💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MikeW8 (California)
Posts: 5
Posted:
Greetings,

I live in Valencia, CA... I'm sure I can't say where it probably would cause a legality issue... Here is my story

2 years ago i moved into a house here in my community with my then g/f and her deadbeat children on a 1 year lease. 4 months after moving in she cheated on me and I kicked her and her kids out... I know harsh but what can I say I have self respect and know what I am worth. Anyhow I was locked into a lease and told the management company that I was kicking out the woman and children and wanted her name removed from the lease and replaced with a friend. They took his credit and discussed it with the owner and he said ok no problem. The only stipulation was the rent got paid on time and no complaints from the neighbors about parties. Well the first years lease came up and the owners went through the management company to ask us to please stay for another year. We agreed. 10 months into the second year of the lease the HOA has decided to threaten the owner of the house that my roommate and i need to leave because we are not a single family... Our CC&R's state:

Primary Use Restriction. No lot shall be used except for private single family residential purposes.

The words to use to describe what this means is a man woman and child must live together

To mean it means that the LOT needs to have a single family home on it... Not an apartment or a Walmart

So i guess because david and i are not a man woman child family the owner is being threatened that he will be sued or come into fines... This to me sounds like illegal and like discrimination. Can this be done?
MikeW8 (California)
Posts: 5
Posted:
Oh i forgot to meant that there is nothing in the CC&R's restricting rentals or leases... The only issue is the HOA saying who the units can and can't be rented to
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Hi Mike,

Your agreement is with your landlord, the owner of the property.

The owner has an agreement with the Association. Part of that agreement is that their guests or tenants will follow the rules of the Association. Your post indicates that you had no issues with the Association at the beginning. However, something must have happened to have gotten the Associations to notice you, your room mate or the property. It might be parking issues, upkeep of the property, loud music, parties, guests, etc. Something occurred that has the Associations attention and you did say that there were to be no complaints from the neighbors as a condition of the lease.

Irregardless of what the actual issue is, it appears that the Association is properly dealing with the Owner. How the owner decides to respond is entirely up to the owner.

The details of your lease are unknown to us. Based on your posting, I suspect that once the lease ends, the owner is free to rent to whomever they chose. If you are not the individual chosen to sign a new lease and you believe you were discriminated against and wish to fight that perceived discrimination, you should consult an attorney or the appropriate State agency. Any complaint would be against the owner of the property and not the HOA as your lease would be with the owner of the property.

Tim

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
As Tim stated the action is between the HOA and the owner however if you and the owner are looking to renew the lease for another year he should check the CC&R's for language specifically defining who may or may not occupy a dwelling in the HOA.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
MikeW8 (California)
Posts: 5
Posted:
The HOA sent us a letter stating we could not have a work van parked in the drivewar so my roommate called them to ask them what exactly he had to do to comply and they asked who he was and he said i am mike's roommate and the womans response was "oh two men are not supposed to be renting a house together... rentals in our community are for families only"

The owner wants to keep us as tenants. He does not want to deal with the HOA and thinks they are rather ridiculous as do we

Under USE in the CC&R's this is what it states as i explained earlier
Primary Use Restriction. No lot shall be used except for private single family residential purposes.

how does the HOA come to that meaning that a man woman and child must live together in order to rent in their community?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Mike,

It does not matter how the HOA defines single family as your issue is not how that individual believes what defines a family. Based on your additional information, the issue appears to be a violation of the rules and regulations by parking a work van within the development.

It does not matter if you think the Association is ridiculous. By renting in the development you agreed to comply with the rules and regulations. The tenant violated the covenants by parking a work vehicle within the development. This infraction alone may be reason enough not to renew the lease (would need to check the associations governing documents).

It does not matter if the owner thinks the Association is ridiculous. They must be the one to deal with the HOA as they entered into a contract with the HOA when property was purchased. If the owner decides not to confront the HOA or does not wish to deal with the HOA when a tenant violates the rules and regulations, then when your current lease expires, I suspect that it will not be renewed. The reason to not renew would be due to violating the CC&R's by parking the work van in the community.

If you believe that there is a different reason and that the reason might be discriminatory, then you have the right to consult with an attorney or make a complaint with the appropriate State Agency. Again, this complaint will be against the owner of the property not the HOA

Tim
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I agree with the posters that the situation is one that is between the Owner and the HOA. The HOA really can't interfere with that contract between the owner and it's renter. They can just make it so the owner is responsible for infractions of the tenant to a point where the owner has to take action.

The concern here may be in regards to having 2 separate rental agreements on the lease other than a "family" matter. It's more of the "Frat House" potential situation they may be concerned about. I have a neigbhor who has atleast 3 roommates that live with him. He had 4 when he bought the house. Then they moved out and he got married to a woman with kids. They divorced and back to 3 roommates...They have a pool and party ALOT...

Two young single men living together may raise the flags of potential party, all hours visitors, and baby-mama drama. This is what the HOA doesn't want. Hence their definition of "Family atmosphere".

Your landlord needs to address the HOA and ask them what their concerns are. If your in violation of the rules, then let him know so he can address it with you. The HOA has a right to tell the owner to rectify an issue but NOT to enforce it upon you directly. You don't even have the right to vote, attend meetings, or make decisions. The HOA shouldn't have an issue with you at all. Your landlord does have the rights. They should say something as the lease agreement is between 2 DIFFERENT people and that's that.

Former HOA President
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
because david and i are not a man woman child family


Tell the HOA that David is your lover, you are a gay couple and a family. If the HOA has a problem with that you will sue for discrimination.

Hehe.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
That said....

A single family house is a separate house, a free-standing residential building as opposed to a multi-family dwelling. Doesnt matter how many people live in a single family unless limited by federal, state, local laws or hoa rules.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Steve that is a great idea in "theory" but I HIGHLY doubt any of them want to "PROVE it"...LOL. They don't seem like the type of guys that would do a "Bossom Buddy" routine or hold hands and kiss...

Their best bet may be having the landlord retool their rental agreement as to NOT have 2 lease holders on the agreement...Have just the 1 lease holder and the other pays their fair share of the rent to that person on the lease. Just make sure if that happens, you have that documented between the two roommates NOT the landlord or HOA.

Former HOA President
PeterD3 (Florida)
Posts: 708
Posted:
The burden of proof is on the accuser. Let the HOA prove they're not!
MikeS1
Posts: 521
Posted:
Their defination of "Single Family" is a gross misinterpretation (IMO). In Fairfax County (Northern Virgina), zoning laws only say that you cannot not have more than 4 unrelated adults living in a residential dwelling in a single Family home (which can be attached or detached)... Townhouse or traditional detached single family home. They are out in left field on this one.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
As Tim and others above stated HOA related issues must be resolved between the Owner of the property and the HOA. You are renters and any issues you have are then between yourselves and the Owner. However, if the Owner wants you to continue renting the following is a definition for him to use as a potential argument.

Legal definition:

http://definitions.uslegal.com/s/single-family-residence/

In essence: Single family residence means a structure maintained and used as a single dwelling unit.

MikeW8 (California)
Posts: 5
Posted:
Yes the HOA logged a complaint against the van because it had company logo's on it... After speaking to them within 2 days he went out and bought plain white magnets to cover up the logo's... We actually received a letter from them thanking us for taking care of it as quick as we did...for 6 months they were quiet and now they are bothering the homeowner again about how a single family is not renting the unit.....

I'm hoping to run into someone on here that knows a little about CA law....

One person suggested we pretend to be gay.... as well as that would work and make them very fearful about messing with us, I am to truthful of a person to pull a prank like it

Someone suggested pulling the other people off the lease... That management company would not go for that because they consider that subletting and they could evict me for it... Everyone living here must be on the lease

Here in CA i have read a few things about what is called a common household and how is all the tenants are living together sharing the rent/utilities and amenities that they can be considered a family unit, and that the only time that can be held in void is if a family of 4 are living in room a and a family of 3 are living in room b and they are both on separate lease agreements

DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Mike, ask the Board to show you a definition of a family unit.

I like these. especially #5

făm'ə-lē, făm'lē)
n., pl., -lies.
1.
a.A fundamental social group in society typically consisting of one or two parents and their children.
b.Two or more people who share goals and values, have long-term commitments to one another, and reside usually in the same dwelling place.
2.All the members of a household under one roof.
3.A group of persons sharing common ancestry. See Usage Note at collective noun.
4.Lineage, especially distinguished lineage.
5.A locally independent organized crime unit, as of the Cosa Nostra.

BarbaraP3 (Maryland)
Posts: 90
Posted:
The declarations state that the "LOT" is to be used for a single family residence....it does NOT state that the "RESIDENCE" is to be used as a single family residence as opposed to multi-units like duplex.

Good luck!
MikeW8 (California)
Posts: 5
Posted:
hahhaha.... that's great.... we will become a crime family
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Barbara,

That is an excellent interpretation of the restriction.Good Job!The word "LOT" is key and mean that only a single family unit, not an apartmentor duplex. If 3 Philadelphian lawyers interpreted this covenant wording, you would hear 3 different meanings. Moral of the story, in a court of law, they would not come to a definite meaning either. In Florida, many of the Statutes for HOA specifically state that every word must be spelled out as to it's exact meaning.(aka ARB restrictions)
Mike, I think that we are on top of this for you.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here