💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

ShawnaT (Maryland)
Posts: 20
Posted:
We recently went from having Neighborhood Watch as a standing committee to a separate entity from the board because we felt that it may be a liability to have NW as a committee. How do other HOA's handle Neighborhood Watch?
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Shawna,

Our neighborhood watch is NOT a committee of the HOA but neighbors who work with our Sheriff's Department. If the Board had a sanctioned committee of N.W, I don't see a problem but this is really about neighbors taking care of neighbors. I supposed that you can list the pros and cons of having it a Board committee so it might depend on how much a Board wants to control safety within the community.
PjW (Virginia)
Posts: 71
Posted:
We're still trying to organize an NW, our local police department suggests it be separate from anything HOA. But they recommend the NW give updates too the HOA just to keep everyone informed.
MikeV (New Mexico)
Posts: 31
Posted:
A couple of questions to those who already posted (or anyone else who has thoughts on the matter) . . .

ShawnaT, how would a NW Committee be a liability for the HOA?

PjW, why did your local police department suggest that it be separate from anything HOA?

I ask, because at this very point in time, I am trying to establish a "NW Committee" in our community; however, you now have me thinking whether it should be an official committee or just some sub-groub of neighbors in our community. I am a Board Member if that is relevant.

Thanks.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I did this in my neighborhood/HOA. YES you should keep the neighborhood watch SEPARATE from the HOA business. There are several reasons for this. #1 being that this is an individual participation and NOT mandaotory. Which means no required dues or participation. #2 Renters and owners can participat EQUALLY. #3 HOA funds shouldn't mix with community functions such as block parties or NW's support. It can really cause a wrinkle amongst owners who don't want to participate but are still paying.

Now there is an involvement between the two. It should be APPROVED by the board that it can exist. There is also a SIGN that goes with NW participation that is provided by the program. It has to be installed on the HOA property as a show of participation. That would have to be approved/recognized if necessary if there are rules involving signage.

All in all it is an excellent program worth the effort. Just keep it as a regular community participaton event as to keep the apples from the oranges...

Former HOA President
PjW (Virginia)
Posts: 71
Posted:
MIke - I can't remember the specific's I think it was mainly cause they didn't think it should get wrapped up in HOA politic's. Plus I think it's because it really has nothing to do with HOA stuff NW is an entity unto itself. I mean one is enforcing bylaws and convenants and working on beautifcation and the other is working on watching out for crime and reporting it in a safe manner.

He didn't say they couldn't be together though
AnnD2 (Connecticut)
Posts: 76
Posted:
Our neighborhood watches used to be organized by our city police department. We got reports on neighborhood crimes from the police and I, as the captain, merely copied and distributed these copies to members. It never was directly associated with our HOA board or a committee.
ShawnaT (Maryland)
Posts: 20
Posted:
Originally, NW was a separate entity, but then we had issues with our previous board and the NW director (also on the board) patroling the neighborhood. (Our previous board behaved rather childishly then and continues today) So, as President, I made the NW an official committee. Our neighborhood NEEDS NW and our current NW Director is the perfect person to run it. But, some things and options have come up over the past few months and we determined that it would be better that NW not be affiliated directly with the POA. Thank you all for your responses, you verified what we already thought.

And Mike, NW is a liability for us because until we find out more about insurance, someone could possibly sue the Association based on the actions of the NW director.
AnnD2 (Connecticut)
Posts: 76
Posted:
Neighborhood watches are not meant to police for violations of HOA rules and compliance with HOA policies. They are meant to deter crimes and to check for possible criminal conduct. When something untoward is suspected or observed, the police are to be contacted. If someone is acting like a vigilante or as the HOA police, then that is not in keeping with the block watches with which I am familiar. Accordingly, there should be no liability connected with block watches, since contacting the police about suspicious conduct is not illegal. If, however, a person is taking on more than the traditional block watch function and is harassing people, for example, that is another and more complicated matter that has nothing to do with block watches.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here