💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KyleP (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Hi all,
I live in a small HOA where dishes are only allowed on common elemnt roofs. 2 issues, signal is not obtainable from unit roofs for pretty much all owners due to large trees blocking signal on South of properties. Several owners have tried to no avail but have been told that signal is obtainable from garage roofs. Our garages are also common elements but have been restricted for dishes. This leaves owners with no choice but cable tv. (Only 1 unit can receive signal from dish on unit roof).
2nd issue - there are many inactive dishes up on the roofs. Who is responsible for their maintaince, liability issues and removal? Probably be all are several years old and installed by previous owners no longer here. Anny idea as to cost to remove?

Thanks, Kyle P
AliJ (Kansas)
Posts: 5
Posted:
Here is a link for the "otard" rule. It is a federal rule saying HOA's can't restrict the placement of dishes.
http://transition.fcc.gov/mb/facts/otard.html
I live in Florida but this is a federal law.

It should be the responsibility of the dish co to remove the dishes but if they are several years old they might be out of date and the company won't want them but you can call and ask them to come remove them and see what they say.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Kyle,

Here is a link to FCC Information Sheet on Over the Air Devices (OTARD) and to
FCC Website page for Installing Consumer-Owned Antennas and Satellite Dishes

Per the FCC web site [emphasis added]:

"OTARD rules do not apply to common areas that are owned by a landlord, a community association or jointly by condominium owners. These common areas may include the roof or exterior walls of a multiple dwelling unit. Under certain conditions, if a common antenna is available for use by residents, then the community association or landlord may prohibit the installation of an individually-owned antenna or satellite dish, provided the signal quality from the central antenna is as good as the signal quality from an individually-owned antenna or dish, and the costs of using the central antenna are no greater than the costs of an individually-owned antenna or dish."

As for the maintenance of the common area, the responsibility would be that of the Associations. If the Association does not require owners to remove their dishes when they move then the Association would assume that responsibility as well. Typically it's better not to remove the unused mounts unless there is a problem as additional expense would be incurred in repairing the roof when the mount is removed.

Tim

KyleP (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Thanks for the responses.

I also believe that the HOA can restrict dishes on common areas. What about limited common areas? I guess any area that the HOA maitains is probably restricted.
I also believe that the HOA is responsible for the maintenance, removal or liability of old dishes left behind as well (on common areas)
I intend to request at next meeting that a comprehensive rule governing dish placement and removal be created for membership so all are aware of options
& responsibilities. Right now we have nothing in writing, which leaves the cost of removal on the backs of all homeowners rather than the individual who installed.
KyleP (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Also, does anyone have any information about the installation of Multiple Unit Satellite dish? I have been told this is now an option for community associations - where one dish is installed and connected to multiple units & bills are sent to each individual according to package they opt for. This would be a great option if possible since satellite reception is not available on the only area allowed by HOA.
Greatly appreciate any info. Thanks.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Kyle,

If the Limited Common Area is for your exclusive use, the OTARD rule applies. The following exerpt is taken from the OTARD rule:

"The rule applies to antenna users who live in a multiple dwelling unit building, such as a condominium or apartment building, if the antenna user has an exclusive use area in which to install the antenna. "Exclusive use" means an area of the property that only you, and persons you permit, may enter and use to the exclusion of other residents. For example, your condominium or apartment may include a balcony, terrace, deck or patio that only you can use, and the rule applies to these areas."

In other words, the association cannot require you to use the common area roof if you have a limited common area that is for your exclusive use and you can get acceptable reception there that is better than the reception you can get in the required location.

Unfortunately, there are several associations that do not understand the OTARD rules and end up finding themselves on the wrong side of a complaint. Should you try to install a dish on an area that is for your exclusive use, your association may end up citing you with a violation. If an appeal to your association pointing out the OTARD rule fails, you would have to file a complaint with the FCC requesting a ruling. While the appeal is pending before the FCC, the association cannot fine you (although they may try). If the FCC rules in your favor, you have your antenna (unless the association files an appeal). If the FCC rules against you, you will be given a period of time to comply before you can be fined by the association. Of course, you could appeal the decision. If you file a complaint with the FCC, the burden of proof is on the association to show that the location they specify results in equal or better reception than the location you have chosen.

As to the community antenna, again, it depends. If the reception is a good as, or better than, the reception you can get with your own antenna, and if the cost to you is not greater than the cost of using your own antenna, then yes, you would have to use the community antenna. Otherwise, no.

All of this is plainly stated in the OTARD rule and in the Q&A section. You really need to take the time to read and understand the OTARD rules to see how they apply (or may not apply) to you before proceeding. The FCC site even has descriptions of several past rulings that you can read to see how situations which may or may not be similar to yours have been decided.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
KyleP,

How many buildings? How many Units per building? And are all Units pre-wired for Cable TV?
KyleP (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
We have 14 units divided into 4 buildings. Each unit has a gargage but the garages
are also divided into 4 buildings, so, my garage is attached to one other persons garage (is this still a limited common element?). The only places dishes are allowed (although I have yet to see anything in writing) is on the unit building roof. I have been verbally told by President(who is the ONLY person able to get dish reception) that no dishes are allowed on gargage roofs.
There is limited if no reception for dishes on these roofs making cable the only option.
I have requested that the board review the current policy, perhaps consider changing current (unwritten in CCR's rule)or consider a multiple dish option for community. Perhaps the best thing to do is to take it to all owners and ask for their preference.
A. No dishes on gargage roofs, limiting all to expensive cable OR
B. Change policy to allow dishes on garage roofs so community has more than one option for TV service.

In any event, I think it wise for the Board to adopt a current and WRITTEN policy for the homeowners.

Thanks.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
KyleP,

You say you were “verbally told by the president”. Are you a Board Member?

Also since you asked about one dish for multiple owners – are your buildings (all Units) already wired for Cable TV?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KyleP on 07/18/2011 6:16 AM
T
I intend to request at next meeting that a comprehensive rule governing dish placement and removal be created for membership so all are aware of options

Excellent idea. I would suggest that you take the time and do an internet search on rules for satellite dishes so you may offer examples along with your suggestion. If you have the time, you might even consider writing a draft for them.

Tim
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KyleP on 07/18/2011 6:21 AM

Also, does anyone have any information about the installation of Multiple Unit Satellite dish? I have been told this is now an option for community associations

I maintain one of these at my work. They are easily done with minimal cost. The Association should contact the satellite company directly about this. If this is done, the main expense is the Dish, cabling and switches.

The down side is that the residents will not have an option between satellite providers either.

Tim

KyleP (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Thanks all for your responses.

Yes, all our units are currently cable ready and connected to comcast.

I WAS a former board member last year & still communictae frequenlty with current board members.

Tim, If I understand what you are suggesting - I should contact either one of the satellite dish providers on our area (Colorado) and they should be able to connect all 14 units (or those who wish to) to one dish via very long cables and the charge to the HOA originally would be for installation and set up. Then each owner would recieve a separate bill by address with only their charges?

Our President has suggested that this is illegal (piracy?).
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Kyle,

It's not piracy. The owners still need to pay for receivers and services.

You will need to check with the Satellite Company on how it will work. Some like to only charge one client and others will have no problem in putting such a system in. Every area is different and the local company may or may not want to get into the situation. However, they should be willing to talk to you and give you an idea of what it might cost.

Even if the Association doesn't want to do it for the development, there is nothing preventing neighbors getting together and work a deal with the satellite provider.

Tim
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
KyleP,

Based upon your responses, I am assuming that you would like to “receive satellite TV”, and that you are Condominium Townhouses.

1. Apparently your Board is not restricting Antennas per the OTARD FCC regulations, to exclusive use limited common areas such as Patios, Decks, or a Balcony, since they have allowed a Dish Antenna on a Common Area, which per the OTARD regulations does not have to be allowed.

(I have no idea why a Satellite Dish antenna would not be allowed on a Garage Roof except perhaps for structural or esthetic reasons, since a Dish has been allowed on a Common area roof).

Also, the roof itself is probably not the best place to mount the Dish. We were told that mounting it on the building peak is a better place.

2. Multiple Condo Units on one Dish Antenna is certainly a good option. That is what we do.

We have four (4) Condo Units per building, and each building has one Dish antenna mounted on it. Each Unit Owner tied to that Dish has their own plan. And it is each Unit Owners’ choice within that building whether or not they wish Satellite TV or Cable TV.

3. If your buildings are pre-wired anything like ours, the Satellite Dish installer should be able to find a junction point some place outside where the Cable TV enters and is split, with a wire going into each individual Condo Unit within that building.

At that outside “Cable TV junction point”, the Cable TV “feed in wire” for the specific Condo Unit that wants Satellite is disconnected, and then the Satellite “feed in wire” is then connected to where the Cable TV lead in wire was.

The Satellite signal now uses the wiring that is already in place for the Cable TV, and there should be no need, or little need, to drill any “new holes” through the siding to get the signal into a Condo Unit.

4. TO GET STARTED, and this is what we did:

Find a Local Authorized Satellite Dealer with a “store front” in your area. This is important. You want someone you can actually visit, talk with, as different from just “an installer” that is "hired" to put up the Dish.

Contact your Local Dealer, or Dealers, by phone and/or in person. Explain that you are looking into service for Condominium Buildings and that the Board is willing to allow Dish installation, wherever needed to get reception.

5. Set up an appointment with that Local Authorized Dealer – either with the Owner or with whomever the Owner suggests – and invite them out to your property to actually “look at” your buildings, and discuss various options with you on site.

6. Let the Dealer know that you would like to minimize the number of Dishes and ask the Dealer to explain about how multiple Condo Units using one (1) Dish per Building, or Buildings, would work.

7. And take it from there.

8. The last time we had our Local Dealer out, we had 2, 3, new pending requests for Satellite service, all in different buildings.

9. Because all our new Dish installations would be thru the Dealership, we were able to arrange for them to take down several “old Dishes” no longer needed (at no cost to the Association), when the new Dishes were being installed.

10. Based on our experience, the “key” is to work person-to-person with a local Authorized Dealer. If you give this a try, please report back and let us know how things worked out.

KyleP (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
WOW. Thanks Tim and Ellie, you both have been SO helpful.

Ellie,
I might consider satellite if it were available. I am one among many homeowners who had the satellite co. tech come out to install only to find no signal avaiable from our unit roof. Currently there are 7 dishes installed on the roofs of 4 different buildings but my understanding is that most are NOT active/operating and would not recieve signal at this point because of the tree growth over the south of the roofs.
I am merely doing the footwork to see what the options are and hoping to
assist other owners in not wasting there time trying to install a dish.
You are right about restrictions and I had not really considered that if HOA allows dishses on common roof area than I guess by law they would need to allow them on limited common areas (individual garage roofs). Thanks for pointing that out. I do know one board member would object to garage roof installation for aesthetic reasons.

The MDU seems to be the way to go. We will be discussing all this at out next meeting tonight.

I really appreciate all the feedback! Thanks.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KyleP on 07/19/2011 11:49 AM
I do know one board member would object to garage roof installation for aesthetic reasons.

The OTARD rules do not permit restrictions for aesthetic reasons (unless its to preserve an historic site). The FCC always shoots such restrictions down. Your board member would lose.

However, restrictions CAN be enforced if it is for safety reasons. Thus, if the garage roofs are not strong enough, then restrictions might be enforceable. Again, the garage roofs would have to be limited common elements for your exclusive use. If the garages are common elements (ie., for more than one homeowner), then OTARD rules do not apply.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BruceF1 on 07/19/2011 12:33 PM
Posted By KyleP on 07/19/2011 11:49 AM
I do know one board member would object to garage roof installation for aesthetic reasons.


The OTARD rules do not permit restrictions for aesthetic reasons (unless its to preserve an historic site). The FCC always shoots such restrictions down. Your board member would lose.

If the garages are common elements (ie., for more than one homeowner), then OTARD rules do not apply.

The OP did state that the garages were common are elements.

BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 07/19/2011 1:25 PM
The OP did state that the garages were common are elements.

Yes, but since "limited common areas" didn't appear until a later post, it wasn't clear to me if in the OP he meant strictly common areas, or if he left out the word "limited."
KyleP (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
I think that is the key question. Are the garages common elements or limited common elements and we may need to clarify that issue first - by looking at CCR's and plats. My garage is one of two in one building in front of my unit. It is a totally separate garage from the other (we only share the roof). Other garages are in buildings with 3 or 4 in each. We have a total of 5 buildings with garages for 14 units.
Personally, I believe them to be limited common elements as they are limited to the owner of the unit assigned to only.

Thank you.
KyleP (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
I think that is the key question. Are the garages common elements or limited common elements and we may need to clarify that issue first - by looking at CCR's and plats. My garage is one of two in one building in front of my unit. It is a totally separate garage from the other (we only share the roof). Other garages are in buildings with 3 or 4 in each. We have a total of 5 buildings with garages for 14 units.
Personally, I believe them to be limited common elements as they are limited to the owner of the unit assigned to only.

Thank you.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
BruceF and TimB,

I do not think we know whether or not the Garage Roofs that the OP refers to are Common or Limited Common.

KyleP has referred to the Garages as Limited Common, and I assume for the exclusive use of the Unit to which they are assigned. But it does not necessarily follow that the Garage Roofs are also Limited Common.

For example, in our Documents the “inside” of the Garages are exclusive use Limited Common for the Unit to which assigned, but the Association “owns” the Garage Building Structure, including the Garage Roof.

It seems unlikely to me that a Garage Roof would be “exclusive use” Limited Common Area. KyleP also wrote that there are two (2) Garages side by side – most likely under one roof, although he did not say so.

It does not appear that his Board is only allowing Dish Antennas where “they must”, since they currently have Antenna(s) on Common Area Building Roofs where they do not have to allow them per the ORTARD regulations.
KyleP (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Yes, Ellie, that is it in a nutshell. The garage, I beileve, is a limited common element, but is the roof above it assigned so? Yes dishes are allowed on common elements already. So far the only place a signal can be recieved from are the garage roofs.
By the way & no offense taken, I am a woman!
KyleP (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Part 2 of my question is the removal a 7 old dishes that do not function. What is the best way for the HOA to remove them w/o much expense?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KyleP on 07/19/2011 4:39 PM
Part 2 of my question is the removal a 7 old dishes that do not function. What is the best way for the HOA to remove them w/o much expense?

It's a simple process.

Send someone to the roof with a couple of wrenches and remove the dish from the mounts. If they have roofing adhesive (or better yet roofing shingles) remove the mounts and plug the holes (or better, plug the holes and replace the shingles).

Tim
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
KyleP,

My apologies on the she/he mix up.

Re getting rid of the “old” Dishes - as I mentioned, if your Association can agree on a location for a “Working Dish”, maybe you can have whoever installs the new Dish also remove the old ones as part of the installation. That person should know how to repair any resultant damage. If it is more extensive than what they usually deal with, they will let you know.

Going back a few years – we had to hire someone to “take down” the remains of some old antennas. If you have a “carpenter/builder/roofer” that you employ, you could use that person. I do not know what it cost us because it was included with other building repair work that was done at the same time.

One of the advantages of working with a Local Satellite TV Dealer, and of having more than one Unit on any particular Dish, is that in the future you are less likely to be left with unused Antennas when Units change ownership.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here