💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

NL (Virginia)
Posts: 43
Posted:
Our HOA passed a rule several years ago, the VP Bullied it through! I should say intimidated!( He had a house next to him that had a lot of work done on it) The Rule says no construction work can be done by a contractor or homeowner on weekends and must be done during the week between the hours of 8a.m. to 6p.m. - this covers both exterior and interior work. Has anyone every heard of or had one that is so restrictive - this means that a homeowner who works must take off work to do or have any construction projects done. Needless to say this has caused a lot of upset amongst owners. We are a townhouse community with 20 houses. And to make matters worse the VA himself had roof repair done on a Sat. because he said he had some loose shingle and that was an emergency - which there is a provision for emergency repairs. The Docs. give the Board the right to make rules and regulations that make the community a better place to live. Just searching for advice and any others who have been in this situation. I am now the HOA President and am thinking about proposing abolishing such a strict unreasonable rule. My feeling is this rule was only written to satisfy one person and not for the well being of the whole community. If we were a high rise I may go along with it.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I believe we had a similar rule in our documentation in regards to CONTRACTORS in either our By-laws or CC&R's. You may want to view that to see if it is actually hard-wired in instead of "meeting notes" voted. There is a HUGE difference. Changing your documentation is an undertaking that can take a long time.

Why not take it to a vote for the members at a meeting? It is MAJORITY rule that dictates after all. Simply put it on the table and ask for opinions/votes. The power to change or adapt rules is up to the membership NOT the individual...

Former HOA President
RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
I'm the Architectural Control Committee chair in my community, and I wrote the construction policy. What your board members need to understand is this: Every time we act to protect homeowners from the actions of other homeowners, we run the risk of interfering with the rights of everyone to enjoy the ordinary benefits of home ownership. Every decision needs to be balanced on this tightrope: protection on one side, freedom on the other.

In my opinion, your prohibition on weekend construction is going too far. I think it's reasonable to give people a little extra time to sleep in on the weekends, but otherwise, weekends are often the only time homeowners have to do such work.

Here's what I wrote about this for my community, and it seems to work for us:

Hammering or running of saws or other loud power tools is restricted to the hours
between 7:30 AM and 6:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and 9:00 AM to 6:00
PM, Saturday and Sunday. Any unit owner who violates this noise rule is subject
to fine.

Rob

NL (Virginia)
Posts: 43
Posted:
Our Documents aren't written that way, the Article of Incorportation state Adopt and Amend any reasonable Rules and Regulations and than the by laws state Adoption of Further Rules and Regulations The Board of Directos may make such rules and regulations consistant with the terms of the Article of Incorporation. What happened her was one of the Board Members was ill and the VP had their proxy so he was able to push this through. The new Board which he is still on for 4 more months two of us are against it as are most of the community. I would like to have some kind of rule/regulation that covers this but not one so restrictive - I was wondering if any other communites have anything like this. As in all communities no one complains until it impacts them directly.
NL (Virginia)
Posts: 43
Posted:
Rob, Thanks...I like the way that is written and am going to use it..... you are right so hard to balance it all and it is a tightrope.
LawrenceC1 (Georgia)
Posts: 480
Posted:
Any change in rules or regulations that narrow the rights of the homeowners cannot be enacted simply by a vote of the board. Homeowners have rights as spelled out in the CC&Rs that are guaranteed by law. There is likely a process for amending your governing documents that must be followed for any significant change. That process is usually intentionally difficult.

Rules enacted by the board can only expand on items in the CC&R, not change them in a material way.

The other thing is that your Articles of Incorporation specifically say "reasonable" to describe allowed actions. It is *not* reasonable to an ordinary impartial observer to limit a homeowner from doing maintenance on his own home during normal hours.

You have a case for getting a lawyer involved and having this rule reversed.
NL (Virginia)
Posts: 43
Posted:
Lawyer already involved but I don't want to be reinventing the well, in Va we can enact new Rules and Regulations
LawrenceC1 (Georgia)
Posts: 480
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NL on 03/20/2011 2:46 PM
Lawyer already involved but I don't want to be reinventing the well, in Va we can enact new Rules and Regulations

Are you saying that the board on its own authority could ban all pets in the community when there was no such ban already in the CC&Rs? Or that they could mandate that all future home sales must be to owners who are be 55 years old or older? Or that no homeowner may own an SUV and park it in their driveway?

I think that you may be getting bad advice if you have been told that the authority of the board is unlimited to enact rules and regulations (even in Virginia).
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Does your municipality have noise/construction ordinances?

Running a chain saw at 7:30 am in my neighborhood would result in a fist fight, I'm afraid.

At precisely 9 am you can hear the mowers start up, but not before.

NL (Virginia)
Posts: 43
Posted:
Those examples are ridiculous - that wold be age discrimination for one thing and btw there are communities that are only 55 + this, so it does happen....the CC&R and Rule/Regulations have a section regarding construction/maintenance so this was just someone wanted to make that rule a little to unreasonable. I am very opposed to such a strict amendment, which is allowed. I lived in a highrise once with a loading dock, that didn't allow any deliveries after 5 or on weekends, so crazy things do get put into documents.

Thanks to everyone who offered reasonable explanations.
LawrenceC1 (Georgia)
Posts: 480
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NL on 03/20/2011 4:12 PM
Those examples are ridiculous...

That was my point. These examples were clearly ridiculous, and would not be legal. But they are not much more ridiculous than the rule that your board passed, which is likely not legal either.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hi NL:

In many states the board can enact Rules and Regulations; however, these are not necessarily legally binding if someone wanted to take an issue to court. There are a number of case laws in which because a regulation was not voted and adopted into the Declaration of CCR’s that the HOA lost because it was just a Rule adopted by the board. It would potentially depend on the rule and the reasonableness of said rule. One such case law was as Lawrence used as an example in which a rule was adopted by the board to not allow dogs. A homeowner sued and won … as this was not agreed to by majority of homeowners, but just by a few board members potentially imposing rules of their personal choice.

Keep in mind the Declaration of CCR’s are attached to everyone’s property. These are regulations which were agreed to by homeowners when they purchased their homes. These also are the regulations which in order to amend would require a majority of homeowners to agree. Therefore, this document is the one if all amendments are done correctly following the documents and state law potentially will hold up in a court of law, if challenged.

The rule you stated in your post potentially could lose if someone was fined for working on their home during the weekend at “reasonable” hours as that is the only time available, and took it to court.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NL on 03/20/2011 10:25 AM

Needless to say this has caused a lot of upset amongst owners.

If there is enough upset, circulate a petition in the membership to hold a special meeting for the express purpose of passing an amendment that counters the current rule. Rob provided a good rule option that should satisfy most of the community. When you circulate the petition, explain what has happened.

To be honest, some board members believe that a rule should be written whenever something inconveniences them. Sadly, if there are not other members willing to stand up and say no - rules get passed this way. This is why it's important to be involved in the governing of the Association.

When I served on our Architectural Committee, a past Board President complained of a neighbor parking a vehicle he though violated the covenants. The Committee informed him that our decision was it did not. When he complained, we had to point out that the governing documents left the interpretation of the guidelines to the committee and not the Board. We informed him that the Board had the authority to rewrite the rules providing they held a community meeting first and/or the authority to remove the Architectural Committee but that the Committee was united behind this and in removing us the Board would have to act as the Committee and perform the annual inspection and write the violation notices. The President backed down.

I used my story above to demonstrate how you don't have to be on the Board to prevent this stuff from happening but you do need to be involved.

Tim
NL (Virginia)
Posts: 43
Posted:
Tim,

Everything you say is so true. I am just new to the Board so am feeling my way around, I never agreed with the rule and thought it was beyond the scope of reality, even if they can or cannot do it, sometimes common sense just comes into play. I have already received many many complaints, so a special meeting is being called and the thing is going to be removed and I hope to be the one to put it in the shredder. I have the other Board members support, and 15 of the 20 homes has signed on requesting a special meeting, so sad when it has to come to this.

I would never be part of such a "crazy" restriction,,,,sometime the weekend is the only time I have to work outside...

Thanks for the comments and input.
RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
Going back to the balancing act of governance...

It is very easy to lose sight of the fact that all of us volunteers, whether director, officer or committee member, are only servants. We serve our communities, which means that in order to do our jobs efficiently (or even correctly), we must first consider each decision we make in terms of its benefit to the community as a whole, and only secondarily consider its effect on us personally.

Wouldn't you all agree that this is true? But at the same time, wouldn't you all agree that this is incredibly difficult to do, in every situation?

My architectural policy, repeated here, works in our community:

Hammering or running of saws or other loud power tools is restricted to the hours
between 7:30 AM and 6:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and 9:00 AM to 6:00
PM, Saturday and Sunday. Any unit owner who violates this noise rule is subject
to fine.


This policy is time-tested (15 years). If homeowners seriously - and in numbers - had complained that 7:30 A.M. was too early for construction noise, then the board would have bumped it later by now. But they didn't. In fact, no one has complained. If running power tools (chainsaws?) at 7:30 A.M. would result in altercations in your community, then modify it accordingly.

But this only serves to illustrate my point: we serve, and in order to serve effectively, we solicit input from the community. As leaders, we do not have the right to make decisions based upon on our personal convenience, lifestyle, prejudices, assumptions, logic or even "common sense." And we certainly aren't empowered to enact rules and create policies based on whether or not we dislike hearing power tools on the weekends, or at 7:30 A.M.

In my case, the architectural policy had to apply to everyone - even me - and to be honest, my own policy has often bitten into my hobby of radio control scale model ship building. Sometimes I like to run my band saw or Dremel tool after 6:00 P.M. on a summer evening, but I can't. People are sitting down to dinner at that time, and it would interfere with their quiet enjoyment of their homes.

Perhaps the Rotary motto says it best: Service Above Self

Rob

JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Rob ... good point ... you cannot please everyone, but just need to insure fair and balanced rules so everyone has an opportunity to participate.

I like your rule (it is fair and offers times for all days of the week). The rule on this post unfortunately I believe would not be considered fair and balanced for all homeowners equally.

NL (Virginia)
Posts: 43
Posted:
Rob, Well put, as a new Board member and a new homeowner in this community, the construction limits surprised me. I have been on 5 other HOA Boards whree I lived and NEVER saw any like this, that is why I intend to change it - after much searching I discovered the VP is a real bull ( got this done because he had a neighbor who remolded his house on weekends and he didn't want to be disturbed) - and no one ever challenges him - that is going to change too. I was elected the President and have been overwhelmed with complaints - most about the constuction rule. I truly believe in things done for the better of the community as a whole, not just for one.
Rob - would u like to come and serve in my community????
Thanks for your feedback - this is going to be put to bed by the end of the month - I have support of the other Board member and the community.
Whew, this is just the beginnig of a thankless job.
RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
Sure, NL - I'll come serve in your community. But what's in it for me? (just kidding!)

I agree that serving - especially as president - is mostly a thankless job. It can be discouraging when the only way to tell if you're doing an OK job is when the homeowners don't come to the board meetings to yell at you.

But there will be a few - worth their weight in gold - who will thank you, and those few can keep you going. I think mostly, though, the reason honorable and conscientious people serve in HOAs is that they have a natural sense of duty, coupled with enlightened self-interest.

Good luck in your struggle, but take my advice: take baby steps. For every action you take to correct an injustice, you will piss off the people who were perfectly happy with the way things were. The balancing act demands more than doing the right thing - it also requires diplomacy and a lot of educational outreach to keep the peace.

Rob
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I always said that being president of your HOA isn't a Thankless job but a THANKFULL job. You have to make it part of your DNA. It has to be you and the confidence that comes with that. Those who are president's of the associations who begrudge it don't own it or don't own it anymore. Once you adopt that mentality that you represent your HOA as soon as you walk out the door or answer the phone, the better off you are.

Don't get "cocky" about of course. Treat it like you would an unruly child you love. Some days you may want to put it up for adoption...but you want it to succeed.

Former HOA President
RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
I like the way you put that, Melissa!

Rob
NL (Virginia)
Posts: 43
Posted:
All well put. I have been President of two other HOA's one a condo and one a single family development, and have always felt a pride and responsibilty to my community - and left on very good terms and what was a successful time - was just overwhelmed and surprised how angry some homeowners were at this crazy rule - and never expressed this discontent.
As one of the residents said to me at the mailbox today - " I am so glad we now have a Board member who is going to work for the whole community instead of their own purpose" whew.... thanks for your input and support and certainly have taken everything as good advice.
NL (Virginia)
Posts: 43
Posted:
All well put. I have been President of two other HOA's one a condo and one a single family development, and have always felt a pride and responsibilty to my community - and left on very good terms and what was a successful time - was just overwhelmed and surprised how angry some homeowners were at this crazy rule - and never expressed this discontent.
As one of the residents said to me at the mailbox today - " I am so glad we now have a Board member who is going to work for the whole community instead of their own purpose" whew.... thanks for your input and support and certainly have taken everything as good advice.
NL (Virginia)
Posts: 43
Posted:
All well put. I have been President of two other HOA's one a condo and one a single family development, and have always felt a pride and responsibilty to my community - and left on very good terms and what was a successful time - was just overwhelmed and surprised how angry some homeowners were at this crazy rule - and never expressed this discontent.
As one of the residents said to me at the mailbox today - " I am so glad we now have a Board member who is going to work for the whole community instead of their own purpose" whew.... thanks for your input and support and certainly have taken everything as good advice.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here