💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DoraineW (Ohio)
Posts: 1
Posted:
We own a condo unit in the Cincinnati, Oh, area (Wyoming Township), and we have rented it for a few years. There have been some very minor issues (ours is the only unit there rented out), with the tenants. These are some very small issues like "They play the tv too loud", "They don't vacuum the common stairs once a month like they are supposed to", "
the tenant smokes and bothers the other owners". These people complain to us about EVERY MINOR THING these people do.

The HOA (owners) just voted to disallow any rentals in the units. We realize that this will not affect our current tenants, but will forbid any future tenants. Is this legal, and do we have any legal recourse? It seems that they may be shooting themselves in the foot, because this will probably lower the values of all of the condos.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Exactly how are they going to enforce this rule? This is a quite hot topic in a HOA. My opinion is that even though limiting rental property in a HOA/Condo association is a good idea, the enforcement is a different story. I don't see a real way to enforce this rule fairly, equally, or impose it on an owner of property.

Find out what the enforcement entails before taking any action. If you have to pay an extra $50 a month to be able to rent, then raise the rent to compensate. If it is a significant enforcement and the DO enforce it, then check out a lawyer. There has to be damage FIRST before a lawyer/court system gets involved. So far it's just talk about creating a rule which can be voted down by the majority of owners.

Former HOA President
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Hi Doraine:

Your questions would depend on the situation …

Did the homeowners amend the Declaration of CCR’s or is it just a new Rule & Regulation? If they properly amended the CCR’s following procedures in your documents and state statutes, then the majority have spoken and most courts uphold these changes. If they did not amend CCR’s and it is just a new rule then in some court cases these rules were found to be non enforceable.

There are two sides to the rental issue …

On one side you have those who need to rent their unit to make mortgage payments and HOA fees. Possibly they were transferred and had to move and in the current market cannot sell their home at this time.

On the other side you have HOA’s limiting rental of units because some mortgage lenders will not do loans on units where there is an abundance of rentals. Also, there are issues where those who rent do not follow the rules; therefore, the many become furious and eliminate what they see as a potential problem.

If it was done properly at least in your HOA they did it where it is fair and equitable across the board in that no one can rent in the future. Some HOA’s will limit the number of rentals allowed, and which makes it more difficult regarding equal treatment of all owners in determining who can or cannot rent.

Read your HOA documents and here is a link to your state statutes:
http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/5311
JrO (California)
Posts: 7
Posted:
First, it is a very hard rule to enforce. We have a percentage rule in our HOA, but we really have no way of enforcing it. Second, see if your HOA is required by law to "grandfather" your unit as a rental. That would mean that as long as you own the unit it is allowed to be a rental, but when you sell, the new owners cannot rent it.
RyanD1 (California)
Posts: 38
Posted:
I manage several associations that are currently trying to forbid and or limit the number of rentals within the Homeowner association. Most of the time it is to keep the value of the individual units up. Lenders do not want to see more than 10-20% of the association containing rentals. If the do, then they COULD pull the funding from the buyer.

For this to be enforceable, the CC&R's need to be amended which requires a vote from the Association. This is a long and difficult process because a lot of associations have a difficult time getting even 50% of the association to vote. Furthermore, there are homeowners that might not want the limitation because they want potentially rent out their unit in the future.

The most successful form I have seen so far in regards to passing is placing a time limit that new homeowners are not able to rent. For example, 5 years. If they choose to rent within those first five years, then they will have to pay a large one time lump sum.

Just some food for thought that you could take to your BoD as an alternative.
KarenS17 (Illinois)
Posts: 4
Posted:
We are a small association of 9 homeowners in Illinois. There is one unit currently rented which we would obviously grandfather in as they have been here for years and are good renters. One of the remaining 8 units is going into foreclosure and we want to ammend our bylaws prohibiting any future rentals, hopefully in time for their unit not to be able to be rented. If it is auctioned off, obviously it will be to an investor who will renting.

How do we accomplish this...getting a 50% vote will NOT be a problem.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here