IS SUING THEMSELVES AND THEIR NEIGHBORS. Let this be your phrase in response. Plus a counter-suit is cheaper for a HOA than filing a suit. Which never file a lawsuit on the HOA's behalf. It requires a lawyer and little reward.

I am sure other presidents have tried and true advice. You can do this and one day it will be more comfortable. Believe me, I've had a ALOT worse than an attenna installation to deal with and so will you. Your getting broken in easy...LOL!!! Good luck!

Former HOA President
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Troy,

If the results of your writting to the owner resulted in a resolution that everyone was okay with, then I say YOU DUN GOOD!. Luckily this owner was willing to compromise.

It might be worthwhile to run a copy of the FCC laws so that you understand the limits that you may impose on future installations. Luckily , he still gets a good signal from further back on his house.

FYI, "HOA Directors For Dummies" is "HOATALK.com
JamesG (Connecticut)
Posts: 83
Posted:
With one antenna installed, you should probably expect other owners to follow. It pays to clarify any uncertainty in your documents by passing a resolution or rule that address all the issues, including informing the owners of their rights under the FCC rules as well as the rights of the HOA under the same rules.

I have attached the document that we use in our community.
📎 Attachments (1):

⏸ Downloads temporarily unavailable

📝1722241184971.doc(46 KB)
TroyH (Texas)
Posts: 55
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DonnaS on 07/22/2011 11:03 AM

Troy,

If the results of your writting to the owner resulted in a resolution that everyone was okay with, then I say YOU DUN GOOD!. Luckily this owner was willing to compromise.

It might be worthwhile to run a copy of the FCC laws so that you understand the limits that you may impose on future installations. Luckily , he still gets a good signal from further back on his house.

FYI, "HOA Directors For Dummies" is "HOATALK.com

Classic... I like it...................

Quote:
Posted By JamesG on 07/22/2011 11:24 AM
With one antenna installed, you should probably expect other owners to follow. It pays to clarify any uncertainty in your documents by passing a resolution or rule that address all the issues, including informing the owners of their rights under the FCC rules as well as the rights of the HOA under the same rules.

I have attached the document that we use in our community.

What is the procedure of these resolutions? Prior to taking on this position, I looked around our neighboring subdivisions and their deed restrictions and noticed resolutions like yours James that were amended to the original deed restrictions? Do these things cost a lot of money to do or are they empowered by the by-laws and what the Board of Directors can do at their discretion? We in our subdivision really need to tailor our deed restrictions to suit us. The developer did nothing by copy/paste from another community. We are about 3 years old...........
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 07/22/2011 10:59 AM
DON'T BE AFRAID TO BE SUED!

I would generally agree with this, except when it comes to a disagreement regarding a dish antenna The homeowner doesn't need to sue. Instead, a complaint can be made to the FCC asking for a ruling. This costs the homeowner nothing except possibly a small filing fee. Most of the expense will be on the association to defend the complaint. More details and the rulings for some complaints can be found on the FCC website. Interesting reading.
JamesG (Connecticut)
Posts: 83
Posted:
Hi Troy,

You need to closely review your legal documents to determine what the Board (Directors) may legally do to establish new rules or regulations. In general the Board can amend the Bylaws and Rules, or establish new ByLaws and Rules. Owners do not need to approve these. The Board must be aware that these changes or additions cannot conflict with the Declaration, however they can serve to clarify the Boards interpretation of the Declaration. If the current Declaration terms do not suit the needs of the community, then they can be amended but only usually after the owners vote (probably need over 67% to pass). Any amendments must be recorded at the Town or City Clerks office.

All the documents have a certain priority in determining decisions. These are:

- Federal Law
- State Law
- City Law
- Declaration
- Bylaws
- Rules

Jim
TroyH (Texas)
Posts: 55
Posted:
Thanks everyone...
Like I stated to the people that actually did show up at the Annual meeting last month, I'm nothing more than a resident just like all of them and I too have a desire to keep the community as nice as possible while at the same time protecting everyone's home values while balancing individual quality of life and personal preference.

My approach to the 1st situation was people working together with the deed restrictions and them understanding they are there for all of our benefit.

I had one person reply to my post with, paraphasing, "I like a nice community as well, but the HOA can't tell anyone where to put an antennae..."

I personally thought the post counter-productive and a jab at the HOA as an institution and creating a feeling of "us" against "them". I replied personally to the person, whom I actually know and have a slight social circle relationship. I let him know that it never was my intention to jeapordize anyone's ability to recieve a signal at the expense of where it is positioned. I let him know that my intentions were, even though the deed restrictions DO address this situation, that the community at large would be appreciated placement of dishes as far back as possible and still get a strong signal. I reread my post several times and no where do I give the impression of, "absolutely not, you can't put it there"......

As you all know.................... Welcome to the club.............. hahaha
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I was talking in general terms about not being afraid to be sued. It wasn't directed toward the satellite dish issue.

Satellite dishes and other technology issues are often overlooked and not updated in the CC&R's. I often advice people when changing your CC&R's to address future green energies and technology. Most documents were written many years ago when those big ugly satellite dishes that took up a front yard were in style. Those were what are banned in most HOA's and then filtered down to the smaller less intrusive satellites of today. The newer CC&R's probably have limits on locations of these items.

I have talked to our cable companies and explained our situation. Some of them aren't regulated by the FCC believe it or not. They would install cables and leave them lying along the street curbs. It may take several months for them to hire a separate contractor to come bury it. There were no regulations saying they couldn't do this. So it's always good to talk to these companies and do some prevention work.

Former HOA President
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Troy,

This worked very well for you.

However, I would strongly encourage you to read the FCC's OTARD rules and some of the cases that have been ruled on by the FCC. At some future date you may encounter a situation that might be more difficult to solve.

Basically, the association can prohibit installation anywhere on common areas. The association can also restrict the location of an installation on the unit itself and on the limited common areas for the exclusive use of the unit owner PROVIDED THAT 1) The ownwer can receive acceptable signal(s) in the location(s) specified by the association, and/or 2) it does not cost the homeowner more to obtain an acceptable signal in the specified location(s). An acceptable signal does not refer to signal strength measurements. We're talking about digital signals here, which have different criteria with regard to what constitutes an acceptable signal. If it turns out that an owner is only able to get an acceptable signal by placing the antenna where it can be seen from the front, that's when you are going to have an issue. If that happens and the association objects to the location, the homeowner can appeal to the FCC for a ruling. According to the FCC rules, the burden is then on the association to prove that its restriction should be upheld. In other words, the association must prove that an acceptable signal is available in the location(s) specified for that individual homeowner. The homeowner is not required to prove that he can't obtain a signal in those locations.

In general, the FCC will strike down a restriction that is based strictly on aesthetic reasons.

Aside from the OTARD rules themselves, reading the arguments and outcomes of past FCC rulings in this area is very enlightening.

TroyH (Texas)
Posts: 55
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BruceF1 on 07/22/2011 1:25 PM
Troy,

This worked very well for you.

However, I would strongly encourage you to read the FCC's OTARD rules and some of the cases that have been ruled on by the FCC. At some future date you may encounter a situation that might be more difficult to solve.

Basically, the association can prohibit installation anywhere on common areas. The association can also restrict the location of an installation on the unit itself and on the limited common areas for the exclusive use of the unit owner PROVIDED THAT 1) The ownwer can receive acceptable signal(s) in the location(s) specified by the association, and/or 2) it does not cost the homeowner more to obtain an acceptable signal in the specified location(s). An acceptable signal does not refer to signal strength measurements. We're talking about digital signals here, which have different criteria with regard to what constitutes an acceptable signal. If it turns out that an owner is only able to get an acceptable signal by placing the antenna where it can be seen from the front, that's when you are going to have an issue. If that happens and the association objects to the location, the homeowner can appeal to the FCC for a ruling. According to the FCC rules, the burden is then on the association to prove that its restriction should be upheld. In other words, the association must prove that an acceptable signal is available in the location(s) specified for that individual homeowner. The homeowner is not required to prove that he can't obtain a signal in those locations.

In general, the FCC will strike down a restriction that is based strictly on aesthetic reasons.

Aside from the OTARD rules themselves, reading the arguments and outcomes of past FCC rulings in this area is very enlightening.


Thanks Bruce...
I googled the "FCC's OTARD rules" and had some hits. From what I have read, the ulimate ruling is in favor of the homeowner, but the deed restrictions are enforceable if it doesn't compromise signal reception. So, the law does seem to protect the interest of both sides of the issue.

Thanks and chalk this one up for learning something new.............

Troy
DoloresM2 (California)
Posts: 60
Posted:
Congratulations, you are off to a great start and your community is lucky to have there. This kind of concern for your fellow homeowners will go a long way in making things run smoothly during your term of office.

ThomasC11 (California)
Posts: 210
Posted:
If dish does need to be installed in front of unit, can accompanying hardware (converter box and cables) be placed there as well? Seems a bit excessive.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ThomasC11 on 07/22/2011 3:24 PM
If dish does need to be installed in front of unit, can accompanying hardware (converter box and cables) be placed there as well? Seems a bit excessive.

I think the question needs to be "MUST the accompanying hardware be located close to (or with) the antenna, or can it be placed elswhere at no additional cost?"

I think this is a technical issue. Ask someone who installs dish antenna systems.
EW4 (West Virginia)
Posts: 95
Posted:
First congrats on working with the homeowner to correct the issue. I wish we had more of that in HOA.

I have been on both sides of this exact issue. I purchased a town home a few years back that had 2 dishes installed. We check with the HOA and they were properly approved. Just after we purchased the home the HOA said we had to move them. We were an end unit those units had fewer options for dish location. The only location that were will to permit had an usable signal as tested/ documented.I am an RF engineer and checked the FCC rules. In that case those rules won and the HOA dropped the issue.

In my current HOA we had a case where a homeowner wanted to install an antenna to receive digital broadcast TV. Just after the conversion. The board disallowed based on aesthetics which I showed they would loose on. Our Lawyer gave the same ruling. Then the board disallowed for "structural" reasons. They lost again.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EW4 on 07/23/2011 5:48 AM
First congrats on working with the homeowner to correct the issue. I wish we had more of that in HOA.

I have been on both sides of this exact issue. I purchased a town home a few years back that had 2 dishes installed. We check with the HOA and they were properly approved. Just after we purchased the home the HOA said we had to move them. We were an end unit those units had fewer options for dish location. The only location that were will to permit had an usable signal as tested/ documented.I am an RF engineer and checked the FCC rules. In that case those rules won and the HOA dropped the issue.

In my current HOA we had a case where a homeowner wanted to install an antenna to receive digital broadcast TV. Just after the conversion. The board disallowed based on aesthetics which I showed they would loose on. Our Lawyer gave the same ruling. Then the board disallowed for "structural" reasons. They lost again.

The FCC is very adept at distinguishing between true safety reasons and aesthetic reasons. They've had lots of experience.

By the way, the FCC will also strike down any rule that requires advance approval by an HOA. The OTARD rules prohibit requiring advance approval because it delays the installation. Also, if I remember correctly, the FCC struck down the requirement that some municipality had requiring the owner to obtain a permit (at a cost). The FCC ruled that the municipality's rule not only introduced a delay, but additional cost as well.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Troy,

Our Association adopted a policy for Satellite dishes requiring them to be mounted in the rear yard or on the rear half of the roof. If an acceptable signal could not be aquired they could mount it in the side yard or front yard but needed to provide a statement from the installer that an acceptable signal could not be achieved in the other locations.

This way, the Association is able to specify where the dishes can be mounted without violating the OTARD as mounting of the dish isn't prohibited, they are just to try specific locations first.

Tim
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 07/23/2011 7:03 AM
Troy,

Our Association adopted a policy for Satellite dishes requiring them to be mounted in the rear yard or on the rear half of the roof. If an acceptable signal could not be aquired they could mount it in the side yard or front yard but needed to provide a statement from the installer that an acceptable signal could not be achieved in the other locations.

This way, the Association is able to specify where the dishes can be mounted without violating the OTARD as mounting of the dish isn't prohibited, they are just to try specific locations first.

Tim

This doesn't exactly meet the OTARD rules because if the owner doesn't supply the required statement and the HOA attempts to force the owner to move or remove the dish and the owner applies to the FCC for a ruling, the OTARD rules places the burden of proof on the association to demonstrate that its restriction must be upheld. That is, the association must be able to prove that an acceptable signal CAN be had in the desired location; not the other way around.

Still, from a practical point of view, this is a reasonable approach since most reasonable homeowners would likely comply rather than go through a prolonged process with the FCC, even if they would likely win, and, it gives the HOA the documentation needed to support their requirement to try other locations first.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
It's not that hard to say that an acceptable signal is able to be achieved. However, the Association is not prohibiting that the dish installation or requiring permission from the Association to have it installed. The Association is only requiring notification. It was worded like this in order to comply with the FCC ruling.

Your right, 99% of the homeowners will be reasonable and comply.

Here is a copy of what our policy says:

In accordance with Federal Communications Commissions’ ruling of Over the Air Reception
Devices (OTARD), the following guidelines exist concerning dish style antennas:

Size: Dish size may not exceed 1 meter (39.37") in size.

Location: In order to maintain a colonial style to the property, the Board of Directors
has established a hierarchy of locations when installing dish style antennas to obtain an
acceptable signal quality.

1. Devices shall be installed solely within such individual Lot and shall not be installed on
Common Area, and are to be placed at the rear roof portion or rear yard, or yard area,
within the lot. Ideally, the device should not be visible from the street unless acceptable
signal quality is unavailable.

2. To the maximum extent possible, Devices shall be located in a place shielded from view
when standing on the street and from the view of other lots; provided, however, that
nothing in these Rules would require installation in a location from which an acceptable
quality signal cannot be received. This section does not permit installation on Common
Area, even if an acceptable quality signal cannot be received from the individual Lot.

3. If acceptable signal quality still cannot be obtained dish antennas may be installed within
the front of the property. Notification of this type of installation should be sent to the
ACC along with a statement from the installer that this is the only location that could be
used to receive acceptable signal quality.

4. The Association shall not be required to alter or remove any landscaping on common
property for reception purposes.

No antenna may be mounted on the common areas of the Association.

Cabling: Cables associated with the installation and use of dish style antennas should be
bundled together and, if required to run outside of the home, attached to the home so it does not
detract from the appearance of the property or community.

Installation: Homeowners are responsible for ensuring that antennas are securely
installed and they in no way affect the safety of others.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Tim,

It sounds like a lot of thought went into writing this. Did you have a hand in drafting it? It could be a model for others to use.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Bruce,

I did do the initial draft and gladly accepted feedback. It had a few modifications done to it prior to the Board adopting it. Anyone is certainly free to use all or portions of it.

Tim

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here