💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

PjW (Virginia)
Posts: 71
Posted:
Is there anywhere in VA documentation that states HOA's are to use Robert's Rules? It does not say anything in our governing docs.

We are having issues with people getting together creating forms for meetings and demanding votes to have them copied - when 4 out of 9 board members did even know they were working on these supposed forms.

Also let me ask this - if 3 members of the majority got together planned out several forms they want us to use and things they want us to do then put then on the agenda for our next meeting without anyone of the minority knowing about these forms - can that consititue them having a kinda of secret meeting?
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Usually the Sec. and/or president formulate the agenda for the next meeting. (I don't know what you mean by "forms") or there is a boiler-plate agenda of items the board works through every meeting.

See your own documents for regulations on posting and/or sending to all HOA Members.

Often at the meeting, the president asks if there are any additions to the agenda and things can be placed under New Business - or if it's determined if the item needs a formal Notice to all HOA Members, that can get started.

Following Roberts Rules or any other kind of parliamentarian procedure is spelled out in the bylaws. There has to be some kind of order to the meeting, might as well pick one to follow.

As far as board members "meeting" - inform them that if they are discussing HOA business, then they need to do that at a duly called meeting, in front of ALL board members and the HOA members who wish to attend.

PjW (Virginia)
Posts: 71
Posted:
I mean detailed forms to track HO's ARC violations, forms to gather personal contact information- forms that make it look like they are trying to do the job of our propety manager

All out papers say is that we have to have open meetings and are very general - our former pres and myself have been using the VA Property owner's act to fill in the gaps until now that is. The majority is stomping all over the minority to in email saying we better vote on stuff or our votes won't count

They have been told several times that they need to stop doing this an take it to the open meetings and they seem to refuse and just do what they want. I'm really frustrated that such unethical behaviour is going on
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hi PjW:

If I go to the below link and search for Robert’s Rules, nothing comes up.
http://leg1.state.va.us/000/src.htm

From what I see here a meeting may not be official unless notice has been given, or unless there is a potential emergency to be addressed:
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+55-510.1

B. Notice of the time, date and place of each meeting of the board of directors or of any subcommittee or other committee thereof shall be published where it is reasonably calculated to be available to a majority of the lot owners.
PjW (Virginia)
Posts: 71
Posted:
yes, that what they have been told several times - yet they still meet and plan and since they are in the majority it feels like they are already making the decisions on what we are going to do and what we're not.

I'm told this is a gray area for taking further so I an those of us in the minority feel stuck.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hi PjW:

Any ideas they come up with would need to be presented at a proper meeting and would not be official until properly voted. You may be surprised and maybe they have some really good ideas to help better track violations or to help the ACC. But … again they would need to be properly adopted by your board.

I have been working on some similar forms for our HOA and will forward to another member who used to be on a city council for input. We are not having secret meetings, we are coming up with a potential solution for potential issues and which would need to be presented and properly adopted after everyone reviews, discusses, votes, etc. They may or may not be adopted, someone may have other better ideas …

PjW (Virginia)
Posts: 71
Posted:
but does your board at least know your working on an idea?

Cause they have not told the minority anything. And by anything, I mean it was a complete surprise to suddenly have things on our agenda that we have never, never, ever talked - they just plowed ahead. To me it seems like trying to take the place of our property manager.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
PjW,

There is no requirement in VA that requires boards use roberts rules of order. Any requirement of this type would be in your own governing documents.

If a majority of the board gets together and conducts business, this is a meeting of the Board. Notice requirements, etc. should be followed in order to comply with the law.

Per the Fairfax County Community Association Manual:

Some boards hold preliminary “working” sessions prior to the actual board meeting, particularly when there is substantial business to transact or when the issues to be addressed are complex or controversial. This gives board members an opportunity to discuss the agenda and time to obtain additional information to enable them to act efficiently on the matters in the upcoming meeting, but these too, must be open meetings. In 2000, the laws were amended to require a notice of the time, date, and place of each meeting be published where it is reasonably calculated to be seen by a majority of the members
(association newsletter, bulletin board, website, or e-mail).

Of course, there are speed limits established for the roads as well. This doesn't mean that everyone will follow them.

There is nothing wrong with creating forms. I have done the same thing on my own and presented it at the board meeting for a vote to adopt. If it's complicated, I would send it to the board members via e-mail prior to the meeting. I've found that these forms tend to help vs. hurt by standardizing the process.

Looking at it from the other side, this might be what they are thinking as well.

Are you upset at the forms themselves or the fact that you were not included in the process? Perhaps it's not following the procedural process that has you concerned.

If it is the process, I would recommend that you advise the other Board members that knowingly refusing to follow the law will result in the Associations insurance not covering the individual directors if any legal action is brought forward. Make sure it's in the minutes of the meeting. Additionally, you might want to move that the president be removed from office (not the board - as that can't be done without a recall) if he is unwilling to follow the law. It won't make you any friends on the Board, but it might get their attention.

Tim
PjW (Virginia)
Posts: 71
Posted:
thanks Tim, Janet and everyone

its the hypocry that I'm dealing with - these members have accused me of doing the things that they are doing. I never did stuff behind the boards back, I always asked everyone what they thought first before I even did anything.

Its them yelling about transparancy and hiding behind closed doors and not even tell 4 people what they were doing.

Its the procedural thing- I think if your going to do something right you have to be legal about it.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hi PjW:

I understand your frustration from other posts. Your HOA has had some recent issues, so there may be certain trust issues. Possibly when the items you mentioned are presented some may state that they are concerned that they knew nothing about anyone working on these items. Also, state that we would like to see our HOA form a “team” effort with regards to moving forward to a better future.

Sometimes not getting overly angry and just making certain small statements that make others think about their actions and how they may feel in a similar circumstance works better. It may take a couple of times, but generally deep down everyone usually has a good heart and wants what is best for their community, but they do not realize how their actions can hurt others.

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
The issue of "inception" or "coming up" with an idea for board consideration can sometimes be confusing.

I find that under New Business, the "concept" can be introduced. The person who has the idea can introduce the IDEA or goal at the meeting and ask for direction or "blessing" from the board to continue on with the study of the idea, FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION from the board ---OR it could be stopped right there.

Do you see what I mean? ONE person is not out there making statements or commitments, they are just doing a study.

For example: suppose one or more board members wants to do a project. They should make a presentiation of the idea to the board at a duly called meeting. The board can "vett" the idea: does it fit our mission, can we afford it, what is involved, maintenance, budget, etc.???

The board then can make a motion that those interested members continue on with formulating details for the project for consideration of the entire board OR that idea can be STOPPED right there, if it does not have majority approval ofthe board.

If you are concerned about people "meeting" to come up with idea, don't worry. They really can't DO anything without total board approval.
PjW (Virginia)
Posts: 71
Posted:
Thanks again everyone for all the advice, I really appreciate having this place where I can throw a question out there and get some very sane answers that have an objective perspective
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
After reading (§ 55-510.1. Meetings of the board of directors.) it appears they were in the wrong not to notice the meeting even a "work session" however I don't think it is a hanging offense. You should point out the section or maybe print it out and give it to them for future reference.

One recurring theme of your posts does bother me though, you seem to feel that the Board "works" for the Management Company and is not entitled to "know" what is going on. In reality it is the exact opposite - The MC works for the Association at the direction of the Board. As such the Board is entitled to know, (no strike that) is REQUIRED to know any actions the MC takes in their behalf. In coming up with these forms and getting contact information it appears to me that that is exactly what they are attempting to do.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
PjW (Virginia)
Posts: 71
Posted:
@Glen - there are things I can not say on an open message board so I try to give as much information yet still not get into areas that are private to our community - in others I'm trying to be as polite as I can be

I've been working on and off my HOA board for almost as long as I've lived in my communtiy so yes I do know that the management company works for the communtity.

My issue, and maybe I'm not stating it well, is that we have a 9 member board, 4 of those people are new and they are part of the majority group (in other words 5 of those people are friends). 3 of those people seemed to have held meetings to plan out forms and the majority's agenda without the knowledge of the 4 people in the minority who were not told about any of this planning but the majority was doing.

We have had our management company for more years then I have lived in the communtity- they already use forms for the items the majority wants and has had a pattern established for us for things like ARC, landscaping, parking and the like.

THe point is not that they think they have a better idea on how to do something its their bullying the minority, spending money we don't have AND not telling the whole board what they wanted to try. Its the lack of respect of others, its the emails that we get that are terse and agressive, its their attitiude. It's their refusal to correct things when it is pointed out that something is done incorrectly and illegal.

I doubt it would have been an issue if someone had just sent out a polite email to everyone saying - hey I have an idea for a new xyz do you mind if I type something up and bring it to the next meeting. I doubt anyone would have said no.

Do all commmunities have issues, yes. Not all people get along, that's life.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
I take back my reply that they were wrong to meet, since they are in a minority, there was no quorum and therefor no meeting that would be recognized by the state as an official meeting. Since they are in the minority the BOD doesn't have to implement anything they come up with. As to their bullying (a much misused term in today's society) I'll advise the Board, just as I would advise them if it were a random H/O doing it. The President runs the meeting, the "bullies" have the right to bring a motion, second it and move for a vote. They have a responsibility to act civil to their fellow Board members and vice versa; THE MAJORITY DOESN'T HAVE TO VOTE FOR IT!

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
PjW (Virginia)
Posts: 71
Posted:
okay - not explaining myself well today - and I can't reveal anymore at this point in fear that one of the majority finds this site and my posts and uses it against me.

one point to make clear though is....

They, the people who are meeting and planning without knowledge of the whole board and community, are in the majority.

I am part of the minority and the old part of the board all of whom have been working with the PM to keep moving forward as much as we can with our regular stuff.

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
PJW - remind the ENTIRE board that a majority number of Board members getting together and discussing HOA stuff, makes for an official "meeting" and is against non profit corporation law and your own documents.

Even a "work session" needs to be noticed, just like a regular board meeting.

This will probably make them go underground and do their discussion on-line, but at least you have warned them. If they continue to "stack" the business against the minority members, then start a recall and tell your HOA resident/Members why. They are sneaks and need to be exposed.

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PjW on 03/15/2011 12:46 PM
Is there anywhere in VA documentation that states HOA's are to use Robert's Rules? It does not say anything in our governing docs.

We are having issues with people getting together creating forms for meetings and demanding votes to have them copied - when 4 out of 9 board members did even know they were working on these supposed forms.

Also let me ask this - if 3 members of the majority got together planned out several forms they want us to use and things they want us to do then put then on the agenda for our next meeting without anyone of the minority knowing about these forms - can that consititue them having a kinda of secret meeting?

3 out of 9 is not a quorum and thus it was not a meeting, when 5 of them get together then that would be a meeting and subject to § 55-510.1. Meetings of the board of directors.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here