💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KimH1 (New York)
Posts: 10
Posted:
I recently built a home that has a HOA. I was given the HOA bylaws book and was fine with the rules and fees. However, I recently sent in an application to the arch. board for a fence. Fences are allowed with approval. The bylaws do not have anything about materials or height of fence. My application was denied. The president of the board informed me that there is a deed restriction and fences 4' high and made of vinyl are the only types of fences allowed. I was not given this addendum by the developer before signing the new home contract, nor was I given the restiction @ closing. Additionally, it is not listed in my land search/title that was done prior to closing. Is there anything I can do?
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Why would you APPLY for something and not ask or become aware of the guidelines before you applied?

Is your complaint that you did not get the ARC rules with your "welcome packet"?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
The ACC can decide what they want to approve or not. The specific language your looking for will NOT be in the By-laws or CC&R's. If they have a separate ACC, then it may or may not even appear in that documentation. Fence or other modifications is in the eye of the board. They set the rules and approve by them.

Sounds like your just going to have to make the adjustments they want if you want that fence. End of story.

Former HOA President
KimH1 (New York)
Posts: 10
Posted:
I did ask for all the rules and the sales person went over them with me. The problem is that there was an addendum filed by the developer 4 years after the bylaws were created. The addendum was filed through the county - but the addendum is not in the bylaw book. In fact, none of the sales people even knew about the addendum. I had to go down to the county building to pull it. I gave it to the sales people and the developer who created and filed the addendum is scratching his head because it is not in the bylaw book. Every home buyer on the street - is not aware of this addendum.
KimH1 (New York)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Yes, my complaint is that I received the bylaws - but the bylaws did not included the addendum. The only person that had the addendum was the president of the hoa (landowner) and the developer (builder). None of the sales people were aware of the addendum either.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
A HOA is a SALES tool used by the developers/builders to get buyers in the door. They then turn over that HOA to the OWNERS to manage and run themselves. That means the OWNER's can make up the rules they want to live under. (Even the developer can IF they still control the HOA).

By-laws typically don't require to be filed. You most likely got a copy of the Convenants and Restrictions which are filed. By-laws are the rules of the HOA and CC&R's are the rule of the land. The ACC is how that land is supposed to look.

Your swimming up creek without a paddle on this one sorry to say. The HOA can turn your submittal down for whatever reasons they have. Go back to the drawing board instead of trying to change the drawing board to fit your needs...

Former HOA President
KimH1 (New York)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Thanks Melissa for your help. I like the idea of rules and standards for each homeowner, that is the reason why I bought on this private street. The developer still runs the hoa because we are all still so new. This was just such a surpirse for this to be out there and no one knowing. The president of the hoa says its not his problem to disclose the addendum. I just feel bad for all the new home owners after me not knowing what I just found out.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
It is the RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER/POTENTIAL BUYER to be aware of the HOA and it's rules. The documentation is a PUBLIC record at the records department at the local county courthouse. People want to blame their Realtor, HOA, Developer, Mortgage company, lawyer, or previous owner about not knowing about the HOA. The existing laws makes it clear that it is the owner's responsibility to be informed and take the steps to be so.

You just discovered the first issue involving HOA's. Their very existance...The mortgage company should have factored in the HOA dues prior to approval of the loan. The dues are akin to paying utilities. That should have been the first clue to people they are buying into a HOA. The ad for the home can include HOA references. You would think the Realtor would inform the buyer of that. However, they can tell their client but can't provide them the rules as they are NOT a member qualified to have a copy. The Realtor can simply tell the potential buyer to go to the courthouse to get the documents, tell them a HOA exists, or they need to talk to a member to get the information. The same applies to the lawyers, developers, or other people involved in the sale of the property. If your lucky, the day of closing the seller/former owner will turn over their copy of the documents. However, how up to date those are is anyone's guess.

Your best bet in a HOA is to be INVOLVED. You want information go get it or have it. Don't wait until you want something to find out what you bought into. A HOA can work well IF the owners/members realize there is NO "They/Them" in a HOA but YOU and YOUR NEIGHBORS"...

Don't make me go into my rant about HOA's...LOL!!!

Former HOA President
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hi Kim:

How many current homeowners vs. developer owned lots? At some point the homeowners will have control of the HOA and can make changes to the governing documents following said documents proper procedures and proper vote. In essence majority rules … so the question is what type of fences does the majority of homeowner’s want to see for the development. The homeowners possibly at the next HOA meeting could present a requested change to the documents for the fencing preferred and see what happens. The developer may even be in favor of what all the other homeowners would like to have as an option.

KimH1 (New York)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Thanks Janet!
We actually will having an annual meeting in May. We have a total of 3 board members. 2 of them are up for re-election this May. The 1 remaining board member is great to work with. (he happens to be my next door neighbor). We have a small hoa - consisting of 40 lots/homes. 30 of the lots now have houses on them. (20 young families and 10 older families). The other 10 lots are still for sale.
In the hoa by-laws, it states that once 50% of the lots have been sold, the developer/president will relinquish his duties, however he will still have voting power on rules in the hoa until the last lot is sold. We have a few home owners that are interested in being elected (the younger families). I would have loved to run, however, my husband is on the nominating committe which cancels my ability to run and be elected.
Most of the families in the hoa are very much committed to having a great place to live and raise their families - but unfortunately, the older families never wanted a young families with kids in the development. (the history is.....when the older families built their homes, it was suppost to be a patio/retirement community. But the lots did not sell and the developer sold rights to a different builder which more or less deals with affordable housing for younger families. Now you can imagine why some of the home older home owners are so mad).
They dont like the kids playing in the front yards, or riding their bikes on the street. It has been a real bone of contention.
Anyways, you are right, as we become more established, and have the ability to run the hoa ourselves, hopefully we can bring some requests for change.
Thanks for your input!!
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Kim - the fact that your husband is on the nominating committee has NO effect on your candidacy.

As long as you are a qualified member, you can be nominated and enter the election.

TimL2 (Texas)
Posts: 11
Posted:
Hi Janet. I'd like to point out a clarification to your statement above. Mortgage companies are the true owners of the majority of your houses. The way I understand it, to get any amendment to the bylaws our covenants would require the approval from every mortgage company that holds a note for a home in that community. That would be near impossible. Mortgage companies love HOA's because it protects their investment. They are not usually willing to consider any type of change or amendment.

At best, the HOA and BOD's could simply choose to allow variances to the bylaws unofficially....problem is that as boards change, so do the "rules" on unofficial variances and that can cause major issues.

My .02
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hi Tim:

I will post this once on this thread as it also pertains also to a question regarding in essence property "owernship". If you have further concerns or questions lets start a new thread as the original poster is from another state.

Actually you are the owner and the mortgage company has a lien against the property. If you look at your warranty deed it will have your name, tax assessor will show your name as the owner, etc. Also, if someone is injured on your lot, who is the “registered” owner … I guarantee it is not the bank they will be going after for any potential injuries. Now some HOA’s governing documents and as allowed by state statutes may require first mortgagees to approve or consent to amendments, etc. and in many cases the first mortgage has x amount of time to reply.

I tend to dislike searching TX statutes as they will make statements to the effect of:
Sec. 204.002. APPLICATION. (a) This chapter applies only to a residential real estate subdivision, excluding a condominium development governed by Title 7, Property Code, that is located in whole or in part:
(1) in a county with a population of 2.8 million or more;
(2) in a county with a population of 250,000 or more that is adjacent to the Gulf of Mexico and that is adjacent to a county having a population of 2.8 million or more; or

ETC., ETC., … Good grief it goes on and on regarding cities, counties, and population …

An example of part of a statute from your state and which is noted in bold a portion which actually excludes lienholders:

Sec. 204.005. EXTENSION OF, ADDITION TO, OR MODIFICATION OF EXISTING RESTRICTIONS. (a) A property owners' association has authority to approve and circulate a petition relating to the extension of, addition to, or modification of existing restrictions. A property owners' association is not required to comply with Sections 201.009-201.012.
(b) A petition to extend, add to, or modify existing restrictions approved and circulated by a property owners' association is effective if:
(1) the petition is approved by the owners, excluding lienholders, contract purchasers, and the owners of mineral interests, of at least 75 percent of the real property in the subdivision or a smaller percentage required by the original dedicatory instrument; and

The point is it all depends on your state statutes for your association and your governing documents. However, in many instances the local and state statutes can supersede. You need to read your governing documents and corresponding statutes pertaining to your association.
KimH1 (New York)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Hi Again,
I wanted to update everyone with what has been found. I am not sure if this makes a difference of not, but wanted to give this information. So to restate my situation, I received the HOA Rules and Regulations (dated 2006) before I purchased to build. I was fine with what was in the rule book. However, when I went to put up a fence, I was denied because the fence had to be 4' high, white vinyl with 4" spacing inbetween the pickets. I thought I missed something, but there was nothing in the rule book regarding this. I asked my neighbor who is on the board to see where the fence regualtions could be found. He stated that he couldnt find it and was unaware of the fence regulations himself. I asked the PResident of the Board (the developer) if he could send me the rules on fence and he e-mailed me the declaration of protective covenants/restrictions (dated 2009). Contained within this is the statement that the fence must be 4' in height. Nothng else. Interestingly enough, I never received this. From this blog, I was told it is MY responsibility to search this recorded information on the land I purchased. There is no documentation of this being filed through the clerks office. I was also advised that this information would be found in my Title/Search of the property. And again there is nothing documented about any restrictions on my land. I went through all my closing paperwork and found nothing about the addendum. When I closed, the attorney for the seller was there and stated that she forgot the keys to my mail box, and would send it out to me when she got back to the office. I wasnt too conserned because I didnt change my address yet. After closing, when I received the letter at my old address, enclosed within were my keys to the mailbox and also a letter stating where to send my HOA dues. On the second page of the letter was a summary of very specific rules that I have nevcer seen before. No basketball nets, hockey nets, playset or swingsets. No above ground pools. Fences must be 4' high. white picket vinyl with 4" spacing. No wood fences. No gazebo's. No parking on the street, working on cars in the drive etc. I was surprised that this was so specific given the rule book itself was vague. Shouldnt this been something I should have got at closing at the least? And why arent the restriction/covenants able to be found on my land? It isnt just my Title Co that did not find it, there are 10 neighbors that bought after me that did not have this in their title either. I re4ally feel something is not right here. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
TimL2 (Texas)
Posts: 11
Posted:
Hi Kim. After reading through your situation, I would simply advise you to consult a qualified Real Estate Attorney for consultation. Your case is so specific, and so wrapped up in language (or lack of) found in your covenants and by-laws that non-specific advise here probably doesn't do you much good rather than where to find resources. I am interested in the progress and final outcome of your situation; especially because you are being restricted by things you did not know about, even after reasonable research.

Question for you. If you ultimately find that these restrictions are binding, would you have still moved forward with the purchase? If you find these restrictions are ultimately binding, would you feel like you could not build or live there and want a way out? Just curious because I think that ultimately dictates how far you would go in your research.

Good luck.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hi Kim:

What is the title on the document which you did not receive initially? Potentially if it states “Amended Declaration …” then it may not potentially be a legal binding document because it was not properly filed. If it states “Rules and Regulations for ….” then potentially these are rules adopted by the board of directors and would not necessarily be required to be filed.

We cannot see all the documents you are questioning and all states vary with regards to required disclosures. If you are greatly concerned about the non-disclosure of the second document you may want to consult a local attorney.

CarolynL2 (Florida)
Posts: 73
Posted:
Hi Kim,
Am I understanding you correctly that you can not find any Restrictions recorded for your property? Have you checked to see if the Association has been incorporated? Aricles of Incorporation should be filed with the state. Is it possible that you have a voluntary HOA?
KimH1 (New York)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Carolyn,
Yes, I can not find any restrictions recorded for the property. The association has been incorporated and the article was filed. I do have that. The HOA is not voluntary. I am thinking that possibly, the ammendment/restriction was not filed properly. I am currently consulting an attorney about this.
Tim,
I guess my answer to your question is yes. Had I known that there were restrictions on the property that went above and beyond the bylaws, I propbably would have not built here. As I said before, I did not have a problem with a HOA initial conditions. And I also know that this could be considered growing pains. I want my house to be beautiful. I want to put landscaping in, a patio and a fence. However, As I progress in this venture, more and more things are being uncovered. I can only imagine what else is out there. I guess I will find out when I try to get something approved.
When I spoke to the developer, I asked him why wouldnt he included the amended 2009 restrictions on the properties in the 2006 bylawss that he is currently handing out? His nresponse was "well the book was already binded and we didnt want to have to take them apart to add the amended restriction". That to me was the icing on the cake.
KimH1 (New York)
Posts: 10
Posted:
The document states Amended Declaration. I am working with an attorney now. I will keep you all up to date.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hi Kim:

For Amended Declaration generally if not properly filed within X amount of time, then if members want the rules it would need to be redone, proper vote by members, and properly filed. They potentially cannot just all of a sudden file a document from 2009 now in 2011. In some states the documents after properly approved must be filed within 30 days to be valid.

CarolynL2 (Florida)
Posts: 73
Posted:
Kim,
If there are no deed restrictions to run with the land, then what would bound you to a Homeowners' Association whether it is incorporated or not? It is my understanding that the deed restrictions are what make membership in the Association mandatory, not the incorporation of the association. Good luck and please do keep us updated.
KimH1 (New York)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CarolynL2 on 04/25/2011 8:14 PM
Kim,
If there are no deed restrictions to run with the land, then what would bound you to a Homeowners' Association whether it is incorporated or not? It is my understanding that the deed restrictions are what make membership in the Association mandatory, not the incorporation of the association. Good luck and please do keep us updated.

Yes, you are correct with what I am saying. There are no deed restrictions attached to my property in the title. The only thing that is in the title is the incorporation of the HOA. So I am working with an attorney to ascertain whether the title company missed this or the possiblity the restrictions where not filed properly by the developer or the county itself.
What a mess!
CarolynL2 (Florida)
Posts: 73
Posted:
Kim,
Good for you, getting an attorney to determine your property rights. If there are no deed restrictions recorded then you must have a voluntary HOA. That is probably why they are refered to as dues rather than assessments. I don't see how there can be any enforcement of rules or ammended declaration covenants that have not been attached to your deed. Most people are not wise enough to ask the right questions. Have you tried asking the President (developer) if this is a voluntary association?

Good luck and keep us informed.
KimH1 (New York)
Posts: 10
Posted:
I have asked the President if this was a voluntary HOA and he stated no. When I purchased/built and closed, I became a member immediately. He is not a very pleasant man. The good thing is that there is a meeting at the end of May and he has to be elected in to stay on the board. Consensus is with the other homeowners, this will be his last term. I will keep you all posted. Thanks for all the useful information!!
Kim
CarolynL2 (Florida)
Posts: 73
Posted:
Kim,

You might ask him what document he is relying on to say you are not a voluntary HOA when there are no recorded restrictions attached to your deed. It sounds like he is trying to bully everyone. Be prepared for him to try and control the meeting in May. Make sure you and your neighbors are prepared. We have experienced presidents voted out and them refusing to turn over Association property and records.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here